15 Plane Concepts That Will Change Travel Forever

Рет қаралды 207,545

Күн бұрын

In a world where people like to travel huge distances, aircraft are a vital part of our modern way of life. They allow us to cross continents in a matter of hours… but, as more people travel, the industry not only needs to look at ways of offering more capacity… but also doing so while significantly reducing the amount of pollution that’s released. The latest technologies have enabled aircraft designers to come up with ideas like never before, and by taking a completely different approach are beginning to shape what the industry will look like in the coming years. From fully electric power, to re-designed shapes, faster speeds, and entirely new fuels… it’s time to take to the skies, as we look through 15 plane concepts that will change travel forever.
#planes #top15
Several segments are licensed under creative commons
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
For more video information, please visit our website.
The Top Fives show brings you informational and entertaining top five videos! Join us and subscribe for more.
Follow Josh on Instagram! Founder and producer of the Top Fives show. Stay up to date with the channel and everything KZfaq and business related! / joshuajosephbaker
Follow us on Facebook!
/ topfivesyoutube
Contact us via the email form here: kzfaq.infoabout
Note: The videos featured on the Top Fives channel are for educational and informational purposes. If you have a good idea for a video, leave us a comment! We try to read each and every comment made.

Пікірлер: 122

@topfives Жыл бұрын

They should bring the concord back who else agrees?

@magardunoe Жыл бұрын

Re invented: Oudated Technologies - Electronics - Materials, Engine Eficiency etc.: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a9aiaM50xpi1ln0.html

@micstonemic696stone Жыл бұрын

Concorde is to small to be brought back the USA did team with the Russian Tupolev which was bigger but needed full AB Reheat to go super-sonic severely limiting it's range, however in this US Russian project they gave the Tu-144 the engines from the Tupolev Tu-160 Blackjack to give the Concordski super-cruise ability it was just research

@DonGivani Жыл бұрын

Nope, too much noise, too much pollution

@robinharwood5044 Жыл бұрын

No one who has lived under its flight path.

@davidsandy5917 Жыл бұрын

The concord was the first of its kind. Just because it was not the final answer doesn't mean that it could not evolve into something more suitable for commercial use.

@anthonynarozniak9725 Жыл бұрын

I've been in the aerospace industry for 40 years and I've heard "this will change air travel forever" a thousand times, I can tell you now.... no it won't....

@kewsiyehboah6058 Жыл бұрын

Bravo Upload.. Mind Blowing.. Wright Brothers Must Be Smiling..

@henrysantos121 Жыл бұрын

Excellent documentary, for the New future. God bless you all fellas,.🙏.

@Lady_hypoxia Жыл бұрын

First and merry Christmas to you

@joeh6877 Жыл бұрын

Seriously a very good channel. Lots of very interesting material presented in a terrific format with expert voice over. Thanks for posting. Its much appreciated.

@topfives Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching Joe!

@davedavis6433 Жыл бұрын

Hi. love your videos but chapters would be a great help.

@Territet Жыл бұрын

People don't want to travel to airfields, large or small, to be herded on to planes. They want to travel city centre to city centre and the high speed train is a comfortable alternative that takes little or no longer from departure to arrival. The technology already exists.

@josephgomez468 Жыл бұрын

Marry Christmas 🎄

@hifijohn Жыл бұрын

And a hippy new year!

@robertomichelson5839 Жыл бұрын

This guy doesn't seem to know that Embraer also designs and manufactures its own planes and is the third largest aircraft manufacturer in the world.

@laurentscheid3785 Жыл бұрын

Super boulot, très intéressant. Merci à toi, à bientôt

@keithwalker6892 Жыл бұрын

Great presentation but you missed LILIUM

@micstonemic696stone Жыл бұрын

interesting ideas

@juanmelendezrivera6085 Жыл бұрын

None of the designs considered escape mechanisms for passengers and crew before an unavoidable crash. Only combat attack planes and bombers have escape seats. It is time to design something to save lives on civilian passenger airliners before a crash. It will cost millions extra but lives have infinite value. Thanks.

