I am a Singaporean. I agree with almost all of Kishore's points. One exception is when he said "USA is solving lots of problems in the world" (this I disagree) while China has enough domestic problems that it doesn't want to meddle in other countries (this part I agree). USA, with its USD funding its military and NGOs,and monopolizing trade transactions, has all along been stirring troubles throughout the world, while using moral highground of "values" as its cover.
@Sunalen-ue9hvКүн бұрын
agree with U 👍
@flyingnan2520Күн бұрын
Though I am a Chinese witnessing all the wars started by the US in the recent decades, I still agree that historically the US has made contribution to the world peace more than the wars. The super power of the US makes the world changing from chaos to order. The order is not good enough. The world police is more like mafia. However, even the worst order is better than no order. Even the order is also a tool for the US to contain the rising of China, it is still better than a completely chaotic environment for China to survive and grow. Now China is challenging the US to update the world order to a more equal one. The contribution of the US is still necessary to be memorized.
@huangzb8060Күн бұрын
101% agree
@JenHope88312 сағат бұрын
The USA has a number of good points but in the last 3 decades, the US government is more of a bully and a irrational beast.. You can disagree with me.
@waynerainer52508 сағат бұрын
US has many factions both doing good and shit (more so) around the world. i only disagree with his assessment of biden over trump. Nice guy doesnt mean better president. Can argue that under trump there was 0 wars.. which do we prefer?
@DragonYang013 күн бұрын
I think a very fundamental issue was not mentioned or discussed by Professor Mahbubani is that American's capitalism, once the most efficient economic system, is no longer as competitive against China's hybrid capitalism+socialism system. American government can not have a long term strategy (more than 8 years) because of its election cycle. Each new administration nullifies the efforts of the previous one. Therefore, while both Republican and Democratic parties want to stop China, they don't have consistent approaches over time because Americans are deeply divided. On the other hand, Chinese are quite united in facing their challenges and Chinese don't have the desire to bully other countries. This contest is like between an old world champion doing boxing with a young contender who actually just want to survive. The time is on the youth side, obviously.
@incognitootingocni47433 күн бұрын
千真万确👏👏👏
@Gman9792 күн бұрын
Besides that US fiscal policy and national debt will hobble America strength and will consigned to its decline.
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
There is a saying in Chinese philosophy that the more powerful a force is the more careful it should be used, and that the most powerful weapons come at a price, such as the power of the American media that you mentioned. A powerful media can influence not only its opponents but also itself. Because of this right now the American elites are being misled by the American media, so they don't understand the world well enough to make sound decisions and judgments.
@Diderot682 күн бұрын
Agree but iust not sure who is old and mature and who is yong and new. To me, USA is young and new and have seen nothing in terms of nation building when seen side by side China.
@user-zw2ve1bo3r2 күн бұрын
简单的说就是堕落了。
@horridohobbies2 күн бұрын
China's Grand Strategy: 1. Develop a strong dynamic economy and a strong dynamic society. Learn from the Soviet Union's internal collapse. 2. Build strong trade relationships with ASEAN. Increase ASEAN's dependence on China. Neutralise the US containment policy. 3. Belt and Road Initiative.
@Diamonds-wu5sl2 күн бұрын
and the only contra strategy from USA is by making propaganda and fake news in media like youtube towords China
@ran908020 сағат бұрын
Quantum Therapy Love Is Love Love is love is love is love. Many people get hung up on finding a name for what they’re experiencing whether it’s Soul Mates or Twin Flames or Husband and Wife or any other description. I have some advice for you-be careful you don’t get so focused on labeling what you’re experiencing that you forget to enjoy the actual experience! If you’re happy, if they’re happy, if you’re enjoying being together, it doesn’t matter what you call it! If you go around worrying about what kind of connection it is, you’re only putting fear and complicated emotions and energy into it. Enjoy the feeling of love-it doesn’t have to have a name other than that. Love is love is love is love. XOXO The Universe
@walhdamaskus24083 күн бұрын
The fact is bully never has any reasonable goal or grand strategy to compete with his opponents. Bully only has a grand ego.
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
That's why there have been debates between the Way of the King and the Way of the Hegemon in China since ancient times, with the result that the Way of the King has always won.
Countries can have strategies, visions, wants & determinations; but who succeeds ? China is the only one that consistently achieved their goals. The Chinese leaders are incredible !!
