Sheikh Mangera *

Alhamdulillah sister. We are fortunate to have one of the best and proper scholar in this time. My advice would be to stick to his lectures and guidance.

Indeed Shaykh is a great Scholar ❤

@@TheTemporary1ne he is not a scholar

​@@FazsterHQkeep crying

This video is a lie and sitting up hate. I've been Salafi for almost 30 years and we have never been taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught (from imam Abu hanifa, imam Malik, imam Ahmed, and imam Shafi's words), that we must not be fanatical about the scholar / imam we learn from.

@headfones1000 Exactly. It is funny (actually sad) that those who know nothing about Salafiyyah get on podiums and give hours long speeches misguiding people or spreading lies. One can catch him right away when he started asking people about naming 5 scholars, blah blah. And what about other Madahib as there were more than 4? Zahiri, etc. Was Imam Abu Hanifa a Hanafi? Was Imam Malik a Maliki? Was Imam Shafi a Shafii? Was Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal a Hanbali? No. They were all Salafis. Alhamdulillah

@@salikidrees2968 how? You guys are a misguided sect, you associate body parts with Allah, and commit lots of problems within the ummah. You guys are cursed

@@headfones1000have you watched the entire video? This brother was in the Salafi dawah

@@salikidrees2968have you watched the entire video? This brother was in the Salafi dawah

Alhamdulilah brother I was young when I started with them but it only lasted a few years. I saw through their character and hypocrisy. I caught them many times lying about "ijmaa" and thats when I knew they have a gang mentality.

Not wasted bro. I'm sure you've gained a lot of knowledge which you can rechannel

Say: I 'was' a salafi and continue with your journey to the Hereafter

May Allah bless you and grant you tawfeeq. He can bring levels in an instant coming on you. Just always think positive about Him

Weak

الحمد لله

Alhamdullilah!!

SUBhANALLAH GLORY HOLYNESS BE ALLAH

Took him 17years to realise that "Salafi's" laymen do not take directly from Quran & Sunnah directly without using Scholars. Issue remains there is no obligation to stick to any mathab. It is different to for a learned person who actually understand the usool of the mathab and follows that usool. However there is no proof for a laymen to adopt any mathab exclusively. Laymen asks someone of knowledge he trusts. Does not matter if he is Hanbali Shafi Hanafi or maliki or thahiri. Sadly I find this type of basic misinformation by someone who seems to be familiar with salafis for over 2 decades to be so clueless. Grins and ridicules. I don't think this man is someone I would take seriously.

The deobandis who think about donkeys in their salah

My dear brother, I'm still in shock how I wrote on the cover of my copy in black permanent marker many years ago that this book needs refuting LOLLLLLLLL I thank Allah for having opened my eyes

@@GenerationSalaahudDeen Muhammad the Brit? Asalamu alaikum, im Ayyub the Brit haha😅 and trust me bro. a dear brother recommended me the book and i remember opening it looking for faults but subhan’Allah it had none!

may Allah guide u back to truth

@@zatheonladdie5715 lolllll I would go all in with the Hanafi Madhab but I've got used to the Hanbali Madhab a lot. Otherwise if I could turn back the clock I'd stick with it, very strong and solid, the Big voluminous works of the Hanafis take you into a different world, the early Madhabs never relied only on Hadeeth alone, never, they also used the Fiqh and Fatawas of the sahaaba and tabi'een and Maraseel Hadeeth and so much more. I'm going to keep adding comments for extra points as I can see fanatics here.

