I’m dead lol

That horrid music 🆘🆘🆘

I have a '22 PP TS and it is indeed the second best winter vehicle I have ever owned. My 2005 Nissan Xterra was a beast in the snow and any trail on this planet. I've yet to own anything that could out match it.

Agreed. I will let KBB do the reviews too if Micah stays completely away from Hondas completely. (He can also do Acuras without mentioning Hondas) (It's because of his stupid pronunciation of the brand).

Great points. Did you know Toyota says MOST buyers of the 4runner never take them off road? Could you imagine?

I don't think that's the purpose. Off-road is always secondary. Only a few live on off road areas.

@@terence4427 ​ which is especially ironic because the very engineering and design of the 4Runner that makes them so great off road also make them a particular sloppy and compromised vehicle when driven on pavement.

Oh yeah it's sad If I'm getting a vehicle that can go off road 4runner tacoma Wrangler Damn Skippy it's going to see dirt Mud Snow The cleanest it will be is when we buy it

Then get a jeep wrangler

@@UnionPacific1997 I do have one. But maybe I want something that is not a Jeep.

@@Offshore1977 the old Tahoes are really rugged and last forever. I'm looking sell my Hyundai accent and get one or a truck of similar age around 1990-2010 range

I’d have taken their free water bottles, left a stinky deuce in the restroom, *then* I would’ve turned around and walked away.

Honda= Garbage! Dont argue & just accept it. I grew up running twin turbos on h22 back in the day & I will never spend a single time on a Honda manufactured after 2013.

Yeah because suvs are very popular and profitable and people want more choices.

You’re right the only sedans now are either sports sedans or mid-large size like Honda Accord and stuff, SUVs it’s almost like you’re choosing which price instead of which size they’re basically the same in all compact to midsize sizes

@@desi4lyfe379 nah. you’re just dead wrong. honda is reliable, has good resale value, fast, and so many more.

@@dazednconfusedrn I will never buy any newer Honda!

@Juan L. Most EX-L's are delivered to dealers with AWD and roof rails which brings them essentially to the price of a Trailsport. If you intend to do any light-off roading, it's best to go with the TS because of the tires. Plus, it has other features you don't find on the EX-L (e.g. navigation, fog lights, etc).

Wrong, these cannot be made as capable as Jeeps. Also wrong again, the passport is based of the Pilot platform. A platform that has way more in common with a Honda Accord, than a wrangler or F-150 for that matter.

​@@klwarhousego watch the videos he's referencing and RE-READ his comment. He's 100% right.

@@sleeksilver 100% right that a passport can be made as capable as a wrangler?

@@terence4427 You're spending more money for smaller wheels? LOL, you aren't very bright.

Education has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence, Terrence. The fact you think that proves my original point.

Which is why most people overlook the EXL trim it has everything but the hvac controls for the back seats lol

@@MeliorIlle Offroading is better with smaller wheels numnuts. More sidewall flex and control.

@Mike R. Did you know Toyota says most of their 4runner customers never take the vehicle off road? I agree the TP could use better skid plating and more ground clearance though the reality is most folks won't do more than a little light off roading if anything.

@@terence4427 Just looking for options.

@@mikeriv60 , Got it

99.9%

Yup, you're correct!

And the departure from sedans to overly obsessive impulsive purchase of SUVs, CUVs, etc.

@@tekkenmaster123 Do sidewalks count?

@@jk-qf3lt yes

@Red River. Not quite. The reviewers don't talk about navigation, fog lights, roof rails, AWD, and other standard features of the TP. Yes, much of the differences are cosmetics but the wheels on the TP alone are a 1500.00 upgrade.

Not true in my experience with 2021 Passport. No issues at all with the infotainment.

@@jimduncan6234 it might be luck of the drawl or perhaps they have put a better solution in place. There are TSBs on this

@George Lehman. Not quite. The reviewers do not explain the major differences across the trim lines, and I find this extremely frustrating. For instance, the TP comes with navigation, fog-lights, AWD, roof rails, and other features standard. Plus, the wheels on the TP widens the track of the vehicle and are better for light off roading. I test drove the Elite and Trailsport and the wheels definitely make a difference in the ride of the vehicle.

