Thats surpriaing its pretty obvious she did She was amirking the entire time and had already betrayed indi It should have been exoected she would betray donovan too

I didn’t believe it until I saw the look. Now it’s obvious.

I mean, maybe people interpret her screaming as Donovan was ageing to death in front of her as surprise, but she was probably screaming, because someone was ageing to death in front of her.

It's like she gave a wrong answer to the person who didn't know and asked her for it. Making him lose his life in the process.

​@@schwarzerritter5724she know he's gonna die, but didn't expect how. She screams also because Donovan holding her when he's "decaying" horribly

You beat me by 15 minutes. I'd also say that if she wanted it for herself, she might have tried to do the same to Indy. When she was dangling, the expression on her face changed and that's when I think the thought of the possibilities took over.

No, she says "might it not be made out of gold?" Which isn't what the transcript says, but it's what my ears have told me since the film came out. It always seemed framed as a question, which is strange considering Elsa's reaction when Donovan drinks.

@@nimrodery Your ears apparently hate you, because they've been lying to you for years. "He chose poorly." ==they start looking== Elsa: "It would not be made out of gold." Indy: "That's the cup of O'Carpenter" ==looking at different cup== It's on youtube in a doesn't different videos. You can listen to every single one of them with the volume up if you want, it's very clear what she says.

I thought it was pretty obvious myself.

@@cst039 Because it was. You can see it in her face, she gave him the wrong cup on purpose.

Fun fact: the belt ends are known as male and female ends. The two that Grant had were both female ends

Any farmer could have told them that chickens often produce viable chicks without males, and there really isn't much of a zoological jump from a bird to a reptile. In fact, some lizard species can do it too. THere's not THAT much of a future in this kind of procreation, because all the young are inevitably female clones of the mother. But it would be enough to populate an island.

that's why it was destroyed. it barely got a theatrical release.

it kinda reflects our society.. which is why it isn't really talked about too much, billionaires are scared they will lose power when people actually wake up :)

​@@mlembrantpeople will never wake up. Race war 2024.

Also, people only wear Crocs

It seems so at first glance, but it's actually pretty inconsistent. Why even bother selling Brawndo to water plants, when there's no one clever enough to understand business tactics and marketing? How could engineers build a monster truck, but not understand it has to go through a door?

I think they were meant to be able to get out of the cars. Why else would there have been a visitor's bathroom right next to the tyrannosaur paddock?

A lot of the things can be explained as oversights...something that the entire movie focused on for things going wrong. Book Hammond is the villain there, movie Hammond is more naive, but expects things to go as expected. The movie setup is that Nedry, essentially, underbid for the project and expected to be able to get more cash after things happened...Novel one had Hammond give inaccurate requirements for the system and then overloaded him while not telling him what he was doing. The movie conversation between Hammond and Nedry comes off, more as the contractor who underbid and isn't happy being held to the contract. Hell, the entire thing with the dilophosaurus spitting venom wasn't something they knew until after someone was blinded by one, same with the raptors being as intelligent as they were...an illusion of control. For the door locks on the vehicles, from the description of things, they rushed things to get the tour available because after the Raptor incident when Jophery was killed, the Investors wanted the immediate view of experts on the incomplete theme park there. There's the list of things that they still need to do for getting the tour ready for guests that's mentioned when they jump out and it cuts back to the control room. And the issue with the backup systems is something cut for time from the movie...there's a mention in the scripts and the making of book about there being a scene during their escape where the power goes back off because of they managed to bring the backup systems online and with the system experts either evacuated earlier for the storm or dead, they didn't know that the backups came on to let them reset the main systems. I can't remember if it was mentioned in the movie or if it was in those books that gave the timeframe of it being between six months to a year between that point and when they expected the park to be ready to open. The Telltale game adds even more to the mix with several other things that were still under construction and things like replacement raptors along with the Herrerasaurus. But even the movie shows that while they rounded up the raptors, they hadn't gotten to go through their former paddock to inspect it since that's where Grant and the kids stumble onto the hatched nest (You can tell due to the distinctive shape of the footprints leading away from it). Nedry also could have easily screwed with the system in a lot more ways during his sabotage. And as a side note, Nedry's decision to try renegotiating the contracts seemed aimed to create more issues due to the timing of it, right when the experts hired to inspect it showed up... With the books, you can blame Hammond, Dogson, and Nedry for just about everything there...but the movies are a very different thing...and a lot of the people there are blaming Hammond because of his novel counterpart combined with him not wanting to pay Nedry more than they'd contracted for Dogson is about the same level of dirtbag in each of them in different ways...especially with the Congo easter egg there that mentions BioSyn and Dogson's viral stunt from the books