​@@GenerationSalaahudDeen Over simplification of complex issues! The hanafi fiqh has some core fallacies/disagreement with the Muhaddiseen (including maalik, Shafiee and Ahmad), such as the Ahnaaf reject the zyadti of Hadith over the hukm of Qur'aan (a pass for hadith rejectors), the Ahnaaf consider istihsaan as a valid legal proof, they also are not in favour of hadees being a proof in itself rather it has to comply with the core principles which their fuqaha have agreed upon! Else the hadeeth is explained away or considered as abrogated! (Another pass for hadeeth rejectors) This is the reason why the muhaqiqeen among the hanafees such as Ibne Hummam, Imam zailai, shah Waliullah dehlavi and Abdul hayy lakhnavi have rejected these principles of Ahnaaf and have declared Imam Abu Haneefa free of these fabricated usool! Ref: Hujjatullahil baaligha of Shah Waliullah dehlavi Rahimahullah. As for the mutaqadimeen of the hanafee mazhab they all were ahlul hadith, the foremost among them being Qazi Abu Yousuf Rahimahullah.

What mistake was exposed of salafis

@just_akh4694 I'm not sure about the new generation, but in our time, there was a lot of accusations of kufr and nifaq of people "not in the salafi da'wah and the ideas that only the Salafi dawah is on the saved sect and anyone following a madhhab would be in hell. Many self appointed imams that never even studied under a proper chain.

Also a place called dammaj in Yemen has the same qualities

Isn’t dammaj supported by Saudi government?

Not really, many are misguided there

Can u provide me with soft copy. JAZAK ALLAH

Yes please, it would be great

​@@niyasusman2657 Give me an email to send you to.

I am also interested brother

Could you pls. provide me with a soft copy too, jzk

Mashallah Mashallah

What’s your Email akhi id like to learn from you

Lol you gotta learn how to add spaces in between the paragraphs in your thesis 😅. Was going to read it, then hit "read more" and saw how messy it looked. Oh well, im happy for you... or, im sorry for your loss 🙃

@@snakejuce apologies I rushed

So you decided on the whole manhaj of salaf based on the mistakes of a bunch of overzealous individuals?? Great😄 So which hanafi you are gonna follow now?? Deobandi? Barelwi? Deobandi hayaati? Deobandi mamaati? Also their tableegh jamaath split into two.. Markaz vs shoora... Their own deobandi scholars have issued fatwas against them... So you see pretty lot of unity among deobandis?? 😊 So sad you decided not to follow those scholars whose pious forefathers eliminated shirk(to a very large extent) from the pious lands of hijaz and stopped the biddath of four different musallas around the kaaba... And decided to follow those who euologise concepts like wahdatul wujood... So imam taymiyyah was wrong? Well then what about those imams who invented concepts like wahdatul wujood which has blatant shirk in it?? Whom deobandis praise to no end... Wallahi, Allah guides those whom he wills. Mistakes of imam taymiyyah in what? You read his books or are you parroting what his opponents alleged about him? No one is infallible apart from beloved prophet SAW thou... U need honesty man not decision based on whims and desires.

The four imams followed the sunnah but not all their followers follow the sunnah. Pakistan is full of innovators who love shrines etc

@@jimmykahn5431 true they have a lot of innovators is this guy an innovator?

@@jimmykahn5431 he was right about madhkalis though

@@thewariscomingtoatownneary7572 I’m not saying this guy is as I do not have the knowledge to give fatwa on individuals. However I have seen Pakistanis in big groups go to shrines and do sujood infront of graves in Lahore.

@@jimmykahn5431eeyazanbillah that is evil

Whitethreadpress.com

Are you implying they were of the wahhabi 3aqeedah

They were all on the Aqeeda of Ahl Sunnah which was the Aqeeda detailed and formulated by Imam Ash'ari. Imam Ash'ari lived later than them. But his and Imam Maturidi's explanation of Creed is that of Ahl Sunnah. These two contemporary Imams formulated the theology just like the four previous Imams formulated the 4 Fiqhi Madhabib.

There is no such thing as Wahhabi Aqeedah. Secondly, the books of the Salaf especially that of Imam Al Laalakaaee where he documented the creed of Imam Al Bukhari, Ali Ibn Madeeni, Sufyaan Ath Thawri, Abu Haatim At Raazi clearly documents the 'Aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah. And it does not entail philosophy or Kalaam. I recommend that you read those books in sha Allah.

