They don't always get away with it though! Check out 10 Times the BBC was Forced to Apologise kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hsWga7B4z5OueI0.html

What do you mean it was corrupt I think you mean IT IS corrupt

Would be harder to find 10 times the BBC wasn't corrupt.

At university, the BBC came in to do a talk for us. This was during Johnson's popularity rise. The talk was so clearly interwoven with propaganda that about 15 minutes in, the room emptied out and the guy that came in was forced to stop the talk as there was no longer an audience there to listen...

I feel like its "upper classes" segment that is actually the biggest problem and allowing these things to happen, or the ones that are trying to to get away with it.

To anyone who suggests the BBC isn't corrupt, I'd like to say "'ow's about that, then, guys and girls?"

You're gonna need a longer list WatchMojo. Not even a top 1000 can cover it.

This could probably be an annual video from you guys

The 'Yes' Campaign was the PRO independence one in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum. You have it the wrong way round. The BBC was biased in favour of the 'No' campaign.

Only 10 times? I can think of thousands!

This needs to be a top 1000 video

A better list would be "10 Times the BBC WASN'T corrupt" although you may struggle to find 10

I got rid of my TV license years ago, do I regret it? Fuck no

How do you explain to people that they've been lied to and gaslit their whole life? (which influences policy) This is a great start thank you! 🙏🏽

Pretty good but you missed Brexit. The almost complete failure to report on anti-brexit demonstrations and the heavy bias of Question Time audience selection etc.

Wow thank you for mentioning the BBC's treatment of the Scottish referendum. As a Scot this was the very thing I thought about (Lineker aside) when I saw the title of your video but I presumed, as usual that it wouldn't get a mention.

Next you have to do sky news as the way that reporter who was offended what mick lynch said to her and we know its the truth

Something tells me that WatchMojoUK need to make a series on this. As an Aussie reading the comments, something tells me that this is simply a tip of the very tip of an iceberg.

I opted out of the TV licence 3 years ago. Because there's nothing on TV worth watching.

I stopped paying for my TV licence 3 years ago. £480 better off so far and never looked back.

You must have only been able to fit 10 into a video instead of the probably 20 plus. Still really the channel. Very fun to watch.

I thought that we had bad when it comes to corruption (I'm an American).

I don't buy a license, I don't watch the BBC.

My smart TV isn't even connected to the internet. It's used as a display panel for my PC. I don't watch any live TV. Anything worth watching can be downloaded from torrent sites, ad free and available to watch at my leisure. I don't need a TV license and I will never get one. The BBC is a commercial company. If you think that they are funded only by license fees, think again. Product placement, BBC worldwide... And... Full ownership and control of the multi channel broadcaster UKTV.

Is this going to be a multi-part series?

To be fair the win for staying in the UK wasn't that narrow ( around 10%)

I won’t forgive them for the way they badly treated Christopher Eccleston.

9:09 I’m curious as to why johnson needed nearly a million quid. For what?

IMHO finding ten times the BBC was not biased would perhaps be easier!

The license fee is going up 13% next year. Worth it ?

*Jimmy Savile died in 2011, not 2012. The scandal did break in 2012 though.

such a fitting video from you guys

The biggest problem the BBC has now is most young people today get their media content via mobile devices rather than television. Whether it's through social media or commercial news channels that 24/7 live stream on KZfaq or streaming services for films like Netflix and Amazon. This is the new way that people (mostly the younger generation) consume their content, so we're getting to a point where the TV license funding for the BBC is starting to out live its usefulness.

And they are going to raise the TV license next year ...unbelievable

Many have forgotten the shocking incident on Noel Edmond's Late Late Breakfast Show from 1987

A friend passed recently and an elegy was read quoting Acts, "and saw corruption l". Sums it up

Well, I haven't paid the licence for a year now in protest of this.

Only ten? I can think of hundreds.

i dont watch live TV so i dont have to pay, however i would watch other channels if i didnt have to pay the BBC tax. With reguard to the bbc being corrupt i thank you for keeping the list short.

Just 10 times??

They also make poor decisions on their channels, including the idea of sacking BBC Four and CBBC, moving Three online only to regret that soon after and now, they are planning to reverse that again but this time, bring One and Two down as well.