The original novel goes into a lot more detail. They made him design the software for the park but never told him what the park was for, so he was working in the dark. In the book it's mentioned that Hammond even called up Nedry's clients and badmouthed him to try to blacklist him from the industry as a way to strongarm him into fixing all the problems they caused. Don't get me wrong, Nedry's still a villain, but the book shows how Hammond antagonized and bullied him, making him angry enough to decide to sabotage the park. Nedry's plan was to quietly sell the embryos and just get back to work immediately, but he gets lost and killed by dinosaurs, plunging the park into chaos because he was the only guy who could run the systems (more lack of redundancy and safety backups etc). Also the whole idea of "the entire park is run by computers by just a handful of people" was not because it was all high-tech, but because that way Hammond could save lots of money by not hiring tons of people. In the book the system does have backups and redundancies but they were all also automated, so they failed too. It was like a house of cards where one thing failing would cause a cascade effect and everything else would fail too. Hammond also didn't want to give Muldoon a bunch of rocket launchers because the dinosaurs were too expensive to kill, leaving him with just two, which weren't enough. As the meme goes, Jurassic Park wasn't about science going wrong because man meddled with nature and all. The science actually worked fine. It was Hammond's greed and cutting corners to save money that doomed the park.

@@marcussantiago Right. There were plenty of places where expenses were spared. :)

@@marcussantiago The Novel and Movie versions of characters are vastly different there. You only need to look at Genero and the kids to see big chunks of it. Movie Hammond is not the villain that the novel version is because of Spielberg's changes there

Pretty much the same as the book, though I believe Hammond also threatens to ruin Nedry if he quit the contract.

@@Morboeatspeople Hammond already had by contacting all of the other people that Nedry’s buisness had contracts with because he wasn’t satisfied with Nedry’s work, despite Hammond getting EXACTLY what he asked for, just not what hr needed since he lied and withheld vital intel.

That was taken from the book, which goes into explicit detail about how Hammond screwed Nedry. Book Hammond was a much more ruthless businessman than his kindly grandfather persona in the film. He not only kept vital information from Nedry about what exactly he would be working on, he explicitly lied about the amount of work it would be. Nedry was led to believe he would basically be doing a final beta test to certify an already-established system. Which is what he bid for. When he actually got there he found out there was NO system whatsoever and he was expected to write one from scratch. He tried to bail not only because that's not what he signed up for but he was getting grossly underpaid for work he should've been making 10X more for. InGen threatened him with a breach of contract lawsuit so he stayed. To add more salt to the wounds he wasn't allowed to inform any of his team back in Cambridge on what he was doing so he couldn't have them assist him other than helping with small, isolated bits of code. So when BioSyn decided to steal InGen's work one angle they thought about was finding a disgruntled employee who would be willing to steal for them. And they found one.

@@DraknfyreYou would think that Spielberg being such a genius filmmaker would’ve figured out a way to include this in the story to make Hammond and Nedry’s situation make more sense.

@@JohnFourtyTwoTo be fair, there's a good chance it might have been included in previous drafts of the script but removed in order to streamline the film.

Where as in the film he’s more misguided but well meaning

But they spared no expense! 😂

​@@TastyScotchThat's what corporate leaders SAY, but they almost always spared some important expense.

I prefer that it makes more sense he doesnt really make sense as a character in the film I guess its cos Richard Attenborough is so likeable they made him a nice guy instead

@@factorfitness3713 in this case he could’ve done better with the fences

I'd say only MAYBE 3 were subtle aspects that could be missed. The clothing in Idioticy was lore building basically, but I never noticed. Jurassic park ends up showing ALL the mistakes throughout the movie, meaning you get to see how frail everything was in addition to how he treated the workers.

To me Shutter Island was him deciding he deserved to be published, thus choosing behaviour that would lead to the lobotomy

Or she came to that realization after Donnovan died. Either situation is equally plausible.

Had the writer known of the demise of malls in the near future he would’ve picked something else for the courthouse, a brothal maybe knowing Biff.

Yep and I’m surprised this made the video because most people saw this when the movie was originally released, I did and so did countless others.

