140 - The Falkland Islands Air War

  Рет қаралды 28,092

Fighter Pilot Podcast

Fighter Pilot Podcast

2 жыл бұрын

'Top Gun Month' kicks off here on the Fighter Pilot Podcast with a discussion on... wait, what?!
Sure, the long-awaited sequel looks to be "all that" but let's not lose track of what else is happening in the world and that includes the 40th anniversary of the Falkland Islands war between the U.K. and Argentina.
On this episode, retired Royal Navy Commander Tim "Bobsleigh" Gedge joins us to discuss the Falkland Islands air war based on his experiences as the former 809 Squadron boss riding the converted freighter Atlantic Conveyor into battle where he flew more than 30 combat sorties. Cmdr Gedge is heavily featured in Rowland White's outstanding book Harrier 809 which is mentioned frequently during the interview. See his post-military boat building academy endeavors here: www.boatbuildingacademy.com/
Episode artwork adapted by Janek Krause. Bumper music by Jaime Lopez / announcements by Clint Bell.

Пікірлер: 133
@javiermonzon7103
@javiermonzon7103 Жыл бұрын
Saludos a todos desde Argentina....Mis respetos a los soldados Argentinos y Británicos que lucharon en Malvinas....y a los caidos....
@rickh7676
@rickh7676 11 ай бұрын
Very diplomatic answer on the differences between 800 and 801. Commander Ward was a little less diplomatic in his book!
@SimDeck
@SimDeck 2 жыл бұрын
Listened to this podcast while cooking a meal for my family. I have read the books you mention and after listening to this great interview I have more questions which is a great sign that you are doing such a brilliant job of keeping people interested. Even my wife who has no interest in military aviation was saying that it was fascinating. Thank you so much for what you do.
@ez8911
@ez8911 2 жыл бұрын
My god ! It’s 40 years already!
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
Time flies.
@DanBlake3rd
@DanBlake3rd 2 жыл бұрын
Nicely done Jello. One of your best interviews yet. What a treat to have the former 809 CO, Commander Gedge, who is closely associated with VSTOL aircraft development for the Royal Navy and Air Force. That he agreed to do the interview speaks highly of the FPP team and your skills as an interviewer.
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words.
@wendywoohinchcliffe5465
@wendywoohinchcliffe5465 3 ай бұрын
My ex brother in law was part of NAS 809 in the Falklands. He was a harrier pilot trained at Wittering and then went onto Yeovil.
@robertdownie6135
@robertdownie6135 2 жыл бұрын
Another great pod thanks Jell-O! When the war kicked off I was 12 years old and I followed the story everyday on the TV, it was fascinating and sometimes tragic stuff. Amazing feat by the UK armed forces. Sandy Woodward was the Naval Commander responsible for the task force and his war diary is essential reading....one point he makes is that you can't keep a naval battle group at see indefinitely, ships need maintenance etc, and had the war gone on much longer it could have got very tricky! It was a close run thing as it was. Numerous RN ships were hit with bombs that didn't detonate. The Argentine pilots flew fearlessly and sometimes so low their weapons didn't have time to fuse! Another great story of the war was the single Chinook which made it, and flew constantly for weeks with no maintenance. The RAF have loved the Chinook every since! That machine just got retired and put in a museum. I'll find a link for you.
@alanhutchins5916
@alanhutchins5916 2 жыл бұрын
Bravo November........
@juanme555
@juanme555 2 жыл бұрын
Im Argentinian, first time watcher, i think im gonna watch this all the way through to see what's being said.
@kennykerr3930
@kennykerr3930 8 күн бұрын
A privilege to listen to that.
@anselmdanker9519
@anselmdanker9519 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I followed the Falklands conflict when it broke out daily until it ended. Very interesting discussion.
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome.
@modscientist9793
@modscientist9793 2 ай бұрын
What a great episode
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 ай бұрын
Thanks 👍
@pjdonald1
@pjdonald1 Жыл бұрын
Great podcast...as some of the people here have said there was quite a lot of sub surface activity. The most notable of course was the sinking of the Belgrano. An event which changed the whole dynamic of the conflict.
