ikr

They’re just reaching for views

To their defense, FOM is extremely strict with what people can use in their videos.

Yup

They used Formula Renault lul

Yes 🤣

Don’t ride the sausage

That is because these are NOT F1 cars. The video is clickbait

@@Bigheadguyfromsmolmovie Yeah that’s why there’s the world “concept” 🤦‍♂️

Hehe Max go brr on sausage kerb. Remove them already lol

it didnt enter F1

it didn't enter the sport

@@hrlqzdg shhhhhhhhhhhhhh sweet summer child. That's en9ugh now

Sadly, the Williams never competed.

No no, they must have meant Tyrell Corp. from Blade Runner...

chill...

I know made me cringe a bit when I heard mention of the TY-REL team 😬

KZfaq seems like a small world sometimes. Same narrators, music, stock clips/photos.

It does! It sounds like Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now

This is their sister channel

@@nilswildeboer882 ah

😳

Verstapen in 2024 ☠️

These are NOT real f1 concepts

Brrrrrrrrrtttt

F1 is going to be Fe in a few years

@@chaoticmoron-zl6nv it’s really not.

What are these concepts from Fe?

@@chaoticmoron-zl6nv not likely. Formula E has the exclusive rights to electric racing til 2039 with the FIA so electric F1 cars are not coming until then if at all.

"Fe", from feminine/female..!

And a ferrari

I seem to recall one that had twin rear axle....

@@bazf7742 the Ferrari had a dually Lay-out at the back

Ferrari 312T6 is also 6 wheeler

You're both right. Williams' first 6 wheeler actually was FW07D (shown at 10.18) as driven by Alan Jones at Donington on his way back to Australia after the end of the 1981 season. This gave promising results so Patrick Head designed FW08 to accommodate FW07D's rear end hence FW08B which was intended to be their '83 car until ground effect was banned (along with 6 wheelers) at the end of '82. The whole point of the concept was to allow more space for uninterrupted venturis/diffuser without the wide rear wheels/tyres getting the way plus to reduce the frontal area of the tall, wide rear wheels/tyres. The trade-off was the extra weight of the transmission, rear suspension & 4 wheels/tyres which is why FW08 in 4 wheel guise was so light it had to be heavily ballasted. March's 771 2-4-0 was all about the frontal area as well as traction and could have worked very well if the expensive transmission case hadn't been changed at the design stage to make it cheaper but weaker. In fact it failed during its first test. When March demonstrated it at a wet Silverstone the press were amazed at the lack of wheelspin. Fact is the rear most wheels were not driven and driver Howden Ganley had been told to go easy on the throttle to avoid wheelspin! If two rear wheels spun and two didn't, it wouldn't look so good!

he couldn’t even get it away from the pits probably

They should let my 7 year old have a shot first..

Sigma looks like a go kart instead of f1 car.

@@arghyadipbhowmik5296 you have a point

1969 Ferrari Sigma probably goes faster than the current Ferrari SF21.

You mean like 95 percent of all motorsports? That has never been the reason for a open cockpit.

@@Hermanos22 in 95% of motorsports the car/bike/truck/horse wouldn't explode anywhere near as violenty as Grosjean's did. And in other categories there is room in the cockpit , in f1 there is none.

@@Hermanos22 also a "windshield" capable of withstand the forces that a halo does (ex: Leclercs debut season) would warp the visual field of the driver. I think redbull did some testing some years ago with a windshield without rooftop (because safety)

@@eltipopiku INDYCAR bought the desing of Redbull for their series. So it eventually got in to use. It has some flaws other than field of view, like heat. Indycars produce an immence heat inside of the cockpit because of the lack of wind

Also bad to have your head sticking out of a car that goes 200 near walls and other vehicles

Thank you!

+1 Instantly jumped to the comments. Thank all of you :)

You're telling me he's not related to the late Queen Margery?!

Shhhhh....you’re spoiling the fun by telling him! We could all be sniggering each time he pronounces it like that! 🤣

An American butchered the English language again

U know this vid is absolute BS right?

