Personally, I believe that was FIFA's masterplan to led S.korea to semi-final in order to engage homecrowd more in the tournament so that they can make guap out of it.

Per sti KZfaqr esistono solo real barcellona e premier del cazz

that ref got busted drug smuggling

@@rinoferraro2126 and a fun fact: now this referee since he is out of jail he started to do the opinionist in some tv channel. Fun fact x2: he supported italy in this euro and he clearly said it. Another proof that criminals and other people like him can do everything while normal people can't.

Nothing controversial about that. All about Byron Moreno and FIFAmafia

What about Senegal Egypt Qualifiers Few months ago

Yeah but the keeper said that it didn't affect him

@@thomascox-brown116 if you are talking about the Denmark-England match then you are dead wrong. both Kasper and Pierre Emile had complained multiple times to the reff about lasers being shone in their faces, contrary to popular beliefs it wasn't an insulated incident happening only at the pens. also he said something more in the likes of ''despite of the attempts to throw me off i still saved the ball, though who knows how much it affected me, maybe i would have caught it or knocked it to the side instead if not for the laser''

@@thomascox-brown116 he isn’t Klopp

So the ref should have sent the crowd off?

Ireland deserved that win

@@minianimejesus8792 i cried when the ref gave that goal, and i'm not even irish

Thank god cause I’m irish

I am Irish I can say a lot of us are bitter about it 12 years later

@@jamplays9596 I'm Irish too

Immobile does the same as Kane

Not true

So trueee

happy karma did justice for denmark and the cup goes to rome instead of home

@@radjishdoekhie8464 karma is not real lol

Actually Barcelona also got screwed by the Refs in the first leg but the 2nd leg was also bad

@@narrow3601 they got screwed both, Chelsea got screwed worse.

Both got screwed. Ballack should have been sent off in first leg plus penalty denied for Barcelona in first leg

@@lennox7209 let’s just say the ref was shit.

@@dannyyu1212 imagine if collina afficiated both

Yeah but he has still saved it, what a keeper. he's so good

@@fishydoesstuff respect ✊ kasper Schmeichel the best goalkeeper around

The laser didn’t do a lot kasper still saved it but Harry Kane the rebounding bitch had to ruin everything again

@@henriknord5283 you are just mad that Denmark lost

@@tipicalalex9908 well I am mad, and I'm not even Danish, English fans are disgusting, they should have never reached the final, but thankfully It came to Rome 🇮🇹🇮🇹🏆 Forza Azzurri

The bundesliga removes clips for copyright

@@kaibutsu7 oh thank you I did not know

@@a.j.c3365 basically there was a hole in the side of the net he then hit the side of the net and the ball went through the hole

Kiebbling ghost goal

same as an england fan i think it wasnt a penalty but u cant really change it now

It was never a pen Kane’s was tho they got it all wrong as a England fan

:)

England lied their way to final, got served the best way.

@@firstnamelastname7675 i dunno i saw germany cheat in the semi against us in this list and also marodona and italy dident really play that fair either

i agree

And if you watch closely when he falls there were actually 2 balla in play and the referee should have stopped play before he entered the box

No offense but it is a 1 year now but still hate the English national team

Sterling and (kane to an extent he always throw himself down at the slightest touch) always does this though, he is generally very unsportsmanlike. as a Dane i will say this however Kyle Walker and Saka deserved the win though because they were fire that day. Walker single handedly stopped our entire offensive play by getting in the way of our target man every time, top class performance, and well saka is saka he was fast on the ball made some good dribbles and gave stirling 2 colossal oppertunities that he should have scored. Like lets be honest England was better that day but these two people were at the root of it, however England was not very efficient and so we almost punished you for it if not for that unlucky own goal. which if i remember correctly was put into the box by Saka. and then later ofcourse that disgusting penalty. had we lost in shoot outs or by a ordinary goal i would have been completely fine with loosing to an arguably much better side. But alas that was not what happened

Im english i agree aswell

Innit

I'm a city fan, and at the time, I would've disagreed. But in hindsight, you're right

@@brainninja7089 i think even if it did hit his hand thats a natural position for jumping

Absolutely right my friend. This commentator is an idiot.

