I was praying. I asked God why He nolonger speaks to us. Why we nolonger see angels. I told Him i stoped reading the bible reason being it has been changed so much. I told him i know all the names people call Him by but i would like to know who really He is. I told Him am afraid to read the bible and Chirstianity with these early pastors they have turned it into a joke yet go unpunished. So am afraid to partake in a lie thinking it's write. I had recited this prayer for so long but today as i kept asking God if is there atleast some truth that remained unchanged in the bible. Then a voice said melchizedec. Now i had no idea where it was but i knew somewhere at the end of the bible. I never checked at that time i kept asking God to speak to me opening some books of the old testament. Then i turned to new testament a page opened about Melchizedec. I prayed and thanked God. Then i took my phone to youtube to see if anyone ever wondered about this figure. To me i believe God was showing me His truth who He is. The beginning and the end. No mother no father. Withought genealogy. King of salem. King of peace. El and Elohim. Today has changed my life and you revealed more. God bless you. I don't call on anyone to believe or debate but i know what i know
@bradlaffin5572 Жыл бұрын
It's clear as day, Melchizedek is the Great I AM in the old testament. Our Lord has always came in flesh to visit His people. Our LORD OF RIGHTEOUSNESS. HALLELUJAH & AMEN
@paulgibbons23202 жыл бұрын
Its interesting he uses Bread and Wine ceremonially in what appears to be an act of communion long before the last super.
@biblicalanarchy132 жыл бұрын
The Jews had a tradition of using bread and wine ceremonially long before Jesus. Jesus says "as often as you do this" indicating they already did it. He was reinterpreting an existing tradition, not inventing a new one.
@jimmycricket5366 Жыл бұрын
Foreshadowing.
@bdault Жыл бұрын
We are convinced that's it is the "order" of Melchizedek. It is not one man, it is a title. The Melchizedek does not have a beginning, end, or genealogy. It is the line of the messiah.
@juliusschutte7862 жыл бұрын
Mr.Bird, it is so refreshing to encounter someone who gives such a well rounded presentation of a topic shrouded in mystery, as that of Melchizedek, thank you, well done.
@africanandproud67923 жыл бұрын
My goodness, this is powerful. The best lecture on Melchizedek I've ever heard.
@johnnewton80173 жыл бұрын
Agreed!
@tuvoca8252 жыл бұрын
Try Lectures on Faith
@Sayheybrother82 жыл бұрын
Do you or anyone in the comments here have an opinion on how the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints view Melchizedek? The men in the church can become elders at the age of 18 and receive the Melchizedek priesthood giving them authority to officiate and give blessings within the church and their families.
@19dcscout2 жыл бұрын
I'm an atheist and I enjoyed this video. Interesting!
@sylviaredmond83862 жыл бұрын
Incredible! I’ve asked my pastor about Melchizedek and he said, “good luck with that!” I appreciate you sharing your insights regarding this subject, but I’m going to have to listen to this at least 37 more times before I have any idea regarding this interesting subject. Thank you!
@Call.Him.Emmanuel2 жыл бұрын
I just finished reading Hebrews 7, and was just wondering why no one talks about Him in the Church. He is too significant to be ignored
@michaellight2211 Жыл бұрын
@@Call.Him.Emmanuel He briefly touches on that. Paul was a Jew and longed to convert the Jews when he could, this was an instance where he was using the reference to "relate" to their culture, as a jew to the jews.
@oldmanfigs Жыл бұрын
@@Call.Him.Emmanuel they write him off as Christophany.
@pmboord Жыл бұрын
This was absolutely fascinating. Often in church we gloss over the Order of Melchizedek and don’t really discuss what it is. I’m delving deeper and look forward to reading your thesis. Blessing.
@melvalively7846 Жыл бұрын
In church we gloss over a lot. I received a healing from a beautiful young lady Madeline Eve! 💕Which lead me to Saint Germain, Melchizedek, Paul Selig. And my life will never be the Same. GOD is here! And he will make himself known if we ask.
@HeidiAHogan3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your research. Reading Hebrews 7 and felt led to stop and investigate Melchizedek.
@vijaykumarpragasam26793 жыл бұрын
Hearty appreciation from Bangalore, India.Profound thoughts from a profound mind on the profundity of Melchizedek.Fascinating insights.
@spacemanspiff97733 жыл бұрын
That’s how I got here too!
@HeritageWealthPlanning3 жыл бұрын
Me too!
@LadyBeeAyarkwa2 жыл бұрын
Story of my life
@choncha232 жыл бұрын
Same here lol
@tedomer36273 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed the analysis and history. Melchizedek is a fascinating person, more is to be learned. His priesthood was without beginning or end, not his person. And he held the high priesthood, not the lower priesthood, like Aaron did later on. Thus, Abraham sought out Melchizedek to give him tithes and to obtain that high priesthood also, under the hand of Melchizedek.