@@Bigheadguyfromsmolmovie that’s why there is the word called concept

If you are a big F1 fan you should know that they are showing cars not related to f1

Cringe

id also be a problem for heating and cooling for the driver making it uncomfortable for them to drive in

They should never happen

halo is 3x compared to pretty much everything

That's why the halo is by far the best compromise, ugly though it may be. All the benefits of a cockpit keeping things away from the driver, but without the risk of leaving them trapped in the car in the event the car itself becomes hazardous

@@Dovoline3 unless it ends up upside down in a gravel trap or something. Then I'd keeps the driver trapped!

it is a mario kart perhaps

Superkart on steroids

Indeed sigma

Mario cart with Ferrari flat 12

No Every Team, even those who have …. That’s motor racing !

@@chrisbraid2907 Wdym every team, it used to be a dream for every driver, not team

@@chrisbraid2907 he’s talking about F1. (That’s like saying “Williams is the team to beat”)

They have a rich history, but they haven’t been very successful nowadays like they used to. (Same goes for Ferrari, in F1. Hence the “You mean every midfielder right?” because they haven’t won a championship lately, be it drivers/Constructor championship since 07/08)

lol. cruel but true.

Noticed that as well. Peculiar to say the least.

Thank you!

Shape shifting tracks?

@@bgk7 fully electric is Formula E

@@busbodge pardon?

@@bgk7 formula E is fully electric single seater racing series

@@Bahiti-wv7yh cool!

…this aged well McLaren 1-2 at Monza!

Yeah....about that...

Click bait.. that thumbnail didn't feature in the video

@@acadityac yea I realized🤬

No thumbnail has ever made me vomit quicker than this one

@@human1080 so tired of negative energy on the internet

@@priztucker then get out of the internet

Anti skid systems were widely used already in the '50s to slow down safely big airplanes without burning out brakes and tyres. The Concorde at the end of the '60s developed it as a fully electronic one. Modern concept of ABS was invented in 1971 at FIAT Research Center , and then sold to Bosch. In F1 ABS appeared and used in 1993 with Williams.

Or use cyber formula cars.

@@archwaldo Already have that - its called video games and they do have a 'few' racing 'eSports' too. That is NOT the same as actually being in the car, actually pushing yourself to go as 'fast' as you dare knowing that a mistake could leave you in hospital. Cyber racing is so far away from the same thing. Real racing is about more than just the 'Driver', its about the machines too - the technical expertise of the team to extract performance and design the aero, to push the limits of of both man & machine. In Cyber space, nothing really matters. The weather is 'fake', as is wind or gravity - its all 'fake' - just the way its 'coded'.

ok, F1 didn't start with a formula but it gained one after it got so dangerous people were dying. This has already been tried, but alas i guess will never happen again because of safety. People are crazy.

@@BAMozzy69 shows what little you know about simracing. Fist and foremost most aero concepts are put through rigorous simulations, on computers, in a virtual (cyber) algorithm. These simulations are highly realistic and useful for testing experimental designs without wasting tens of thousands making models. That said, actual simracing games like iracing are extremely realistic and many drivers use simracing games to practice during off season. Things like the weather might be simulated, but track temps and ambient temps definitely affect how the car handles. Not only that anything that can be adjusted in reality can be adjusted in a good simracer from brake bias to tire psi and even camber/caster and gear ratios. Things like tire & engine temps matter for optimum performance, the realism goes on and on. I'm not talking about Need for Speed or Forza games either. Those are arcade games. There are several simulation racing games with pretty damn realistic physics dude. You must live under a fucking rock..

He’s not he knows nothng about F1 he should not make this video

Yeah this vid is BS.

I cringed

@@dazzab111 You cringed????? lol.

I hated that

God damm my fucking English just got destroyed just listening to that

I don't know, I kinda favor, "VehTELL."

Yeah, like a demon love child between a Formula (not F1) racer and a Le Mans Prototype, jus like the Red Bull X2010 first seen in Gran Turismo 5 and the predecessor to the X2014!

I’ve managed under 4 minutes with it in Assetto Corsa, absolutely insane car

That X2010 Challenge is so hard, especially with a controller, even with a steering wheel rig I've heard it's pretty tough! It's pretty much the first car in the series I haven't been able to get to grips with yet, although, I haven't really taken the time out to do so... And I've seen around 3:30 on Nordschleife! It is insane! It's not cartoonishly fast, that would make it slower than it actually is!

True

Flat 12 Mario cart

Gt Sport has X2019 competition but slower than X2011

X2014 aerodynamics are superior, plus the car is more drivable while not needing as much power.

