100% of Math Students MUST know this to PASS Algebra

  Рет қаралды 272,874

TabletClass Math

TabletClass Math

2 жыл бұрын

TabletClass Math:
tcmathacademy.com/
Math help with factoring in algebra and how important it is for students to know factoring to pass algebra. For more math help to include math lessons, practice problems and math tutorials check out my full math help program at tcmathacademy.com/
Math Notes:
Pre-Algebra Notes: tabletclass-math.creator-spri...
Algebra Notes: tabletclass-math.creator-spri...
Geometry Notes: tabletclass-math.creator-spri...
Algebra 2 / Trig Notes: tabletclass-math.creator-spri...

Пікірлер: 309
@nsn5564
@nsn5564 2 жыл бұрын
Actual solution starts at 11:01. A lot of rambling and unnecessary talking. I don't know if it's to make the video long or what, but it made the video difficult to watch. I suggest writing a script that's tight, to the point, and moving the ad to a written sceren you flash in the beginning.
@frooqy
@frooqy 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@ZeroSleap
@ZeroSleap 2 жыл бұрын
Zoomer ADHD detected.No communication needed,fast information only.
@whatd0605
@whatd0605 2 жыл бұрын
@@ZeroSleap Well yeah that's sort of the reason people are here. They want to learn math, not hear this guy's life story about how he was a teacher and that stuff. It's great that he's a teacher and has so much experience, but this isn't the best place to share that.
@joe-ib1wn
@joe-ib1wn 2 жыл бұрын
@@ZeroSleap -👴
@mygreatbigfoot1679
@mygreatbigfoot1679 2 жыл бұрын
And even then i land on the KZfaq ads. I already watched some before he started his interminable smug rambling and preening and begging for money.
@mylittlepitbull3143
@mylittlepitbull3143 8 ай бұрын
I graduated high school 1979 97th percentile in the nation in math. Over the years, I've become incredibly stupid so this is helping me sharpen my skills and I must be getting it back, cuz I did the problem in my head in about 20 seconds.
@Grisusan
@Grisusan 5 ай бұрын
One thing I want to add, is that for us in Europe, if there is an unknown in the denominator, we always had to note down that the denominator cannot be zero, so in this case it would be noted that x cannot be 1/2 and -(1/2). It was part of the solution for us , but this could be due to regional differences.
@panagdimi
@panagdimi Ай бұрын
Math is not regional but UNIVERSAL. Of course the "Americlans" always beg to differ. By the way these videos are unwatchable. I wonder why?! 🤔👎
@thomasmaughan4798
@thomasmaughan4798 Ай бұрын
@@panagdimi "the Americlans always beg to differ." No begging needed. Americans are different.
@philplante6524
@philplante6524 9 ай бұрын
The domain is all x except x = -1/2 AND x = 1/2. Even though the factor (2x-1) was factored out, it was part of the denominator of the original expression.
@tumunu
@tumunu 8 ай бұрын
Thank you for bringing this up, I just got here and I consider the given answer to be wrong due to this. If the constraints are stated (x != 1/2, -1/2) then it's ok.
@user-qm6de1wr8m
@user-qm6de1wr8m 5 ай бұрын
I'll be retiring from work soon after having worked in Commnuication Engineering Field. I find your step by step teachning method absolutely great which will definitely inspire many of math scholars and help them enjoying mathematics.Thanks a lot for that and keep it up!
@MichaelFenley
@MichaelFenley 2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the related examples. You never skip a step and we gain from your proper step by step teaching.
@davidweinrich5135
@davidweinrich5135 8 ай бұрын
Extremely important to be able to simplify any mathematical expression! Must have these procedures committed to memory and down cold...99.9% of tests are timed and one is not going to have all day to putz around on any one problem. Very practical stuff here for sure.