@conqc20 Жыл бұрын

They all say battery powered, that isnt green until you say how those batteries are powered. I doubt its 100% green energy.

@oldmanuserphan Жыл бұрын

More green than petroleum is still a win. It's not an all or nothing concept.

@robertdragoff6909 Жыл бұрын

Batteries, no…. But Hydrogen has potential.

@Dwendele Жыл бұрын

It can't be with the materials needed to create the batteries. MUCH harder on the environment than any oil drilling.

@oldmanuserphan Жыл бұрын

@@robertdragoff6909 I totally agree. 100% I do still want constant testing and progress with energy storage tech though. A bunch of little baby steps coming together over time is always the answer.

@Dwendele Жыл бұрын

@@oldmanuserphan but it's not more green than petroleum. There's a science Channel that explains it in plain language why current EV technology will never be as green as petroleum.

@kentamccarter9580 Жыл бұрын

Nuclear power is the best way to run these airplanes.

@oldmanuserphan Жыл бұрын

"In a world where..." made me laugh for some reason.

@raideepu4 Жыл бұрын

SureFly!!!!!! Ever heard of Ehang??

@rexeverything4578 Жыл бұрын

Craig? You'll never catch me on one of those...

@alancranford3398 Жыл бұрын

It's always interesting to see how technology is evolving and to anticipate the impact of change. One issue raised scares me--a potential trade war between Boeing, Airbus, and the new Chinese/Russian aircraft company. At present, industrial espionage is an ongoing problem. Throw in LawFare as global tech companies sue each other in order to gain total control over the market--monopoly power requires government force. It's not acknowledged, but direct action in the form of industrial sabotage, campaigns to slander corporate rivals, even extortion of executives takes place now. In the past piracy was used to drive off rival corporations. When anything goes because "it's just business," expect everything.

@metgath Жыл бұрын

You forgot about Virgin Galactic. Their goal is a low earth orbit space liner.

@tylermcintyre1454 Жыл бұрын

Tyler Mac we want air Canada with Toronto maple leafs colors

@tsukishima_ran Жыл бұрын

I also saw a solar hovercraft concept that can do 2machs at most and have 500max capacity. it has 2 floors and 1 bridge at the front tip. it looks like the ISS ship of Star Trek but smaller and "raw"-er. It looks like a cargo craft.

@danellis-jones1591 Жыл бұрын

I makes me hopeful that there are so many possible solutions, and some that aren't too far from commercial reality. I think long haul may have to just look at being as efficient as they can with jet fuel. Although the synthetic fuel being developed for F1 might be an option.

@michaelwilliams3232 Жыл бұрын

50 years plus to catch up with Concorde's 1960s tech. The Tupolev famously crashed at the Paris airshow.

@fred6319 Жыл бұрын

because a French jet came to close trying to take photo

@superheracross89 Жыл бұрын

The Cr929 no one that matters will want it

@MasterBlaster3545 Жыл бұрын

Well you won’t be able to fly soon in your 15 minute city. At least the rest of the world will be able to move around, your western masters will be whipping your sad arse into submission.

@planestrainsdogsncars4336 Жыл бұрын

At the rate of change were seeing at the moment, it will be many many years before we see a change in configuration. Bums on seats trumps canard wings every time.

@andrewsvaz Жыл бұрын

Embraer and Otto aren't mentioned because...?

@rajr1032 Жыл бұрын

As long as greed does not not take over, hope the airlnes flying the passenger versions of these aircrafts offer roomy seats with good leg space to their long-suffering customers ! 🤗

@Kodiak1293 Жыл бұрын

What do you think fuels innovation, the end goal of every plane shown is gobs and gobs of profit.

@cokycoffee5882 Жыл бұрын

🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️

@ireneuszfus8398 Жыл бұрын

Yeah, right :D I bet, in 40 years we'll still be flying in tubes with wings. Fuel might be different, but i'm sure shape will stay the same

@bearbait2050 Жыл бұрын

I think he missed one. Boom is also working on a HYPER sonic passenger jet that will go at Mach5.