I've heard yes in the near future

No turbos is a blessing. Turbo engines u will be lucky to get 150,000 miles out of it without major repairs. Look at Ford, VW, and Audi turbo just to name a few costly all way need repairs or an engine replacement.

@@natelove187 VCM in honda engines are not reliable not to mention it has timing belt.

There is a reason Honda and Toyota stick with older designs. Tried-and-true RELIABILITY. New designs and modern tech are great, until you get recalls or even worse, break down. And dealer service departments these days are worse than ever. A "warranty" is only worth so much. With this Honda, you get rock solid reliability and at least it's quick, and decently efficient. The 4Runner on the other hand, although bullet-proof, is a dinosaur which is both slow and terribly inefficient. You can't have everything. I think this Honda strike a sweet spot.

Yup, and they're consumers like me who prefer that look to what you commonly see on the road today.

Have you test driven this vehicle? I have and it's nothing of the sorts. BTW, I've owned a minivan. Doesn't resemble it closely.

That’s why the passport is a top seller and also one of the best 2 row suv on the market. You really don’t know what you are talking about also going test drive one before you start yappin you’re mouth.

@@DanielCruz-js4oh the population that buys these mediocre minivan with AWD needs to be educated. I bet these are the same people that looked at Hyundai and KIA.

No it doesn't

I think the back resembles a 99-13 Subaru Forester, especially the tail lights

The New Ford Explorer is a Beautiful rolling piece of junk that Ford refuses to design right. It’s sad the Explorer looks good but reliability and seat are garbage 🗑

The Isuzu-based model with the actual low range transfer case?

On a 2000 mile trip to national parks in SE Utah, got just over 25mpg. We're quite happy with

I agree. A CRV has like 2 cubic feet of cargo space less than this, gets better MPG, and undercuts it by 10k the passport is kind of redundant

WTF are you talking about? It's 0-60 time of 6.0 seconds is one of the quickest in the segment. And "floats on deep snow??" Obviously you have to be aware of your ground clearance. It's not meant to plow through a foot of snow. Very few vehicles will.

@@kevinbreese5739 my 01 crv was more responsive and better in snow. assort def not 0-60 in 6 seconds its 6.5 lol

@@phuturephred Car and Driver tested the new Passport AWD to 0-60 in 6.0 seconds. Your old 01 crv has HALF the horsepower (only 146hp) and 0-60 in around 9 seconds (it was slow). Still don't know what you mean by "floats in snow" but this new Passport is a bigger vehicle than your old crv and has a far more advanced AWD system. Performance in snow has a lot to do with tires. Maybe you had dedicated snow tires on your old crv, but mostly it just sounds like you're inflating positive thoughts of the past and being critical of the present. Many people tend to do that as they get older.

@@kevinbreese5739 they both had all season tires and the crv was also half its weight and i never had trouble getting out the hole with it like i do in the passport. the ridgline was really good in the snow. when i say float i mean the tires dont get to the cement as quick or at all compared to other hondas, the passport is not that much better then a 2016 accord in the snow. it eats potholes better then anything though possibly even better then the ridgeline. you dnt have to agree this is my experience base on how and where i drive

@@phuturephred Have you tried putting it in sport mode? I think what you are talking about is simply throttle response. The passport is much quicker and faster than your old crv. Don't take my word for it, look up the 0-60 and 1/4 Mike times. Facts are facts. In terms of the floating on snow instead of sinking thru it, that's purely a function of the tires width, tread pattern and compound. Think about it...Will a heavier vehicle press down into the snow or a lighter vehicle? It's all about the specific tires. You might have had really thin tires that were really good in snow on the crv. I can only assume you have a FWD Passport instead of AWD based on your comments. The passports AWD system is one of the best and will make a big difference in the snow, rain, and handling in general.

@@terence4427 Who cares, it still sucks.

@@terence4427 Yeah, whatever.

Looks like a Hearst? Seriously? Hideous front? The front end looks great, which is pretty much a unanimous opinion. Your senseless opinion has been duly noted and appropriately sent to the trash can.