@victoriaakingbade69082 жыл бұрын
This is so powerful I have been born again for decades but had no full understanding of this king and High priest , my eyes are filled with tears once again thank you just subscribed to your channel
I shared some of what I learned from you with my Sunday school class yesterday morning. They went wild. "Mel who?" haha oh man! We spun off on that for 20 minutes they tore their bibles up looking for Melchizedek. It was great. Thanks Mr. Bird. I clicked on the Subscribe button. See you at the next one.
@Joedebengaluru2 жыл бұрын
Best comprehensive talk I have heard on the subject so far
@roje36473 жыл бұрын
I'm glad that this was shown to me. Bless the LORD
@911SWIM Жыл бұрын
This is exactly what I was looking for in a video when I searched his name. Great work APTTMH 🙏
@markita.hardenhome2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm. I disagree that Melchizedek isn't Jesus for a few reasons: 1. The Holy Spirit inspires the writing of the Scriptures. Why would God speak like this?.... running down rumors and comparing Jesus to local "folklore"? Unless there is serious significance to Melchizedek, being mentioned by Moses, David then in Hebrews. 2. If we believe the encounter of Abraham and Melchizedek to be historical fact... then we must believe the things being said about him as well... 3. If Melchizedek can never die, and a person made a priest after this order is primarily because of its permanency.. that would HAVE to mean Melchizedek still exists somewhere... since he couldn't die... AND he would have to STILL be a priest.... because by definition that's what being a priest after this order means. Your position is permanent because you have no ending. 4. So then, do we have TWO priests in this permanent priedthood?..... Melchizedek that Abraham encountered and then Jesus??? 5. Either Melchizedek was a human that died and they attributed his myth to Jesus.. in order to help us understand Jesus' priesthood....OR...Melchizedek was Jesus in the Old Testament. It's more plausible that Melchizedek was Jesus in the Old Testament. Being said to have the exact characteristics..... no beginning or ending.... no father or mother. These are attributes of God. Jesus existed in the beginning. Being the very thing THROUGH WHICH the Earth was created. So then why would it be so hard for it to have been Jesus? Of course not known as Jesus but by the other titles we know him to be..... THE WORD OR LOGOS. When did Melchizedek cease being on the Earth? Did his priesthood just disappear or end? when there's a change of priesthood there's also a chance of covenant. So then, could it be when Moses and his people accepted God's covenant... this is where the priesthood change happened? Not that Melchizedek ceased being a priest... but being a person of the Godhead manifested in human form like Christ, went back to heaven? And with God dwelling amongst his people he temporary appoints Aaron and his sons to take on the task? Kinda like when Jesus said if I don't go then the Holy Spirit can't come. Not that God is incapable of being in two places at once... but there is a change in covenant. The Holy Spirit now has a work to do in the Earth. If we can believe that Enoch was the 1st human taken alive to heaven because he pleased God, and alln of the other incredible things scripture recounts....it's not too extreme to suggest Melchizedek was a manifestation of the LOGOS.... here not yet being the "Son Of God"...having not yet been conceived into Mary.... being only known to them by what he actually is.. THE WORD. Just my take on it.
@thenapqueenohana6612 жыл бұрын
Yes! Amen.
@bbl54992 жыл бұрын
Well articulated
@StripedCheeseBread2 жыл бұрын
He just doesn’t want to read what it says. Hebrews 7 slashes the Aaronic priesthood for the fact that the priests died, but if Jesus is the perfect priesthood, then Melchizedek must live forever and is said to live in the present tense twice earlier in the chapter. Also, Galatian 4 tells the allegory of the bond woman and the free woman in comparison to the Jerusalem on earth and the Jerusalem above which is free. I’m t would stand to reason that since Jesus is the priest after Melchizedek, and his covenant is of the Jerusalem above, then Melchizedek was the king of the city Jerusalem above, making him, well, God himself. However, lot of scholarly academic theologians have this false model of God that would come crashing down if Melchizedek is an incarnation of God.
@nathanielkgobe4272 жыл бұрын
Me too,i would not agree that Melchizedek is not Jesus Christ Himself.
@Yahusha772 жыл бұрын
I agree. Other scholars have researched and found Melchizedek to be the Messiah. They evidence is pretty clear.
@love1almightygodandallhisc6662 жыл бұрын
PRAISE THE LORD PSALM 150! THANK YOU FOR THIS VIDEO I APPRECIATE ALL YOUR WORK! THANK YOU!
@lamar68thelam434 жыл бұрын
Very Extensive review on Melchizedek. Thank You.
@martinmccormack8673 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your very well explained background to biblical interpretation. We often interpret the Scriptures in regard to the traditions of Jewish culture, but we forget to realize that there were documents and mystical traditions as well...I never would have thought of this, and it is a real eye opener. It helps when i read in Jude his reference to Satan debating with Moses, which is from the book of Enoch ( which is not in the reformed canon )....So, this has been very helpful, and beautifully presented. I thank you very much. God bless you brother.
@sharegreats21573 жыл бұрын
If Melchizedek was different from the Son of God he could nevertheless be a "picture" of Him, a fore-shadow, like other persons in the Old Testament such as David = King, Shepherd, or Moses = Redeemer. Those scriptures from Hebrews 7 and Psalm 110 are worth to be learnt by heart which I will do this month. Well presented rich information. Interesting books in the background. Thank you. Regards from Germany.
