100 MPG, High Mileage Carburetor

Рет қаралды 3,753

2 жыл бұрын

Vintage 1980 news video on high mileage carburetor. 100 miles per gallon was possible in 1980!
#vintagetv #retronews #100mpg
Fun Time
/ @gossamer1234
My Blog
thewayiremember.blogspot.com/

Пікірлер: 10

@travismoore7849 9 ай бұрын

Get a sheet of metal wrap it up like a wick of carbon fiber. Have that sick up and out around the T joint of a pipe like the bottom of a T joint in a jar you have fuel. It wicks up to the top of the gasoline wick. Then air is sucked over the wick to make gas vapors to run the car. It draws about as much vapors as the throttle will allow. A spark arrester is just a fin mesh screen on two ends of a pipe stuff with some loose steel mesh like a scrubbing pad. Anyway that was just an idea.

@martinauriemma2518 10 ай бұрын

Lol the safety PSA at the end is some impressive con artist bullshit

@gregsteele9002 2 ай бұрын

Shell USA management fingers typed this comment

@keithc8108 10 ай бұрын

Does it cause any damage to the engine?

@discozula4469 8 ай бұрын

possible valve deposits as you´re running on fumes, you might go through spark plugs faster, the engine needs to be even more well oiled because petrol works as a lubricant in the valve stem. Other than that a carburated engine isnt that nuanced to be harmed by a highmileage carb.

@evoman44 Ай бұрын

@@discozula4469I think that could be prevented by setting up the system to introduce liquid gas at almost full throttle. At least that will keep things a little cleaner and lubricated.

@gregbaniak9650 Жыл бұрын

WHAT ABOUT THERMODYMICS LAW.....You cannot cheat those....

@cronicjohnson 10 ай бұрын

Yeah but it was just some dude that made that law humans are wrong like a lot of the time

@martinauriemma2518 10 ай бұрын

lol thats rich@@cronicjohnson

@thisstupid757 2 ай бұрын

Correct, we can’t currently but it doesn’t mean that it’s not just undiscovered science as to how we could. Idk if this high mileage carburetor does break those laws or just gets extreme efficiency out of the gas I’d have to understand it better