Happy to have found your channel. I find it top top top, the best so far to me! Cheers for your detailed work.

Is bot true, is not true

Atlantis is neither the Azores or the Richat. The basis for the landmass is the Cycladic plateau, which would have made (most of) the Cyclades a single large island around 12,000 BCE. ...there are a couple scholarly papers on this.

The Azores are named after and were ruled by Azaes of Atlantis (one of the ten kings of Atlantis.) The capital of Atlantis is the Richat in Mauritania, Africa. The Azores were used as a place to rest and resupply during the return trip back across the Atlantic to Africa from Central America and the Caribbean. Atlanteans used the tradewinds to sail back and forth across the Atlantic and the Azores lie within the tradewinds on the return trip.

@@marijuanaman3757 You say that, yet etymology, Berber history & religion, Basque culture, geology, matches to Plato's account of Atlantis, science on the Younger Dryas, Egyptian religion, Greek mythology, Basque & Berber rare blood frequency, etc. refute your claim, some of which refute the seamount by several different above subjects cross-corroborating the Richat as the capital of Atlantis. Sorry, but your assumption-based, uninspected hypothesis fails in the face of scientific method, where the Richat hypothesis is close to a mathematical certainty. Experts on Atlantis know the three definitions of "Atlantis" as well as what the word "Atlantis" originally meant. Experts on Atlantis have read the majority of or all of Plato's details about Atlantis and compare all of Plato's details to a given theory. The best experts use scientific method to weed out the impossible. People who don't know what they are talking about take a few of their favorite details that Plato wrote about Atlantis (a word that they can't define and thus do not understand) or the commonly-assumed, incorrect, pop-culture narrative about Atlantis that Plato never actually wrote and make ignorant assumptions, which they are often wrong about. These people routinely can't process facts because they are closed-minded, lack critical-thinking skills and are in love with their own pet theory, which is almost always wrong. The reason most people pick a pet theory about Atlantis and get it wrong is because they really don't know what they're looking for in the first place and wouldn't know Atlantis if they found it by accident since they don't know what "Atlantis" means or the details that identify it. If a person didn't know what a cat was but knew that a cat had fur, then anything from a woolly mammoth, to a hyena, to a dog, to a rat could be identified as a "cat." This is the method that most people use to attempt to find Atlantis and it is a comically inept and completely unscientific approach to the subject of finding Atlantis.