@@drmauroof I'm not convinced imposing a theology or 'aqeeda' by Imam Ashari is in the best interests of Muslims today. You only have to read the 'Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology' to see how confusing and conflicting the ideas prevelant were in those academic circles over 1000 years ago. As a simple example, is the Qur'aan eternal or created ? Just how does Imam Ibn Hanbli's position become 'correct'? There is no nass to believe in either sides arguemant. No Muslim will be asked about this on the Day of Judgement.

@@MusaMills1 No matter what spin you put on it using names of the actual Salaf that you have no chain/connection to through scholarly transmission isn’t going to help you. Let’s call a spade a spade, yes wahhabi aqeedah

The deobandis who think about donkeys in their salah

Wa tu izzo man tashaa wa tuzzillu man tashaa! May Allah guide the Shias, pseudo salafis and ahlul bidaah to the siraate mustaqeem of the Ahle sunnah waljamaah! Ameen.

@@dhiaulhaq5958 may Allah guide the deobandis, especially the ones who think of donkeys in salah and the ones who think Allah has the possibility to lie. Ameen

@@AhleSunnah586 The curse of Allah be upon the liars. May Allah open the doors of hidayah to the ahlul bidaah who openly SEEK madad from ghairullah although in salah they recite IYYAKA NAABODU WA IYYAKA NASTAEEN!

@dhiaulhaq5958 if its a lie why do deobandi scholars like limbada and adam al kawtheri back the statements. Stop blind following.

Yes.. Time to unite the way likes of Imam shawkani Rahimahullah called upon... He was a fierce oppnent of taqleed... Also wrote a beautiful treatise on it.. I forget the name

Would be interested please.

Many of them are just European language speaker or Turkish speakers ... Very weak in English

You have local scholars in Istanbul and elsewhere who are Hanafi and Shafi'. Very easy to request them to speak on these topics.

@@tandoori1990 there are already the ones that speak on such topics. The actual problem is that people nowadays in Turkey have A LOT OF Kibr(arrogance) They don't want to listen to any Hoca (teacher/scholar) They see them as backwards. Some even reject hadith and Quranist. Some say Allah gave me brain, I read and understand Quran, some mixing things with science. A lot of crazy things going on, so due to such arrogance, they don't listen and hate such scholars. Turkey is messed up BIG time unfortunately. May Allah guide us all

@@ac-go4np wow

​@@ac-go4npthis is happening in subcontinent too not just turkey ...that's why many of youth are entering wahabism modern narrow thinking

Nobody who is a salafi says this. What the salafis say is that the those from hindu lands such as the pakistanis and indians, and those from the christian lands, such as the bosnians,albanians, and turks, those from the levant and egypt have chosen to align their deen to be closer to hindusim and christianity with the constant grave worship, amulet worship, birthday worship, major and minor shirk, and so on, that is far away from the 4 imams and Islam. That is what the salafis criticize. We do not care if you choose not to perform raf al yadayn or something like that.

Most of the strong hadiths were only compiled after the 4 imams came into existence. One can follow Quran and sunnah blindly but one cannot follow imams blindly. If the imams verdict contradicts the Quran or the Hadith you cannot follow the imam. That is like shirk . According to Hanafi madhab one is not allowed to eat prawns but there’s nowhere in the Quran or any reliable hadith where prawns are forbidden to eat. So are you gonna follow hanafi or quran?

​@@sbslm1They definitely didn't follow shaykh ibn taymiyyahs, albani, bin baz and uthaymeens Madhab. That's a stupid questions. As the imams were after that time That's like me saying did the khulafa follow hadith or shahih Al Bukhari. The four imams followed the understanding of different shahaba and the shahaba followed the Qur'an and sunnah.