Or she thought she picked the right one and only realized her mistake after Donnovan died. Either is equally plausible and until Spielberg chimes in that’s what I’m going with, she made a mistake and accidentally killed her Nazi boss. Also, she’s a straight up Nazi. A few tears shed at a book burning don’t absolve her from being a fucking Nazi.

Not even common knowledge, just accepted as truth.

I'm pretty sure *ALL* of them were common knowledge, this is just a bad video.

Yes, the Judi Dench M character arc is done well in Craig Era. In the books BTW, Bond girls generally do NOT die until Goldfinger (which Quantum references) and then it's Thunderball and OHMSS... Most of girls before have dark and troubled past (like three in a row are boobily blondes who had sex like once before, and unwillingly), but end up well-off. Vesper kills herself because she's a turncoat working for russia as they kept her Polish boyfriend hostage and blackmailed her... But Fleming goes absolute batshit from relatively progressive writer into depths of bigotry after Dr. No. Bond, who was tolerant if untactful before and respected women, goes on tangents comparing Koreans with dogs and mensplaining lesbianism. Anyway, the 90s era tried to play it off as a joke and the new M was "feminist" in Hollywood way calling him a dinosaur while girls for some reason liked it (written by men). Last few 007 films FINALLY write women decently... I think starting with Quantum actually.

And suddenly I like Silva even more(and not just because he's played the always awesome Javier Bardem) and feel he's justified in his actions. Especially if you've heard the theory that he's M's (adoptive?) son. Think On Your Sins = Your SOn isn'T in hk. "What is this if not betrayal? She sent you off to me, knowing you're not ready, knowing you'll likely die. Mommy was very bad."

I mean being the Lizard automatically implies some degree of complicity in the Lizard transformation. Like Andrew Garfield says in No way home he's had to cure the lizard multiple times. Peter Parker in the comics and most other media has had to do the same thing. It's a core aspect of the character that he doesn't want to be the Lizard but doesn't have the strength of character to stop.

I feel like polyester is easier to automate like how the lawyers are automated in idiocracy. Farming has a bunch of steps where stupidity can break things while applied chemistry is going to always have the same result.

Farming isn't easy, see Africa after they kicked all the farmers. Maintaining certain industries are easy.

@@AnonymousAnonposter while true, your specific example’s failure is an example of what happens when anything has the people with expertise kicked out and replaced in the middle of doing the job and replaced by people without any training or info on what’s going on.

Yeah. I mean, nobody seems to wear leather either. To make basic leather, you skin an animal and beat its hide into submission with a club (or, alternatively, soak it in piss). I can see people not being able to figure out how to grow, harvest, spin and weave cotton, but I can't see people forget how to make leather.

@@AnonymousAnonposter Farmers are historically smarter than doctors. Farmers saw the empirical evidence that water helps crops to grow and used irrigation for a thousand years before the discovery of the Calvin Cycle. In the mid 19th century Dr Semmelweis presented empirical evidence showing that doctors washing their hands between patients led to a large decrease in the spread of disease. They didn't like his (admittedly wrong) explanation of why it worked and resumed killing patients until the invention of the microscope led to the discovery of germs.

Yeah. I wondered at the time why, after using volunteers for every other test up to that point (in order to avoid having to face the danger himself), he just threw caution to the wind and took a drink without having a volunteer test the Grail to see if it was the real one. I mean, isn't that why he shot Henry in the first place? So Indy would go, get the real thing, and bring it back to him there where Henry was and prove it was the Grail by using it to heal his father?

Kids are already doing it for their homework... ChatGPT is everywhere, and it gets dumber all the time (probably because more and more of what it feeds on is written by itself, allowing the flaws to procreate

You would be correct.

WhatCulture writers aren’t that bright, and they dont properly vet their scripts before making their videos. They also often have terrible opinions except for maybe Jules. But Josh and Simon are the mist egregious. WhatCulture is trying to do their best IGN impression.

I also always thought Nedry was being paid fine. In the argument over getting more, Hammond says, "I don't blame people for their mistakes, but I do ask that they pay for them" which seemed to me that Nedry did something in his personal life that now requires him to have more money and he is asking Hammond to fund it.