@chrisstathe91832 жыл бұрын
He was God since he had no beginning or end.He was Jesus as was the one who wrestled Jacob or met Joshua as the captain. Jesus is God who would be born into the human race after.Jesus is God with us.He is the holy one of Israel.
@michaellight2211 Жыл бұрын
"Melchizedek was different from the Son of God", John 4:37 And herein is that saying true, One soweth, and another reapeth.
@jimmycricket5366 Жыл бұрын
That's dedication and very wise to memorize scripture. Are you in the habit of memorising passages of scripture, and how has that enriched your life? I commend you for being a strong Christian in a relatively God-less land like Germany where self-sufficiency has sadly led most people to become 'lean in spirit'.
@jimmycricket5366 Жыл бұрын
Oh and don't forget Joseph as a type of Christ who I would say was a saviour to his brothers and therefore the Hebrew people= saviour.
@akamajesty92378 ай бұрын
And then there’s John 8 54-57 he says he knows abraham zero context of how he just says before abraham I AM
@donaldnord28952 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation!....Thankyou for your dedication and study and sharing on this wonderful subject.
@anthonybetances8503 жыл бұрын
My guy Chad- thanks for this exploration and explanation, and for making your thesis publicly available! I thought I would have to find you on socials or track down your email but nope, needs anticipated and met. Thank you! 🐐
@thenains3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your highly enlightening and interesting talks. I really appreciate your channel and am very grateful to have discovered and subscribed to it.
@jimmykey8784 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely fascinating! Thank you so much for this video! The mystery Melchizedek is definitely intriguing and I'm grateful to have learned more from you. Again thank you. Peace be with you and God bless you 🙏
@AbraAlahouzos8 ай бұрын
I am currently reading your book The Christ Key because of a dream I had 2 weeks ago. I did not know you or your work prior. I had another recent experience regarding Melchizedek and also have vaguely heard of the name in the corners of my mind. I've never read the bible, and was not brought up religious despite being baptized Greek Orthodox. I have spent the past 4 days researching anything I could get my hands on about him and I see I have come full circle with your research paper. Thank you for your work and I am just flabbergasted at this point.
@lee-be6pp2 жыл бұрын
The Urantia book says Melchizedek was sent to reestablish God's word as pre[paration for the coming of Christ. The references to God speaking with Abraham were actually of Melchizedek but, apart from one passage, were later switched out by the priests who didn't want any figure to eclipse the patriarch's status.
@angelioforosaletheia88553 жыл бұрын
1) To me, it is obvious, but like some things in Scripture, it is not required for all to know it, such as Jesus saying "to whomever can receive it, let him receive it" as He did with John the Baptist being the Elijah to come. Why then, do some Christians think Elijah is one of the 2 witnesses when Jesus made it clear that Elijah has ALREADY come? Because not all can receive His saying and something go over certain people's heads. Now ... for Melchizedek: 2) Melchizedek has neither beginning of days, nor ending. *That is in reference to ETERNALITY,* for Jesus also has neither beginning nor ending. 3) *Melchizedek is the King of Salem.* It is a disturbing lie to read Jewish and Christian Commentaries that insert "Jerusalem." No. There is nothing about the CITY of Peace. There is literally nothing in the Text that says "Jeru-salem". Nothing. That is an insertion of man, and the blind leaders who don't know the difference. There is only "peace" (Salem - shalom) written in the Text. In fact, there is no city mentioned at all. PEACE is intangible. You cannot see or touch it. 4) *Melchizedek is the King of Righteousness.* How can a mortal man be the KING of Righteousness!? Only GOD can have such a title! It would be blasphemy to give a title that belongs only to God, to mortal men! 5) *There is literally no such thing as the "priesthood" of Melchisedek.* That is literally never written. It does not exist in the Text. Saying there is a "priesthood" of Melchizedek is as much an insertion and an error (intentional or otherwise) as inserting 'Jerusalem' into the Text when the Text clearly says "Salem" only. There is, likewise, NO mention of any other priests or successors, NO mention of any Temple, NO mention of any 3b & 4b & 5B) "My Kingdom is NOT of this world" - Jesus 6) *Melchizedek is both King and High Priest.* No one else can be both. No king can also be high priest, and no high priest can also be king. ONLY Melchizedek was this, and ONLY Jesus is this. 7) *His very name means KING OF RIGHTEOUSNESS* Do you not hear the blasphemy in that, to call a mere mortal, the KING over RIGHTEOUSNESS!? The very NAME is DIVINE! FAST FORWARD TO THE NEW TESTAMENT 8) *The author of Hebrews mentions things that a sacred to the Jews, showing hos Jesus is GREATER than all of the things, but when it comes to Melchizedek, the author does NOT show Jesus as being GREATER, but instead, he shows Jesus as being {EQUAL} to Melchizedek.* When you read the surrounding Chapters in that light, it becomes clear that the one thing the author does not make Jesus "greater than," is Melchizedek. But instead, he considers Jesus to be "equal to." 8) *The author is holding something back about Melchizedek.* He says that there are things he wants to tell them about Melchizedek, but they are all too weak and unspiritual and unlearned. He even complains about their spiritual immaturity - rebukes them for it, even. So, the question is, WHAT is it that the author wants to tell the saints about Melchizedek? That he is GOD in the flesh? That he is Christ (Christophany)? And why is this so hard to imagine? Did not Jacob wrestle with a MAN that he called GOD? Did not three MEN visit Abraham of whom he called his Lord, Yahweh? 10) *Because the greater always blesses the lessor.* It is firmly established and considered that Abraham was the most righteous man alive in those days. So, if he was the MOST righteous, what in the world could be MORE Righteous than the MOST righteous? Only GOD! The greater blessed the lessor. 11) And this one, to me, seals the deal. *ABRAHAM GAVE TO MELCHIZEDEK WHAT {{BELONGS}} TO GOD! HE GAVE HIM THE TITHE!* You cannot give what belongs to God to anything else! And no righteous man would take what belongs to God unto himself. It would be robbery, perhaps sin! So, why does Abraham, who knew better, give what belongs to GOD, to a moral man? It is for the same reason Abraham went running off to three strangers, bowed, and call them his master! Melchizedek has to be GOD!