​@@4ozking858you forgot to mention the Arab lands where the salafis do shirk by blind following their skaykhs which is also shirk. They choice shahi albukhari over hadith and sunnah. They look past their shaykhs mistakes which are against the hadith or sunnah which is also shirk. They are following there shaykh over Allah. Such as letting American troops have a base in Saudi Arabia when it is clear in the hadith no non Muslims can be in the Arabian peninsula. It is not permissible for any of them (the kuffaar) to live in the Hijaaz. This is the view of Maalik and al-Shaafa’i, but Maalik said: I think that they should be expelled from all the Arab lands, because the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Two religions cannot coexist in the Arabian Peninsula.” Abu Dawood narrated with his isnaad from ‘Umar that he heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “I will certainly expel the Jews and the Christians from the Arabian Peninsula,, and I will not leave anyone there but Muslims.” Al-Tirmidhi said: this is a saheeh hasan hadeeth. And it was narrated that Ibn ‘Abbaas said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) left behind three instructions. He said: Expel the mushrikeen from the Arabian Peninsula, honour the delegations the way that I do, and he kept quiet about the third. Narrated by Abu Dawood. Al-Mughni, 9/285, 286.

​@@imtiazlatif4948I don't know where you have learnt your knowledge from but your information is incorrect. Strong hadith were written at the time of the shahaba and not after the times of the four imams. Also the hanafi opinion is different from that of imam Abu hanifa. The imam believed prawns were not fish and his students believed they were fish. Translation: A fish is that creature which has a backbone, lives in water, swims with its fins and breathes through its gills. Prawns do not come under the category of fish, because they do not have a backbone nor do they breathe through gills. So they fall under the category of insects, and would not be allowed. Eating Insects: It is not permissible in the Shafi’i school to eat insects (such as ants, bees, flies, beetles, roaches, worms). This is because insects are considered distasteful, and permissibility has been tied to what is good, and impermissibility to what is distasteful. This is derived from the Qur’an (7:157), in describing the Messenger “who makes good things permissible for them and bad things impermissible.” I would love to write more to disprove your baseless claims. You can research the false claims you have yourself as the correct information is there.

England

Imam Abu Haneefah was Salafi in aqeedah do you follow the same aqeedah as him?

No he wasn't a salafi in aqeedah any salafi beliefs ascribed to him are fabricated or misinterpretations don't say incorrect things

@@husamzaheer5415 have you read his books?

Mufti Sahab is wrong and even spreading lies. Since when anyone from the Sahaba, Tabiyeen and Atba Tabiyeen used aqal before Deen? This "thought process" (philosophy) or using rationale before authentic Ahadith is what none of the earliest generations did. Ali Radiallahu Anhu even spoke against it in an authentic Hadith when he talked about how Islam does not always go by logic as he saw Prophet Muhammad sal Allahu Alihi Wa Salam.... Abd Khayr reported: Ali ibn Abi Talib, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “If the religion were based upon one’s opinion, one might expect the bottom of the leather sock to be wiped instead of the top. I have seen the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, wiping over the upper part of his leather socks.” Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 162 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani

@@salikidrees2968He never ever mentioned using philosophy over the Sahih Ahadith. I can bet you did not watch the whole video. What He is saying is that even the Salaf differed in various. Yani even the Salaf had ikhtilaf on some issues. Who are we to believe that just “following the Quran and Sunnah” is enough? Even the modern day don’t just use Quran and Sunnah, they use the views and interpretation of Al-Albani and Ibn Uthaymeen and Bin Baz. So once again, even the Salaf had ikhtilaf because the Prophet (pbuh) accepted these differences. And Hadith are not on the level of the Quran. According to Hanafi fiqh for example, we use Quran, Sunnah, Ijma, Qiyas (logic and aql), Istihsan (personal opinion) and Customs (‘urf). If there is no answer in the Quran and Sunnah, using Logic and Aql becomes necessary.

@@salikidrees2968 Albani was hanafi and so was father RA but he strayed away from it. As Mutf sb said, if you wanna follow S Albani then feel free to do so.

@raystar800 father who? Again did Sheykh Albani Raheema hu Allah prayed according to Imam Abu Hanifa or did he pray according to Rasool Allah ﷺ? Are Muslims to follow Prophet Muhammad ﷺ "blindly" or someone else? Sheykh Albani wrote a book on Prayer with references from authentic Ahadith. Alhamdulillah. Do you pray like Mufti or do you pray the way Prophet Muhammad ﷺ prayed and told us?