I tried the Junior in Gran Turismo 7 and was left feeling "what is this?"! Not as mental as its bigger, more insane siblings! It had no pace, that was its problem!

he said that

They also didn't work very well with the drivers saying the air went between the chassis creating lift

ACKCHULLY

The Nurburgring?

Who for?

It looks like a stretched go-kart

🤔

It was to improve aero, smaller tyres create less drag but offer less grip. 4 small tyres are in theory better than 2 large.

No it wasn't. Not sure where you got that idea, but it's completely wrong.

​@@mr_pennason5329 Hmmm ... sort of. Not really though. Smaller tyres created less drag AT THAT TIME, AS A RESULT OF OTHER RULE STIPULATIONS IN THE FORMULA, without creating too much of a disadvantage in other areas, therefore making it beneficial. Four small tyres are NOT, in theory, better than two large tyres. There are NUMEROUS factors involved, and there are many disadvantages to having four small tyres, so whether or not they're 'better' depends on all sorts of things, but in the end it boils down to the rules and restrictions that are in place. Four front wheels happened to be better AT THAT TIME, but that does NOT mean it would be better now, or that it would have been better at any other time. The front wings are so small nowadays that the four small tyres wouldn't fit behind them completely - as they did on the P34 - so the advantage would not be as great as it was back then, and consequently wouldn't counterbalance all the complexities and disadvantages that come with having four front wheels. Like so many other innovations that have come and gone in F1, it was the right answer to the formula of the time.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrrell_P34 Have a read..

This guy should talk to Romain Grosjean

Lol same

I was just about to rant about him saying non-sense about closed cockpits. But you did. So thanks

Your panties are really in a bunch over this.

Edit 6 should be you fixing the edit numbers lol

@@mrpancakedemon7454 Lmao bro, I must've been so excited and annoyed at the time. I never noticed

why arnt closed cockpits safer?

Having more than two powered wheels in f1 is banned. it also might make the car slower on the track because there would be electric motors on the front as well as larger front tyres which would reduce the potential of aerodynamics that could applied to the car. F1 cars get 95% of their handling from downforce aka aerodynamics. Having AWD might make it a little bit faster when the track is wet

. . . He is from Simple History.. His name is Chris Kane.

Mangles pronunciation elsewhere?

@@DubSun33 complaining about his pronunciation is like telling a baby they are a failure because they can’t engineer a race car. Teach him how first, then complain.

@@Kilo-sz4ch Complain after teaching him? Better not to confuse a comment with a complaint.

@@DubSun33 complain if someone knows better but intentionally does it wrong rather than complaining about someone doing something wrong that they never learned how to do right

I could

@@increase9896 Of course you could. F1 drivers can't physically handle the g forces but sure a youtube commentator can.

PCM user?

Gt6 is not gtsport lol, gt6 came out in 2013 or something. Everything else is correct tho 👌

GT5 had the X2010, GT6 which was between GT5 and GT Sport came out in 2013 and updated the X2010 to the X2014. GT Sport had an update to the game in version 1.40 of the game that released an X2019. Likely the GT7 release in 2022 will have either an X2022 or X2023 at some point.

❤️

Bless your little grandma heart !! You are certainly #1 in my book !!

Hello!

not true..

@@wahedeenhoorn6444 Yes true. Ferrari haven't been on top in F1 for over a decade and before Ferrari's dominance was Williams, McLaren and Mercedes.

Oof my dude

@I like Cheese press X to doubt

@I like Cheese I just think they fell so hard behind on development

Nah m8 this vid is BS. Literally all the cars are NOT F1 cars.

It’s clickbait.

Thank you!

No it isn't. Not even close! The first syllable is NOT pronounced 'tier', and the 'e' is NOT pronounced as a 'u', it is pronounced as ... drum roll please ... an 'e'. Tyrrell is pronounced tih-rehl. SMH...

No idea what a "Lodus" is either 🙄

Thank you for pointing that out

The new f1 cars for 2022 look oddly similar to these

@@elijahchampaigne6753 yeah but not nearly the same. A lot of them are just have tons of bits to make them look aggressive and more appealing to kids. Personally i love the look of the 2022 car and the concepts because they all look simple and clean

Yeah the voice over guy is not a true F1 fan because no real F1 fan would ever mispronounce tyrell like that.

No idea what a "lodus" is either

That wont work, Americans cant say squirrel either!