"It belongs in a museum!" "So do you!" -Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

*Buys model and throws it into a fireplace*

Okay Indy lol

What is your museum?

How much money do you need for this ?

Lexi Butman the titanic that I went to was haunted and I was with my family and hopefully I survived that day

In Missouri

Lexi Butman It has a Giant one And I would know Because I live in Belfast and I’m actually going To the Centre soon

Nevermind the museum, I need one of them

So does the one in Halifax.

xd

What you think you look like: More like the entire ship before it went down

what i think i look like: titanic what i actually look like: deflated pool floatie

@ROCKSTAR hi rockstar how’s GTA 6 goin?

Emperador Caligula

Doug Bader excellent idea! Especially having the models displayed proportionately

Great idea. They could also paint the debris field on the floor. Maybe even hang a model iceberg from the ceiling at the relative location of the initial impact and a damaged hull (bow down of course) at the point of sinking...

@@FiferSkipper some people might be offended by the idea you're proposing. Btw the actual wreck site is nearly 4km below sea level and if someone decides to make a model of the iceberg taking the correct proportions into consideration, they'd have to place it about 10.7 km above the wreck's model... that's virtually impossible and pointless. (The actual ship was 269m long and the video's title suggests that the model's scale is 1/350 that's makes the model nearly 76 cm long (combined length). You can do the math it you wish to)

@@vivy-kun3510 I understand your point however, the Titanic was an entirely avoidable tragedy. It was not a few religious zealots, that cause the death of well over a thousand people, it was the hubris of a few old white men. If someone is offended, they should be offended by the stupid idiots that thought a long-distance speed test, in the Spring, in the North Atlantic, in fog, with too few lifeboats, in an 'unsinkable' ship with only 11% reserve buoyancy, on her maiden voyage...was a good idea. BTW: the closest to unsinkable a ship can get is, a modern aircraft carrier (although, no one dares to call it unsinkable) and it has over 250% reserve buoyancy. Your 'do the math' comment is really cute... 3.8km / 350 = 10.9m (not 10.7km)

@@FiferSkipper yeeeeeet! My bad😹😹😹lmao. Btw I said it might be offensive to some because it would be the same as making a miniature model of Hiroshima and Nagasaki prior to the attack but with an atomic bomb hovering in the air or like the world trade centre with a plane approaching the buildings, just like the comment above mine pointed out.

Pretty sure this was considered at one point in time. They definitely considered raising the Titanic.

@kork krokeman ur right but it would be cool to see the titanic in person!!

@kork krokeman i know but just seeing it would be sick also i have seen a skeleton in a youtube vid before

@kork krokeman there's no skeletons in the titanic. The only thing that's left are shoes.

@kork krokeman it's because is too deep, and fragile. Cant move it without destroying it

Thanks for the encouraging words!

Thanks bro! I don't have the energy to make another big scale model like yours so I'm sticking with the smaller scale for now

At 1/350 scale this model is TINY compared to yours, 1/2 the length and 1/8 the volume...

Raise the Thai 10 Nic

Raise the Titanic

How did the Titanic sink what the

Less than 100 years. At the current rate, Titanic will be gone within 20 to 30 years

She can't and won't be raised either. It's a mass grave, the ship would fall apart like wet paper and I'm pretty sure the site is protected. Best we can do is recover small stuff or build a full scale replica.

She’ll just be a piece of metal in a museum

Shagrat, good news! We are building a replica

In another 100 years the engines will still be standing tall ^^

"Looks like somebody left the water running."

Thanks so very much for your encouraging words!

the Titanic side propeller shaft placement is not correct. The actual side propeller shaft is at the same level as the center propeller. And in the model the side propeller shaft is placed at a very high level than it actually is..

@Do0m3rdude1995 yeah with faulty rivets and no double haul that other ships had before her time. There's a reason they went to welding hauls cause it's stronger

Yep they cut every corner

its a shame she sank at all!

@@somegermanguy7 Yes and no (imo.) Obviously it's horrible so many people died, but had the ship not sank its very, very likely she'd have been sold off for scrap eventually. At least beneath the ocean she's left as a kind of marine museum.

@@keighlancoe5933 I know what you mean; it was mostly a joke though.

Haha, genuinely made me laugh

Rip stern😢

I was thinking the same thing but with Jack on the bow with his arms spread wide yelling "I'm King of the Undersea World."

Jayden MU Its prow dumbass. Prow means the bow part above water

@Jayden MU You seem like a bigger idiot being a selfish asshole.

