1:2 - Biblical Data Q&A on Divine Incorporeality | Advanced Course

1:2 - Biblical Data Q&A on Divine Incorporeality | Advanced Course - The Attributes of God

Рет қаралды 1,149

5 ай бұрын

Section One: Divine Incorporeality
Part Two: Q&A on Biblical Data
Dive into this 17-part graduate-level course from Dr. Craig on the divine attributes.
This unique one-week intensive taught at Houston Christian University is divided into five sections.
Section One: Divine Incorporeality
Section Two: Divine Aseity
Section Three: Divine Eternity
Section Four: Divine Omniscience
Section Five: Divine Omnipotence
For more resources visit: www.reasonablefaith.org
We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:
www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/
Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains short clips: / drcraigvideos
Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter: / rfupdates
Like the Reasonable Faith Facebook Fan Page: / reasonablefaithorg

Пікірлер: 7

@pepperachu 5 ай бұрын

William Lane Craig is crazy smart. Definitely born to philosophize

@137chuckm 5 ай бұрын

Has anyone proven that early Genesis has to be and must be about material and physical creation? Why can't it be something higher reeler and better according to God?

@sapientum8 Ай бұрын

It appears that while the soul is an immaterial body, God is a purely immaterial Being without a body (even an immaterial one).

@ReasonableFaithOrg Ай бұрын

Why think that the soul is an "immaterial body"? - RF Admin

@sapientum8 Ай бұрын

@@ReasonableFaithOrg there is a lot of circumstantial evidence for this view in the tradition of the Church. Indeed, the traditional Catholic view is that soul is totally immaterial (which in my view makes little sense), yet the traditional Orthodox view rather leans to the side of the soul being an immaterially "subtle" body. There are multiple arguments for this point of view, which would be too long to write here. A XIX century Russian theologian, bishop Ignatius Bryanchaninov has written a whole book on this subject following his public discussion with another very well known theologian, and I found his arguments more convincing.