@liviemillie6455
@liviemillie6455 Жыл бұрын
It would be so cool if sometime you could do test prep videos related to CLT math, or unrelated, videos for those struggling with dyscalculia which is a learning disability that affects how you process numbers (not logic). Wonderful videos! You are a lifesaver. I was homeschooled but never learned more than arithmetic, and I took some years away to work. Now I'm going into college and have to learn higher math, but I'm terrified of it, and I really appreciate how you break it down and clarify each concept. Kudos and thank you!!
@tonytor5346
@tonytor5346 2 ай бұрын
Math ruined my life! I wanted to be an airline pilot. For that, back then in the 70’s we had pretty much first have a BS in engineering. I could barely follow algebra 1, did pretty well in geometry. Advanced algebra was a disaster. I went into physiology. Had to take calculus I & 2 for pre-med. I hired a tutor . The first quit, saying I was “unable to understand math” . The second was a post grad working on a PhD in physics. He came to the same conclusion, but he gave me hope. “ for calculus 1 you will have to use one of these 10 formulas and he listed them. Now we are going to work on the wording of the problems, so you will know which formula to use! So, he would write 20 problems and I had to find which formula I should use, and what number went where in the integral calculation. It was like memorizing a script for a play, or poetry, and then quickly recognize which formula I had to use and I wold get an A! I got A in both calculus 1 & 2 without understanding why or how that formula was the right one. I felt cheated by nature! I breezed through the rest of the courses, advanced biology, Chemistry, biochemistry microbiology, anatomy and others. I passed the MCAT and breezed through medical school and graduated Suma Cum Laude, with the second highest GPA á for my medical school class. Now, at the age of 70, having taught in Ivy league medical school, authored over 50 articles in peer reviewed journals as well of being Editor and associate editor of several well known textbooks besides some authors who were Nobel prize laureates, there is only one thing I was never been able to master: ALGEBRA AND CALCULUS! I remember driving my algebra teachers to near madness or despair. They would write a complicated advanced algebra equation on the board, do the obvious simplifications which I understood. Then he would say, “Now we are stuck, let’s think what we can do: lets multiply by 5”. That drew a complete blank in my reasoning! I would ask “why 5? Why not Planks constant? Why not Newton’s gravitational constant of the universe? “ He would look at me as if I was from another planet. “Watch and you will see”. I did watch and to me there was no logic as to why he had picked “5” to multiply. I waited out of respect till he finished the equation, and he would ask me: “now go you see why I di what I did?” I looked at him and would say, I am more confused now than when you multiplied it by 5” Where did you get 5 from? Are you psychic? Did this number just came to you as a Divine revelation?” I would stay after class & Mr McCartney tried to show me how and why he came with these “spontaneous solutions” I kind of understood how he would chose a random number, but it still did not make sense… That’s when I got a tutor. I squeaked by in his class, but in Calculus, it made absolutely no sense to me. Tutors saved my life and I owe them my achievements in Medicine, being an internationally known expert, and having been invited to conferences all over the world. I am now seriously thinking going back all the way to simple fractions and learn calculus before I die! I speak 4 languages, am a quasi-genius in electronics, I love to read quantum physics until it comes to math. I skip that part! So I still have a dream to be a pilot. I am building a full size cockpit of a Boeing 767, on a Thompson platform using electric actuators. Using geometry I can calculate how much 2 actuator have to go down when I am making a descending turn to the left or right.. That makes sense and the formulas come to me naturally. Including the turning rate or an endless screw to match the opposing actuator pushing upward at a different angle. Lot of trial and errors even using math, but aí manage to get it done. Any advice for an old doctor who sucked at math all his life?
@garymurawski1476
@garymurawski1476 Ай бұрын
thats a great story. I would guess your continued patience will keep you afloat. @@tonytor5346
@juliusshakari5457
@juliusshakari5457 4 ай бұрын
Thanks for the refresher…. I’m having a ton of fun with your videos
@danitajminer3279
@danitajminer3279 8 ай бұрын
9:51 - 13:09 problem solving begins / ends.
@UpInSmoke54
@UpInSmoke54 7 ай бұрын
Thank you!! He talks too much!!!!!
@YAWTon
@YAWTon 4 күн бұрын
Hint, skip to 9:51, then mute sound and play in double speed...
