GARY WTF DON'T LEAVE US HANGING LIKE THIS. AT LEAST PUBLISH YOUR PAPERS.

Where or when was this talked about??

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ibWHp5WXp6-Vhn0.html

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ibWHp5WXp6-Vhn0.html

Surely you just finished Hofstadter's book? What did you mean by saying the absolute inconsistency is itself being destroyed? How can you logically describe this happening? Is it being made consistent? Is it being made non-absolute? Can you refer to some source on this?

@@memesofproduction27 "All the world" And by that he meant the few hundred thousand people concerned with the issue. Lol The issue seems to be, "that which is provable is rooted in digital logic at it's base." People struggle with the unnecessary inclusion of indeterminate variables. An elementary example is when I was first exposed to "x" as a variable. I hotly contested that every "equation" had a fixed, finite answer. I would guess that most people being exposed to set logic have the same urge to count the apples as when exposed to algebra. Relaxing the mind is difficult, when trained to focus life long.

The margin wasn't big enough

Alastair Carnegie if only Godel had of found the path of service in Bhakti Yoga. A bhakti yoga practitioner does not care if he/she lives or dies for they know that the body is temporary and the soul is eternal. Their only fear is forgetting that truth, and their only desire is to serve the Supreme Being, God, and all His parts and parcels.

I don't think Godel was afraid to die. I think he was so sure of his metaphysical beliefs and so in love with his wife he wished to move on from this life and into the next. No one starves themselves to death without an extreme sense of certainty about why they are doing so.

The song's named "Gloomy Sunday." One of my favorites.

finally! A thousand thank yous!

Happy to be of help! There are many versions of it, Billie Holiday's is my personal favorite.

Diego Cervantes 내가 많이 좋아 졌다

coming soon...out of order

what do you mean that a question is false?

there is no absolute directly, but probabilistically as infinite classes of infinite ranges of "evolving-progressing" sets, and there are infinite probabilistic absolutes theoretically but not actually and we cannot measure them because then they are no longer absolutes

I watched Sapolsky's lecture on Limbic System and Schizophrenia, and I don't follow your conclusion. How does genius and madness sometimes being linked (in this case w/ Gödel) discredit his worldview or theorems?

Sapolsky is a bro, but what on Earth are you trying to connect here?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ibWHp5WXp6-Vhn0.html

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ibWHp5WXp6-Vhn0.html

nazi bastards are symbolized as dogs, Plato was a nazi - pure Athenian that didn't accept complex consepts only imaginary, these nazis slayed Greek mathematicians that have revealed the existence of irrational numbers. Adolf Hitler and Marx had this magical thinking also, they wanted to bend the actual world arround their limbic system schizotypical perception. Only manslauhter can do so, you cannot change to world, only kill the ones that oppose your fairytale version. Many of nazi and communist ideas started with a kind metaphysical ascpet of some overestimated biased values. Kurt Gödel was not a nazi himself but an idealist. Idealism based in limbic system disharmony causes theories that lead to manslaughter. Google "limbic system" and "schizotypical prespective range" Kurt Gödel was a kind not nazi nazi. He fed the bias of absulute pure unchangable ideas all societies have, but politicians with the same schizotypical psychosis used the Platonic and Gödel point of view as a justification for applying perfectionism. If you don't blame Kurt Gödel for social nazification it's like not blaming Carl Marx for Stalin;s crimes, even against fellow Russians. Some people play the role of the brain, and some others lead the decapitating axe. The main brain might not give direct orders of manslaughter, because society is like an octapus, even the slaying hand has a self developed brain, this is no reason to disengage Kurt Gödel from that crimes against humanity. The worst crimes are commited by kind-hearted people that teached social bias in the extreme, like support others, eternal love and other pure ideas that to be applied in the real word, they do not say so, but only manslaughter can allow a common bias. Plato Socrates and other nazi theorists were very intelligent. The fact they were intelligent does not mean they didn't cause a craving for biased absolute interpretations. Bernhard Riemann and Aristotle on the opposite hand tried to seperate the bias from the real cosmos. Aristotle was ancient so he made some mistakes, but he was the father of humanistic-practical sciences. Also Gödel's incompleteness theorems are anti-bias theorems, so even Gödel was against bias, but he selected biased opinions for emotional and axiomatic reasons. This is the greatest Gödel's incompatibility and lack of consistency. That self-controversy caused to him trauma and more psychic stress. His deepest fundamental ideas supported his intelectual enemies ideas, but he mis-interpreted them either focused on emotional biased needs. That caused not only more inner trauma to him. but deaths of people that expressed his ideas politically.

uploader-X Ha.

+uploader-X that doesn't make any sense. Marx was a materialist. Socialism and social-nationalist fascism are incredibly atheistic political ideologies and those governments outlawed freedom of religious expression and greatly oppressed people who spoke of love of God. In the USSR, you could be executed for publishing theistic writings. Gödel on the other hand, was directly opposed to materialistic society and the social Darwinism that results from believing that the purpose of life is purely driven by survival of the fittest. Gödel directly opposed all that. So what you're saying literally doesn't make any sense. Materialistic society is driven by the idea that consciousness is a product of matter and that material existence is the only basis of truth and the purpose of life is material success. This materialism, taken to a fascistic extremism, is social Darwinism. That fascist extreme is Hitler. That is the direct result of the belief that the purpose of human life is material and economic success. Whereas God consciousness directly opposes this materialistic ideology by saying that the purpose of life is understanding and loving God and thus cultivating our higher humanity and spiritual development. God consciousness, the spiritual sciences, directly opposes the fascism of materialistic governments.

+ΣΚΡΟΥΤΖ ΜΑΚ ΝΤΑΚ Lmao

+Dong Destroyer Interesting take. But could you elaborate please. Would you consider Jung to be a patriarch?

Good. The best of us don't. Make the next yours. Create.