As a city fan aguero was offsides and lorentes hand did touch the ball but natural position and he didn’t mean too

Completely correct.

yes

@Cyan Prove it

Schmeicle?

Ok but he saved it what a guy

Then they scored oof

that was before.

One person aims laser at Denmarks keeper. ALL ENGLAND FANS RACIST

Fun fact: Man City and PSG get money for transfers from oil companies in Saudi Arabia. Still can’t win a Champions League title tho 🤣

Absolutely.

The llorente goal was a bit dogey as it was a handball as from the footage in that goal it looks like a hand ball but the sterling one was offside and can accept that as aguero recived the pass in an offside position

ye objectively both decisions were correct. This is how VAR should be used

@@enzocg9103yeah i think that it would have been worse without var

its clearly scored with his hand

@@enzocg9103 no just no… clearly scored with his hand

@H I and ur a mistake to humanity

Even the commentators didn't say anything about the ball, so it wasn't a distraction to the game. It isn't too close either. Also go cry about it, you should consider yourself lucky that your keeper was absolutely OP or else it wouldn't have gone to ET

@@JuperLuperBruh you are an England fan who says this to Denmark fans and then probably goes and complains about how ref didn’t give chiellini a red card in the final

why would i complain about ref not giving a red card. england wouldn't have won in normal time anyways

Well im definitely really proud of Denmark after all that happened but it was a weird decision

dude that call was ridiculous!!!

@@mezamezz and Real v Man City when casemiro should’ve got red twice and real didn’t deserve a penalty

Do you want a tissue to wipe those tears

@@Nobody99712 yes for my tears of joy when England lost the final

@@hilos306 you do realise we take it as a compliment that most countries hate us?

Literally everything you just said was a lie. That’s impressive commitment to being a liar. You’re disagreeing with Schmeichel himself; he was completely unaware of any laser. I’d love to see you try and balance a laser in someone’s eye across a field. And no, it’s not illegal or blinding, the law is for helicopters. Goalkeepers are not operating helicopters, so unless it’s a military grade laser it would be no different to the floodlights that blind you. Most of all, if England are disqualified, Italy shouldn’t be allowed in the champions league, considering Italians went to England and almost killed a father with his child in a brutal attack, Sean Cox. They only served 3 years, while Sean Cox is permanently disabled, and lost all ability to operate due to such brain damage. Yet people cry about Twitter trolls and a crying German girl… nice priorities guys 👍

@@XXXTENTAClON227 Think you need to google some more mate before spewing your crap on my comments ill copy paste a few things to lecture you -> "What did Schmeichel say about the laser? The goalkeeper has now revealed he told the referee about the laser before the penalty: 'I did not experience it on the penalty kick because it was behind me on my right side. But I did experience it in the second half. 'I told the referee. And he went to say something to the other officials." "How far will a 5mW green laser go? A 5 milliwatt laser: a distraction 2 miles away It is a potential eye hazard from the pointer to about 52 feet. It is a temporary flashblindness hazard from the pointer, out to about 260 feet." "FIFA Standard Soccer Field Length: 100 Yards to 130 Yards Width (Goal Line) 50 Yards to 100 Yards" And you had a comment about everything else, but no the fact how english fans had forced them in betwen the danish ones and started harrasing them an throwing things at them. Also regarding your comment about Sean Cox that was back from 2018, its unlucky for a fan to get jumped after a match yet ... it was After the match and had no influence on the outcome of the match... theres been alot of things happening after a match his story just hit the news where others where forgotten..