@billweck3883
@billweck3883 12 күн бұрын
thanks for the factoring emphasis, truly tough to see easily. Must practice that one.
@regisbrasil4082
@regisbrasil4082 2 жыл бұрын
I'm an engineer and I've been reviewing this material lately. Math is amazing. Good video. Keep it up.
@henkhu100
@henkhu100 Жыл бұрын
But be aware of the many errors, see my comment.
@user-rt8vm3gm7w
@user-rt8vm3gm7w 6 ай бұрын
Great speech to the kids. Thanks for understanding
@isaacmunroe9159
@isaacmunroe9159 2 жыл бұрын
You mix teaching algebra with history and practical advice so well 👏 👌
@henkhu100
@henkhu100 Жыл бұрын
And with errors, again and again
@abeonthehill166
@abeonthehill166 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing ……..you make it look so easy Man !
@MYfriendsknow
@MYfriendsknow 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome - Thank you
@evanj3535
@evanj3535 2 жыл бұрын
If you know how to factor the difference of two squares, it is simple. You get (2x+1)(2x-1), and it is obvious which of those is a factor of the numerator.
@alfajuj
@alfajuj Ай бұрын
If you don't know how to factor the difference of two squares, then it is impossible.
@ronalda.saname396
@ronalda.saname396 2 жыл бұрын
Will you have a video on Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations, and Linear Algebra?
@MrPaulc222
@MrPaulc222 8 ай бұрын
Thank you. The maths is sound, but I do find so much extraneous chatter to be a distraction. I'm sure it must work for many though.
@panlomito
@panlomito 2 ай бұрын
First you will have to recognize the factors in the denominator: a² - b² = (a-b).(a+b) In this case (2x)² - (1)² = (2x - 1) . (2x + 1) And realize that the numerator can be written as 8x - 4 = 4.(2x-1) Which results in 4.(2x -1) / (2x - 1).(2x+1) = 4 / (2x+1)
@peterscheldeman2977
@peterscheldeman2977 2 жыл бұрын
this video is 4 times longer than it needed to be, and even then it fails to be complete : of course you can only eliminate the common factors 2x-1, with the assumtion that x is not 1/2 !!
@MFM230
@MFM230 2 жыл бұрын
I am no expert in math, but I believe it is with the assumption that x is not 1/2 nor -1/2.
@tmjcbs
@tmjcbs 2 жыл бұрын
@@MFM230 I see that assumption nowhere explicitly...
@MFM230
@MFM230 2 жыл бұрын
@@tmjcbs 4x squared -1 = (2x+1) (2x-1) as a denominator. Even though the (2x-1) cancel out each other in the numerator and denominator, the solution cannot equal zero because it would result in a zero denominator. Hence, you have to solve both (2x+1) and (2x-1) for zero so as to avoid a zero denominator. It is permissible to cancel the terms as long as the solution is not zero. If there is a math teacher out there, I would like her/him to check my reasoning.
@tmjcbs
@tmjcbs 2 жыл бұрын
@@MFM230 I happen to be a math teacher, your reasoning is right. I can only repeat my earlier comment: in the video that assumption is made nowhere...
@MFM230
@MFM230 2 жыл бұрын
@@tmjcbs Thanks for checking my math.
@bjornbjornson9359
@bjornbjornson9359 7 ай бұрын
4(2x-1)/(2×-1)(2×+1)=4/(2x+1)
@boylevalerie
@boylevalerie 9 ай бұрын
You’re an excellent teacher, John! Thank you!
@pentameteriamb6196
@pentameteriamb6196 Жыл бұрын
Math is the purest, most powerful science of all. Go Math! :-)
@liviemillie6455
@liviemillie6455 Жыл бұрын
The fact that this comment is from someone with your username is nice hehe
@brianmontgomery1619
@brianmontgomery1619 6 ай бұрын
I'm an engineer and I can honestly say that I haven't done any factoring in a looooong time. I did get the 80's Mohawk though. Appropriate because I took algebra 1 in 1985. I'm watching your videos to help me remember so I can help with my grandkids. Thanks.