@GTKJNow2 жыл бұрын
Agree Jesus is Melchizedek.
@bbl54992 жыл бұрын
Alright, and the perfect embodiment of the invisible Father is........ before Abraham was, I am.
@voidremoved2 жыл бұрын
lol
@amyrenee1361 Жыл бұрын
In Hebrews 7:1-3 it states that Melchizedek was "without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life"
@michaeldemny6122 жыл бұрын
Great show. I also have found Melchezedek fascinating over the years. I have a hard time wrapping my head around this figure. However I dont trust Enoch book 2 & 3, so I have to throw that out. But the rest of your prsentation is great. Thank you. I still dont understand who Melchiszdek is but will keep praying for understanding
@JP779M2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for taking the time to extensively explore further, the Way of GOD’S TRUTHS AND LIGHT… EXCITING TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE LORD BAITS US ALL… in JOY AND INCLUSION IN HIS PROMISES … JESUS, OUR REDEEMER AND HIS MOTHER MARY… truly hold you in Filial Esteem ! Thank you for sharing 🥰
@elsainnamorato22313 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. I love Melchizedek I feel that he is someone very important and God's kingdom and in my life. It would have been someone I would have loved to have met here in this world. So thank you for the video God bless
@janiecekeys47653 жыл бұрын
Amen
@jimmycricket5366 Жыл бұрын
Indeed.
@melchizedek777lastdaysmelc9 Жыл бұрын
I want to Add to My Previous Comment as Far as More Research Material Regarding Melchizedek, Some of the Context of 11Q Relates in Wording to 'Pistis Sophia', He is Also Mentioned in 'the Sermon of Zoroaster', and 'the Paraphrase of Shem', and 'the Three Steeles of Shem' for Reference to Those Who are Interested.
@youtubernr.12982 жыл бұрын
What scares me the most is the part when it says: "Sit at my right hand, UNTIL..." and then what? Sit there no more?
@ephraimphiri57893 жыл бұрын
This is the best I have seen on Melchizedek!!! Thanks alot!!!!
@bobrock2393 жыл бұрын
not only have I successfully deciphered who this Melchizedek is but also Nimrod and all I got to say is you will be blown away at their unveiling.... scholars and historians don't even know this... I sought and I found, dammit did I find......
@FDroid01 Жыл бұрын
What did you find?
@brianmpofu2295 Жыл бұрын
Can you please share.
@VladaldTrumptin Жыл бұрын
Ok….?
@greglindstrom27332 жыл бұрын
And Adonizedk king of Jerusalem, the Same was Shem, went out with his men to meet Abram and his people with bread and wine, and they remained together in the valley of Melech. Jasher 16: 11
@mrmcface7132 жыл бұрын
The Book of "Jasher" you quote from is not the true book of Jasher
@eew80602 жыл бұрын
@@mrmcface713 Exactly! And Melchizedek IS NOT Shem
@joefranklin98812 жыл бұрын
@@eew8060 Right, he had Father and Mother, and beginning of days......He was born...
@annemurphy93392 жыл бұрын
@@eew8060 I always thought he was Shem because I thought there could be only one high priest at a time?
@jessicaleague41732 жыл бұрын
Melchizadek is an order. The one with no father or mother was Adam. The one Abraham gave tithe to was Shem, and the last one is our Messiah Yehoshua. I think it was passed down until the order was split into the line of Judah as king and the line of Levi as priest until they were reunited in our Savior. It might have gone like this, Adam, Seth, Enoch, Methuselah, Noah, Shem, Abraham, Jacob and then split or something to that effect. Not one person. An order or line of people, rather.
@mexrobert35633 жыл бұрын
Melchizedek is very interesting subject to learn.. i think he was the most mysterious person in the Bible..
@chrisstathe91832 жыл бұрын
He is God.