I don't know about today's rules, but I saw that game. As a goalkeeper myself at that time, i can tell you that goalies had the right to guard. Jumping with a knee or even pegs up or punching for the ball was legal tackle, even if you connected with an opponent. In the box, you had to back off when the goalie came. Ot was the only way to protect us. The german (one of the greatest ever goalies in my opinion btw just for full disclosure) went for the ball but missed. You may think i am biased, but the rules did allow that. It was not a referee error. If not for that rule, hundreds of keepers would have been injured or worse over the years.

@@neilfraser2349 For me Schumacher was one of the dirtiest goalkeepers of all time and should have been sent off and arrested for this so called tackle.I too am a goalkeeper and can tell you I would never jump ass first into an opponents head even if it was legal as I would be taking my eye off the ball.I have held a grudge against Schumacher since 1982 and one day would love to meet him to settle the score.

@@neilfraser2349 No way It was an obvious fowl and he should've received a red card ..

That seems ridiculous 😅

@Nikhil Vattathara i would have battered the ref at that point.

@Nikhil Vattathara oh he should have done

That Lampard goal felt like some kind of weird karmic loop being closed

Could've included? The not-goal decided the WC Final in 1966, these are two total different situations.

I love how foreigners love to complain about the time England actually won silverware 😂 rent free. The game would’ve ended 3-2 anyway, England would have won. 🏆

@@j_james_01 With that argument, Germany would have won 4:2 anyway in 2010, so why argue about Lampard's goal? We'll never know if the goals following either incident (England scoring another goal in 1966 and Germany scoring two more in 2010) would have happened if the decision had been different.

@@taflo1981 so you’re contradicting yourself? Why is it different for England in the 66 final? We would have won 3-2 anyway same way Germany would’ve won 4-2 even with that goal if it were allowed. England won fair and square in 66, we complain about the lampard goal not because it would’ve made a difference, but because it was blatantly over the line, and 2010 and 1966 are two different eras of football, stuff like that should not have been happening in 2010. Lampards disallowed goal was the leading factor to goal line technology and VAR being introduced in 2016.

I’m an England fan and I agree but there was a clear penalty earlier that was ignored so we deserved a pen regardless

When ur moving at that speed and get clipped that’s enough to make you fall over

I agree, and if people say the penalty isn’t deserved, there was another ball in the game, right where sterling ran by, and as a referee, you have to stop the game, and remove the ball

Stop drinking then.

Most refs played football at some point in their lives. You don't just start refereeing as a teenager with 0 experience with the game, usually from playing in youth competition.

@@nelsonroy4157 With recent referee and VAR decisions you'd be forgiven for thinking they didn't know what they were doing.

Its there as one of them, "Lampard's ghost goal"

@goal 90 He was talking about Hurst's first goal in Extra-Time in the 1966 World Cup Final.

England still would have won 3-2

@@mouldypotato5147 I know but it was a last minute goal which Germany were tired for probably going for a winning goal and so might not have happened but from whay I've seen England were the better team anyway

@@mouldypotato5147 the germans had to change their tactics to try and score a goal which left them more vulnerable to concede

You forgot Germany second goal

​@@benwoollam8 What's about Germany second goal. Its clear goal.No offside ,no handball.Unlike England's 3rd goal.BBC have the moment from the goal line,not by angle in which you love to show this moment.And the fourth goal is also illegal.There people at the pitch and even in penalty box of Germany at that moment 🙂.

No they don’t, your probably saying this without knowing the rules of football

@@mrsjgray-teacherofclassics6347 You are right, refs don’t give out red cards out for free. There are several refs that train to see who is worthy of doing the finals and stuff like that.

AL_xz. Your right when the Italy player went over Greileshes leg with the spikes that should have been a red car that's ilegal

@@jacobnunn7134 where's he meant to place his foot? Is his foot meant to just stay midair and not fall back down? He can't help the fact he tried to dodge the tackle and his foot accidentally ended up on Grealish's leg

@@mrsjgray-teacherofclassics6347 No, the ref literally ignored the danish goal keeper when he got the laser in his eye

Wow

no clearly not🤡

Its difficult because the was barely any contact but the free kick was also very contravertial

@@lucybradley3272 Yea but huge diffrence beetween a dive in the box and dive outside the box.