@harrymatabal8448
@harrymatabal8448 6 ай бұрын
You are absolutely correct Devon wilson
@MatthewsLetsie-gv2ef
@MatthewsLetsie-gv2ef 5 ай бұрын
😂Your teaching technic is brilliant. I love your sense of humor.
@orangebetsy
@orangebetsy Жыл бұрын
Would it be correct to say that with 4/2x+1 nothing can be done with the 4 and the 2, such as reducing it to 2 and 1, because the 2 is actually wrapped up with a quantity x and that product + 5 so it's not really 4?
@alfajuj
@alfajuj Ай бұрын
If you didn't know how to factor, and you just start plugging in numbers, you would see that the numerator is always 4 and the denominator is 2x + 1. ie. plug in 1 and you get 4/3, plug in 2 and you get 4/5, plug in 3 and you get 4/7, plug in 4 and you get 4/9 ,etc.
@thomasmaughan4798
@thomasmaughan4798 Ай бұрын
The task is to *simplify* not to solve for X. Since it is not an equation, there cannot be a solution for x.
@rhatid
@rhatid 2 ай бұрын
Very good video 👌
@Lnxtc_
@Lnxtc_ Жыл бұрын
My teacher in grade 6 doesnt teach us and let the top 1 student teach us. So ur vids help me very much
@stevenjohnson1143
@stevenjohnson1143 Ай бұрын
Breaking this down we 4(2x-1) on the top and (2x+1)(2x-1) in the bottom canceling the (2x-1) leaves 4 over 2x+1
@the_moist
@the_moist 2 жыл бұрын
For problems with standard form, is there any shortcut to find their slope, without taking the time to isolate y?
@notatottenhamfan9678
@notatottenhamfan9678 2 жыл бұрын
Slope = -x/y when written in standard form
@johnspence8141
@johnspence8141 2 жыл бұрын
(-1) * the coefficient in front of x divided by coefficient in front of y. So if its ax+by=c, m= -a/b. Examples 3x+4y=6, m = -3/4. -2x+4y = 3, m = +2/4 = 1/2
@laminobaituray7971
@laminobaituray7971 5 ай бұрын
I'm from Sierra Leone, how am i getting your link
@vadim64841
@vadim64841 2 жыл бұрын
Skip to 10:54
@camiblutube7116
@camiblutube7116 9 ай бұрын
Thank you!!!
@bobgade6733
@bobgade6733 2 жыл бұрын
4x^2-1~>8x-1
@alanhurdle3949
@alanhurdle3949 8 ай бұрын
I do like your videos at end I am close to catching on. I am looking for certain approaches to the equation like a like a directory of a search engine in computers and programming you call that bool low wattage serge lines that turn on and off in sequence of patterns formed in rows how do I know all that oh ya I read it, I looking for algorithms like that law falls under squares write out table use your forty-five degrees and count in have visual only in my head we do up and back down to 25, 16, 9, 4,2, One ×itself is one your deminson box all ones square begin, the power of 2 second deminsion that where the law now I just got lost again but that is one I trying to like to algorithm to do algebra. That you for the Bush up it really appreciated Alan Jr Hurdle
@danitajminer3279
@danitajminer3279 8 ай бұрын
I love the channel 😁
@martyl1313
@martyl1313 8 ай бұрын
You can simplify it as long as 2x-1 is not equal to zero
@tomtke7351
@tomtke7351 2 жыл бұрын
There certainly are a bunch of petty complaints and comments herein. I wonder why as this guy is good. Solving math is resolving an equation or reducing to the simplist form.
@harrymatabal8448
@harrymatabal8448 Ай бұрын
That's your point. The complaints are not petty. They come from intelligent maths students. Why is your backside burning
@davidcummings5984
@davidcummings5984 7 ай бұрын
I cant believe someone moans about digression ..your a good tutor .....unbelievable
@user-cw9qn1nb2n
@user-cw9qn1nb2n 5 ай бұрын
I left school nearly 60 years ago, and have never in my working life been given an algebra problem to solve, to make something work properly. This seems to me to be math for the sake of it, with no practical application. Am I wrong?