I have a feeling this may have been influenced by recent going ons with a big eared crisp seller and his suspension. First time in his career he was sent off as well. The BBC isn't impartial and hasn't been since 2017

This is so weird and so unAmerican that a channel dedicated to entertainment like celebrities, tv shows and movies has made a video about the BBC and the British news, politics, economy and social issues. Apparently, news and current affairs are now entertainment?!

Almost Mojo.

Ahhhhhh inflation ‘only’ at 5%. What a time to be alive!!!!

don't pay tv license

I can only comment on my friends behalf here, but remember when the BBC and other news outlets were on about HGV driver shortages? my friend was the first to get on a training course, after he passed his class 2 he found there was no work around, subbing out work and the class 1 HGV drivers he spoke to also find work to be scares with lower pay than before, now with all these new qualified drivers, companies can easily lower hourly rates, tell newer drivers that they need more experience on the road for insurance means and reduce everyone's pay because of it. I'm going to stop watching the BBC and cancel my TV license because they read statements from the rich and wealthy and influence everyone to benefit them

A tip for you watchmojo... if you want to get a message across clearly, DONT smother it in near-incessant annoying background music

Only ten?!? 😂

You got your Yes and No campaigns mixed up mate, YES was for indy and NO was against.

You could probably find another 8 just this week

Yes its out there now and people are switching off i haven't believed a word the BBC news utters for years😊

That’s funny about them being impartial

Just ten ? The Jimmy saville lovers will cover up anything to make money....

What happened to Gary linekers 1930s Germany tweet

They certainly do undestand how we live and don't give a shit...!!!

To quote Grogu... "yuup."

Love how the Commentator says 'Tell us in the comments if you pay your TV License' Good luck....

Whoever creates the debt must provide the remedy. Maxim in law. If the BBC hasn't sent a bill to you there is no debt. If they have sent an invoice then accept it for value and return it for settlement.

What about not covering the March in London Protests on Friday????

I’m amazed their still around, with all the corruptions

Its why I dont pay my licence

Is that all or is it just the tame ones you have put in

only 10? you could make 100 parts to this video then

No I don't have a TV licence it says nothing to me about my life

Think you got ‘No’ and ‘Tes’ mixed up there. The ‘No’ complain was unionist.

With reference to the Independence Campaign the No Campaign was the pro-Unionist campaign, the Yes campaign supported an Independent Scotland

How did you guys keep it down to 10 ?

Only 10 you can come up with more than that

BBC is not what it used to be

Now do the same with other broadcasters.

So why are you taking the opportunity to criticize old media so harshly when you are a company, or so called new media. It doesn't take a genius to figure this out, I think you're just taking advantage of the algorithm and happenings with that football guy right now to sway public opinion in your favor, in a somewhat corrupt way yourselves. Sit down!

BBC Asian Network and Cliff Richard?

The BAE BAE CAE

Never paid it in my life when the license man comes to the door he just says he will give me a letter saying he called but I wasn't in what does he care everyone paid it he'd be out a job

They missed a couple of naughts

This is pretty ridiculous. I don't think any of those has been proven (though I accept some look very dodgy indeed), and some of them, even if true, wouldn't be classed as 'corrupt'.

You could make multiple top 10 vids on how they're corrupt starting with TV licence which I've never paid for

I haven't watched TV in over a decade...

Its always it is including the weather

Tory Laura is a classic example.

swap the word WAS to IS and you have the correct title.

Anyone still paying the BBC licence tax are part of the problem.

I'm not sure the BBC has ever "parroted" the Govt.

I'm going to go ahead and assume that the only reason you haven't produced a corresponding '10 times the BBC wasn't corrupt' video to counter this one, is because you couldn't find a total of 10 times the BBC wasn't corrupt.

I don’t think that the 2014 referendum was won by a small margin. 10% in favour of the union is not a small large margin it’s a large one.

Many of these points are opinions, not factual, and the worst thing you're illustrating in most of them is bias. Bias is just bias - to be corruption, there needs to be personal or financial gain earned because of that bias.

You only had 10???!!

