USA likes to be unique, just like they use a completely different measuring system, they like to use their own rules. I doubt that would change. The higher you go, the more creativity/stretching of the rules they will allow

Thank you! That will be the next rules video that gets released. When I have time, I will start the work on it!

@@refereeuniversity oh waaw, that's gonna be great. Thanks again

Glad to hear that!

Thank you and great question. Experienced referees typically go the route of what occurred first: Ball contact then body contact: Play on/call jump ball unless contact is excessive Body contact then ball contact: Most likely a foul In your two scenarios, I would not have a foul. The cylinder is to help assist referees in determining if there may be a foul that occurred. But plays where players contact the ball first and minor contact (which is expected) that occurs after, should not be penalized unless excessive, unnecessary and/or dangerous. Does that make sense?

Great question, it only applies in fouls after the act of shooting!

You're welcome!

Yes, all it did was reduce the min and max to have a maximum +-25m in variation

You are correct! Thank you!

May I ask, are you an EBOA official (I am)?

Hey Jess, No rule change on double foul. There was a change 2 years ago which you can find here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z82Xd9lhkpasdok.html

Nope, no carryover. Team fouls carry over and each time gets 1 timeout

More so to showcase when someone enters and bumps the player or an offensive player extends outside to gain an advantage. They feel that would be more clear to have a signal for

I will have it slated after my correctable errors and whats the call video. That might be a little more difficult but I will see what I can research at the time.

You are right, I misspoke and fixed it :)

With the language barrier, I am not sure what the referees said to the crowd but to apply FIBA rules: Head Coach Challenges (HCC) cannot be used for missed calls, you can only challenge calls made on the floor, so since the call was on the player trying to shoot the ball after and not on the goaltending, a HCC cannot be requested on it, they could request it on the foul call. In regards to the Instant Replay System (IRS), it can only be used on goaltending and basket interference plays when it is 2:00 or less in the fourth quarter and overtimes. Both situations means the play cannot be reviewed and it would avoid scenarios like this, it requires the official to blow their whistle on the scenario that occurred.

@@refereeuniversity thanks for the clarification. I originally thought they used all the fiba rules but just found out they have their house rules which allowing the challenge to be used on a no call goaltending . It creates lots of confusion since they actually counted the GT and later on use POI to resume the game . Not a good idea imho.

Hi Henry, thanks for reaching out! I would have to find someone who speaks spanish and who want to do videos for free. This is basically volunteer work for me to help educate referees. Maybe I can figure something out in the future.

Thank you!