It looks even better in person, in my opinion

Fing the bat that fits the specs that are best for you.

Me neither. We actually hit them more than the Resmondo cause some guys came out after to hit.

@@hittingwiththenation How many swings would you say you put on them?

@@felixmeana8095 around 70

I only hit the Worth Platinums. It gets really hot in Texas and if I use real balls they only last me one summer maybe. Then they are mush.

The knob cuff weights .4 yes, I understand what you are saying. Also, just so you know there is no real ".5" or "full oz" endload

Yes they do

Sub to my channel and find out. It was my past review video. New Easton Alpha Resmondo One piece

Subbed. But only cuz you made me..

@@tayloroneill9261 Excellent.....in a Mr. Burns voice

The 2 piece Bedlam is still going for me at about 200 swings. I used it in the slowmo video.

Thanks, I usually swing a long barrel 1oz endload so leaning towards Riley, but if Bedlam lasts longer and similar preforming might just have to try, can get both for pretty much same price right now

@danjosselyn3343 try the new Mutant or dc41 if thats the case

Hopefully you do a review/comparison soon and I can make a decision

Any discount code for DC41 for Miken website? Think thats the way im going

.. and i have a question about passing compression. Ive been out of the game for about 15years. whats the deal with passing after hitting? is it good or bad, im assuming its the life of the bat? They dont test compression in our city league, they just make sure its stamped usssa. Sorry im a rookie its been awhile.

Or.......both

Only have money for 1

@@captainobvious6499 if you get them tested go rezzy

@@hittingwiththenationso does that mean the bedlam is Hotter?

If you have been around for a while, you know the "mayhem" era of slowpitch

@@hittingwiththenation I remember the bj fulk mayhem, the dark blue mayham XL, and the white barrel with green and blue lettering XL with m75 tech, I believe..

@tylerlavergne8396 just before that was the red and green (aka booger) those had to be the most shaved bats of all time

@hittingwiththenation yea, I remember those too.. I wanna say those came out in 2007-2008ish..

In the context of a game, it doesn't help to try and train getting the fastest ball speed.

In the context of a bat review, batted ball speed is one of the most important factors as it correlates to performance, compression, and is one of the values in the BPF certification requirement of

@MarraSoftball I understand your points, and they are very valid. However, for it to be useful data, you would have to take away a lot of variables. I use it to show about what speed I get when I hit the ball down on a line. So, from bat to bat, people could see if there is a difference. But from an actual review standpoint, it doesn't show much. You would need to have a robot swing the bats the same speed every swing. And the bats would all need to be testing at the same compression. I have also hit different speeds on different pocket radars with the same bat/swing.

@@hittingwiththenation my crew has pocket radars. They’re all testing within the +\- 1mph ball speed of one another which is the tolerance range. I’m aware of the variables. That’s why it takes the same ball, on a tee, hit in the same spot of the bat. That’s why one must use statistical tools once the mph is exported to show anything meaningful. Specifically, an IMR control chart, followed by an ANOVA to show if the data sets are truly the same within 95% confidence (3 standard deviation). I’m a scientist/engineer and a former member of the ASTM softball/baseball chapter. This is the stuff I live for. Considering battled ball velocity is literally the thing that decides whether a bat gets certified or not, radar is the only metric that means anything assuming you create the most like for like conditions and are skilled enough to be as consistent as possible. Most of the time when people say radar doesn’t mean anything, or is stupid, it’s from folks that don’t know how it all works together, and they get confused when it’s not producing values they expect. That’s the beauty of science - it doesn’t care what you expect, it is what it is.

Love your content by the way. Just helping bring some clarity to the variability and radar experiences you’ve had.