20. Graham Priest | Dialetheism

Рет қаралды 2,761

Күн бұрын

Graham Priest is distinguished professor of philosophy at CUNY Graduate Center. He is a logician well-known for his work on dialetheism, paraconsistent logic, and logical paradoxes. He has also worked on epistemology, philosophy of language, Eastern philosophy, and more.
/ friction
/ discord
/ frictionphilo
00:00 - Introduction
01:30 - Dialetheism
03:30 - Are dialethia meaningful?
05:16 - Many-valued modal logics
11:35 - Metaphysical modality
16:20 - Mathematical necessities
20:04 - Fictional entities
29:58 - Logic and quantum mechanics
31:13 - Rational obligations
34:48 - Newcomb's problem and rational dilemmas
42:08 - Analytic/synthetic distinction
44:00 - Contingently false dialethia
45:17 - Demonstrating dialethia
47:16 - Examples of contingently false dialethia
50:16 - Logicians without mathematical background
52:29 - Sample paradox
53:55 - Tense and truth
57:45 - Paradoxes of motion
58:32 - Belief revision
1:00:46 - Contradictory properties
1:10:16 - Resolving the liar's paradox?
1:11:39 - Vagueness
1:14:22 - Ontological commitment
1:16:22 - Abstracta
1:20:24 - Free will
1:22:50 - Prevalence of dialetheism and paraconsistent logic
1:27:29 - Counterfactual conditionals
1:33:49 - Fuzzy logic
1:35:13 - Paradoxes of self-reference
1:37:23 - Natural kinds
1:38:31 - Curry's paradox
1:41:23 - Conclusion
Possibilities by Jay Someday / jaysomeday
Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0

Пікірлер: 24

@kamilgregor 3 жыл бұрын

"We don't know whether Homer existed." I beg your pardon? :D

@brnoza298 3 жыл бұрын

I think what he said about hume there was inspired by his recent engagement with David Hume.

@italogiardina8183 3 жыл бұрын

When I think of the tower I think to open its image on a screen but when I think of Homer I think to open the history page which suggests a kind of syncretic ontology going on between states of non-existence (phenomenological) and existence (my viewing the screen or page).

@martin2289 5 ай бұрын

"worked on" lol

@lukecronquist6003 Жыл бұрын

Graham would make more sense if he wasn't so insufferably arrogant.

@Liliquan Жыл бұрын

Lol. Even if he was arrogant, that doesn’t affect whether he makes sense. Dummy.

@lukecronquist6003 Жыл бұрын

Actually it would because he is talking like he's the first human in existence to go against principle of explosion, with his own vague personal terminology and not explaining from the paraconsistent logic that all his stuff vitally depends on.

@Ber9200 Жыл бұрын

Quit projecting

@lukecronquist6003 Жыл бұрын

See my above comment and address it if you'd like to make a real response lol

@Ber9200 Жыл бұрын

@@lukecronquist6003 Ain’t no substance to it. Quit projecting.