@@salikidrees2968 he followed hanafi fiqhs interpretation of Quran and sunnah then strayed away to create his own school of thought.

And Imam Al Shawqani has included all the best in Nayl Al Awtar 8 volumes in Arabic

@@dayan47 my dear sister, 1-Hadeeth is not the only source for Fiqh, there are also thousands of statements of the Sahaaba in Fiqh and then we have some 500 verses of the Qur'an for Fiqh 2- In 1 hadeeth you will find 1 or pillars of an act of worship, in another some more, and so on, thats not how thousands of ulamaa were taught Fiqh for 1000 years, Fiqh texts act like an Index, they organise issues into a simple manner, the conditions then the pillars then the farood, then the Sunnahs and so on 3- Texts of Fiqh are taught in stages, like school then college then Uni 4- Fiqh texts summarize hundreds of verses, thousands of hadeeth, thousands of fatwas of the sahaaba and thousands of Qiyas that were based upon the Quran and Hadeeeth 5- Nailul Awtaar is not for the beginner or intermediate student as Imam Shawkaani followed a lot of the opinions of Imam ibn Hazm az-Zhaahiri, you must be very well grounded in Usoolul ul-fiqh first and thats after at least intermidate level in Nahw and sarf and balaghah and uloomul hadeeth Hope this helps, JZKL

In the school of Ahle sunnah waljamaah the rulings (sharia) are derived from: Primary sources 1.Quraan and sunnah 2. Rulings of the Khulafa e Rashidin (Abu Bakr, Umat Al Khattab, Usmaan Ibne Affan and Ali ibne Abi Taalib Radhiallahu anhum. Secondary sources 1.. Qiyas (analogy) 2. Ijmaa ( consensus) of opinions of the imams of fiqh Wallahu aalam

everyone claims they follow the quran & sunnah even Shia do...A salafi is the one who follow the Quran & Sunnah WITH the understanding of the Salaf (1st 3 generation)

@@AM-5d The real salafis my brother are the Ahle Sunnah wal jamaah. We RESPECT and FOLLOW the rulings of the Khulafa e Rashidin in ALL matters including 20 rakaah of terawih, 3 talaqs if given in one go counts as three etc. We do not pick and choose. The pseudo salafis while CLAIMING to follow the first 3 generations , disregard the rulings of the Khulafa e Rashidin. May Allah open their hearts to the haq. Ameen!

@@dhiaulhaq5958 Salafi are ahlus Sunnah/Hadith/Athar... Our disagreement isn't merely fiqhi position but is regarding 'Aqeedah...Where do the Asharis & Maturidis drive their 'aqeedah ?

@@AM-5d 1.Qulhuwallahu ahad. Allahussamad. Lam yalid walam yoolad. Walam yakullahu kuffowan ahad. 2.Ashhadu alla ilaha illallah wa ashhadu Anna Muhammadan abdoho wa Rasuluh

That’s not how it works.

@@monkmodemalik8225 how does it work then?

@@rahilhabib He may have meant that he does not follow any of the 4 major madhabs. His rulings will still need to be derived from scholars who are qualified to give rulings. Salafia is wholly misrepresented. All of Sunni Islam is upon Salafia, if one sect is not then it cannot be Sunni Islam. later additions from later scholars are just that, additions. We leave it to the scholars of Ah lul Sunnah to determine whether they are beneficial or not but the Islam we follow today is the Islam that is derived from the first 3 generations and the prophet (saw) with evidences.

​@@rahilhabibso you follow Imams of ray? Astagfirallah

@@azizurrahman116 my point is that when you ask a scholar for a ruling (because we laymen aren't qualified to derive rulings ourselves) we rely on them for the ruling and trust in them for that. That is the same thing 'blind following'. The difference is that the salafi madhab is a contemporary madhab while the 4 mainstream madhab have gone through over 1,000 years of scholarship.