@qipaguanchaКүн бұрын
It's not that China's leaders are incredible, it's that China's system and culture can accomplish such things as China's Five-Year Plans, where every five years a plan is formulated for the next five years, and the plan covers all aspects of the country's development. The plan is then implemented according to the plan, and even if the leader steps down, the next one must implement the plan. China has been formulating and implementing five-year plans since 1953, and its 14th five-year plan was formulated in 2021. In addition, there are two concepts in Chinese culture, one is that success is not necessary for me, and the other is that success is in the present generation and benefits are in the future. Culturally successful Chinese people care more about their reputation in history because Chinese history continues and the merits and demerits of leaders are recorded forever in history. So Chinese leaders generally don't care about how much fame and fortune they will gain while they are alive, they are more concerned about their record in Chinese history
It's always fascinating listening to the Prof, but i'd also like to commend the interviewer. He asked good questions.
@jzeng20222 күн бұрын
Professor Ma Kai made a very good point that if America wants to be great again, it must reconstruct and build society. But in the so-called democratic system of the United States and Western countries, power is always connected with capital. Capital has long penetrated into every aspect of the country and influences all national policies. In China, capital will never override the government, and the government can shape social consensus completely according to its own wishes.
@cyinglaw36792 күн бұрын
This is indeed a very constructive dialogue where Prof Kishore has made profound and insightful comments. The moderator was professional in asking unbiased and objective topics of importance. We need more of this.
@jamesgarden-dm9bm3 күн бұрын
A wise man indeed
@lavaltsangmanpun38412 күн бұрын
Professor KISHORE is As To Date AMONG THE BEST GEO POLITICAL ANALYST AND MINDS our world is Knowing Cheers from Mauritius 🇲🇺
@wantan618213 сағат бұрын
Proud of you Prof, greetings from Melbourne Australia
@taoren34253 күн бұрын
干货满满。
@siewkonsum72912 күн бұрын
All past great Empires came & went. Each average shelf life is about 250 years. Each of their fiat currency, shelf life is about 100 years. America is moving close to these 2 thresholds. But for China is still the China a few thousands years ago, and will still be into the far future, always developing, innovating & progressing - and its economical power & influence are getting wider, stronger and wealthier moving forward.
@vichitvideo60412 күн бұрын
Another talk from Professor Kishore showcasing the depth and scope of his knowledge and the high level of his intelligence about world geopolitics.
@xixihua25152 күн бұрын
What a remarkably wise statement, it's rare to see such insight in today's political climate.
@qipaguanchaКүн бұрын
There are plenty of people with this opinion, just not in the West. The political elites of most developing countries have this understanding
@jtzh-ku8xe21 сағат бұрын
这个提问者提的问题非常好和有思想,马凯硕是位太了解中国领导人大战略的外国人
@ianthesiow30132 күн бұрын
❤America calls it "Liberation" instead of "Invasion". That was what US call it in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and the list goes on... Why the double standard? Confused... Please enlighten. Genuine question... Instances of the United States "liberated" or overthrowing, or attempting to overthrow, a foreign government since the Second World War. (* indicates successful ouster of a government) China 1949 to early 1960s Albania 1949-53 East Germany 1950s Iran 1953 * Guatemala 1954 * Costa Rica mid-1950s Syria 1956-7 Egypt 1957 Indonesia 1957-8 British Guiana 1953-64 * Iraq 1963 * North Vietnam 1945-73 Cambodia 1955-70 * Laos 1958 *, 1959 *, 1960 * Ecuador 1960-63 * Congo 1960 * France 1965 Brazil 1962-64 * Dominican Republic 1963 * Cuba 1959 to present Bolivia 1964 * Indonesia 1965 * Ghana 1966 * Chile 1964-73 * Greece 1967 * Costa Rica 1970-71 Bolivia 1971 * Australia 1973-75 * Angola 1975, 1980s Zaire 1975 Portugal 1974-76 * Jamaica 1976-80 * Seychelles 1979-81 Chad 1981-82 * Grenada 1983 * South Yemen 1982-84 Suriname 1982-84 Fiji 1987 * Libya 1980s Nicaragua 1981-90 * Panama 1989 * Bulgaria 1990 * Albania 1991 * Iraq 1991 Afghanistan 1980s * Somalia 1993 Yugoslavia 1999-2000 * Ecuador 2000 * Afghanistan 2001 * Venezuela 2002 * Iraq 2003 * Haiti 2004 * Somalia 2007 to present Honduras 2009 * Libya 2011 * Syria 2012 Ukraine 2014 * 2014 - 2022 - 9 countries yet to verify. Pakistan 2022 * Haiti 2022 * Niger 2023
@leegrace66542 күн бұрын
受益匪淺,為教授點讃!👍👍👏👏
@marvinfok653 күн бұрын
新加坡国家这么小,但真的是人才辈出。那么多的大国都想听听新加坡的意见。
@longhei63233 күн бұрын
世界出了一个中国,我称这是一个现象概念,而西方愿意听又有能力解释中国成功的国家不多,新加坡算一个。
@clipwat15113 күн бұрын
Small and rich. They have the second highest per capita gdp (ppp).
