no worries dude or gal - nice vidd heh.. keep up the good work.. :)

Nice vid and attitude!

There are industry standard dB levels for music, voice over (vo), and sound fx, etc. Look them up and use them as a guide, it'll immediately make your videos appear more polished. KZfaq may have it's own recommendations, I can't remember, but it doesn't hurt to be aware of "broadcast" standards.

Whats the song at 0:15 during Hikaru segment?

@@mdsimons1 It's AI-generated lol

weird time code

Funny time stamp

@@exoticunicorn253 lmaoo

😂

I did 😂

me too 🤣🤣

It wasn't his fault, though, it was Howell.

@@JimEadon Yep! It was just a casual game. Nobody was penalized 😅

U look like my cat

@@ZDTF good song

@@bitpof7523 indeed

@@ZDTF Your cat looks pretty human.

@@Bai_Su_Zhen yeah But She's nice She is a very good girl I heard Cats scratch people and tear apart stuff She doesn't do that I like her She's a Good kitty🥰 Oh and she even makes food for me She's so human

canty gonna be gm one day. dude puts in the work

I do hope so too! But itll be years till then, he only has 2184 fide currently and no norms i think​@killasnipe_

and eric beat the cheater too in another game where he switched the engine off and hung his queen

GMs, and future GMs.

​@@thetramp123 Exactly!

​@@thetramp123That'll be the day the moon turns to cheese.

GMs and very annoying IM fighting cheaters

Levi didn't even last 5 moves tho lol

And he LOST to 18,7 accuracy lol 🤣.

crazy

In any game for that matter

Magnus thinks hes cheating cause Howell gave him a hint but he does cheat 😆

@SlumpyCatMEOW it's cheating for sure but it was kind of accidental I think. When someone blurts out a big hint it's kind of hard to pretend you didn't hear it. Howell shouldn't have said that but I can't blame him for being exciting seeing it before magnus did lol

probably a program that plays for you or shows the best move with arrows on your screen or something

Browser extension

Others said it but yeah it's either a program/browser extension as other said, or it's just fully a trained robot: what Hikaru was playing is an example of that where it just played automated moves every set amount of seconds.

ChessBot program

If it was classical all you would need is a simple app on your phone besides you

I couldn’t resist using it 😂

@@TightKnights 10/10 lol

Whats the song at 0:15?

The bastion was the only aim-botter, the team was randomly assigned to each other and the cheating team lost that game. You'd better be re-watching the video again xD

wall of shame

@@unnecessaryupload5919 Perfect 👌

They played twice, two moves each time which explains what happened

LOL

Levy is a people's GM, there's nothing wrong

Levy will become a gm in a couple of months

​@ExileDAmir maybe a small chance he becomes one after a couple of years but not months

Couple of months? I don’t think you realise how much he has left to get to GM lol. He needs to get his rating to 2500 (he’s like 150 away). He needs to consistently be playing tournaments with a high win rate. And then the 3 norms. That could take a year if he is perfect. But 2 is more realistic. And these kids are getting better in quicker time. It’s difficult to say at this stage.

Lmao

They do a seemingly random move that way later down the road screws opp. over. Also the time they take is sometimes telling.

It’s a weird rook sacrifice with very low time that is clearly engine move, any human just makes the Queen and plays 2 rooks vs 1 for the easy win

You would NEVER find it

​​​@@ohnah6261Fair enough, I would find that move pretty quickly. But it might take me about 30 seconds to calculate it, I'm not a bullet player (I play 30 minute rapids or longer). They're alot higher elo than me (1986) so was just asking from someone elses perspective as the tactic isn't that impressive imo. The caluclation speed is far greater than mine....but I'm not a GM, that's the only thing that impresses me. Not sure how much you just rely on intuition in bullet, because it's not something I'd feel comfortable playong without checking it for sure.

​​​​@@krisboudreau3475Not weird at all. If they take the rook. You make a queen and take the knight because it's check. That's a massive material gain, and it's the only possible way to get the pawn to promote. Rooks with closed postions are arguably not as strong as knights, so getting a queen and clearly the knight or removing a pawn is exactly what you need to improve your position. It's also creates the only two candiate lines for a check which you're always looking for. Doesn't take much calculation to see you get a queen and go up an extra 7 points of material or worst case win a pawn with check and get greater rook mobility. Seems like a pretty human move, but it would probably take me around 30 seconds to find that. Im only 1986 in 30 minute rapid though. So was just curious to get someones perspecive from bullet.

@@Joshwaheazo you would never find it because you would never even think to look for it. You like any other human, especially being sub2000 would simply win the horse and play 2v1 rooks. If this is smtg u would find in 30s you would be much higher rated than 1986 rapid (which is like 1700 blitz maybe)

If he takes with knight the pawn queens XD. i was just as confused as u too. nah bruh that's crazy.

Because then the pawn promotes to queen with check and then recaptures the knight

Who leaves 9 comments within the same hour asking for the same thing. stfu.

The engine gives you the best moves

The main way of cheating at least online is to use an engine on another screen. We have gotten to the point where computers have far surpassed humans in terms of Chess, since engines are open source people can just use them to find the best moves on another screen. That’s why cheaters take more time making a move, because they’re looking at their engine.

Vs very good GMs you probably still need to let the computer calculate for a bit in order to be sure to win?

@@asdfasdf-mn8iu I mean maybe , I peaked around 2600-2700 blitz and bullet and quit before I could find out because it got boring.

It's only boring when you bought the cheat, not created it

@@spiderlegs101 it was free

cheaters take a consistant time it doesn't have to be 2-3 seconds. Since you don't need to think you make a move in roughly the same amount off time (move a piece the way the arrow tells you) and if you try to fake it you don't know on which moves it's logical to take more time since your mind is not in the game at all

You can say this about any sport or video games. What’s the point of running track if I’m just going to lose against doping or what’s the point of playing fps if they can just aimbot. Cheaters are inevitable everywhere

What is the point of living if someone is living better than you

Well because 50 percent of online chess is bots vs 2 percent doping

Isn't it more the other way around? What's the point in playing if you know you can't be beat? I don't see how following engine lines can be fun whatsoever.

The art of chess, though seemingly simplistic in its outward appearance, possesses a depth and complexity that transcends the notion of mere victory or defeat. The challenge of the game lies not solely in the pursuit of triumph over an opponent, but in the profound intellectual engagement it demands. The pursuit of knowledge and the refinement of strategic acumen are the true rewards that the game of chess bestows upon its devotees, irrespective of the outcome against any adversary, whether human or artificial. To dismiss the intrinsic value of the game due to the potential for defeat against advanced technological adversaries would be to overlook the profound lessons it holds for the development of one's own critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, as magnus himself even says.

Using stockfish

@@ariffirfanshah i meant how you be so dumb to cheat

Watching a 2700 player take 1.1 seconds to find that 3-move checkmate that sacrifices a rook instead of taking the knight or taking the pawn is quite obviously insanely surprising my man. If that happens against a 3k player after like 10 seconds, ok, but not in that case, absolutely insane.