@jermaineallen2915 Жыл бұрын

I, can't wait to fix their engine and fly them.

@barrybarlowe5640 Жыл бұрын

Oooo... Coal powered airplanes! The electricity doesn't just magically appear. And battery manufacturing is VERY environmentally unfriendly.

@SGliderGuy Жыл бұрын

Don't worry, Coal Power is being replaced by sustainable power everyday

@roberttorrance731 Жыл бұрын

Interesting, but pass on the China/ Russia jv, thank you 😅

@randomchanneltokeepthingss5321 Жыл бұрын

Anyone here watch Simple History? Narratior sounds awfully familiar.

@davidsandy5917 Жыл бұрын

The one thing people who talk about electric or hydrogen powered vehicles never talk about is where do you get the electricity or hydrogen. If either were more efficient or less polluting, industry would have already adopted it. In most cases, we would burn the fuel on the ground to charge the batteries, then claim that the aircraft is zero emissions. This is just a shell game.

@HarryGuit Жыл бұрын

„ … clearly influenced by those being made by Boeing and airbus …“ Well or by aerodynamics and similar necessities?

@snotspat Жыл бұрын

If you use solar cells to power the on board electronics, it will not result in a massive reduction in fuel use, because they don't require much electricity. Also they wouldn't work at night, so you'd need heavy batteries. The speaker sure says a lot of weird stuff. Like the Russian aviation market being relevant, or claiming they could use Western engines.

@piconano Жыл бұрын

Electric flight is not economical with Lithium batteries. There are new battery technologies like Aluminum Graphene by GMG, and Sodium ion Graphene by CATL, which have 3 times the capacity and can be charged 17 times faster than Lithium Ions. They are in trial testing and will be available for sale next year and 2026 respectively.

@topfives Жыл бұрын

I agree electric planes don't seem economical at scale

@piconano Жыл бұрын

@@topfives I think hydrogen hybrid electric will come on top in aviation and big trucks.

@Xogroroth666 Жыл бұрын

06'53" Moog Incorporated? So, it is a flying synthesizer?

@Xogroroth666 Жыл бұрын

Eviation: I'd rather see an e-Osprey?

@jamesbugbee9026 Жыл бұрын

Need a mach prop 4 the electrix

@YaEditorTeddy 28 күн бұрын

8:16 where engine?

@bellbell872 Жыл бұрын

Is all of this from alien 👽 technology?

@tidepoolclipper8657 Жыл бұрын

While battery electric is fine for small airplanes; there's more of a future for hydrogen with larger models.

@DimaZheludko Жыл бұрын

10:06 That's what happens when there is a gesigner, but no one with a slight idea of a center of mass and a lifting force. It's like a kid's picture. Fun, but totally impossible.

@colinbarnard6512 Жыл бұрын

Personally, I'd rather ride a ginormous helium filled diridgible powered by solar cells embedded it its skin. Talk about green! Quiet! Spacious. It's a no-brainer!

@carlsmith5545 Жыл бұрын

America needs highspeed rail..

@meejinhuang Жыл бұрын

Solar powered blimps for long trips and E planes for shorter trips.

@TheFilipFonky Жыл бұрын

Aren't blimps really bad for the environment with how the gas needs to be handled?

@masterfranklin1938 Жыл бұрын

@danielobrien1571 Жыл бұрын

Fantastic picture, happen to be a lady with very long hair? I find that quite attractive, please describe it?

@masterfranklin1938 Жыл бұрын

@@danielobrien1571 what in the Sam Hill are you talking about?!?

@danielobrien1571 Жыл бұрын

@@masterfranklin1938 Sorry to disturb you, it seems I mistook your gender through your profile picture. I find woman with long hair very fascinating, and the longer it is the more beautiful it is to me. I do apologize for my mistake so I'll bid you farewell and you have a good life.

@masterfranklin1938 Жыл бұрын

@@danielobrien1571 ok… that’s a bit weird, but fair well.