England would've still won 3-2 btw

@@ItzRafaelGames They would haven’t have they scored a goal that didn’t cross the line then they scored a goal where there was a handball….

*forgot

England clearly cheated in the 1966 world cup. Also I'm not german

@@ItzRafaelGames England's fourth goal was literally the last kick of the match. If the third goal (the one that didn't cross the line) hadn't been given, W Germany would surely not have left themselves so exposed at the back in the dying seconds of the game, being on the cusp of losing and so desperate to get an equalizer. This should be obvious to anyone who isn't blinded by massive bias in favour of England.

Which could have won the US the game too

To be fair (I'm from USA) John O'Brien punched the ball against Mexico but it wasn't seen by the referee. Obviously no way to assume the PK would be converted either way.

I am a Chelsea fan

There was a lot of unfair decision during that game

As a chelsea fan from year 6 to 13 and seeinf this shit so many times it just hurts

@@sameulcrap2830 there was like 5 pens

@@orekostic1751 yeah exactly unfair decision

Diving gets rewarded way too much in soccer. It’s not just one bad ref. It’s cultural.

How was Italy beating turkey 3-0 a controversial decision? Unless you’re Turkish I don’t understand why you think that Italy didn’t deserve to win

@@benhaney9629 y do Americans say soccer? It makes no sense.

@@trevorphilips5252 Chiellini x1 handball, Çelik x1 handball, Soyuncu x2 handball, if u didnt watch the game dont talk.

@@jinx4660 who tf cares how someone calls a sport?

because Lampard's goal was 11 years ago and allowed GLT to come in

It was still one of the worst decisions, up there with Roy Carroll picking the ball pit of the back of the net and Man Utd not conceding

Because we all hate England

@@RizeF1X people still talk about 1966 so..

@@benb6786 ?

Facts

And the Kane one was during normal time so we woulda won anyway

@@abubakr3863 or missed? Like he did?

the descison was already given to deark so ot wqs ifnored

The sterling one was it was jensen check on him that gave the penalty and the kane one wasn't a penalty kane kicked the denmark player when the deal player got the ball so no penalty

idiot kane bascially missed the penalty it was rebound

That was literally my most salty moment

No Chelsea deserved both

both red cards were spot on mate.

Yeah

hope tht most english fans take ur example.ur an open and honest man.

I agree that it shouldn’t of been a penalty but you can see some contact

@@thaddaeussnowden4589 not a contact a penalty worth.or blow all the 1000 contacts

@@radjishdoekhie8464 yea true like you can only see a slight nudge

I'm an England fan and I agree

Nope, you can’t really see it in this angle. But his hand was on the left side of his body and made the ball go right

The ball in the sense of how far it is actually takes a while to go back, considering thwse players received thousands of shots like these its impossible he didnt knew/wxpect to hit his hands

I think puzzlego is right maybe... I'm not sure 😓

I agree, it doesn't look like that hit his hand.

sry puzz but llorente controlled it with his hand to give him a beter chance of scoring

Man City fans paid him to include that to make them feel better.

