I remember the lawsuit. It was hilarious to try and argue that such a generic pose could be copyright infringed. They wanted free marketing for their own indie comic

Probably only chance they had was if they could prove that that pose didn't exist prior to their comic cover being done, which would be near impossible.

The only way something like that has any hope is if it is the EXACT same pose. Tony's right hand is posed differently, his left knee is more prominent, and you get a better look at Tony's chest. Yes the two characters are posted in a similar fashion but the Iron Man 3 poster also isn't a blank white backgrond so there are plenty of other ways the poster is not at all similar to the comic cover.

Yup we are lazy and will do anything for an easy dollar and it's sad

Especially if medical costs are involved, because, well...

Yup. Hate to say it but the Dexter one the person was likely inebriated or otherwise not okay in the first place and thought "I can claim it scared me and that's what caused to me fall." **sigh**

7:02

Yeah that makes no sense when there's been more posters with issues

Whatculture literally said it was the Netflix and the American marketing that did the film wrong. The og French poster (because it's a French film) didn't feature that. It's clear you didn't even watch the movie because then formally a dance team isn't even the major part of the story. Also no one should get death threats for a film about their experiences as a child.

@@momo7989 OP is exactly what's wrong with people and the internet these days lmao

@@momo7989 I never said anything about the poster or death threats. The movie does clearly sexualize children.

@@ParabolicGains We found the guy that likes little girls.

@@ParabolicGains Yes, everyone can tell how young you like your girls.

Did you ever actually watch the movie. Or do you just believe everything that you read on the internet 💀

@meghanmmagicss2876 The plot doesn't matter in the least. The fact remains that they dressed tweens in outfits meant to sexualize while doing dances meant for adults. Saw plenty of that in its clips and advertisements. Any at all is to much. When making movies about bad things you don't actually do the bad thing, you pretend. Cuties did the bad thing, they didn't pretend.

...that's not what's happening. The artist owns the tattoo DESIGN as it's an original art work. He doesn't want the design that he created used.

Not how copyright works. Artists own the creative product of their efforts unless there's a specific contract that says otherwise - in this case, the design of the tattoo. Same for photographers. It's why celebs like Gigi Hadid and Dua Lipa keep getting sued (and settling because they'll lose in court) when they use someone's photograph of them for social media promotion. Unless there's a contract in place beforehand that says something is work for hire, Photographers automatically own the copyright of every photograph they've ever taken, graphic designers own every design they've ever made, artists every sketch and design, musicians every composition, authors everything they've written, etc., etc.

​@@RLplusabunchofdumbnumbers So say a tattoo artist does a generic flower tattoo, for example, can they claim it as theirs, even though there are plenty of those around.

​@@RLplusabunchofdumbnumbersYou have to file an actual patent or copyright on your design. It can't be just implied, or else people can claim anything. You say musicians for their songs, but they have an actual contract which says that. Unless the tattoo artist has a piece of paper that says that it is their original design, then it is free use. What about when a tattoo artist is asked by a client to tattoo on them someone else's design. Can that artist sue another tattoo artist for using their design? What's good for the goose.... I mean, that tattoo in "Hangover 2" is just a bunch of lines. Nothing original about it. The photo thing is crap. Anyone can take a photo. If anything, Dua Lipa could sue the photographer for using her "image and likeness".

@@RLplusabunchofdumbnumbers so you agree that someone can photograph you and sell it but not inform or pay you for that?

He's English. The eighth letter of his alphabet is "haitch", he stresses the first syllable of garage, and won't let the T in fillet be silent.

@@user-mg5mv2tn8q So the issue is he speaks the language as it was originally created(barring some modern adjustments) rather than the short form americanised version?

​@@thornofsociety6857actually it's believed that the main American accent is more similar to the way people spoke in England a few hundred years ago. Apparently after people migrated to America they kept speaking roughly the same way while the pronunciation evolved more in England.

Somehow I don't remember the others twerking .

Yeah how dare they protect the things they make. Disgusting. 😂

Maybe they feel entitled because they are

How would you feel if you made a piece of art and a multi billion dollar company copied your work, and didn't pay you? And somehow, they always get away with it. James Cameron got away with ripping off Roger Dean too.

​@@ringringbananarchyDo you have a patent or copyright? Unless you do, it is in the free market.

@@dhenderson1810 Most comics are copyrighted art, yes.

“I have never watched it and will never do it” all ur saying is you fall for propaganda and don’t do your own research

"MsheU" really. If you have seen "She Hulk: Attorney at Law" you would probably know that Bruce Banner shows up, fully alive and well in the very first episode.

Bruce Banner is still alive, did you know. It's in the literally the first episode of "She-Hulk".

Why do people refer to it as the MsheU? There are still way more male characters than female characters, and even if there weren't, there's nothing wrong with female superheroes. I mean, I get that you prefer to look at men in skin-tight spandex with their bulging muscles, and that's fine, but calling the entire franchise a dumpster fire just because there's less male eye-candy for you to ogle isn't really fair.