@Nikioko
@Nikioko 8 ай бұрын
Depends on the value of x. If x = 1, then (8x - 4) / (4x² - 1) = 4/3 If x = 0, then (8x - 4) / (4x² - 1) = 4 etc.
@IRanOutOfPhrases
@IRanOutOfPhrases 8 ай бұрын
The challenge is to simplify. Not input values for x to see what it produces
@Nikioko
@Nikioko 8 ай бұрын
@@IRanOutOfPhrases Just that? Well, if you apply the third binomial formula on 4x² - 1, you get (2x + 1) ⋅ (2x - 1). And (8x - 4) / (2x - 1) cancels out to 4. Therefore, you get 4 / (2x + 1) as a simplified term. But you should mention in the task what you want from me.
@IRanOutOfPhrases
@IRanOutOfPhrases 8 ай бұрын
@@Nikioko He does that at the 0:17 mark
@GarrettH1
@GarrettH1 Жыл бұрын
How many topics in algebra do your notes cover?
@nfpnone8248
@nfpnone8248 6 ай бұрын
What does it equal, it has to equal something to solve it, you can’t assume it equals zero. If you just simplify as you suggest you get 4/(2x + 1).
@user-vx4lb8rj8r
@user-vx4lb8rj8r Ай бұрын
exactly. it wasn't asked to be solved it was just asked to be simplified.
@kurtsalm2155
@kurtsalm2155 2 жыл бұрын
Very reasonable prices for courses and notes!
@henkhu100
@henkhu100 Жыл бұрын
But be aware of the many many errors you will get for these reasonable prices. In many, many of his videos he makes errors and teach the wrong things. See also my comment on this video. Even the demo on his commercial website contains errors!
@femaleKCRoyalsFan
@femaleKCRoyalsFan 12 күн бұрын
I don't remember this type of problem in my algebra classes. I graduated high school in 1997
@LilacTheSkully
@LilacTheSkully 2 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: in 5th grade i really struggle to this day to do multiplication and spelling and almost failed 6th and 7th grade but 8th grade I really stepped up my game and tried harder being I need these skills to understand things future wise so im trying to learn the most i can even though im not a fan or studying im making notes
@seibertmccormick184
@seibertmccormick184 Ай бұрын
I got it. But I wasn't sure I was done until I watched the video.
@victorsinsights5451
@victorsinsights5451 2 жыл бұрын
Your digression is always too much, makes me lose interest in the main thing. Learn to be direct and face what you have set out to do.
@kkartha
@kkartha 2 жыл бұрын
True.
@laurendoe168
@laurendoe168 2 жыл бұрын
FYI - it's "lose interest". "Loose" rhymes with "goose", "moose", and "noose". "Lose" rhymes with "shoes."
@pittyconor2489
@pittyconor2489 2 жыл бұрын
@@laurendoe168 all of them rhyme
@richrichards3631
@richrichards3631 2 жыл бұрын
I'm totally in disagreement. His explanation is great 👍
@laurendoe168
@laurendoe168 2 жыл бұрын
@@pittyconor2489 yes, that's my point. "Loose" does not rhyme with "shoes". "Loose" means "not tight". "Lose" means "unable to locate"
@lisahamilton9105
@lisahamilton9105 5 ай бұрын
can you help me with the hiset math on the ged.
@Towl35
@Towl35 2 жыл бұрын
Could you have said... 2/(x + ½) ?
@laurendoe168
@laurendoe168 2 жыл бұрын
yes... but fractions within a fraction are typically avoided
@DayanandPandey-ns5qc
@DayanandPandey-ns5qc 2 ай бұрын
4/2X+1
@knutholt3486
@knutholt3486 3 ай бұрын
If you know the so-called third quadratic rule, you could do this in your head with some concentration. If not you will need some more thinking and papr work , but undertstanding factoring, you still would figure it out, at least if the school has not dislearned you from using logical thinking, which the schools for the masses do with purpose to hinder ordinary people from social climbing.