Alhamdulillah.... Same here.. Iam from India... Alhamdulillah for salafi manhaj

Masha Allah But all the above can be done without the Salafi Manhaj too

@@faizahmed8076 Stay strong my brother... BaarakAllaahu feek.

Same here. Nobody compares to the salafis in terms of their adherence to the sunnah, enjoining the good and forbidding the evil. Teaching and encouraging the learning of the Arabic language so Islam can be accessible to all.

@@4ozking858 Emphasis on learning arabic is also bcoz the truth should be accessible to all... As books written by salafussaliheen are in arabic😊. Stay blessed my brother.. May Allah grant patience to the ghurba of this ummah.

Brother regarding madhabs u need more research cuz ur facts are mostly incorrect ...jazakumullah ❤

Agreed

@@dianacruze1825 May Allah reward you for your suggestion. I will do more research in Sha Allah to always learn more. Can you tell me what is incorrect from what i said so it will make it easier my research? 🙂

You keep to your madhhab unless you can evaluate the positions yourself.

You go to a scholar who will sincerely evaluate for you based on proofs.. That's salafi approach. Interestingly, hanafi fiqh is alone in many issues while other three madhabs are United in many issues.. Exactly why hanafis are so strong in their opposition to salafis.

⁠@@faizahmed8076 can you give examples of this? You make it seem like the hanafis actively want to disagree with the other madhahib while forgetting that the Hanafi madhab was the earliest one of them all. Furthermore, the whole point of having madhabs is that there will be differences of opinion on small issues however the point is that ijithaad was done when deriving the rulings. Hanafi’s have their own usool of deriving rulings, our scholars didn’t just come up with random rules with no framework or structure.

@@faizahmed8076 also want to point out that the issue many people have with salafis is that they act as though they are the only ones on the truth and everyone else is wrong. You look down on others for doing taqlid while not realising that you’re doing so yourself through following your own salafi imaams. You state that you follow the Qur’aan and sunnah alone as though implying that everyone else is following some third source. It makes zero sense

@@SJ-jk7wz superiority complex is not found in salafis alone... Box headed deobandis too live on this earth who think that their sect has been given the ticket to jannah. Secondly, none of the imams asked their followers to stick to their madhab at all cost... "Framework" Is a nice word to mask the fallacy of blind following.. No frame work can supersede clear texts.. See my posts.. Have given many examples.. Being oldest madhab is a very oft beaten jargon... If that's so then why did imam abu hanifas own students differed with him in more than half of his rulings? And if your argument is that these madhabs are established on certain "framework" Who made it? Is it infallible? And what about great imams like shah waliullah dehlawi who came out of it and gave rulings contrary to the madhab? We're they deviants too? I leave you with one example of condemned blind following of hanafis... They wipe their necks in wudu which is not proven in any saheeh hadees... We don't oppose madhabs we only dislike the fanaticism towards it. As for the aqeeda they are maatureedi, far away from the aqeeda of Imam abu hanifa Rahimahullah... So do your home work.. If you wanna further debate, bring me a clear proof, a saheeh hadees for wiping the neck in wudu... Please no beating around the bush.... Wudu is a form of worship it needs to be done the way prophet taught... So either you bring me the proof for it or accept that you only have words to repeat what your maulanas tell you.

Did he say all different sects constitute "brother hood". If you say "yes" then either your are truthful and Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu Alihi Wa Salam lied (in the Hadith of 73 sects and about those who do biddah) or you are speaking of something you do not know and thus might be misguiding others. So one should not speak without knowledge. Lying upon Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu alihi Wasalam has grave consequences. Read the Ahadith about one who lies upon Prophet Muhammad sal lalahu Alihi Wa Salam.

The deobandis who think about donkeys in their salah

This video is a lie and sitting up hate. I've been Salafi for almost 30 years and we have never been taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught (from imam Abu hanifa, imam Malik, imam Ahmed, and imam Shafi's words), that we must not be fanatical about the scholar / imam we learn from.

