This lectures series on Hegel and Deleuze is really great. Thanks a lot for sharing!
@nickmonticello3 жыл бұрын
53:35 Best explanation of Dialectics/Being-in-itself/for-others/for-itself I've ever heard. All the others were confusing.
@markfoster9304 Жыл бұрын
This is the best Hegel lecture I’ve seen. It’s honestly great that it’s from a Deleuze lecture
@jeremyliebenthal99164 жыл бұрын
This is really, really good. Thank you!
@user-hr3gf6bv4z3 жыл бұрын
'I dont know that I have to recall Sartre while I have travelled half planet to India.'-- lol, why there is a common ressentiment toward Sartre via scholars with different backgrounds? It seems Sartre is such a shallow philosopher who will discredit others with a certain shallowness. I think the answer is that Sartre applies socalled 'dialectical structure' only to the ontology of human being rather than in a more general sense. And Hegel may suggest there is an absolute, which unites a whole. On the contrary, Sartre don't think being-in-itself and being-for-itself(nothingness) could be united. He follows the Kierkegaard's critique on Hegel at this point.
@austenhartwell39453 жыл бұрын
a wonderful resource ...
@sydneysymposia3 ай бұрын
If this lecture proves anything, it's that Hegel is more profound than Deleuze.
@user-mx9iq7pi6u2 ай бұрын
Profundity always tells you more about the subject
@sydneysymposia2 ай бұрын
@@user-mx9iq7pi6u profundity is the self-explication of the depth of substance which is, admittedly, also subject, so yes ;)
@jm0489 Жыл бұрын
59:00
@Julle3993 жыл бұрын
59:15
@davidzubiria3783 Жыл бұрын
A dog perceives things in a why, we can perceive things in a different way but not only that, science allows us to extend our perception. There's no rational reason to suppose we are the ultimate perceptors and that we see things for what they are. It doesn't make any difference in the everyday world but it's not that simply as you put it
@marcomiranda947610 ай бұрын
The questions are ruining a great lecture
@austenhartwell39453 жыл бұрын
The only problem with this lecture is that it's too ABSTRACT
@trianglejefferson3 жыл бұрын
not abstract enough
@georgepantzikis798811 ай бұрын
It's a philosophy lecture. It can't not be abstract.