@beverlywilhelm7312 жыл бұрын
I have always believed that the Priesthood of Melchizedek and the Priesthood of Aaron are separate with separate responsibilities…
@chiron14pl2 жыл бұрын
This is the stance taken by the LDS church, where the Aaronic priesthood is a lesser one than the Melchizadek priesthood.
@patrickthompson56122 жыл бұрын
One is eartly one is heavenly divine. We get baptize physically by men but our spirits by the divine priesthood. So above so below.
@Skashoon2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this. I thought people knew more about him and I only read his name, but it seems most of us hadn’t read much about him. It must’ve been a difficult thesis to write since very little is known or in evidence.
@richardglady30097 ай бұрын
Wow! That was an amazing lecture. I am not a good reader and never really understood the Bible. 1. Your explanations were great and 2. As a historian and archaeologist, I understand completely the concept of context. I am lucky enough to be able to own, as ebooks, the different non-Biblical texts that you discuss. Now…I have to return to them and read them. Thanks for this amazing video and all the hard work you put into to it. God bless you.
@michaelsuperstar606 Жыл бұрын
The Dead Sea scrolls and Nag Ham speak of Melchizedek. Melchizedek is a celestial being that materialized upon the face of the planet earth to uplift humanity. The Melchizedek order and being is spoken about within the papers of the Urantia Book.
@lesserpoo3 жыл бұрын
I was raised to believe that those other books were evil. I still haven’t finished the book of Enoch, but I’ve started. I’ve read through the Bible 5 times and always wondered what all that bizarre scripture meant and The order of Melchizedek was one of them. Thanks for sharing!
@JDSabre2 жыл бұрын
Nothing makes me more alive than researching, contemplating this stuff... the rabbit holes that appear, the doors that open... but how does one make a living from it?
@sixwingsram Жыл бұрын
A brilliant expose' of the historical fragments regarding Melchizadec. What wonderful and scholarly insights are offered here into ancient spirituality and mysticism.
@captain.markos3 жыл бұрын
A sincere thank you for sharing.
@StoneInMySandal Жыл бұрын
I landed here by chance, and I’m glad for it. That was a very good talk. Thank you.
@willscott47852 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for this excellent piece. Very well done -- succinct but rich.
@erinshepard1502 жыл бұрын
just found this. I'll be back, and thanks for not being petrified of 2 Enoch
@johnnyrarere Жыл бұрын
I am an LDS and hold the Melchezidek Priesthood...it was restored to the Earth with its keys by Peter James and John in 1820 as was the Aaronic Priesthood by John the Baptist... after which Christ's Church was Restored to the Earth...I know that many out there do not consider our Church as being legitimate or even Christian but we do still have a living Prophet We have Temples ..where Baptisms for the dead are performed as is mentioned in 1st Corinthians 15:29...as far as Christian denominations are concerned it appears that we are more structured according to the ancient Church then any other that I am aware of Be interesting to see what others think as there is a very strong anti Mormon stance regarding our legitimacy as a Christian denomination Enjoyed this presentation immensely
@jvftools Жыл бұрын
this was a nice video, and one off the only times someone actually sticks to written facts, i couldn't even discover what faith the man has because he referred to what is written... Very nice. Cheers
@patrickroden7132 жыл бұрын
Hebrews sets out from the start, to answer questions that Jewish believers (or potential believers) had about the Messiah. The various myths that had developed over the centuries about who the Messiah was and how he would manifest, had become excepted as almost as equal to scriptural truths. Therefore, the author of the book of Hebrews begins the first few chapters by explaining that Jesus was 'greater than the angels, greater than 'Moses', 'greater than Abraham', and of course 'greater than Melchizedek'.
@patrickroden7132 жыл бұрын
Another important point is that in Jewish Law, a man could not hold the office of a priest and be king at the same time, so the fact that Jesus was being preached as both a King and a priest, would have raised some questions, so the book of Hebrews shows us a man who was the 'King' of Salem but also 'priest' of the God most High, showing that it was only those who held the office of the Aaronic priesthood that were barred from holding the position of King. So, Jesus was the 'King of Israel' and the 'High priest of our confession', and since His priesthood was of 'the order of Melchizedek' it was not breaking Jewish law.
@jamesstumpff77742 жыл бұрын
How is Jesus greater than Melchizedek…infinite in existence? Is one infinite greater than another?
@NegdoshaManido2 жыл бұрын
The way I've come to understand it, the kingship and priesthood of earth were represented by one man starting with Adam, and passed down along the line of patriarchs, (not the twelve patriarchs of Israel as the word is commonly associated) until the two offices were divided. The kings were to descend from the line of Judah, and the priests from the line of Levi. This was done by God, and he was very serious about the separation of the two, as is evidenced by the severe judgment of leprosy placed upon Uzziah for attempting to overstep his place as king by offering incense, something only a priest could do. The significance of the connection between Mechizedek and Jesus is that for the first time since God separated the two offices, the kingship of the entire world and the priesthood of the entire world would once again be embodied in one man. I'm of the opinion that Shem was indeed Mechizedek, and that he inherited the kingship/priesthood from his father, Noah. The apparent immortality that appears to be ascribed to him is actually dealing with the nature of the priesthood itself, and not the man himself, even though the ultimate expression of that priesthood would be the immortal God incarnate, Jesus Christ. Thanks for the video! I enjoyed it very much! I have been trying among my fellow Christians to advocate for the importance of study into extra biblical texts in order to gain a better understanding of the Word of God. It really opens up so much more rich meaning and understanding. God bless! : )
@moatd12 жыл бұрын
thanks for sharing your insight in regard to dividing en bringing together the two roles of kingship/priesthood
@abolanleaderibigbe67602 жыл бұрын
Yeah really insightful.