Interesting. That's the issue with having state TV. They were never going to get away with criticising Prime Ministers without severe consequences for the organisation. So they went the other way. But as for the Conservative "Islamophobia". I'd imagine many Muslims actually share similar conservative views regarding maintaining the traditional family unit. It isn't that simple. Firstly, there are people who dislike most Muslims because of the colour of their skin - that is racism and should always be rooted out. But if there is such a thing as Islamophobia, it would mean that a person has an irrational fear of Islam, which would not be their fault anymore than having an irrational fear of spiders is the person with arachnaphobia's fault. I don't know anyone who has an irrational fear of Islam. But I have seen racism of course. The "phobia" part is a red herring designed to deflect from the real issues, just like with trans people. As for anti-semitism within the Labour party - they aren't stupid. They know that there aren't that many Jewish people in the UK compared to Muslims, so which vote do you go after? The Muslim vote of course, despite Labour being responsible for the barbaric bombing of two predominantly Muslim countries. And for what? How is Iraq doing today? How about Afghanistan being under Taliban control again? So many lives lost and for nothing. But to revert back to point, the BBC needs to compete on a level playing field with other channels. Either they charge a monthly subscription fee or allow advertising. No longer should people HAVE to fund them or possibly face prison, whether they watch the BBC or not. It's an absurd state of affairs which cannot continue as it gives the BBC a HUGE competitive advantage. FWIW I do pay my TV licence as their output is still decent but I do tire of Gary Lineker's wokeness and virtue-signalling when he was only a footballer, not a political science graduate. He needs to stay in his lane. You don't see me talking about astrophysics as I know nothing about the subject. Gary might want to stick to football, rather than horribly comparing Rishi Sunak to Hitler. The UK has its problems but everytime a country is compared to 1930s Nazi Germany, it only cheapens what Hitler did. Whether you like Sunak or not, he is nowhere close to being Hitler (Hitler would have killed him!). THAT is why Lineker should refrain from political comment as he lacks the historical knowledge to draw even the most basic comparison.

I don't have a TV licence, the main reason being I don't agree with the outdated concept.

This was a weird self contradictory list. BBC should not "parrot" anonymous govt. sources? How then would the public later know that these claims were made by public officials, but were untrue? Of course the journalist isn't "beyond reproach". If it's shown that he/she lied about the existence of anonymous sources, the journalist would loose both integrity, job and career. Journalists do reveal anonymous sources to their editor(s) if needed, who then contact and confirm the sources. BBC should reflect the majority-meaning on different matters? So, not just the facts then? Or only unbiased reporting? The vast majority of journalists work in local publications or channels... it's news to me that they are upper class. In more or less every country in the world, the major news-outlets are focused on the capital. That is ordinarily the political and financial centre of a nation, where the most important decisions with regards to the entire country is made. Daily. The people living in smaller cities and towns often get more local news than people living in and around the capital, as their news media focus more on local matters than the smaller outlets around the capital. According to the narrator, BBC should be unbiased. Just not in scientific questions. Well actually, on *some* scientific matters both sides should be heard, but apparently not in all cases after all (has anyone seen an increase of flat-earthers presenting their views on BBC lately?) - but the BBC should no matter what always be unbiased in questioning political affairs, like the Scottish referendum for instance, not the Tory Islamofobia though... Look through newspapers during every single political administration, and you will find that the press will always be questioning, and at times in conflict with, the ruling party. That being Thatcher or any other politician who wants to make changes that will interfere with the lives of many. If not, the press would hear they weren't critical enough, and rightfully so. She was, by the way, neither the first or last Prime minister called out for being a war monger. Just ask Tony. No, most journalists don't know the intricacy of financial services or politics. Just like most of them don't have a background as a pro footballer. The presenter shown on the screen reading the financial news, probably is a journalist. But there and then he is acting as a news anchor reading for instance official press releases and the work of other staff members. He is not there as a specialist whatsoever. That is also why larger news outlets hire experts in different fields, on for instance medical, financial, historical, military, extra terrestrial, scientific, etc. etc. matters. Which also is criticised. I don't know enough about the Jimmy Saville story yet, but if half of what I've been told so far is true, it will always be a stain on BBC's reputation. Deservedly so.

Top 10 times the BBC reported fake news next?

Only the BBC??? Oh please!!! Sounds like someone has a personal vendetta against the BBC. Smdh

ONLY 10???????

Didn't expect watchmojo to make a video about BBC partiality

You need an update

Only 10😆

Only one government did more damage than this one. Thatchers!

If the bbc wasn't unbiased there would have never been a need for Tommy Robinson. Not telling the truth because of political facism(correctness) is madness.

I think the BBC's overt anti-American attitude deserves a placement somewhere in the top 5 of this ranking.