@kyanderson2461
@kyanderson2461 2 жыл бұрын
Great work ! Thank you !
@easytiger2069
@easytiger2069 2 жыл бұрын
just about to listen but i know its gonna be great so much appreciated to you all for such great content.
@ryansanico6539
@ryansanico6539 2 жыл бұрын
Great podcast hats off to the podcast and towards to all Military Avation avators hats off to them.100% respect
@thunderace4588
@thunderace4588 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@gustavorocha78
@gustavorocha78 2 жыл бұрын
Great job, people!
@matty6848
@matty6848 2 жыл бұрын
My uncle fought in the Falklands war in 2 para regiment. He was only 22 years old, when he killed his first Argentinian soldier, and one was with fixed bayonets. I asked what did you think at the time? He said at the time you didn’t think, just your training kicked in, but over the years he can still see the faces of equally as young Argentinian soldiers who he killed in combat on the battle for Goose Green. He regularly wonders what would those guys be doing today had he not killed them and they survived the war? He has suffered with PTSD which he thinks is connected too historical guilt of taking their lives, but as explained to him, he was at war, and had he not killed those soldiers they would of took his life. As they say “ war is Hell”
@searchtron7601
@searchtron7601 Жыл бұрын
Im a ninja special paratrooper
@sichere
@sichere 4 ай бұрын
@@searchtron7601 inappropriate
@petebanham4916
@petebanham4916 2 жыл бұрын
Another great pod from Jello, quality every time.
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Pete. 🙏
@alanhutchins5916
@alanhutchins5916 2 жыл бұрын
If you read Sandy Woodward's memoire he states it literally was, to qoute Wellington, 'A close run thing...' until the troops landed,... and then just a matter of time ....
@arielalvarez5553
@arielalvarez5553 2 жыл бұрын
The SHR was a far superior weapon system to the Mirage IIIEA/V and A-4B/C/Q Skyhawk. The Argentine Air Force received the MATRA 550 Magic I in March 1982, so the Argentine Aviators had no training with those missiles. The Rafael Shafrir MkIV was far less capable than the AIM9L. The Argentine fighters didn´t have radar warning, chaff, or flares....not to mention, that the MIII and MV didn´t have any navigation system other than the magnetic compass for flying over the Atlantic Ocean. And the Fleet Air Arm Aviators were among the best in the world, their training in the air to air was second to none. I would not blame the French for providing the SUE/EXOCET, the UK provided the Mk17 bombs, Blow Pipe missiles, Canberra bombers, and Type 42 Destroyers...anyway, Jell-O, it would be very nice to have an episode related to the other side of this story.
@Lewisgaylard
@Lewisgaylard 2 жыл бұрын
The Sea Harrier fleet didn't get their Blue Fox radars at the start of delivery of the aircraft. The last Sea Harrier got its radar in January of 1982, so not much time to train on it! Also, the Sidewinder 9L were air dropped to the Task Force, so no embarked pilot had used it. It didn't matter too much as all aerial kill were rear aspect shots.
@AA-xo9uw
@AA-xo9uw 2 жыл бұрын
@@Lewisgaylard Britain had 19 AIM-9Ls on hand when the fleet sailed south. NATO stockpiles were raided at Leuchars and 100 had been ordered from the United States. Missiles were flown to Ascension Island and waited for Hermes and Invincible to show up. Then LtCmdr Tim Gedge qualified the weapon on the SHAR at Valley on Anglesey in about a week prior to 809 leaving. All of the rails on the SHARs had to be modified on the cruise down south as the 9Ls new fins prevented them from being mounted. The chaff and flare dispensers ended up being air dropped by a RAF C-130 not the missiles. Those interested should get a copy of Harrier 809 by Rowland White.
@searchtron7601
@searchtron7601 Жыл бұрын
The Sea Harrier is superior Only with aim 9l😉, the rest is Your crap😉
@searchtron7601
@searchtron7601 Жыл бұрын
@@AA-xo9uw 🤣🤣
@anothersucker-Youcantfixstupid
@anothersucker-Youcantfixstupid Жыл бұрын
Training and breadth of experience goes along way. The British were more adaptable and 25% of them were instructors.