Fluid dynamics. She cut water cleanly until her last movement

The stern leveled out when it went under and spun as it fell. In the process it tore the upper decks off and implosions blew the hull apart, it then slammed into the bottom with the water column following it . The impact and water column flattened the stern much more than this model represents but it’s still amazing that anything survived the long fall from the surface.

Splitting isn't too uncommon. The Yamato comes to mind. I think it even crazier to see wrecks like Lusitania that almost curls in on herself.

Phoenix Gravin Overflowing.

🤣 Nobody there to pull the drain plug I'm afraid.

so is the swimming baths lol

But not still hot.

The yellow rubber duck has gone missing.

Thanks for your kind comments! For my next version I think I'll add the debris field in a compacted form.

@@cjholmes4329 I would also like to compliment this! I knew that there was apparently a decent chunk of the middle not attached to either side, but never looked into it. Stumbling upon a model portraying exactly that was a very pleasant surprise! If I may ask, I’m curious how much this sold for?

@@cjholmes4329 .. the Titanic side propeller shaft placement is not correct. The actual side propeller shaft is at the same level as the center propeller. And in the model the side propeller shaft is placed at a very high level than it actually is..

@@WR-NC-ASPL Thanks for your comment, however the wing props are at the correct level. You are correct that the center and wing props were in line horizontally when Titanic was built. However when the ship sank the stern section hit the seabed so hard that the center blade and rudder were buried deeply in the mud while the wing props and supports were bent sharply upward over 20 feet. That's why photographs of the actual wreck show both side screws but no center prop.

@@cjholmes4329 ..Hello,, 1.. The position of the propellers in Titanic wreck has been described in the KZfaq video called "how Titanic's propellers lie to us ... By Zom games". Actually they are using the video of your own model to describe the mistake.. 2.. Starboard propeller - Only 2 blades are visible in the wreck. The third blade and even the Bolts that held third blade are missing. All 3 blades of the starboard propeller are not visible in any original photo of Titanic wreck. In a KZfaq video called It is called "Titanic and her lost starboard propeller blade (archive video) by Aaron1912 record and research", they are saying that they have located the missing third blade of the starboard propeller many kilometres away from the location of the wreck near the exact location of the collision with the iceberg. They are telling that this blade was lost due to collision with the iceberg and the Titanic continued to move forward for about 10 minutes after the collision before stopping. That is the reason why the third blade of the starboard propeller was found many kilometres away from the main wreck of the ship and it was the first part of the Titanic to sink to the ocean 2 hours 40 minutes before the rest of the ship sank to the bottom.

Actually what’s interesting is that it’s a lot smaller than I thought it was. I remember as a kid thinking it was about as long as a certain street in my hometown when I paced it out. It was less than 1/3 as long. Of course any modern cruise ship absolutely dwarfs Titanic.

*laughs in broke*

Bow did well considering it was a 25.000+ ton object hitting the ocean floor at 21 knots.The stern sadly wasnt lucky.They dont build ships like this anymore.

AJS NAGRATIN yeah hopefully built better and won’t sink!!

@@tma4137 Im talking about the design.Im not the type of person "Ohhhh old stuff were much better than new crap" I love modern technology and im pround to say us humans have improved not just ships but everything else.But holy hell do modern Cruise ships look ugly as shit.Overstuffed floating hotels,absolutely hideous.Glad that they are at least much more safer,and many of those safety regulations did come from Titanics disaster.

@@tma4137 But again,give any modern Cruise ship the same damage Titanic took,and i put my head on that it will just capsize in 1 hour and sink.Look at Costa Concordia.

Costa Concordia ran around, though. No ship, no matter how well designed, could survive that kind of impact for longer than a few minutes.

Especially considering the wreck has deteriorated much more since it was discovered.

on a miniature Atlantic ocean

.....on miniature Earth I guess!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

On a miniature galaxy

On a miniature youtube comment

...And miniature me

HOW can dislikes on a KZfaq video have any relevance at all.. HOW????

It's be cos it's obvious that the upl9ader did not scratch built and kitbash this model. They came in the mail in order as is.

@@The_Deaf_Aussie "It's be cos"? Really? Fix your grammar and your statement might carry some weight.

Because: 1. People are stupid. 2. People are envious. 3. People are jealous. Those types of people take satisfaction in brining down those who are better than them. That's it. 236 people can't do this, and so they shit on the one who can.

@@The_Deaf_AussieYou’re one of those people that thinks everything magically exists but no one made it, aren’t you?