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
西方能听但是不会改hahaha
@happymelon71292 күн бұрын
But their state midia CNA , basically a western meida.😂 anti-china
@mizusoraart15342 күн бұрын
@@qipaguancha 不是不會 是改不了 只有繼續裝 才不會傷心 原來一些都是假的
@nickinsin119 сағат бұрын
Beside the great dearly departed LKY this man has the greatest mind.
Except for the Soviet Union part, everything was perfect, and I can give him that. Nobody can be an expert on everything!
@axli13Күн бұрын
There is old saying "if top leaders are crooked, the followers/institutions/citizens will mostly likely be bad too," This seems to fit us quite appropriately.
@anselbaron684812 сағат бұрын
哈哈哈哈,顶UP主
@LipingKong-ms1zm3 күн бұрын
Soft power is especially the culture difference, one is with a long history, people collectively focused culture, the other is with short and young culture, America has always won, they don't know and don't want to know how it is to be oppressed, individuality is written everywhere in all policies. Sacrifice is definitely not considered.
@Johntor88882 күн бұрын
summary from this seminar is you must help- china to be no 1, so you will not depend with USA and USA will not bully you again and again
@pursuitofmine4 сағат бұрын
❤intellectual talks
@user-yo8jt9kf7u2 күн бұрын
太理想化了,现实残酷的多。。。
@user-qt7py8di5jКүн бұрын
一针见血
@impressionfirst85772 күн бұрын
👍👍👍
@khaitashi60572 күн бұрын
China is already ahead of the US
@zhuzhu-sf7ryКүн бұрын
The per capita difference is far away. But this shows that there is still a lot of potential in China, because everyone wants to live a better life!
Do you know If a strong China and a Chinese business style US business will go bankrupt soon. You want US to stop fear that is not possible. Have you go business with China before?
@mamamia1686Күн бұрын
和李光耀一樣睿智⋯⋯
@supahsmashbro2 күн бұрын
The GOAT
@fredtan1506Күн бұрын
It’s all about his BOOK.
@qipaguanchaКүн бұрын
None of China's development experience will appear in Western textbooks, but will only be criticized in Western media. For example, the Nobel Prize in Economics was awarded to a few economists who studied the problem of poverty eradication, and the content of their research was ridiculously naive to the Chinese. Using calculations to study how to get people out of poverty, China has millions of party members actually practicing the matter of poverty eradication. Their practical experience is much more reliable than these economists!
@PenamingКүн бұрын
that's right. the husband is largely the stronger of the couple but we all know the wife, having the last say, is often the most powerful.
@cheungchingtong3 күн бұрын
我一直都很喜欢好莱坞有部电影叫[天国王朝 Kingdom of Heaven]里的一句台词 “Convert to Islam, repent later.” 道尽如今西方政治无论对内亦是对外时的双标 虚伪及伪善
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
还是历史底蕴不够的原因。但凡历史在久一些,经历过兴衰就知道国家不能双标。
@IEtoileFilanteI2 күн бұрын
US strategy is to buy more time so we can come up with a strategy 😅
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
If time is not enough, then develop more policies to buy more time.
@hocheesiong66362 күн бұрын
in ppp terms CHINA is already the largest economy in the world
@shupmmak5298Күн бұрын
Being number one on the US side (8:35), I believe the US can do whatever it wants to any other country without any restrictions, just like it has in recent decades.
Kissinger: “The biggest strategic mistake US is making in this contest with China is launching the contest without a strategy.” 4:10
@zhenyuxia76653 күн бұрын
Not entirely true. The US noticed China could become a challenger at least 15-20 years ago and the US has been trying to develop a strategy to contain China ever since. The problem is China is very difficult to compete with, and the US needs China too in more ways than the media tells you. The US elevated the competition in 2018 without a clear strategy because it found no simple strategy that worked before will work on China, so the current strategy is basically trying everything, so it looked like no strategy at all.