As a programmer, I totally buy that Nedry was hired for job A and then expected to do jobs A-Z. Given that his work is done on site, he was likely expected to work 16 hour days to compensate for what should have been a job for a dozen people. I’ve been there more than a couple times. Lastly, since Dr. Hammond says he spared no expense if there’s one thing we can be sure of, it’s that he was stingy as fuck. When a boss says “my door is always open” they don’t want to be bothered. When they say “I have years of experience with this type of problem,” they have literally no idea what they’re doing. People in upper management positions get there through mastery of perception - politics - not competence. It’s actually more telling of human nature that the charismatic rich guy is believed to be the good guy while the fat angry service person is assumed to be the bad guy. Hammond is absolutely responsible for the deaths of dozens of people, people were dying at the park long before Nedry screwed up - it’s literally the opening scene. Nedry was guilty of theft… so he’s the antagonist and when he dies we’re supposed to think he deserved it? 🤦‍♂️

The book makes it much more clear, and the movie does give hints that he was being cheap behind the scenes to afford luxury up front. However, the reasoning here makes it sound like Batman was created by his parents, because if his parents just hadn't been rich and worn those darned pearls, they never would have been mugged. In other words, I don't care what Nedry was being paid - he chose criminal activity, did it in a stupid way, and got people killed.

nope. uRiding solo on that one.

I totally agree with you. It seemed to me that the IT guy was trying to extort the old man. And nobody else said anything about being underpaid. All the time he was playing the victim. Anyway, underpaid or not, there was no reason for doing what he did. If the job was so bad (I don't think so) he could've just quit.

And she STILL was not happy. That was a great movie though.

I love a fan theory I saw, that Jareth was originally like Toby - a younger brother taken by the goblins due to a sister wishing for it. Main reason is he is the only human in that world. In a song number he shows his desire that Toby will become grow up to be Goblin King. Some even say that Jareth could be an alternate version of Toby, who was not rescued by Sarah (a bit of wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey) and raised to be Goblin King by 'Jareth' (he told Toby "I'll call you Jareth"). The theory also looks at Jareth's view of Sarah, her journey to save her brother, compared to his past and the abandonment by his own sister. But hey this is a fan theory. just adds spice to repeat viewings.

@@BMakabre This actually gets confirmed in some of the expanded universe books and manga. No one came for Jareth when he was taken so he was raised by the denizens of the Labyrinth and its surrounding areas

Yeah

You mean that they are taking it as an example?

I'm also surprised they forgot the awesome plot twist in "Gone With the Wind" when it turns out Rhett didn't give a damn (frankly) THE WHOLE TIME!!!

Was Nedry being underpaid or was he simply greedy?

@@dhenderson1810 Both. Nedry gave a low bid for the job, probably without being told exactly what sort of park it was, and when the amount of work involved got out of control (because Hammond wanted as much automation as possible), Hammond blamed him for it and wouldn’t pay him for the extra work. He also would have been tied into the contract and unable to get any other work to make up for it. So Nedry got angry and greedy enough to agree to steal the embryos for BioSyn. Hammonds cost avoidance is responsible for just about every weakness in the park, so when things go wrong, they do so spectacularly. Electric cars powered by fixed tracks....that don’t have locks on the doors? All the main fences powered by a single system? Minimal staff? The buck stops with Hammond.

Yeah I thought Nedry was being Greedy hence his line to Dogeson "Dont get cheap on me, that was Hammonds mistake"

@@LADYBUGS_MOVIE_REVIEWS I can't trust Nedry watching him now, because he is slimy like Newman. Hammond should clench his fist and say "Nedry".

@@dhenderson1810 oh yeah for sure. I'm not sure why Hammond Trusted him cos the red flags where there

See certain Africa nations after they kicked the farmers. People don't understand that agriculture is harder than it seems.

@@AnonymousAnonposter harder than than the fractionally distillation of oil?

It's a Batman poster. Not something Batman would have been around to paste up at the time, and why would he?

It's contradictive because it was made by a shitty director.

Yeah, that bit was a none-too-subtle nod to Batman, but it is not an explanation as to why this universe has no Batman (and no such explanation is needed - even if you make the assumption that every universe in the DC Multiverse must have a Batman, this one already does - Dan Dreiberg...he just uses a different name, which is not-uncommon for even explicit counterparts). Also, this scene is set a good 10 years too early for Batman to be a contemporary of the second generation of crime fighters, which would make inserting him pointless to begin with.

I actually didnt think of the Watchmen franchise as having anything to do with the DC universe. So, anything to tie to another comic series flew past me.

I’m shocked it was layer out here as a hidden plot point, when I watched it, I just assumed that was the truth because it seemed like the intention of the scene.

Same. I'm pretty dense but thats how I always understood the scene

@@TheTeejay00 yeah it wasn’t a plot twist, and it wasn’t subtle either. No one missed it.