@Loonypapa
@Loonypapa 5 ай бұрын
4/(2x+1). 14 seconds. In my head.
@lookingforahookup
@lookingforahookup 6 ай бұрын
4/(2x+1)
@laurendoe168
@laurendoe168 2 жыл бұрын
I did in under a minute what this video took almost 11 minutes to even approach.
@sayrain908
@sayrain908 2 жыл бұрын
Then you already know what you need to know, which is great! This video took a long approach to explain it to those who are new to the concept or who struggle with it, which you obviously don't
@laurendoe168
@laurendoe168 2 жыл бұрын
@@sayrain908 I stopped watching the beginning because it was confusing me... and I KNOW the topic!
@Shedrack-tt9rv
@Shedrack-tt9rv 24 күн бұрын
@@sayrain908 I have to acknowledge and applaud the class with which you responded to that comment. Politeness is still huge in 2024. 👍
@ElumalaiNivithaSreeBmss
@ElumalaiNivithaSreeBmss Ай бұрын
I FEEL SO MUCHH RELIVED ABD LESS STRESSED BRO
@claudelett5804
@claudelett5804 Ай бұрын
If it takes a hen and a half, a day and a half, to lay an egg and a half, how long will it take one hen to lay a dozen eggs?
@tiffanywhittle1901
@tiffanywhittle1901 28 күн бұрын
i aint good at math and i could never simplify no fractions, I never understood it and I am trying my hardest I still cant understand it
@robertdufour2456
@robertdufour2456 3 ай бұрын
I remember the 80's! Oh yeah!
@wimharter
@wimharter 6 ай бұрын
Factoring is unnecessary if there is an equation I can use, like the quadratic equation. Teachers often will show the problematic way to solve a problem before showing the simple way. Remember the most important thing is to get to the correct answer in the fewest number of steps.
@Astrobrant2
@Astrobrant2 20 күн бұрын
All I can say is thank god for the right-arrow key.
@jimwalshonline9346
@jimwalshonline9346 Жыл бұрын
Damn! Couldn't work it... Back to the drawing board.
@brendawalters3728
@brendawalters3728 9 ай бұрын
I somehow messed up and got +4 as my answer. anyone know what I did wrong?
@horacecomegna335
@horacecomegna335 8 ай бұрын
“ A crummy commercial!” - - Ralphie, A Christmas Story! 😂😂😂
@Ghostridden
@Ghostridden Жыл бұрын
Hi I used to be an A+ student and algebra looks really easy and I have taken algebra 2. I got a b at first but then I got an f because here's what happened. I was home schooled and my parents just put me in a room to do my homework but I found the answer books and basically skipped 8th and 9th grade. Now I want to be a mechanical engineer but I have no foundation. What do I do?
@MsChemicalEngineer
@MsChemicalEngineer 8 ай бұрын
I'd recommend taking remedial classes to catch up or finding a tutor who can catch you up.
@devonwilson5776
@devonwilson5776 9 ай бұрын
Greetings. The answer is 4/(3×+1). The answer is determined as follows. First you factor the numerator (8×-4) to get 4(2×-1). Thereafter, you divide numerator by the denominator after factoring 4 times x raised to the 2 power minus 1 to get (2×-1)(2×+1). (2×-1) in the numerator will cancel (2×-1) in the denominator following which you would be left with 4 in the numerator divided by (2×+1) in the denominator. Answer =4/(2×+1).
@bowlinghuddles17
@bowlinghuddles17 6 ай бұрын
I think after you say, "Greetings," you meant to say, "The answer is 4/2x=1" not 4/3x=1.
@devonwilson5776
@devonwilson5776 6 ай бұрын
@@bowlinghuddles17 Greetings. Correct. Thanks for your attentiveness. Blessings.
@tasnuvarahman9115
@tasnuvarahman9115 4 ай бұрын
Thank You 👍
@jimmcdiarmid7308
@jimmcdiarmid7308 5 ай бұрын
Of what use is this?