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
America's problems are not without strategy, and America's political elites are still smart enough to see the problem. However, the U.S. system makes it impossible for the U.S. to do long-term strategy, and the strategic goals change with the change of leaders.
@amazingcfo2 күн бұрын
@@zhenyuxia7665 Yes but in early 2000, US try to contain China but 911 happens. In 2008 US tried to contain China but subprime crisis happens and US need China help.
China was the first country established free trade agreement with ASEAN 15:50
@JenHope88312 сағат бұрын
The Chinese innovates all the time..from block printing to printing money, gun powder...to fireworks to rockets, from small canals to large canals that transport small ships, diversion of water from south to the northern dry land..etc
@yhh84272 күн бұрын
微軟公司老闆回覆紀者他來中國開新創分公司是因為1萬人會有一個天才所以中國14億人口會有很多天才。
@lilypang75902 күн бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@charmaine85122 күн бұрын
Just before I skid into my grave, I hope the show is a good one and not a tragic ending with the US destroying another country
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
You can rest assured that China will still be China in 500 years, it's been around for thousands of years. But it's hard to say how long America will be around.
@andreakubicki2582 күн бұрын
is there any Q&A Session?
@sancheowho526619 сағат бұрын
Prof u knowledged Knowingly or unknowingly Xi's 做好自己 philosophy to a better society. Hope more countries can adopt the same to a peaceful world.
@syedfadzli1768Күн бұрын
American had met their match, the real rival: China! Hegenomy American may have strategies to counteract China but China had their own strategies. Look at the effect of Petrodollar vs the BRICS on global economy…..
@jinlsui2 күн бұрын
It is such an obvious pity that American elite has been too arrogant to consult the best diplomatic experts in the world such as Kishore, for their own benefits.
@qipaguanchaКүн бұрын
The experts can't influence the U.S. policy system, the money can.
@juhantoon65242 күн бұрын
When 2 elephants fight, the grass below suffer. This is especially so if one of the elephant loses its mind. So get prepared for the bad days to come.
@Sky-86462 күн бұрын
Kishore let out too much secrets..
@HLC642 күн бұрын
If the ability to do sanction is there then they are still the hagemon! No matter how much dedollarisation if 30 to 40% of countries are still using USD as their Reserve. There is still some time before dedollarisation can be effective on USd hagemon Note China is still pegging its currency to USD.
@jacintochua68856 сағат бұрын
Many in the west can't accoet a non western country becoming as good as they are.
@laubockseng19942 күн бұрын
Well question for a question?
@xya65303 күн бұрын
有些字幕和翻译错的好逗😂
@toplee64473 күн бұрын
AI的吧,应该
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
能力有限,见谅hahah
@mizusoraart15342 күн бұрын
@@qipaguancha 已經很好了 看不懂的人 應該要意識到自己該提升了
@BobQuigleyКүн бұрын
There's 8 billion precious humans today and every year another 80 million, 2X population of Canada, join us. The nation state model is clearly failing humanity. We need a new path forward without man-made borders
@elizabethchin946323 сағат бұрын
China is unstoppable ..hahaha 😂JIAYOU
@qipaguancha20 сағат бұрын
加油!hahah
@panyaboonc56212 күн бұрын
Most of the time he mentioned China, US, China and US. I am waiting for Firstpost lady Palki to ask him "how about Indja"
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
Sorry, the China-US issue is complex, but India is not included in it, ASEAN has more impact on China-US relations than India does
The goal in actuality is to reflect the worst human nature of pride, God is the witness.
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
Strangely enough, the Chinese do not believe in God and are free of the doctrine of original sin. But the Chinese have emphasized since ancient times that arrogance is man's own worst enemy. Weakness and stupidity are not the obstacles to survival, arrogance is the
In some Native American cultures, hearing a wolf howl is seen as a sign of impending change or transformation, and may even be considered a message from a spirit guide😅
@leo3325Күн бұрын
Of course, the #1 will dominate international rules. One simple question for every audience will be: do you want to send your kids to United States or China? They have the answer.