@mattg9971
@mattg9971 Жыл бұрын
Lmao. The ship building portion of the book was "riveting". Nice
@carlitosmedina7546
@carlitosmedina7546 2 жыл бұрын
Hi jello, just a suggestion but having some episodes with the same air frame more then once with a different pilot and their experiences would be nice! Thank you if you see this!
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
I see it. 👍 Would you prefer a second show on an aircraft already covered over a first show on a new one?
@Pricklyhedgehog72
@Pricklyhedgehog72 2 жыл бұрын
Great stuff. And yes, the Falklands, or South Atlantic Map is coming soon from RAZBAM for DCS World. I've been lucky enough to have a little tinker, and as a kid watching the war unfold on telly, it's surreal seeing it come to life in the digital world.
@SteviePonder123
@SteviePonder123 2 жыл бұрын
Looks good
@Cubcariboo
@Cubcariboo 2 жыл бұрын
He mentioned something in passing I wish you had followed up on: Something regarding the Argentinian air forces not operating as he and his peers expected them too. - at 16:48
@st1nk1n
@st1nk1n 2 жыл бұрын
Perhaps to do with the fact the Argentinian fighters didnt attack in force taking advantage of their superior numbers and they also didn't want to dog fight.
@Camilo_Z
@Camilo_Z Жыл бұрын
​@limon ysal Yeah. The argentinians didin't have a fighting chance. Just the AAs and daggers that had the same problems. (sea harrier was better at lower altitude, so they tried to force the mirages/daggers into a low altitude dogfight)
@el_Contra
@el_Contra 10 ай бұрын
@@st1nk1n A couple of details that allow for people to make silly claims... Argentina only had 2 c130 hercules for aerial refueling, that greatly limited the number of aircraft in the air at the same time Not all Argentine planes had refueling capability. Not all planes were in flying condition. All Argentine fighters that could reach the islands were able to remain there for a couple of minutes, making dogfights something to avoid since you could run out of fuel on your way home.
@st1nk1n
@st1nk1n 10 ай бұрын
I agree, but that would have won the war@@el_Contra
@el_Contra
@el_Contra 10 ай бұрын
@@st1nk1n better equipment, more ordnance, better logistics would have won the war... but what many don't take into consideration was that the idea, at the time, was to negotiate some compromise... not really to start a war. Which is why the main objective of the Argentine initial landing was to "NOT cause any casualties", which they did not, so as not to justify an armed response and later negotiate... unfortunately, they did not take into consideration that thatcher would also use this to further her political career. A stupid gamble from an illegitimate Argentine government, further complicated by the the ambitions of a failing english politician, that led to not only the death and suffering on both sides but also sacrificed what could have been a harmonious and prosperous relationship between peoples.
@SpaceGaucho_
@SpaceGaucho_ 2 жыл бұрын
Respect from Argentina. Thanks for the excellent interview to both Jello and Bobsleigh. Also have the same question as @Cub Cariboo, can't seem to understand what was meant by the remark that Argentina "blew" their chances. I'd really like to expand on his thoughts on that. As always, thanks for the great content.
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
I believe he meant sending larger numbers of fighters against the fleet in combined strikes.
@peterpovey5908
@peterpovey5908 2 жыл бұрын
I was 14 in 1982 and thought your pilots were amazing, flying so low to avoid our anti aircraft fire, they were very brave.
@actonman7291
@actonman7291 2 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately the fleet didnt "blew"up as it should had been because some faulty bombs that didnt detonated i believe the argies did well in sending waves after wave attacks the attrition war could had been on their favour if these bomb exploded nevermind that exocet war head that should had broke the Sheffield in two parts with more destruction to swing the pendulum of the war. My two cents. Thanks for the content.