@@headfones1000 It's not a lie, you're just not as hardcore a Salafi.

@@SonGoku-io7shNot hardcore? I say that deobandi Islam understands Allaahs asmat wa sifat in an innovated manner, like the ashari's. And they are sufi, although not as astray as the brewli sufis. This is why we can perform salaht behind them, but not behind open brewlis. And I say that their version of hanafi fique is not fully representative of imam Abu hanifas madhab. Rahimullaah. And I say to the ignorant on this issue, thatI fall under the description of madkhali, although that lebal is nonsense for anyone. I hope that confirm I am so called hardcore. ** However, that doesn't change the fact the we are not taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught from the imams of old and present that we must not completely blindly follow a madhab when we reach a good age or level of understanding, nor be fanatical. .. And my 30 years includes traveling n meeting Salafis in many countries n Ulema too. And I say that this video is based upon a lie and stiring up hate. May Allaah have mercy upon us all.

@@headfones1000 Brother you should not speak out of ignorance. Of course I make excuses for you to say you are ignorant rather than lying on purpose, as you accused this video of doing. I mean you are a self professed Madkhali yet you are trying to convey your group as so softly spoken and never having done any wrong. To call you a liar would indeed be easy based on the behaviour of those which you follow. However I don't wish to personally attack you as I do not know your actions away from this comments section. As for blind following, if you don't blind follow your "Sheikhs", what else do you do? That is one of the biggest contradictions in your Madkhali ideology because you have no clue what your Saudi Sheikhs rulings are based on. You don't even know what your pseudo-Sheikhs fatwas are based on, yet you do Taqlid of them and spit these fatwas out. Your problem with this video is simple. It states the truth as everyone knows and the truth hurts. This video has more home truths than your Madkhali "Sheikhs" have spoken about in the last 20+ years. The Madkhalis are a corrupt organisation yet you are attempting to perform damage limitations for them, so they hold onto relevancy by the skin of their teeth and corrupt the Ummah to the best of their ability. May Allah protect us from the corruption of the Madakhila and other corruptors. To ask your opinion on sifaat of Allah is like asking for financial advise from a toddler.

@@SonGoku-io7sh You went along with what I said in my first comment, but you made the assumption that I'm not the type of Salafi that the speaker in this video refered to. I then gave you detailed info to describe myself so that you realise I am what people erroneously describe as madkhaki. Instead of you then accepting that the video is clearly wrong, you accuse me of lying, while at the same time admitting you don't know my character. Do you even know what the erroneous label of madkhaki means? And the ahlul ilm that we follow are in South Asia, Kuwait, Sudan, etheopia, Nigeria, yemen and many other places, NOT just Saudia. The fact that you refered to Saudi scholars demonstrates that you follow sterio types just like the speaker does in the video. And I don't think you know what blind following means. It means obeying all Islamic teachings from someone (other than the Prophet, ﷺ), without knowing or hearing if its from Al kitaab wa sunnah... Yes a child can do this, or an adult in an emergency with time constraints can ask an Alim for a ruling and follow it without knowing what text. Ayat or hadith it's based upon. .. But that's the exception.

I think they mean in general localities. It’s ideal that you have a scholar local to you that can help answer questions

Brother do you happen to know where to access the online courses of the hanbali scholars you mentioned?

@@MH-ng3bs Check مطلق الجاسر also عامر بهجت also القعيمي.

@@MusaMills1 May Allah reward you brother and accept from you this blessed day.

So you follow a madhab of a scholar

I know many lay salafis that go direct to the text.

When it comes to matters of the shariah everyone follows the scholar they trust, certain level of knowledge and understanding is required. But with everything else please think and reflect yourself as well. The scholars I follow taught me ignorance cannot be excused on the day of judgement and you cannot hide behind scholars on the day of judgement.