@@marijuanaman3757 I don't have to cope. I have data that proves my stance, whether either of us like it or not. Interesting tactic for you to argue with insults and your feelings, instead of data. Your delusion is unfortunate. If you can't understand me or Plato then it would seem that Atlantis is too difficult of a subject for you. A pastime that doesn't require thinking, such as watching TV, seems to be the level of intellectual interaction that you are capable of. If you actually read and remembered any of Plato's details except your favorite one or two, you'd have a chance to know something about Atlantis. Your hypothesis is based upon ignorance and doesn't align with Plato's writing on Atlantis. Plato wrote that Atlantis' capital island was on a lake/inland body of water, which the Richat was between 15,000--8,000 years ago, according to radio-carbon dating. The capital island of Atlantis was never on the ocean, according to Plato's original writings in Ancient Greek. You have been misled to believe that Atlantis' capital was on the ocean by an incompetent translation of what Plato first wrote and an assumption that "sea" always means "ocean" when it obviously doesn't. Plato wrote that Atlantis was " covered by water" and subsided into a lake, not an ocean. Again, Atlantis never sank into an ocean, according to Plato. A continent that sank wouldn't leave Plato's "impassable barrier of mud to voyagers sailing hence (from Atlantis' capital) to any part of the ocean... caused by the subsidence of the island (of Atlantis, meaning the capital island, not the continent of Atlantis that is classically shown as Africa upside down)" because ocean currents would wash away mud quickly but a mega-tsunami like the one indicated by Bright Insight and confirmed by Oz Geographic that swept over the width of modern Mauritania (where the Richat is located) within the last 12,000 years certainly could have deposited Plato's "mud" that prevented sailing from the lake around the Richat or by the nearby Tamanrasset River to the ocean. W. Africa doesn't need an ocean running through it to be Atlantis. Read any scientific studies about the last African humid period, and you will learn that a significant portion of the Sahara was savanna. The Sahara had massive rivers and mega-lakes as little as 5,000 years ago. The Richat itself was a lake at the time of Atlantis and had the nearby Tamanrasset River running to the ocean and could be traveled both ways (from inland to the coast and from the coast inland) becuae of the level of its slope. "Atlantis" means "Atlas," Atlantis' king that Atlantis is named after. Atlantis' capital, the Richat, is in the Atlas Region next to mountains named Atlas (no not the Atlas Mountains that everyone knows about,) with a tribe of Atlases living nearby (attested to by Herodotus) and near the Atlas Ocean that was named from Africa's West Coast (according to etymology) where Atlantis' capital is. But you'd know that Plato wrote that Atlantis' land and nearby ocean were named after Atlas if you'd actually read Plato's writings on Atlantis and knew anything about the 50+ criteria for Atlantis that Plato listed, apart from a meager couple of details. Richat has verifiable evidence of Plato's details for Atlantis: elephants (bones, cave art,) concentric rings of land and sea (15,000-8,000 years ago) in correct number/sequence surrounding a central island with a freshwater spring, water exit to the south, massive collection of red white and black rocks, beautiful mountains sheltering it to the north, abundance of gold in the region, proximity to highest twin birth rate in the world (Atlantis was ruled by five sets of twins,) center of central island is 50 stadia distant from the lake/inland water body, 2000 by 3000 stadia plain (with natural landmarks) that descends toward ocean, etc. The Azores are named after Azaes of Atlantis, not Atlas. The capital of Atlantis is named after Atlas. The Azores were a colony of the Atlantean Empire, just not part of the continent and certainly not the capital. You'd probably know that too if you weren't so closed-minded and ignorant. The Azores are past Gibraltar, an island surrounded by the Atlantic and named after one of the 9 subordinate kings of Atlantis. That is where the Azores similarity to Atlantis' capital and continent ends because the Azores have no other details that match Plato's description of Atlantis. Every other similarity that the Azores supposedly had relies on complete imagination and zero tangible evidence. If there were more solid evidence for the Azores, they could compete with the Richat. The Azores has a less than 10% match rate to Plato's criteria for Atlantis. The Richat has an over 90% match rate to Plato's criteria for Atlantis. If Carlson had a lot of objectively-verifiable evidence to support his hypothesis, he might have a case. Sadly, Carlson's case is 90+% imagination and less than 10% objective facts. I'd suggest using scientific method to vet your hypothesis before posting uninspected theories or at least be open-minded enough to consider any hypothesis with better matches to Plato's description of Atlantis. I like Carlson. He has had many good ideas and I commend him for challenging ignorant dogma in academia. Unfortunately, Carlson is wrong in this case. Like you, he is ignoring a lot of relevant information about the criteria that Plato described Atlantis as having, is using tunnel vision to focus on a few data points rather than the extensive criteria for Atlantis and is in love with an idea that is widely considered impossible/improbable in the scientific community (glaciers raising the mid Atlantic ridge out of the ocean.) It certainly is an imaginative idea. As brilliant as he usually is, Carlson is being fairly bone-headed about Atlantis. You can't come in with a "weaksauce" case of less than 10% match to Plato's criteria for Atlantis and then ignore a match of over 90% to Plato's criteria and expect to be taken seriously. The Richat hypothesis is mostly facts that objectively match Plato's criteria for Atlantis, supplemented with plausible guesswork that matches Plato's criteria for Atlantis. Local culture, other subjects and scientific studies corroborate this theory. The Azores hypothesis is mostly guesswork and imagination. Most of the scientific community refutes the mid Atlantic ridge claim. Only a couple of objective facts match the Azores to Plato's criteria for Atlantis. Etymology and Berber culture argue that the Azores are not the capital island of Atlantis.

@@marijuanaman3757 Your statement is totally incorrect except fot the fact that the Sahara was not an ocean in the last 50k+ years. It's a shame that you aren't aware of the plethora of information that makes my statement a fact. It is also a shame that you have resorted to personal attacks because you are so misinformed and do not like my facts. I don't need to cope. Facts prove my position, whether either of us like it or not.

Eles teem nos mentido.portugal e o pais mais tem ocultado acerca do passado da humanidade.devo tambem dizer que portugal e o pais que domina o mundo despercebidamente.e é em portugal tambem que esta localizado o anticristo

I listened to the same podcast. VERY interesting stuff.

Plato wrote about more so about tbs center island it wad the capitol city called Poisieda all the other islands were submerged before and it is a lost continent not a lost city only posueda is now surfacing the rest is buried forever.

Ya man. I think sections of the thinner ocean crust could rapidly drop in large sections, sucked down in effect due to high stress continental rebound and magma displacement. Give and take.

