My friend wants me to thank you for this comment. She went her whole life thinking those were zoomed in pictures from the telescopes. Crazy, huh? Thank you again ... from my friend.

They're just bummed they didn't do their 47th Key & Peele reaction

These space scientists are motivated by nothing other than continued funding. Without anything interesting or newly discovered in space funding will dip. It's all a money game

@@Sobbayi You'd better have some good damn evidence fabricated if you're getting space exploration funding making stuff up. You just as easily described why someone *wouldn't* make these things up, all of their funding is on the line. They need to *wow* the public sometimes.

@@jacket5456 Funding in any field is finite. In case you don't know what that means is all funding runs out. To secure the next round of funding they need to justify it currently. They do that by making stuff up. If a round of funding is 3 years for example and nothing new is discovered then chances are the next round of funding will be reduced if not cut entirely.

@@Sobbayi Your condescension was pretty crude there, you essentially typed a paragraph to ask "You know money runs out right?" yes I understand that concept

Just lazy slobs, really.

They are here because of science 😏

calm down karen

Yeah it's weird to complain about.

Kamala's snatch.

Stellar and primordial

And supermassive is the largest. They are blokes

God created the whole world and everything in it!!! Who else could do that?

@@theinsightfulvisionary0197 me

Yes but we still shouldn't be so gullible as to believe everything. Government control is more influential than you think.

If they told you that Usain Bolt could run 100 miles in 4 hours you might want to believe them because at his top speed the math checks out. However, you shouldn't believe them because he can't maintain that speed and endurance for that amount of time. Even if the science seems plausible that doesn't mean that their guesses are correct.

Certainly true. Scientists are experts in their field for a reason as they’ve spent decades devoting themselves to answering previously unasked questions. All science is rigorously tested and verified and if it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny then it doesn’t continue on. How it gets reported is the biggest problem with how science is received these days. We see the headlines of the cliff notes of what is actually said in research papers and results. Scientists have no good reason to lie about their results as the general public isn’t their audience. Their audience is the people who will be reviewing their work and those who will replicate their experiments to verify results. ONLY after repeated verification can something be considered a theory. A theory that can then be tested by new questions and procedures that might shed new light on whatever is being researched. So to refute what another commenter added, they wouldn’t tell you that Usian Bolt can run 100 miles in 4 hours just because the math checks out. They’d tell you he can run faster than anyone else and can travel a 100 m in a ludicrous time for a man of his size. So just because the math checks out doesn’t mean that it’s correct and it wouldn’t be said that way. However due to how the story has changed, due to our society’s constant game of telephone, the message can come out different than initially written.

Could be humanity's next big filter.

Nahhh just the US. And honestly I think that would be a good thing. 😉

@@tjaymetal3116 Yes the death of 300 million would be indeed a good day 😑......you need help

@@justinr1513 As long as those 300 million are AMERICANS CITIZENS. That’s a blessing to the world.

@@tjaymetal3116 GFY

@Say Sike Right Now The electrons loose energy and don't orbit around the nucleus any more. Matter kind of collapses and disintegrates at that point at the atomic level.

@Say Sike Right Now I will admit that my knowledge maybe quite dated, it is from a Nova from 2008 called "The Race For Absolute Zero," When they explained what happened to atoms at that temp, the easiest way to interpret what they were saying was the atoms getting out of focus/fuzzy and almost melty. Usually I'm pretty good with my random facts, but if I am wrong, I don't mind being corrected.

@@Heegaherger You spelled lose wrong. Can't trust anything else you say now

@@oROBBIEo lol Up to you. My spelling may be bad (and it often is) but the info is pretty solid.

Which makes you think there's infinite possibilities of every condition imaginable and unimaginable, making it clear that we cant be alone in the universe. There's gotta be neighbors out there that humanity will simply never get to meet.

Life finds a way. Considering how immense the universe is, it's foolish to think that we are an isolated incident. Other civilizations are surely out there, but we're all destined to be alone. Thanks, physics.

I don't know if I'd quantify that as luck persay, as the only life we know to exist happens on our planet with the conditions you have described. As far as we know life wouldn't have developed on these other planets as you also mentioned in the first place. So I don't know if I would prescribe our existence to luck, maybe chance is a better concept.

@@DannL18 life will happen where it can, don't know how else to put it

One time my friend and I called this radio program years ago asking what the name of their opening theme song was. They responded "Oh, it's not even a real song. Someone just made it up"

@@youmayberight 🤣🤣 Exactly, everything is just made up lol

Too much man? Would you prefer some woman to help mix it up a bit?

Super massive?