@donfacundo2118
@donfacundo2118 4 ай бұрын
Great teaching method for students. Those who think that they are better and find only faults in this teaching method, create your own video.😂 ✌️
@oldschoollew
@oldschoollew 8 ай бұрын
this one looks like a trick 4(2x-1)/{(2x +1)(2x-1)}= 4/(2x+1) so i was there about 12.44 i have physical chemistry books available....
@stevemarshall5197
@stevemarshall5197 2 жыл бұрын
When did maths become singular ?
@larrybarnes1794
@larrybarnes1794 2 жыл бұрын
We say "math" in North America and they say "maths" in the U.K. but they both refer to "mathematics".
@shyamalidas1208
@shyamalidas1208 2 ай бұрын
4/2x +1
@XingYu_xdd
@XingYu_xdd 2 жыл бұрын
This is grade 3 maths in China brah, they some hard core maths ppl
@juanalocken5852
@juanalocken5852 2 жыл бұрын
Ok, Sounds like you’re the one to ask my question then. Haha! I don’t NEED to know or anything, but now I’m bothered because I haven’t figured it out… 😄 and I just need to figure it out, ok?! 😅 Aaaaanyways. So, say I have a mixed packet of Sweet Bell pepper seeds that contains equal parts of 5 different varieties. What is the minimum number of seeds that I would need to plant in order to ‘guarantee’ that I’ve planted one of each variety. 80% of them + 1, right? Well, what if I had a bucket of seeds?! That’s just a ridiculous amount of Bell peppers. So, instead, I decided that I was willing to utilize two rows in my seed starting tray. That’s 12 cells. There are 39 seeds in the packet. An equal 20%of each variety (orange, white, purple, yellow, and red) included in the packet, according to Burpee. What are the “odds”, “%chance”, or “probability” (i’ve been thinking about this too long and I’m not even sure which I’m asking for anymore. lol) that I will have planted at least one of each variety? Please and thank you
@joyboyd3585
@joyboyd3585 6 ай бұрын
Get to it and stop the fluff! I’m trying to learn!
@michaelempeigne3519
@michaelempeigne3519 2 жыл бұрын
you keep saying that you are a high school math teacher but from where ?
@glengreen362
@glengreen362 7 ай бұрын
I saw what you did, I sort of get what you did, but I regret to say that I didn't understand algebra 55 years ago, and it is still a foreign language to me, making no sense. When I first saw the math problem, I thought the top line was 8 times -4. Obviously my mind refuses to see algebraic equations. I am algebraically dyslectic.
@visarionostafe6830
@visarionostafe6830 Ай бұрын
Too much talking !!
@EmelyMarquez-wm6sx
@EmelyMarquez-wm6sx 11 күн бұрын
Dats what he supposed to do
@albertsanchez5539
@albertsanchez5539 2 жыл бұрын
I'm your pilipino learner❣️
@suzizuki
@suzizuki 8 күн бұрын
4?
@matikramer9648
@matikramer9648 3 ай бұрын
🙂 I'm 64 😊 thank you for reminder ❤
@johnswanson4759
@johnswanson4759 8 ай бұрын
X != 1/2 and x ! = -1/2
@user-uw7mb7fo5y
@user-uw7mb7fo5y 3 ай бұрын
x≠±(1/2)
@saltydog584
@saltydog584 Ай бұрын
Mohawks were late '70s in the UK what with punk.
@hubster4477
@hubster4477 2 жыл бұрын
Have no idea, but it still didnt prevent me from being debt free and retiring early!😂
@johnnyllooddte3415
@johnnyllooddte3415 6 ай бұрын
hmmm i guess ive forgotten how to do higher level factoring
@MrMousley
@MrMousley Ай бұрын
Before I watch your video .. 8x - 4 divided by 4x^2 - 1 Let's see if we can get x to the same value. LONG PAUSE .... Yes we can .. 2x 8x - 4 becomes 4(2x - 1) and 4x^2 - 1 becomes (2x - 1)(2x + 1) so it's 4(2x - 1) divided by (2x - 1)(2x + 1) and now the (2x - 1) 'top and bottom' of the division can just go, leaving us with .. 4 divided by (2x + 1) ... and I think that's it !