If you haven't listened to it yet, Randall's "Kosmographia" podcast goes into depth on this issue in its early episodes.

Fascinating, why did she think that? And things under the ground like what?

If no one ever witnessed it, how did she know about it?

My grandmother always told me that snow white was black and after to so many years finally I got to see snow white and she was black.

I Believe her. I heard there is a inner earth civilization that lives there, Pretty Amazing!

Thank you!

Or the serious ones already know and have already done the science quietly.

I absolutely agree. There’s plenty pointing that directions d has been for a while now but when everyone started looking literally everywhere else it’s became more than a joke to most and was considered new age lunacy.

I absolutely agree. There’s plenty pointing that directions d has been for a while now but when everyone started looking literally everywhere else it’s became more than a joke to most and was considered new age lunacy.

The Azores were not the capital, nor the continent of Atlantis. The Azores were an island, subordinate kingdom of Atlantis, named after/ruled by Azaes of Atlantis. The Azores were a rest stop for Atlanteans returning from America back to the capital of Atlantis in W. Africa via the trade winds on reed boats (thenupa.) Spiral solar calendars (carved into rock) are all over W. Europe/Africa and the E. Americas. These spiral solar calendars indicated when it was safe to sail in order to avoid hurricane season.

You are partially correct. The Azores are obviously not the famed Atlantis. They are the remnants or what remained after the cataclysm that destroyed this great civilization. These remnants were later discovered and settled by the Portuguese. They remain so til this day and hopefully many more to come.@@Matt-gg2cq

Yes! Talk to James Cameron (the film director and more) about doing an expedition. He supports these things. His focus is underwater finding.

Thanks for watching.

My pleasure!

@@Apocalypse_Tube THIS is what the Internet was made for. Get millions of minds with open sourced data solving one problem at a time. Congrats. Any plans of visiting the Islands?

@@christorres348 Definitely going to visit, I wanted to go this year, but I have a lot of planning to do, so it will likely be next year. There's a lot I want to see, but it will take a lot of preparation as I will need to do a lot of island hopping. Flights from the UK are inexpensive, island hopping is only about 20 Euros each way (so long as you take the ferry). Not all ferries run all year round, so the best time to visit is May to September.

@@Apocalypse_Tube have you considered the Gobekli Tepe comets to be part of the Taurid meteor shower? They occur each year in late October early November when the sun is in Libra. Fun fact, I am Puerto Rican and the local taino myths include a great flood where people had to hide in caves.

I quite like my tinfoil hat.

@@Apocalypse_Tube yes TRULY comfortable

@@Apocalypse_Tube Does it work better than plastic bag hat to keep off rain?

Thanks for watching!

Thanks, that's a great idea!

Thanks so much for your positive feedback. I will be sure to check out your channel. It looks like you've got some interesting content.

We have maps for this. The Azores is not an area affected. Besides its topography is horribly wrong compared to the story.

@@frosty6960 yes but not in afrika. There were ten cities. This was one perhaps.

@@ancientbutstillhere6570 No, 10 kingdoms... aka countries. This is a continent... that means a major part of the world. People are just confused with the description of the disaster affecting 1 city, not even near the ocean.

@@frosty6960 we have maps for the areas of the earth's crust that were that were affected by the isostatic depression/rebound that occurred after the ice age? Where would I find them? I'd love to look at them.

@@BushrodJenkins Try googling. Geology isnt magic. Now answer me this. Why, when looking for a CONTINENT, would you search on the bottom of the ocean ... right next to a CONTINENT

Glad you enjoyed it!

Thank you for sharing. Interesting great work.

1. "Gaul" literally translates: Foreigner(s) It is the ancient Germanic word that they used to describe the Celts (or any Foreigners). This descriptive was misunderstood by the Romans as the name of the people rather than a adjective. 2. Authentic Conjecture is underrated. The problem today is that mainstream, funded, scientists hide their conjecture as "science".