@GracedVille2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant 👏 👏 👏
@alecepting13712 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation. You also see the two roles represented in the Messiah's two advents. In the first advent, He served in a priestly role, as an offering for sin once-for-all, and in His second advent, He will serve in a kingly role -- the former overcoming the flesh, the latter, the world and Satan, all 3 of which are the enemies of our soul. The nation of Israel was designated to be the vehicle for both, through which the Messiah would perform His work, and in the end times, Jerusalem will be the center of His earthly rule, both in the old Jerusalem and in the new.
@l.sanders59212 жыл бұрын
I did not realize Melchizedek was in the bible multiple times. Thank you for sharing about the writings that are not a part of the English Bible translation.
@Iamvictormaria Жыл бұрын
I really appreciate this work you shared with us.
@philliplabuschagne55082 жыл бұрын
Best video on Melchizedek I have seen to date.
@ronskrobutan7635 Жыл бұрын
OK WOW ! i just down loaded your thesis and you have an amazing book my brother. write it just like you talk. The wold needs to read this. it might give you a house. God provides..
@darrellcollins8772 жыл бұрын
GREAT video of a tough subject, layed out to easily understand ! Bravo ! Thanks
@ronnestman46963 жыл бұрын
Love the video lecture. Good job my friend!
@monika1234ify4 жыл бұрын
I appreciate the historical information and look forward to reading the link.
@sagepeace90883 жыл бұрын
Could it be that melkisedik is an example of a man who is so committed to the lord that they have been transformed into the image of yeshua not above not below but a mirror image of yeshua a priest and a king.
@choncha232 жыл бұрын
He might have been a favored man in the eyes of the Father. Just like David and Solomon.
@jasonmusic3 Жыл бұрын
🙏🏾 They all have the same purpose. They will raise the consciousness of this material realm and therefore free this planet to bring the Light🙏🏾
@susanporter4031 Жыл бұрын
I do not understand a lot of this. I get frustrated. However, listening to you today was difrent. I understood more than usual. Thank you for this! Thank you very much! I'm very undereducated in religion. As a child I grew up learning nothing! Thank you again! You have given me some hope today!😂
@dennyanthonymusic3 жыл бұрын
I have a question about this. You say something to the effect that what the author of Hebrews is doing is simply echoing common rumors about Melchizedek, not attempting to lay claim to their validity and in this way, he is like the Son of God. However, if this is the case, then what does that same process say about Christ's priesthood? Is the author trying to tell the readers that not everything that is written about Jesus is true? I'm trying to follow the logic of this... it isn't making sense to me. I'm a bit slow about "getting" things sometimes. It seems to me that if Jesus tells us to pray, "Your Kingdom come, your will be done on Earth, just as it is in Heaven" it suggests (to me) that Melchizedek would have already been a priest in Heaven before Canaan, thus, he laid the foundation for an Earthly Priesthood, being the first Priest from God to bless mankind (break curses). If that is how it really is, then it is easy for me to see the correlation between Christ's Eternal Priesthood and that of Melchizedek. Because then, Melchizedek and Jesus both came from Heaven. It reminds me of later on when Hebrews tells the readers to "entertain strangers" for by doing so, many have entertained Angels unaware. Very interesting indeed.
@mablehayes53233 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this analysis.
@karenallen82792 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Your presentation cleared up the confusion I had on the Priesthood differences.
@believewithyourheart56273 жыл бұрын
Very interesting! Thankyou
@richardtorres1092 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this wonderful instruction and thoughtful elucidation of this important topic. …
@redcossack245 Жыл бұрын
Good teaching. Thank you for posting this.
@cherylzents59802 жыл бұрын
You might be interested in what the Urantia Book says about Machiventa Melchizedek.
@philliplabuschagne55082 жыл бұрын
The 1st time I read the vers talking about the Priesthood of Melchizedek, specifically the Order of Melchizedek something in me just switched on. This Priesthood Order is Very Real and transcend space and time. I could not find any info on it, but knew it was something very special. Found Druvaldo Melchizedek with Sacred Geometry looking for answers. The name Usavius came to me in a dream, maybe I must go read Usavius writings on Melchizedek to see how this opens more doors for me. Have you ever studied the link between John the Baptist and Elijah (Jesus and Elisha) maybe they were all part of this Priesthood. Chosen people to come back to assist human development on earth.