@SpaceGaucho_
@SpaceGaucho_ 2 жыл бұрын
​@@FighterPilotPodcast thanks for the reply. yes, I remember him saying that. I would really like to know what he meant by it. There were 40 sorties (of various types) just on the first day of the air war (1May). 11 of those where anti-ship strikes that where extended during the entire day. some where combined efforts, most had 2-3 airframes involved (mirage V's and A4B/C's). and that would be a typical day in "bomb alley".
@SpaceGaucho_
@SpaceGaucho_ 2 жыл бұрын
@@peterpovey5908 yes, and lucky, the SeaCat was a very scary air defense system. apparently the tracking radar had problems with the ground clutter from San Carlos bay which was always in the background. it was very effective when that wasn't the case (A4 popping up after an attack). people think the Royal Navy was unprepared for low incursions, the fact of the matter is that it was really unlucky, as it couldn't use that capability to its full potential. that would have been a game changer. thanks for your comment!
@weirdguy564
@weirdguy564 7 ай бұрын
at 48:47 the question about the two squadrons being different in operation probably (well, almost certainly) comes from the C.O. of 801 squadron's own book, Nigel "Sharkey" Ward's "Sea Harrier over the Falklands". Sharkey freely admits that he doesn't do well when given orders he doesn't agree with, and is a fighter pilot with a chip on BOTH shoulders. Ward is highly critical of the admirals in charge of the fleet and their tactics, and in particular the lack of spine of the C.O. of 800 squadron in Hermes to refuse dumb orders like searching the sea visually with the radar off to look for submarine periscopes (In context the 801 squadron were able to get their Blue Fox radars to work slightly better than specs, while 800 squadron on Hermes couldn't get their radars to work well at all and stopped trying to use them). Sharkey's book is an excellent read, and I highly recommend it, but just remember that Sharkey was never promoted, and left the navy after he was done flying. He was not a yes-man in a service that requires you to toe the line to get promoted. Tim Gedge is being polite when he is saying that both squadrons produced the same results. I think he has his own opinion of Sharkey and its probably not positive.
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 7 ай бұрын
Interesting commentary, thank you.
@mwnciboo
@mwnciboo 6 ай бұрын
But which Squadron got results? If Sharkey had done as ordered - it would likely have cost the Task Group yet more losses. The "Us and Them" between HERMES and INVINCIBLE was detrimental and then further exacerbated by Personalities - lack of tactical acumen - lack of shared and listened to expertise etc. Came from the top and the Admirals embarked staff.
@robbowman8770
@robbowman8770 2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. It was an extraordinary achievement by our armed forces to win an outnumbered expeditionary campaign so far away. Contrast that with Russia today who cannot maintain 100 mile supply lines. Thinking of those who fought for freedom, then and now
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
Here here.
@mikebrownhill8955
@mikebrownhill8955 2 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't believe everything the mainstream media reports on the Russia-Ukraine conflict. According to these idiots the Ukranian air force had a reincarnation of Erich Hartmann blowing dozens of Russian fighters out of the sky. I'm pretty sure the Russians are doing fine.
@elliskaranikolaou2550
@elliskaranikolaou2550 2 жыл бұрын
The bulk of the Argentine Air Force confronting the British was generational behind the British. There was no doubt the Brits were going to have Air Supremacy. Never the less the Argentine's fought superbly in there inferior aircraft to inflict massive damage on the RN which was their primary task.
@JohnRodriguesPhotographer
@JohnRodriguesPhotographer 7 ай бұрын
Harriers radius of action really hurt the effortto protect the fleet. The ony weapon for modern air to air was the Aim-9L. They didn't have in flight refueling, which would have helped.The radius of action was roughly 125 miles. The Harrier was designed CAS mission from improvised air strips, close to the front. Range was not an issue for the mission they were intended for. Vertical take off is accomplished with reduced fuel and weapons. With a ski jump allows more fuel and weapons. I believe the overlap between Super Entendard aquiring a target and launching an Exocet was about 25 miles or so. If you don't believe me look at the record. No Super Entendard aircraft were intercepted or lost.
@Stinger522
@Stinger522 2 жыл бұрын
This would probably break the bank but I think England should have six carriers. Two could be on deployment, two could be could on workups or in maintenance and the other two could be sitting in reserve.