The Atlantean origin of the Guanches, the Basques and of the Berber People of the Atlas Mountains is somewhat obvious for geographical reasons, and more than plausible that of the Egyptian elite ( and also Sumerian) and the various branches of the Celts for many other reasons, some also anticipated by NA. Yet, though Atlantis had to have a representation of all the 4 original races, it was basically the center of the Red Race which at some point must have become overwhelmingly aggressive and forced the others to flee, so I'd see Celts and Sumerians-Egyptians as "white" eastbound migrations much long before Atlantis destruction. As to gigantism, the Atlantean time was unquestionably the age of giants, but I would not make this solely dependent on a carnivorous diet of wildlife; it would be a merely materialistic explanation of a modern kind. In the period under consideration, the cause due to a dramatic psychic imbalance - consequence of a break with the spiritual domain - had to be much more decisive and affect also the very balance of the earth's axis. It would therefore be more appropriate to link the origin of gigantism to the origin of cannibalism, as suggested by the myth of Pelops, according to which the gods, upon realizing that they were eating human flesh, "overturned the table ( i.e., the Earth's plane of revolution) in horror" , and consequently produced that sudden upheaval of plans that caused the great catastrophe. After all, the Cyclopes, in Greek mythology, were cannibals. In this context, the portrayal of the European peoples as "too primitive" gatherers and hunters applies best to the early phase of the post-catastrophe period, but for the Atlantean period it contrasts with Plato's account, which describes the Greeks at the height of their civilization as allies of the Egyptians against Atlantis.

@@horpakheret3447 My problem with the Solon story (Greece and Egypt being allies against Atlantis) is that Greece just simply didn't exist 11,000 years ago. It didn't even exist 4,000 years ago.

@@matthewstorer8236 this site gives as its goal the discovery of the city of Atlantis - and as a corollary of anything that may have relation to its empire elsewhere in the Atlantic - following to the letter the account of Plato, who reports that of Solon, who reports that of the Egyptian priests. Thus, it is the Egyptians who speak of Atlantis and of the Greeks of the Atlantean period - about which Plato's Greek contemporaries had forgotten everything - following their chronology, preserved uninterruptedly in the temples. According to your reasoning, which is that of the official historiography, in 11000 B.C. no civilization existed, so neither did Atlantis and the Egyptians.

@@horpakheret3447 Exactly my point. I'm sure fictional writing existed in Platos time. Besides, there were colossal disasters that could have given Plato a basis for the story like the eruption, earthquakes and tsunami associated with Thera. We simply don't know so any argument on Atlantis' existence is futile. I personally agree that there does seem to be some trace evidence of a progenitor civilization in the deep past.

Glad you enjoyed it!

@@Apocalypse_Tube If I was to say I was there at various points during the vast and rich hidden history which was the Atlantean Civilisation, going way, way, way back and encompassing all of the three main volcanic catastrophes which hit the main Atlantean mainland over many hundreds of thousands of years, it would probably and understandably raise a few eyebrows in disbelief. All I can honestly say is that various versions of my soul did embody and take incarnations during these varied times of Atlantis. The last remaining section of which you are referring to here in your wonderful video presentation is the island states which made up Poseidon (The later day Atlantis) prior to that there was the original city of the Golden Gates, with its concentric circle arrangement. This was the true original Atlantis, the city located 15 degrees north of the equator. It predated the copy of the Concentric Circle City, which was located on the Poseidon Atlantis, by many hundreds of thousands of years. Again many thanks for your wonderful video presentation. Brings tears to the eyes to those few who truly remember.😊

(also Doggerland, when the British Isles were connected to mainland Europe was around then - the vast lands mentioned too across the Atlantic would've been when Greenland too was connected to the American continent. As well as of course, the South East Asia landmass and the Australian continent being joined to Asia. A lot of academia is blinded by the idea that the topography isn't the same then as how we see it now.)

Thanks for your kind comments, I hope you enjoy the rest of the videos.

Check out the Azores Pyramid ;D

That's what I'm worried about. Not easy to see beneath deeply packed sediment.

it is actually the island, the cities name is not known.

@nocommonsense2000. Of course you would know better that someone who was born there. Dude get a life and a clue. Atlantis was a city on the continent of Appalachia.

Glad you enjoyed it!

It's all in the reflexes.

Need to search for it, but saved a link that shows how measures of the Richat structure are much bigger than those given by Plato for the city of Atlantis, so nothing like the "exact size" of it ! Anyway, no doubt Mauritania was an Atlantis colony, and the Richat just an open pit stone quarry.

​@@horpakheret3447 bro get a life

@@swigglyforce5215 You have edited the reply, but I still can see you were asking why I was still arguing ... ... and so on: because the Richat structure is the latest hoax invented to capsize the truth set by Plato, Socrates, Solon, the priests of Sais, and you seemed felling a bit too much for it. There are only two options: either you accept Plato's "truth" to the letter, which is what "Apocalypse" does for its geographic location, or you get lost behind whatever IMO you may like best. In any case, Atlantis, just like the other 4 Pillars of Heaven, is not the Original Island, but one of its substitutes in a much later and intermediate period. Losing the primordial island is like falling out of the tree house, hitting your head and losing your memory, and this is what you call "getting a life".