What about it nothing wrong

@@soiiv_ I’m pretty sure the winning goal was actually not a goal, apparently universities studied it and it was really close to the line

There was nothing wrong

It was recorded on a potato though

@@Kanato27 I agree, the 3rd english goal wasn’t over the line but fourth one was definitely a goal

Thanks for the visit

Same

@H I true put it was a joke bro

@H I actually, I'm French and we have a very bad football relationship with Italy, but no one wanted England to win so we all rooted for Italy 🇮🇹

@H I actually the world was rooting for 🇮🇹😉😂

He wasnt

@@marcohara6124 stop talking rubbish

England should of lost

@@Eli_23789 envy huh

@H I Anyways you still lost in the final so it doesn't matter 😹

@@samuelwainaina5900 u lost in the semi finals🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🥲🥲🤣🤣😂😂🤣😂

Respect that your a danish I’m one too but they didn’t play great they just cheated to win and I got pretty sad too

You dumb? Llorente used his hand to score

@@simonthorsen2191 lol check again in other vids u can see there is no contact and if he did touch it hand was in a natural position

@@mrborstry2782 Hahaha bro you blind? It was a clear handball and it was outside hes body so it was not natural dumb kid

@@simonthorsen2191 blind city fan

@@simonthorsen2191 No wtf he touched it with his heels not with his hand

yessir

There was a hole in the net, that’s why their are showing the net

They didn’t win tho?

@@cheebi9820 Yeag

Nothing Italy tho the spaghetti mafia paid da ref

@@masonclark9110 i'm italian and i can confirm that, we gave to referee 1.000 kilos of spaghetti

@@cima9581 tbh if I was ref u know I’m taking that spaghetti 👌🏽

There was also nothing controversial about two VAR decisions being correct. An entertaining twist of events? Sure. Controversial? No.

@@Guggex exactly

Chelsea vs Barca 2009

@@twoodakamarcell2119 no

@@nicolajrasmussen4513 ok agree to disagree

Can’t just stop it, as a player gets into the box, still tho that sterling dive, got me pissed off

If one player stopped bc of the ball then it wouldn’t of been a pen but not a single player got distracted from the ball (the play has continued) and English got a pen bc of Olympic diver.

There were 48 balls on the pitch.

Thanks Mr. Obvious!! ...... He made a goddamn mistake bro so what?

@@IdealIzzy some ppl didn't know so...what's wrong in clarifying to ppl?

@@IdealIzzy i didn't know that, that 'mistake' is pretty important

@@IdealIzzy So he doesn’t even know enough about the game to know the correct score, let alone that both of those decisions were correct.

Winners don't complain as much cause it doesn't matter to them. But if both teams were equally victims of poor refereeing, obviously the losers will suggest it's a robbery while ignoring their own foul play and advantages. Chelsea should have received 3 red cards during that tie, not one was given.

England is shit

@@veerved7828 you're right

The reason the Kane penalty wasn't given was because he fouled a Danish person first, hence why there was a free kick given to Denmark for that

People always forget to mention that Denmark's goal was never a free kick.

No, Kane commited an offensive foul before that and the ref blew the whistle. Everything was correct in that situation.

vid not available in my country wt do i do? i mean, i changes my location to 5 other countries including uk but the video is not available

@@SkyrushLOL www.google.com/amp/s/www.getreading.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/tv-pundit-says-reading-fc-19390029.amp Read that article about the game instead.

Sad

I’m a reading fan too it was really annoying

As I Sheffield Wednesday fan who was at that game I agree but there was defiantly not 5 penalty’s there was about 3

VAR for Man Utd is like the new Fergie time

he was blocking de geas line of sight for sure. great call by var.

Denmark will win a major trophy soon 🙂

@@Wakeup-to-reality yeah

mee too since the 80s as danish dynamite.denmark go robbed/italy-denmark would me a representative final.

Don’t worry Denmark is going to win the World Cup and that’s much more better then the euros and also I’m a danish too and this still makes me mad and sad that the referee was blind and the var was english and sterling dived and Kane rebounded

I would of loved to watch Denmark vs Italy but of course England and their violent fans had to ruin the fun again like ever year

KZfaq removed it, sry

Wish it was retaken....Poland might have won the euros

@@Ajax_FAN no, i think they could go to the final, and they couldn't had any chance with France, now World Champions.

@@Ajax_FAN 2nd place is max. they could do. But quarterfinals are still success for Poland

yeah that was poor tbh.