@mikebrownhill8955
@mikebrownhill8955 2 жыл бұрын
It would definitely break the bank. I would love to see a CATOBAR flying off navalised typhoons. As it is we can only afford to send one of our carriers on ops, while the other sits in reserve. Jackie Fisher would be rolling in his grave seeing the paltry state of the RN today.
@Akm72
@Akm72 2 жыл бұрын
Five is probably the maximum we could consider, if the UK defence budget was bigger: This would be enough for one forward deployed 365 days per year and a second deployed as often as possible, which would be enough for our requirements. In addition we would also want three dedicated commando assault ships, probably dedicated LHDs with both a helicopter and a Dock for LCUs. However this is clearly unaffordable on the existing budget given the small numbers of line units available across army, navy and Air force. There are a lot of things we would need to buy before considering a larger carrier force.
@st1nk1n
@st1nk1n 2 жыл бұрын
You mean UK :) Even if the country could afford or choose to build another three, I think the RN would struggle to man them and definitely couldn't afford F35s.
@Akm72
@Akm72 2 жыл бұрын
@@st1nk1n Indeed. If a magical money fairy turned up and granted the RN surface fleet more money I'd go for more escorts before more carriers anyway given the current fleet as a starting point.
@MrKbtor2
@MrKbtor2 2 жыл бұрын
Were harriers on the Atlantic Conveyor there to replenish anticipated aircraft losses on the 2 carriers?
@anothersucker-Youcantfixstupid
@anothersucker-Youcantfixstupid Жыл бұрын
Plus drop of the RAF ground attack harriers.
@benjaminperez7328
@benjaminperez7328 2 жыл бұрын
Great stuff Jello. Did you make your way over to the Midway yesterday for the TG2 premiere? 😎
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
Nope, but I saw the movie on North Island last night.
@MonkeyBidness359
@MonkeyBidness359 2 жыл бұрын
@@FighterPilotPodcast And...? What did you think? Is it worth all the hype or not so much?
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
@@MonkeyBidness359 I am sitting on any public reactions for now.
@MonkeyBidness359
@MonkeyBidness359 2 жыл бұрын
@@FighterPilotPodcast Awwww. Spoil sport! :-)
@AA-xo9uw
@AA-xo9uw 2 жыл бұрын
@@MonkeyBidness359 NDA
@Sup3r6f0ur
@Sup3r6f0ur 2 жыл бұрын
I can't help but wonder how this would have played out if the Brits had an American Carrier with F14s, A6s, and E2s. Truly amazing the Sea Harrier was able to pull off what it did. I suspect thats more to do with the skill and knowledge of the Royal Navy's pilots than the airframe by itself. Great interview Jello, really enjoyed this one.
@stretch3281
@stretch3281 2 жыл бұрын
It would have played out very well while the weather was fine but autumn in the south Atlantic is v stormy. What was needed was more harriers and airborne early warning radar equipped seekings.
@mikebrownhill8955
@mikebrownhill8955 2 жыл бұрын
The AIM-9 was crucial in the British victory.
@Akm72
@Akm72 2 жыл бұрын
The Argentine Junta would have attacked Chile instead of the Falklands if the UK had been equipped to that standard.
@d-rob5513
@d-rob5513 2 жыл бұрын
If we had those assets you talk about the Falklands conflict wouldnt have happened, it wouldnt have happened if we still had our big carriers with Phantoms and Buccaneers.
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 2 жыл бұрын
@@d-rob5513 Spoken by a man who as never been down there!!! It wouldn't have happened has the Thatcher Government not been trying to get rid of the place. The Big Carriers would have struggled down there as the weather is mostly too bad to allow operation of cat and trap aircraft. Either the sea state is too rough or if the air pressure is high, you get dense sea fog. Also the radar reliability on the Phantom was that good. When I was down there in 1988, The RAF never had more than 75% availability on the Phantoms down there. Sea Harriers radar failure rate was 20% that of a Phantom. AEW would have been a Game changer.