@@horpakheret3447 Oh my god stop arguing, idc anymore about this, your just being annoying now because your just drowning out my notifications

Its the most noticeable. Except for one issue. While richat has alot of evidence. Itd have to have sank then rose immensely. . All of africa would have dramatic elevation shifts. No one has mentioned?! The richat also. Is not within a sea with an ocean beyond it. Plato writes about north america. And upon the other side. Being asia. That atlantis was capable of impacting all continents. Except africa. Is never mentioned. Africa has a large discernible structure of water eroded lines. Suggesting north africa was greatly covered in water. Offering atlantis the ability to avoid sailing to the southern africa. Horn. Straight to egypt. N asia then after.

Did you miss the part where even the OP referenced EXACTLY what you are talking about?

Glad you enjoyed it!

Hi Cyberstar, thanks for watching my video and taking the time to write your well thought out comment. I still wonder if the melting of the North American ice sheet alone is enough to account for sinking the Azores Plateau by two thousand metres. Perhaps there were also bottom loading, isostatic interactions that we haven't taken into account yet. I will be presenting some ideas in episode 4, so stay tuned!

The ice melted from heat. 10 to 38 power ergs estimated. Carefully examine the shelf. Carved by water from existing rivers today. In florida caves under 100' (30 meters) of the ocean have clay pots, burned wood, artifacts of people. The Hopi described the event. Aborigines carved in stone, drew paintings in caves of it. As did others. In egypt at karnak the granite carved statues were melted on one side. See B Foerster works. SOMEONE moved 1000 plus Tonne rocks to build these things. It was not the romans. And level 8 hard rock isnt scratched by bronze tools. Core drilled holes exist still that only diamonds cut. How?

i imagine it would. consider the thickness of the American plate vs the oceanic plate. it would be like the difference between bending a phonebook vs bending a piece of aluminum foil.

It's not in America as for some reason Americans always think they are getting left out. And if you listen to the video it explains what the size of Libya and Asia meant back then as ancient people seen it different to us. Atlantis was either Azores or Canary Islands when there was more land all evidence points to this not America or the Bahamas. i mean Americans think Jesus went there the ark of the covenant is there it's insanity. Except the facts. The Aztects Mayans and Incas were in America not bloody Atlantis why do you think we call it the Atlantic Ocean.

@@mattysavage2800 Well, im not american if that what you are implying. For some reason, even tho the opposite has been proven, people think the americas were unknown. About the size, that is seriously underplaying the descriptiion and their understanding. "The americas" means north and south, and has nothing to do wth USA. Dont even get me started on the azores or canary island bullshit. Thats just insulting the ancient egyptians.

@@mattysavage2800 Yes, why is it called the atlantic island... weird huh? Maybe read the story again ?

@@frosty6960 It's insulting the Ancient Egyptions by saying America and of course I know you meant north and south. Theres more evidence that matches the list than for any parts of America.

@@frosty6960 There's no talking with your type. You obviously have no business discussing this bye snowman.

Thank you so much 😀

We're all a little crazy.

I do discuss potential links between the Azores and the Richat Structure in episodes 8, 9 & 10 of my Atlantis series: 08: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p5OWqMqQz-DPqJc.html 09: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rc6cgc6dvbXRnKM.html 10: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/prSZfsxexq_ZYZc.html

“This power came forth out of the Atlantic Ocean, for in those days the Atlantic was navigable; and there was an island situated in front of the straits which are by you called the Pillars of Heracles” - Plato, from Timaeus If it was on the other side of the pillars it would be on the land?

Forget it it's fiction, .. Sames Atlantis ...it's neither a City, country, or continent ... Atlantis was a Venus Colony, the ppl were the Atturians ...from Venus ...

@@kidcreole6749 Where are your proofs? I would be interested to check them. Instead, in my book "The code of Hathor deciphered", you can find enormous proofs for the fact that Atlantis existed and is now on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.