@MaydayAggro
@MaydayAggro 7 ай бұрын
Took me 10 secs to do this in my head.
@RustyAmmerman
@RustyAmmerman 8 ай бұрын
And, at the risk of being..."That Guy".... I'll continue with pointing out that, if we were to graph this expression, there would be removable discontinuity at x equals plus or minus 1/2. And, in fairness to you, the problem was only simplifying, factoring, and nothing more..
@thatomofolo452
@thatomofolo452 Жыл бұрын
Kaboom 🚀🥳🤸💯💫
@ghostlym7852
@ghostlym7852 2 жыл бұрын
Okay
@claudelett5804
@claudelett5804 Ай бұрын
A man sells eggs by the crate. After three sales he is out of eggs. With each sale he sold half his inventory plus half a crate. How many crates of eggs did he have to start?
@pibbles-a-plenty1105
@pibbles-a-plenty1105 7 ай бұрын
Clear as a Caesar salad. Can't there be an order of operations when doing factoring? Or does it have to be sink-or-swim only? 🤔
@GaryBricaultLive
@GaryBricaultLive 6 ай бұрын
You really need to put the point of the exercise in your title. "100% must know to pass" is not helpful statement in the opening screen.
@trailertrish2587
@trailertrish2587 2 ай бұрын
You don't want to belabor the point. Is that what you mean? I'm going to watch your factoring videos right now.
@bircanayak
@bircanayak 2 жыл бұрын
This is so easy
@Patrick-il4es
@Patrick-il4es 7 ай бұрын
Good info for passing academic testing, but of little use in the real world for 86% of today's jobs. Not everyone becomes an engineer, scientist, or math teacher. I achieved a 98 on the NY Regents Algebra test and never used this math in 30 years. I have a calculator.
@piglex1
@piglex1 2 жыл бұрын
Skip the first ten minutes!
@chriskennedy6961
@chriskennedy6961 8 ай бұрын
PLEASE! Will you cut it out with the smiley faces, we're not children .
@mooblerthomson9851
@mooblerthomson9851 2 жыл бұрын
You me confused at the beginning I worked out the correct answer in my head then skipped ahead to the park where you had the equation set equal to 3/5 I was like wtf???? (Edit when I watched the whole video I realize that was an example of simplification)
@andreasrehn7454
@andreasrehn7454 2 жыл бұрын
same. stupid example
@denisrenaldo3506
@denisrenaldo3506 8 ай бұрын
Sorry, but I am so trouble by the way - after so many digressions - you are giving your solving : 4/(2x+1) and 100% to the students providing it. I am 73, but I clearly remember my math teacher : "you only gave half of the solution! You forgot to provide the restriction : IF X NOT EQUAL TO 1/2” Dividing numerator and denominator by 2x-1 is only possible with such restriction!
What’s the smaller fraction?
9:41
TabletClass Math
Рет қаралды 13 М.
The Algebra Step that EVERYONE Gets WRONG!
17:54
TabletClass Math
Рет қаралды 102 М.
CAN YOU HELP ME? (ROAD TO 100 MLN!) #shorts
00:26
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН
когда достали одноклассники!
00:49
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
Want to PASS College Algebra? Absolutely, better understand this…
12:57
TabletClass Math
Рет қаралды 536 М.
Calculus at a Fifth Grade Level
19:06
Lukey B. The Physics G
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
The Simplest Math Problem No One Can Solve - Collatz Conjecture
22:09
x/4 + 8/x = 3 This Algebra Equation is NOT so simple!
20:14
TabletClass Math
Рет қаралды 74 М.
2 to the x = 9, many don’t know where to start
16:17
TabletClass Math
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
EFFICIENT studying: How to ACE everything in a FRACTION of the time
15:19
Factoring Trinomials
4:17
Mr H Tutoring
Рет қаралды 777 М.