@mikebrownhill8955
@mikebrownhill8955 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing that only the USMC and Spain bought this great little aircraft. Another triumph of British engineering on a shoestring budget. It was the perfect aircraft for this limited war in atrocious weather. The skill of the pilots and the AIM-9 were also crucial to victory.
@Lewisgaylard
@Lewisgaylard 2 жыл бұрын
Only India bought the Sea Harrier.
@mikebrownhill8955
@mikebrownhill8955 2 жыл бұрын
@@Lewisgaylard I forgot about India. Spain bought 12 Harriers
@Lewisgaylard
@Lewisgaylard 2 жыл бұрын
@@mikebrownhill8955 Spain was going to buy the Sea Harrier, but the Yanks stepped in and they got the AV/8A/B
@mikebrownhill8955
@mikebrownhill8955 2 жыл бұрын
@@Lewisgaylard yeah ok so they didn't procure from the UK but ultimately Spain still had harriers. It's just surprising that so few countries bought them after how well they performed in 1982.
@AA-xo9uw
@AA-xo9uw 2 жыл бұрын
@@mikebrownhill8955 Spain obtained the Mark 53/AV-8S(VA-1/VAE-1) Matador - which were essentially the same Mark 50/AV-8As as the Marine Corps - beginning in 1973. The original eight aircraft were shipped broken down to St. Louis and assembled by McDonnell Douglas and then delivered since the Brits didn't want to publicly deal with the Franco government. They bought an additional five in 1980 - Mark 55s which were for all intents and purposes the same aircraft as the Mark 53s - directly from BAe. They sold a total of nine to Thailand and began to receive the AV-8B in 1987. The first SHAR wasn't delivered to the RN until June of 1979. India didn't get their first SHAR until 1983. Spain never expressed any interest in the SHAR.
@somethingelse4878
@somethingelse4878 2 жыл бұрын
Subservice yes oh yes
@somethingelse4878
@somethingelse4878 2 жыл бұрын
Whats the book
@paulybassman7311
@paulybassman7311 2 жыл бұрын
do you think you could do a feature with 'Bobsleigh' on the Sea Vixen. check out this monster Dude! Heavy but Beautiful 😍
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
Our standard answer: if it was an operational military aircraft that we have not yet covered---it's on the list!
@couchfighter
@couchfighter 2 жыл бұрын
NOT SURE IF THERE WERE SUBSURFACE ACTIVITES? REALLY? UNREAL. It was the last time a submarine has sunk a ship in combat, The Cruiser, General Belgrano previously the USS Phoenix ,1938 -Then to Argentina, 1951-1982 RIP To the crew
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, really. I even read about it in Rowland's book and still forgot in the moment. I look forward to your productions--I'm sure they'll be perfect.
@colonelkurtz2269
@colonelkurtz2269 2 жыл бұрын
The guest mentions the Belgrano at 31:21 so it isn't like the incident was completely omitted. Stay off the caffeine. 😵‍💫🤣
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 2 жыл бұрын
@@FighterPilotPodcast British sunk a Argie sub as well.
@AB-gi3qy
@AB-gi3qy 2 жыл бұрын
I think the Argentine aircraft carrier would have been sunk if it wasn't inside Argentine waters.
@searchtron7601
@searchtron7601 Жыл бұрын
You must be a master
@AB-gi3qy
@AB-gi3qy Жыл бұрын
@@searchtron7601 You have a keen eye, I am indeed a master.
@stephenfowler4115
@stephenfowler4115 2 жыл бұрын
The Belgrano an Argentine ship was sunk by a British sub.
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
True.
@matty6848
@matty6848 2 жыл бұрын
Yes and it was originally a British built ex Royal Navy ship brought by the Argentinian navy. The irony it was sunk by a Royal Navy submarine.
@actonman7291
@actonman7291 Жыл бұрын
​​@@matty6848 you are totally wrong very ignorant comment That Ship was a USN it was so american that it was a survivor of Pearl Harbour go figure.
@beatlekev-sf1lx
@beatlekev-sf1lx 11 ай бұрын
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@sohrabroozbahani4700
@sohrabroozbahani4700 2 жыл бұрын
Every time someone says sea vixen I can't help but to think about the poor fello who was put in the closet on the side to work the radar... perhaps the second most claustrophobic seat in aviation after ww2 tail gunners...