I assume you're a yank with no understanding of British and ironic humour

@@drkelmentz so what is the joke? which is the thing I already asked about. You will "assume" something, meaning you admit that you don't know, also calling me a "yank" meaning you think that means something about how I think, even though you know nothing about me. And why would I need to know what "british humour" is instead of something just being funny? What is your point, your message, the reality of the situation? what are you doing?

@@Stephen_Brooks 🤣🤣🤣 case closed

@@drkelmentz what case? so you don't know what is funny, just like your country over other ones? what is the point of that? just say what is funny at that point in the video. maybe if you could explain your superior sense of humo(u)r, people would be converted to it, and you could showcase your amazing superior comedic value to the world

You monster.

My whole life has lead up to this moment.

Talk about pointless existence

So

I get your upset that your 18 hours late. But don’t take it out on me. I’m sure if you had a family you would use them for that.

@Channon Legier still, y would anybody worry about what could happen, it also could not happen! If something happens it happens, I'd rather not know about it anyways

@@e-reptiledysfunction2243 Well not everyone thinks like you or is in that sort of mindset. People are always naturally curious about something no matter how much you wanna put off and play like you don’t want to know something, it’ll always come to mind and you’ll think of it anyways. Some people dont like to play ignorant and want to be prepared for the worst. If anything, you should always be prepared for the worst. Being complacent isn’t really a good thing.

But it is proven... or it's not even stated as fact to begin with...

Except most of this stuff IS scientifically proven, at least to the best of humankind's knowledge

That just proves your own ignorance….. science is rigorously tested over and over again, the reporting on science often only reports the headlines and not the whole story. Yes without traveling 4 billion light years the Virgo Super Cluster, we can’t tell for certain the exact highest temp, even if we’re some how able to survive the environment out there. But we can give you a range that can be scientifically proven given our current level of technology and science. Experts are experts in their field for a reason, they’ve put in decades into their fields to know more about a certain subject, and have had their work tested and tested again by independent experts to verify their results. If the results of these independent experiments don’t match the original, the original is thrown out and the process starts again. Lying about your results or making things up is a great way to lose all of your credibility in the world of science. To boil it down even more, scientists ask questions and look for answers, those answers are tested independently and verified. If they can’t be verified, they’ll change their question and approach for finding answers. I don’t know where you got your quote about a small number of people understanding space research and it’s findings, but if anything it’s incredibly misleading. Anyone who does research would be able to tell you that. These things are very collaborative, often multi-national efforts, especially in space research. There are THOUSANDS of highly educated people that collaborate on all aspects of this research. And there are even more that aren’t involved with each project ready to make their own observations to verify the results independently of the research. It’s not the experts that are “lying” to you, they have no need to as you are not their target audience. it’s how the media portrays science as an absolute reality, without reading the whole paper, they read headlines and so do you by proxy. They report the highlights without substance because most normal people don’t care about the details. All you have to do is do a little digging. You don’t have to be a classically trained rocket scientist to understand this stuff. Look up information about how the research was done, the methods used and how those methods were developed. You might learn something new. This applies to all sciences by the way. Not just space science.

@@DannL18 Finally. Someone not having a potato for a brain and is ignorant. A lot of people like to sit in the corner and plug their ears and say La La La as loud as they can when presented with information thats beyond their own understanding, factual or not. Either they’re scared of feeling “stupid” or just simply refuse to hear out anything that isn’t their already preconceived notion.

@@DannL18 My point is that not all scientists/experts are correct. Some of the most intelligent scientists have been proven wrong overtime. For decades, Pluto was a planet, and then one day some intelligent scientist says it is not. Why? How come? No one seemed to want to explain the change in a way the average person would be able grasp without thousands of hours of intense study. The same thing happens in the the animal sciences as well. It seems that each year a animal is moved from one family or another and some experts do not agree with the decision. If the experts cannot agree, how is the public going to learn something new and interesting? Or have faith in the facts? I know every academic pursuit is prime for bringing in large sums of money for universities, colleges and foundations. The scientific community is no different than the public when it comes to money. Many scientists may care about their reputations and image among their peers. But do not try to tell me that there are no corrupt people within science looking procure millions through grants in order to become rich. All the sciences need to rethink their M.O. nowadays. Far too many experts are throwing out the facts for some sinister reason. In biology, there experts who are now questing the number of sexes there are. Now the public is supposed to relearn that there are 20, 30 or 40 different sexes? There is something really wrong with this picture. Personally I love the idea of space travel, and I would buy passage on some spaceship to somewhere once it became safe for the general public, but there is no doubt that the scientific community is not as forthcoming with all the research. There are too many recent changes within the sciences to ignore and no one seems willing to give explanations for anything.

No...

If entire world thought like you, we would still be figuring out how to walk.