He was looking for the USN Scorpion and the Thresher

I agree. I wish people would leave it alone.

Iceberg- not my fault, I was minding my own business and got hit.

@Clare Panniers Not sure Titanic saw it that way. :(

Captain Smiths fault.

Thanks so much for the kind words! Yes, those National Geographic articles are great.

It really is like that,you cant blame the dude.

@@ajsnagratin6504 oh no, I wasn't blaming him I was just making a statement.

@@treystephens4490 i didn't say you were,sorry if it sounded like that

@@ajsnagratin6504 that's alright no problem. ⛵

Yeah, if I recall, they believe the front sunk down a bit more gently, while the back half sort of just spun out wildly into the depths, causing it to just get ripped apart based on the trail of derby found scattered all around the back half. This vid goes into detail about it, but it's a bit hyperactive, cause I guess that's what was selling back then v: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kKpydtCEvZzQe4E.html

Titanic honor and glory is going to be great for exploring an accurate replica of titanic as it was before it sank, Titanic VR is great for exploring an accurate replica of the wreckage of titanic as it was before people started taking shit from it, check it out it sometime you can find it on steam for a good price. (you don't need VR to play it but it does give you the option)

Robert Aviles There is someone recreating a real Titanic and will be finished around 2022. It’s going to be called Titanic II and the plan is to take it on the same route Titanic was to complete.

@@Candy_Gal What could possibly go wrong? Didn't another ship from the same line bounce back and forth around the world and it's now rotting in Boston? The Britannia or something?

Feint Hahahah, yep....I won’t be sailing on that one or the next! 😂

@@Candy_Gal holy shit you still believe that crap?? Lol

I read in a number of books that boiler room number 1 was used to generate steam for heat and light when the ship was in port. They weren't full scotch-marine boilers but nevertheless were used to some degree on the ship.

i heard somewhere that boiler room one was only used during the sinking to generate power. why the others flooded. i dont know how true that was

Thanks for your kind words!

Well, there's the history behind it, the grandeur of its construction, the people who were on it, the sheer size of the ship itself, the legacy it left on maritime policy in general, how it sunk, how many lives were lost, the brevity of its existence, etc.

They've done subsequent investigations, (in 2012 during the 100 year anniversary of the disaster,) led by the Titanic, (and Avatar,) director James Cameron, who gathered ship builders, disaster experts, hydro-dynamic engineers, and a panel of all the leading Titanic, "experts," and by compiling all the most relevant and recent information gathered on all the expeditions. It was not only an effort to see what he got wrong when he was making the movie, but also to compile all the definitive facts people have been able to collect in all the expeditions into one superceding, "final word," on what happened. In the course of the investigation, they were able to recreate the final moments between when the Titanic disappeared below the surface until it got to where we see it had come to rest and they determined that the bow section was falling through the almost 4 kms of ocean so fast (30 to 40 kph) that by the time it came to a sudden stop hitting the bottom, the weight and strength of the wake in the water column that accumulated behind it was significantly strong enough to hydraulically destroy the bridge cabin completely. Just like it was primarily responsible for deforming the entire upper surface deck plating and even blow open all of the latched cabin and stateroom windows and sheer the heads off of the forward hatch cover bolts simultaneously, throwing the 1 meter x 1 meter hatch cover to where it finally came to rest on the ocean floor where it was found almost 600 meters away. (But, don't take MY word for it, it's Googleable information lol look up the information yourself, it was made into a National Geographic documentary that's available on KZfaq.) And, BTW, it's "through," not, "threw." ("Threw," is what someone does with a ball, or what you evidently did with your chance at a basic education.)✌️

@@WitchettyMan lol

Thanks so much for your encouraging words!

Thanks so much for your kind words! I'm encouraged to strive to do even better.

My pleasure, I'm so glad you appreciate the models!

I agree. With all of latest tech, we haven't figured out how to either see it all or raise more of her. I know some say it's a graveyard and I agree, but sometimes humans need to be humbled and learn lessons. And she unfortunately is a prime example of arrogance.

@@thub7637 the Titanic was definitely a story of hubris

T Hub they should look more inside the stern , it has many open spaces for a camera to see

Thanks for the kind comments. The stern is a real challenge to model but is fascinating in its own right.

CJ Holmes absolutely and you’re welcome! It doesn’t get much press. You did an amazing job and love the video tour with explanations!

Thanks for the kind words!

Thanks!

Thanks so much for your kind comments! I'm planning on making another one as soon as I finish a smaller scale model of the wreck of the Britannic