@danielobrien1571 Жыл бұрын

@@masterfranklin1938 Take my passion for them however you like, but ladies with Rapunzel length hair are far more attractive, and if they casually smoke even more so.

@MrLewooz Жыл бұрын

ion prop in space? ok Ion prop in the atmosphere??? ah ah ah ah ah ah ...

@captainfranknoneofyourbusi8564 Жыл бұрын

Where is the plane in the thumb nail?

@tidepoolclipper8657 Жыл бұрын

Didn't Rolls Royce flat out ditch Boom Supersonic? Their involvement was crucial to that airplane. Boom Supersonic may very well be doomed. As for that Sky Whale; it'll likely remain a concept design. Never mind we've already reached the size practical limits with A380.

@IslandBlaze8 Жыл бұрын

there are plenty of us who will be willing to pay for a 3hr flight plus it could change the way private owned jets are used. "the rich" could uber fly with planes like the boom plane.

@Jerry-sw8cz Жыл бұрын

yeah, get efed Boeing and airbus !!!

@dgpofficial3640 Жыл бұрын

China tops the list for an innovative idea of a regular airliner based on airbus and using GE engines... WHAT!?!?!?!

@joseevsngelista6342 Жыл бұрын

I’ll never ride of made in China passenger plane.

@Teladian2 29 күн бұрын

I wouldnt fly on a CRAIC airliner ever.

@CES1122 Жыл бұрын

Barriers are far from green ever google how a battery for an electric car is made u will chg ur mind on all the electric bs pretty quick

@MrJBA79 7 ай бұрын

You quote decades and multiple decades.. you simply won't believe how vastly different your life will be by 2030. Let's just say, this might not age well.

@fifski Жыл бұрын

Sorry, not sorry to burst the bubble, but almost none of these concepts will ever fly commercially. Only the ones that are economically feasible and able to cram as much passengers as possible on a given flight. That's how airlines make money. Not by flying ridiculous 3-story monstrosity 🤣 Even much more 'reasonable' A380 is not hugely profitable. To all those delusional commenters here, aviation tech is hard. Really hard. So don't fool yourselves 🤣

@terrylalley Жыл бұрын

that voice uuuurgghhhhh

@russellmigues64 Жыл бұрын

People could say and what they think but I would never go in an electric plane, EVER

@richardlandrio3732 Жыл бұрын

How bout when the plane is takin a nose dive toward earth ? Would you still want a plane whos wings are loaded to tons of fuel in them?

@henrycoats2202 Жыл бұрын

You can’t change travel when something’s so ridiculous, it’s never going to happen, waste of time and energy.

@user-ts3ou3zn9x Жыл бұрын

ничего интересного и перспективного не показано.

@aleksanderkuncwicz7277 Жыл бұрын

People need electric jet engines for going to space the world might flood.

@amyjinkerson1822 Жыл бұрын

looks like a toy

@aeoh2000 Жыл бұрын

NOTHING NEW SINCE TW0 DECADE ALWAYS REPEATING

@ip0071 Жыл бұрын

Much of this video assumes that CO2 is a pollutant but in reality it's simply plant food! If you care about having a green planet then you should want more of the nutrition called CO2 in the atmosphere!

@robertmoorefield3756 Жыл бұрын

It kinda is at the rate we are going. Do some research

@markmh835 Жыл бұрын

Are you a 5th grader? Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that traps the sun's heat in the atmosphere and is gradually warming the planet. We are dumping far more CO2 into the atmosphere than all the plants and oceans can dispose of -- especially with destruction of the rain forests. Global warming will melt the ice caps and lead to catastrophic sea level rise. Humanity absolutely must work to LOWER CO2 in the atmosphere if we want to survive global warming.

@ip0071 Жыл бұрын

@@markmh835 please show me non government funded peer reviewed evidence that CO2 is a green house gas! The earth is actually cooling right now not warming! Thanks to CO2 the earth is 15% greener then it was two decades ago and the northern hemisphere has significantly more trees then it did 100 years ago!