Atlantis was a Venus Colony, the People were the Atturians sent here from Venus to Recolonize Earth 33k yrs ago ... They're Modern Humans 3rd, but majority, Ancestor ... 263k yrs ago they fled the cataclysm, that resulted in the sinking of Lumeria, the result of another Nuclear War with the inhabitants, of a wandering planet that visits our Solar System on a regular orbit. They were now returning, Venus made 4attempts, the first was 45/50k yrs ago with the Pre-adamites, the Paracas ppl, an the Baachi, Modern Humans, 1st ancestor. Their Agarthian continent stretched from mid Atlantic off the coast of Africa to the islands of the Caribbean ... The Azores, is the highest peaks of the Island of Athenia, the island Plato refers to directly outside the gates of Hercules, one has to transit this island to reach the Argathian continent. The Carribean Islands are the highest peaks of the Agarthian continent at the junction of the America's continent...

@@krisvandendriessche2480 The rapid thaw of the Nth Pole ice sheets, was the result, of a non stop, 9day an nite, Nuclear Holocaust, 11.5k yrs ago ... The culperables, the Atturians an Athenians... It Flooded every year for 300yrs, an took that year for the thaw to reach the tops of the Nth Africa, an Europe, mountain ranges, an then cascade over the rims, causing huge tsunami that raced around the planet ... The Atturians Domed their City's, with 3ft thick glass fibre, There are 28Domed seafloor city's across our Oceans, home to millions of Atturians, Athenians, an others, There are 8in the triangle of, L.A. Cuba,Florida, Caribbean Islands, Bahamas Trench, all exist on the submerged Argathian continent. Directly off the coast of San Juan, nestled on the Floor of the Bahamas Trench, is a Atturian, city 10miles in Diameter ...home to millions of Atturians ... Maybe this is what your looking for, ? I challenge anyone to go take a look, My guess is the sign will say, Welcome to Atturias, the Capital City of the Atlantis Colony ....

@@krisvandendriessche2480 It took the planet 300yrs to tilt off its axis an reach the 23.5°angle it's at today ... It moved 0.0783333333333 degrees each yr for 300yrs ... I don't really want to reveal that ... what the hell, I guess ppl already know, how it got there ....

Cheers. I agree, more core samples need to be studied in detail. Given how important the Azores triple junction is to Geology, there's a shocking lack of physical Geological research that takes place in the region.

Thanks!

Glad you enjoyed it

Proud of this Matt guy making Matt's proud. Two people in this comment section were sent here by the Matt from AA, whose be spreading the truth

AA?

@@michaelb4538 ancient aliens

@@1992zorro thanks.

@@1992zorro no Ancient Architects channel, Matt.

Thanks for watching!

Thanks for watching!

I discuss the importance of the Richat structure in episodes 8, 9 & 10.

@@Apocalypse_Tube thanks! I'll check them out. I'm in the Azores right now and the scenery is quite impressive. Looks a bit like final fantasy from certain vantage points, like the remains of a broken land that sank into the ocean. Keep it up! ;)

Check out episodes 8,9 & 10 of my Atlantis series if you want to see my opinion on the Eye of Africa.

I'm working on it, slowly, but I'm working on it.

Agreed this is important knowledge you discovered here. Especially the part about Gobekli Tepe. Also, the Taurid meteor shower occurs when the sun is in Libra so maybe the comets are actually those. Do they match up with Orion or a Bull-like creature?

Thanks so much! I just subbed to your channel, you had me at Streets of Rage!

When the first navigators arrived at the Azores there were no mammals on the islands, only birds And no leftovers from any human culture Atlantis is a myth concerning human vanity and iniquity and its doom and downfall It has nothing to do with history

"colonies" is spelled with "I" "e" in the end of the word

@@Rotebuehl1 thx, i corrected it

Google Earth only has limited bathymetric data, I'm guessing it has something to do with copyright or permissions? Try using the EMOD portal (the data isn't as clear as it once was, they are constantly updating and merging their datasets for a more complete picture of the sea floor. It looks like a few datasets have been merged right where my proposed location is, but you can still make it out pretty well): emodnet.ec.europa.eu/geoviewer/#!

Google Earth / Maps doesn't show a lot of high resolution bathymetric data. It could be as simple as not being able to get the rights from the various Oceanographic Institutions that survey the sea floor, there are a lot of them.

If you want to go down the D.C. rabbit hole, check out the work of Melissa Campbell: www.mercurialpathways.com/post/24-was-the-capitol-built-on-an-ancient-site

I will definitely check this out. Have you got a link to the specific video?

@@Apocalypse_Tube Andrew Hall: Handbag of the Gods

@@DegreesOfThree Awesome, thanks.