@VladaldTrumptin Жыл бұрын
Regarding your last sentence, about 2 years ago (before I considered myself a believer) the sentence “the 7 churches” somehow popped into my mind and wouldn’t leave. I’d never read the book of revelation or knew anything whatsoever about John the Baptist. Certain words like Patmos followed me it seemed until I was annoyed enough to look it up. Also the word paternoster. Oh yeah, and the numbers, everywhere 🙄 Of course there’s much, much more but these are what come to mind at the present time. Anyways, I’m still really no closer to understanding what it all means, if anything at all. But learning about these things actually led me to learn some previously unknown bits about my genealogy etc & of course I now own & read a bible, so there’s that. I come from a family of staunch atheists to which I’ve always suspected I was adopted. A lot of secrecy seems to shroud my first year or two of life. Something I always wrote off as being unwanted. The fact my mother has told me 3 seperate different names of my father over the years is also strange. Anyways! I’ll go on wondering, or hoping for something more meaningful than what the current bitter narrative offers 😂
@ertlk242 жыл бұрын
Rabbinic teaching and the early Church fathers all believed that the title Melchizadek (king of righteousness) was the son of Noah, Shem. Shem was the only 1st born in the Genesis account that did not loose his blessing; Cain, Esau, etc...I believe that if you count the years of Shem's lifespan, he out lives Abraham by 25 years or so. What we see in the biblical account is Melchizadek as a type of Christ, and New Testament worship of God: a priest offering bread and wine, receiving a blessing and then paying a tithe. The Levitical priests did the same thing in their offerings of bread and wine: see Leviticus 24-25. Jesus at the Last Supper: offers bread and wine stating that it has now become his body and blood of the New Covenant, commanding his disciples to "Do this in remembrance (anamnesis: covenantal representation) of Me" Only a priest could "Do" a sin offering. Jesus Christ is a priest "in the order of Melchizadek.: Psalm 110:4 Also of interest, as Mechizadek was King of Salem, Abraham offered Isaac (Aqedah: binding of Isaac) on Mt. Moriah, in Salem. "Where is the lamb for sacrifice?" "The Lord will provide." Abraham named that place: Yahweh Jira: in English: Jira-Salem (Jerusalem). See Genesis 22:14. This is exactly where the Jerusalem Temple was built: see 2Chron. 3:1 and where Jesus was Crucified: Calvary, a hill on Moriah.
@Call.Him.Emmanuel2 жыл бұрын
Most satisfying explanation♥️
@victormashatt63584 жыл бұрын
When I was a young Christian and came across him I was very interested in who he was.
@richardglady30097 ай бұрын
Thank you for the link to download your Thesis.
@shaneharrison47752 жыл бұрын
Thank you for expanding my awareness of the priesthood of melchizenek and the possible like to the priesthood of Christ Jesus
@francislando6160 Жыл бұрын
Best lecture on Melchizedek
@peggytippitt14074 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your sharing your studies.
@johnnewton80173 жыл бұрын
What a wonderful video!!!!
@thesourcerer65042 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your input and the explanation. Makes good sense.
@alecc93407 ай бұрын
This was very helpful. Thank you!
@theespjames41143 жыл бұрын
Melchizedek was the "High priest" without beginning or end! In Hebrews Apostle Paul refers to Christ as the "High Priest" forever ! And Christ also was without beginning or end! How can there be two high priest forever unless they are the same Christ!
@ronpatton57213 жыл бұрын
The answer might be found in that the word forever can denote quality over quantity. Whereas Jesus Christ is a priest forever in both quality and quantity, the Hebrews writer seemed to be emphasizing eternal qualifications, namely, that just as Melchizedek did not derive his priesthood from Aaron nor anyone else but was appointed by God, so also Jesus did not derive his priesthood from Aaron and was also appointed by God. In the case of Jesus, our Lord is greater than the Old Testament priesthood because the Old Testament priesthood was in fact temporary, Jesus on the other hand obtained a priesthood based on his eternal and thereby infinitely superior nature. Since Jesus’ appointment to priesthood functionally began when he died at Calvary and rose from the dead according to Hebrews chapters 4 and 10 along with Romans 8 and 1 John 2:1-2, it would be very difficult to view Melchizedek and Jesus as being one and the same. The writer to the Hebrews seems to have intended to demonstrate to Christians who, being severely persecuted for their faith in Jesus, and considering reverting back to an inferior system (one that held Abraham in the highest human esteem) that even Abraham, great as he was, recognized Melchizedek as someone greater still and worthy of Abraham’s recognition, submission and honor. So also, Jesus is worthy of their recognition, submission and honor over and against the Old Testament regime born ethnically out of Abraham and legally out of Moses, the mediator of God’s old covenant which has now been removed in Jesus Christ. Maybe this final thought will do some good. The Hebrews writer clearly taught that, in reference to Jesus, if He were on the earth he could not be a priest. Yet Melchizedek was manifestly earthbound, and served in a priestly role. Having no predecessors nor heirs could simply mean God, for some reason hidden from our understanding, appointed Melchizedek directly as a unique figure - perhaps to foreshadow the unique nature of Jesus. This is a vey difficult concept, to be sure. Even the Hebrews writer admitted it in the discussion about Melchizedek. Very sincerely and respectfully, Ron Patton Pulpit minister, Vancleave church of Christ
@b14ksy172 жыл бұрын
Melchizedek was Shem, eldest son of Noah who lived for around 600 years after the flood.