@eatthisvr6
@eatthisvr6 2 жыл бұрын
ooooooh
@FighterPilotPodcast
@FighterPilotPodcast 2 жыл бұрын
aaaaaah.
@stretch3281
@stretch3281 2 жыл бұрын
Just a little bit!
@SimDeck
@SimDeck 2 жыл бұрын
@@stretch3281 Just a little bit more.
@stretch3281
@stretch3281 2 жыл бұрын
You star..! Thank you 😊. There's 7 billion people who don't understand why this is funny 😄 😆 🤣 😂 😀
@SimDeck
@SimDeck 2 жыл бұрын
@@stretch3281 haha we get it. All the best!
@johncallaghan2205
@johncallaghan2205 2 жыл бұрын
Interesting podcast however, I think he was a little bit disingenuous to the RAF when it came to how many pilots from the RAF where actually flying sea harriers during the Falklands Campaign. A book not mentioned but writtten by an RAF pilot on loan to the RN flying Sea Harriers at the time and an excellent read (Hostile Skys, David Morgan) mentions that they actually made up 25 percent of the pilot strength and accounted for the same percentage of aircraft kills, with the first two Argentine aircraft shot down attributed to the light blue and the most aircraft shot down being achieved by Morgan himself, an RAF pilot whom after the conflict transferred to the Fleet Air Arm of the RN although originally he had joined the RN passing through Dartmouth college so ended up back in the service he had originally joined, Whilst the submarines positioned between Argentina and the Falklands passed information to the the fleet regarding movements of Argentine aircraft departing Argentine airbases, it is now known that Chile was also monitoring take offs from the various bases and this information was being sent direct by SAS signals personnel stationed in Santiago via satellite phone to Northwood,
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 2 жыл бұрын
It wasn't just Chile's radars monitoring the Argentines air movements. The RAF had a Radar on the Chilean boarder as well with 10 of their personnel running it!!
@davidkoon767
@davidkoon767 2 жыл бұрын
NAVY HORRIBLE LIVING CONDITIONS
@mwnciboo
@mwnciboo 6 ай бұрын
809 reformed a few weeks ago in Dec 2023.... The Legendary Squadron is back. The ship that bounced the Missile from land was HMS Glamorgan - 14 died. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Glamorgan_(D19)
097 - Avro Vulcan
1:04:26
Fighter Pilot Podcast
Рет қаралды 11 М.
142  - TOPGUN the Legacy (Part 2)
1:15:19
Fighter Pilot Podcast
Рет қаралды 7 М.
small vs big hoop #tiktok
00:12
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН
World’s Deadliest Obstacle Course!
28:25
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 151 МЛН
I’m just a kid 🥹🥰 LeoNata family #shorts
00:12
LeoNata Family
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
The Falklands - MiniWars #1
7:29
OverSimplified
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН
061 - F-22 Raptor
1:36:38
Fighter Pilot Podcast
Рет қаралды 103 М.
Sea Harrier Kills in the Falklands - Dave Morgan (Part 2)
1:02:57
10 Percent True - Tales from the Cockpit
Рет қаралды 53 М.
149 - The Future of Air Warfare
1:36:02
Fighter Pilot Podcast
Рет қаралды 10 М.
"Air Combat in the Falklands" by David Smith
1:03:13
ozatwar
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Devastating Argentine attack at Fitzroy (Falklands 1982)
11:10
Showtime112
Рет қаралды 236 М.
Tornado F3 in the Gulf! | Derek "Grinner" Smith (In-Person Part 1)
30:29
Aircrew Interview
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Fix Bayonets - The Battle for Goose Green
1:12:14
Element 18
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
ПОКУПКА ТЕЛЕФОНА С АВИТО?🤭
1:00
Корнеич
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
GamePad İle Bisiklet Yönetmek #shorts
0:26
Osman Kabadayı
Рет қаралды 181 М.
cute mini iphone
0:34
승비니 Seungbini
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН