Hennessey Venom F5 review: can it really do 334mph? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r6iSgNdo3NS2Z2g.html 334mph = 537.5 Kilometers per hour (kmph).

A "fan car" now holds the record at Pikes Peak ;-)

Didn't know, thank yoi for the info!

@@PROJECTDREAMMULTIMEDIA this is well worth a listen if you want to know more about that story... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r9h4e8d-q6i2k6M.html

Yes, it's because it created so much dirty air which is bad for aerodynamics of the car behind, and the racer would have limited vision because of the debris being flung out of the fan

@@dimasbimasunyoto7706 not correct I'm afraid. The other teams claimed this but it was a false claim. A fan doesn't "fling stuff out the back". It throws it centrifugally. And at this point in time, aero was not anywhere near as sensitive to dirty air as it is today. In fact, only Lotus had an aero package that actually made any different in the first place.

@@ThePippin89 well, not really, some of them will invariably be yeeted out the back, this issue was also present on the chapparal 2j, and why no wheel-to-wheel racing series allows powered aerodynamics

Thank you so much, seriously! :)))

It’s made by a corporation, that’s why it’s so good but few subscribers.

2.67k as of June 16th 2022

3.5k on 17th July

@@A._.Neill26 3.56k as of june 18th 2022

That car is truly a beast!

gordon murray t50 is more enjoyable. in terms of being as fast as possible, it shouldve been freepiston combustion with minimal electric battery, so weight is lower but still perfect smooth troque vectoring and immedeate torque from electric motor. freepiston is like 2 combustion pistons on either side, connected by shaft on which lubrication and magents are attached, non moving magnet around it makes electricity, storing as much power in air pressure as possible before relying on ultacapacitors, then battery, to minimize weight maximize lifetime of electric parts. exhuast sound could be much more unique due to freepiston pairs being packageable almost like ev battery, more perfect weight distrubution. this way the 2 seats in gma t50 can been facing rear for thinner cabin for areodynamics, although distance front window pillars helps increase feeling of speed by increasing how much vertical area of driving enviroment can be seen, the area closer to driver at windows seems to be moving faster toward him than area futhur down the road. ticket window should be replaced by window that comes down partially. i have lot of aesthetic modifications too, but something that can be understod in words easily is the idea of having custom decoration, not only in color but also texture ie wood interioir like the front fo a boat, sono motors moss air filter which can be colored, etc. a tinted transparent areo shell (the cover over insides of car) would allow seeing moving gears etc by a color mark on the edge of wheels (like gears) to see its rpm as its spinning, same cna be done to steering rack by line in middle, etc. i drew a headlight design for lighting up area that car will turn toward liek toyota corolla hatchback 2022, except it moves by rods similar to how muscles move eyes in human. headlight is transparent sphere where beam of light can be seen in it, gold heat sinks are spread out to take up space toward the front end of light housing.

@@kalmmonke5037 Shioriko Mifune ever driven this McMurtry Spierling once.

Your words bless my day in a way i cannot describe! Thank you for the support!

(1240 now)

​ (18900 now)

Agree. And a masterpiece too.

lol right off the bat

Amen 🥂

how many Ace Combat fan here?

@@PROJECTDREAMMULTIMEDIA Played Air Combat, Ace Combat 2,3,4,5, Zero, skipped 6, played AH (very disappointing), skipped infinity and still playing 3, 4 and 5 from time to time. The best one was 3 and 4. After 5 came out the physics became lame. At 2, 3 and 4 you could sense gravity when u were pitching up. If you were not careful, you could hit the ground very fast because the weight of the plane is sumulated. After 5 they screwed up the physics, even Ace Combat 7 has still lame physics when pitching. Edit: If you want to play a good oldie, play (Eagle One - Harrier Attack) for the PS1.

@@PROJECTDREAMMULTIMEDIA many many

Thank you so much!

Yes one problem F1 faces today is weight. Just ditch away all the safety and we would have way faster cars, but multiple of the current drivers would be dead at this point.

The wealthy could care less about the drivers or their safety ...... all they care about is getting as rich as soon as possible , if a driver dies , there is always another pawn to take their place .....it is all about $$$$ and only $$$$$ , the wealthy don't care about anyone's life , when it comes to making their riches ...... it is no different with world governments .... they could care less about their citizens , it is a political rich club , they do everything to get wealthy off the people and if citizens get killed in the process , they could care less

I disagree with F1 having casualty rate of 60's-80's if they made there cars faster . When max and lewis tangled last yr and max went into barrier head on red bull said he experienced 50+ g's on impact and walked away whinnying about coming off 2nd best not about any injuries he sustained. Freak accidents like one at Japan gp or sauber 10 yrs ago hit barrier sticking out from rest of barriers and badly hurt driver are only way drivers are at risk these days and there on old school tracks to those accidents,modern tracks with 20mtrs run off then sand then inflatable barriers are so we'll these days .

@@cappaus5480 Im sorry man I dont understand your point. Its hard to make out what you mean. I dont know hwere you got those numbers but its pretty consistent consensus among F1 fans and leadership that faster cars are more dangerous. Theres harder impacts, less time for decision making, more reliability on downforce and tyres to keep you on the track. Theres a reason speed limits exist in the public world, theres a reason safety both in F1 and daily cars exists, but the correlation between faster cars and casualties of accidents is very strong. You can prevent injuries or deaths with insane new safety features, but people will always die in accidents. Its a reality of driving and any way we can mitigate those by enforcing safety, we should. F1 is the top of racing. I dont want to see a driver die, therefore I am all for safety. You may not agree with the so called 60-80% casualty rate (still dont know where you got that number, considering that would mean in an average F1 season only 4-8 drivers would survive.....yikes) but even 1 driver dying because they chose to lossen rules and compromise safety for a better product is too much. Better to have it at a place where there is risk in racing, but still put out a competitive race. Just my opinion but im satisfied with a F1 car being capable of going 360 km/h. Thats good enough for me, and also not see someone die.

@@Amm17ar have you ever raced anything even a racing go-kart .sound like an armchair expert . I could name 20 motorsport series straight away that are way more dangerous than F1 . and all 20 are more exciting for the racer & viewer vs F1 . Don't quote about faster means more down force is needed seriously Indy car are way faster with less than 50% down force F1 have . All down force causes is higher cornering speed and increase impact as I'm sure you are aware in racing where are you liking to have a crash? Into or exciting a corner. Down force should be stripped from F1 to something like 90's period to bring back wheel 2 wheel racing not have it decided by q3 order with only chance for movement of the order being start to first cnr and 1-2 pitstops . hasn't been fun to watch since Montoya days.

I agree with you its one of my favourate cars and im sad that its not in gt7

Well there’s the X2014 and X2019 variants

Never tried to drive this car on AC tbh, last time i guess it was on GT5/GT6. I still remember the sweat i made to get the gold on the Sebastian Vettel Challenge on GT5...good old times! :,)

Thank you so much!

You are right, that is another fancar we didn't consider. Great eye here!

Hehe that's the effect i have aswell!

Mustard Yellow: best colour. Also thanks for the support! I agree that Ridge Racer Type 4 had a huge influence in the graphic branding of this channel!

Thank you so much!

Or at least bring back the original Red Bull X range. All GT Sport has is the X2014 Standard and Junior, along with the X2019 Competition (itself a derivative of the Standard).

#BringBackX2011Prototype

Perhaps Gordon Murray's T.50

Hehe thank you :)

Thank youuuu :))

i dont think they(the tyres) exist right now, but iirc pirelli said they could design f1 tyres that could last for almost an entire season, so the tech is there, or i'd like to belive so

You are right. The prototype is mostly theoretical as there is no way something that fast could drive on a normal racetrack. ...for now, hehe Also thank you for the support! We always appreciate these kind of words! :)

We have racing tires capable of reaching 400kmph (record from 1988 405 end of Mulsane Straight in 24 Le Mans), i think with current technology it's possible we get 500+ for more than one lap. Now it can be better with carbon fiber wheels (lower rotation mass). Also look like car from P1(Prototype class) lm24.

The current F1 hard compound tire can withstand at least two laps of that speed.

Thank you so much! 😊

Thank you! I love it aswell haha

Thank you so much, very appreciated!

Thank you!

Ace Combat gang here

@@PROJECTDREAMMULTIMEDIA mess with us or we'll nuke your country 7 times >:)

well as long as you don't nuke your country....wait, no no no wait I WAS JOKING WAIT

@@PROJECTDREAMMULTIMEDIA *BOOM*

@@ThreeStrikes015WW "Belka did nothing wrong"

Thank you! :)

Also isn't there the Red Bull X2019 Competition? One of the lastest Red Bull cars? Unfortunately it's been slightly nerfed to make it harder to drive due to V12 engine.

Hehehehe, thanks for the support! :)

Gotta love Gran Turismo OST

How are the Red Bull X cars on GT7?

Thank you so much! It would be weird to see that cruising on the streets ahahahaha

@@PROJECTDREAMMULTIMEDIA it's too powerful for Goodwood, basically doesn't have sense. But maybe LeMans? Slower corner's and long straight. Green Hell are off it's too bumpy. I don't see any place where it's possible to extract 90% of that technology

It's Quiet Curves from Ridge Racer Type 4 ;)

I want the x2010 s.vettel miss the short ratios

Hehe, i love that game seriously, one of the most underrated ones in my opinion in the racing community! Especially for the newer generations that never had the possibility to experience the PS1 era

Thank you! :)

Physics? What's that high school thing?

Yes that's true. I remember back in the day Gran Turismo had a slower version of the RB X2010 called X2010 5G, which was used only for a japanese esport competition long before Gran Turismo Sport FIA championships. It as fast as a Gr.2 in GT Sport, and the only big difference it had from the original X2010 was the removal of the fan car system.

@@PROJECTDREAMMULTIMEDIA also, in GT6 they released the RBX Jr., which is like the 5g in the aspect that its basically the x1 without the fan.

Thank you so much! I really appreciate that :) Well, i don't know which song you are referring to, but here is the list of every track in the video: Ace Combat 7 Main Menu OST Ace Combat 7 Multiplayer Lobby OST Solaya - Yummy Trip MAKOTO - The Trip Nine Lives - Unicorn Heads Ridge Racer Type 4 OST - Quiet Curves (It might be probably this one!)

But it doesn’t have the same performance of the of x1 iirc.

Of course it's ok! It's the best you can do for the channel and we'll be infinitely grateful for it! Thank you so much for the support! 😊

Came here from your post on Reddit.

@@ianwest6679 I didn't even post it yet lol