@DocPetronКүн бұрын
For the majority of my life and up to 5 years ago, it was a no brainer, the US. 5 years ago, I began to question. For the last 2 years, I would rather have my children grow up in China. I would move there myself except that I'm too old to learn the language and make new friends and my professional credentials would not transfer into China. For my kids, it's a no brainer in favor of China. As a matter of fact, my nephew who is just graduating from University in Australia and he asked me about coming to the US. I told him to look at China.
@leo3325Күн бұрын
@@DocPetron better to ask those 35,000 Chinese crossing the southern border this year. Perhaps they will tell you a different story.
@DocPetronКүн бұрын
@leo3325 According to a Harvard study (yes, our Harvard) the approval rating for the Chinese government is around 85 to 80 percent. That's about 1.2 billion people. Also about 15 to 20 million tourists leave China returns to China. Your 35k if divided by the 15 million tourists who return to China each year represents one quarter of 1%. To put it in perspective, 2% of adult Americans, about 7 million, think that the world is flat.
@leo3325Күн бұрын
@@DocPetron this approval rating is broadly cited by Chinese government. Back to 1935, the approval rating of Nazi Germany was 95%. Any high rating is a sign of nationalism. China now is not an exception. I will not argue the amazing development of China. China is a heaven for elite groups just like in other communist countries. What you should look at is those under class people who lives below 1000 yuan per month referred by Li Keqian, the deceased former premier. Of course, everyone has his own experience. But action worths thousands of words. Particularly considering where they stand. What a joke!
@qipaguancha22 сағат бұрын
China-Vietnam border you know have been there will know one thing, China-Vietnam border residents are very many are living in China in Vietnam to do business, where a day in and out of the Chinese and Vietnamese people at least two or three million people. There are at least a few million Chinese who live and do business in Vietnam all year round, so only 35,000 people go to Vietnam a year? Where did you get such a small number from? LOL
@Time4Peace2 күн бұрын
Where is the talk proper. This is just Q &A ?
@peternjoyceКүн бұрын
@23:06 when the closed caption shows PUTOCRACY society I don't think it is a typo.
@K30A13 сағат бұрын
😂
@user-xe8xu1up7t2 күн бұрын
Tonight, I want to start by asking, with the upcoming U.S. election, do we expect to see any real potential changes in U.S. policy towards China before the end of this year? Is it a national policy or a policy related to the president himself? I will give you a very contradictory answer. On the one hand, the election results may not change anything; on the other hand, it may change everything. Because it is obvious that even today, the well-known fact is that the United States is a deeply divided society, unable to reach a consensus on anything, except for one thing they all agree on, which is that it is time to stop China. So no matter who the president is, the task of stopping China will continue, and this policy has deeply ingrained itself in the U.S. political system and society. But at the same time, why do I say it may change everything? Because if Trump is re-elected, he may take extreme measures against China, which will greatly change the situation. We must be prepared for all possibilities, as small countries like the UAE or Singapore have already realized that, whether we like it or not, we are now witnessing the largest and most far-reaching competition between two major powers in history. This competition will shake the entire world, affecting the lives of all of us, which is why we need to have this dialogue here, it is very timely. Regarding the future of U.S.-China relations, a key question is whether the United States has a clear strategy to deal with China's rise. Makaisuo pointed out that although the United States has initiated this competition, the goal is not clear. Is it to overthrow the Chinese Communist Party? Or is it just to contain and isolate China? These questions have never been clearly answered. For China, their goal is clear, they hope to surpass the United States economically and become the global number one. In addition, Makaisuo also mentioned how China is responding to U.S. containment policies through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative and establishing free trade agreements in Asia. He believes that China has systematically formulated a grand strategy to address challenges from the United States and ensure the diversification and stable growth of its economy. Finally, Makaisuo emphasized the wide-ranging impact of the competition between China and the United States on the global stage, especially in terms of economy, military, and soft power. He believes that the next decade will be an acceleration period for the competition between China and the United States, which will be one of the greatest performances in human history. This interview delves into the complex and crucial relationship between China and the United States, providing important insights into the changing global political and economic landscape.
@qipaguancha2 күн бұрын
One thing you have to understand is that China doesn't really want to overtake the US, either economically or militarily. It's just that China's population of 1.4 billion is so huge that China will inevitably overtake the US in every way as long as it continues to grow, and that's determined by physical reality, not by China's subjective will.
@ekleong82 күн бұрын
@@qipaguanchaCorrect, even India one day (may be 30 to 50 years later ) will surpass US with the largest population in the world!