@wushupants2 жыл бұрын
That's why the bible says "a high priest AFTER the Order of Melchizedek" just like it says that the Father would give Yeshua the throne of David. If Yeshua was Melchizedek the bible would've called Him a high priest after His own order... not somebody else's.
@MGMG-lb6no2 жыл бұрын
AMEN AMEN AMEN 💖💖💖
@SteveFirefly7772 жыл бұрын
Paul was using a Jewish midrashic, hermeneutical, devise. Jews and Judaism do not believe Melchizedek was literally without beginning or end. Obviously he is long dead. “Without beginning “ is a metaphor for very old age. He was so old that no one alive had any knowledge of his parents. He was generations older than everyone else, and he worshipped the one true God.
@georgemay81703 жыл бұрын
You are telling us about the various speculations that the Biblical writers encountered concerning the lives of the past men and women of the Old Testament. I can appreciate this as I have done my own research. What I conclude is, Melchizedeq's attitude and actions were probably well known to Abraham and his followers to be the kind of reminder they needed to review in light of their knowledge of God and His eternal Covenant that would one day be fulfilled in His Son. Like we who believe and look back at the resurrection for "meaning and knowledge of God for eternal life, so did the patriarchs look forward in this promissory covenant for the same meaning, "to know God."
@MrKizzle3402 жыл бұрын
That was awesome info, question though, What about when jesus said i broke bread with abraham? As to him being melchizedek? because who else that it was written that broke bread with abraham?
@victormashatt63584 жыл бұрын
Thanks Chad.
@isaacmadhavan23483 жыл бұрын
Best explanation . I believe since he was living in the land of Canaan , he does not belong to Canaanite. Bible says he has no genealogy. A blessed man would not be raised from Canaan , the one who was cursed by Noah.
@INRIVivatChristusRex Жыл бұрын
You just gave me an idea on how to name my KZfaq channel. It is 33. The year that Christ founded His Church, the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. Thank you, God bless🙏🏻 Pray the Rosary 📿 Viva Cristo Rey!
@theoctagonentertainments Жыл бұрын
Well said I have searched in depth who he was and you are great in your thesis. I will read your conclusions and leave another detailed comment for now you have my subscription 😎
@perryewell539511 ай бұрын
I appreciate you sharing your insight on this great figure of the Old Testament. For a bit more information on Melchizedek, look up Alma 13: 14-19 in the Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants 84:14.
@anthonystrickland2923 Жыл бұрын
I was with you once before. Abraham longed to see my day!
@rcteal122911 ай бұрын
Thank you for making me think more about supporting documents
@israeljimahworldoutreachin9156 Жыл бұрын
My brother good job. Very brilliant and clear teaching, however, there is a verse in Heb.7 that almost every teacher do not touch and I see you have done the same thing. That verse makes this teaching much clearer about who Melchizedek actually is.
@stevenkirkham67263 жыл бұрын
What are your thoughts on the theory that Melchizedek and Zarathustra were the same person? There is a fair amount of evidence for them being the same and it was three Zoroastrians that Gabriel told a savior was born into rather than three Hebrews.
@Nick.T.A2 жыл бұрын
Can you site any sources? I haven't heard this before and am not aware of any historical records link those two together. Likewise, I have not heard that the savior (of all) would be Persian. There are some texts that allude to Cyrus the great delivering Israel from Babylon, but not savior of the world
@lee-be6pp2 жыл бұрын
They lived more than a thousand years apart
@keith16172 жыл бұрын
Very nice delivery.
@sofiah56682 жыл бұрын
Thankyou so much for this interesting lecture.
@defendfreedom777 Жыл бұрын
The superiority of the priesthood of the Christian in comparison to the Jewish priesthood is a hard pill for the Jews to swallow.
@stephengould22322 жыл бұрын
The names of Jannes and Jambres are recorded in the Book of Jasher, which precedes Samuel and Kings.
@NathanTRousseau8 ай бұрын
My theory is that the Order of Melchizadek is now given to all of us, since we live in a post-incarnation world. I believe this because once, God seemed to tell me I was of the same order. I wrestled with that for a long time, not wanting to feel superior or prideful in these words, and the more I through about it, the more I realized... if we believe what the bible says about us being "co-heirs with Christ," than to me that translates to the order of Melchizadek, that same ruling priesthood outside of the traditional lineages of the religious leaders!
@terranhealer2 жыл бұрын
Is it heretical to think Isaac was born by divine conception? The Bible seems to say that G-d himself visited Sarah and gave her Isaac. And then goes on to recount the near sacrifice of G-d’s could-be son.
@michellescott61422 жыл бұрын
Deuteronomy 29: 29 says the secret things belong to the Lord and those things are revealed are for our children and generations to come.I am going on what information I read from the Bible ,if it's in the Bible I want it,if it's not there,God will reveal it on that great and glorious day.