I recommend actually watching the video

My dear brother. The Ummah was a lot more united before the issue got spread of trying to work out for ourself from the Quran and Sunnah directly. And before we had scholars with good intentions who started to call us to not stick to follow one of the 4 Fiqh Madhabs. Also yes absolutely we should unite upon the Quran and Sunnah but what does that mean? 6000 verses of the Quran are simple and easy to understand and act upon for any Muslim, in fact millions of non-muslims have entered into Islaam just from reading the Quran as it’s easy, the vast majority is very easy. The rest of the 500 or so verses are more difficult somewhat and they are related usually to the matters of Fiqh. They need extraTafseer and explanation. Sometimes the explanations just for those 500 or so verses termed as Aayaatul Ah’kaam, they go into volumes by themselves. Each of the 4 Fiqh Madhabs have their Tafseer books just for these verses alone in volumes and sometimes they comment in extra detail on those verses whilst explaining the whole Qur'an. So we can and always did unite upon the Quran by busying ourselves with the 6000 verses and by letting the scholars explain the other 500 or so verses about the rulings/ah’kaam/halal and haram, …. Then we can do the same with the Hadeeth/Sunnah. Thousands of them are authentic and only some of those are for Ah’kaam-Rulings that need more explanations. To top that those types of hadeeth a lot of times conflict each other apparently and this is only one of the various services that the 4 Fiqh Madhabs provided by writing books and explanaing in detail on hadeeth that seem to contradict each other. Like the different hadeeths about not when the Fajr time enters in but the time best for Fard Fajr Prayer to be prayed in Jama’ah. (In the eastern city of Ih’saa of Saudi Arabia if you miss in Jama’ah the Fajr or ASR then you can catch it in the Hanafi Masjids, they have 4 Fiqh Madhabs in that city, maybe this happens in Cairo also I’m guessing). But point being, yes we can unite and usually did for 1300 years upon the Quran and Sunnah easily as the vast majority like 90% of the Quran are Sunnah don’t need Tafseer to get a good basic understanding and act upon them. Only in the last 100 years the calls to not learn or follow or give fatwa upon one of the 4 Madhabs has divided the Ummah very badly, it was a slip up and devils deception and we ask Allah to forgive the scholars who called to it and we do them a favor by clarifying their error so that they have less followers to follow their wrong way. They had good intentions but wrong is wrong and must be pointed out for the better of the UNITY of the Ummah which is a lot more important than some scholars. You can get Tafseer for the 6000 easier verses for extra benefits but it’s not needed to understand enough to act upon those texts. As for the remaining 10% then we unite easily simply by following one of the 4 Madhabs as a way to quickly understand those remaining texts of the Quran and Sunnah. We can't stop our daily lives for 10 years just to try and understand directly ourselves, rather we have scholars and these 4 Madhabs are just different ways to understand those texts. Many big top notch scholars attested that way who were alot bigger in levels too for 1000 years, so lets use some common sense. And not to forget, sometimes they all agree on many issues of Fiqh and sometimes they disagree because some issues of the Arabic grammar are differed over maybe. Sometimes over if a narrator in the chain of a hadeeth if he met that Sahaabi or not. Or if the narration speaking about the reasons why a verse was revealed or a why an important incident in a hadeeth in this issue is authentic or not, which can prove or disprove the actual wisdom behind the hadeeth or not. So 4 imams and their students and their students who became high level, developed systems to gather, analyse, deduce, reconcile between different narrations and so on. Hope u understand my dear brother. Can any medical student study with one university some chapters and topics then some days go to a totally different university for other chapters and another university for the remaining? And they keep doing this for 4 years. Will they pass their degree? Will they even gain a real solid understanding or have major holes in their studies? Will it be even legal or accepted or looked upon as mad? And just because we have very rare odd and biased or fanatical statements of very few of the scholars within the later scholars from the 4 Fiqh Madhabs doesn't mean we disregard them, those statements were rebuked and pointed out.

……..on the understanding of the salaf.

@@GenerationSalaahudDeen United? Like how? When for nearly six hundred years there were four musallas around the kaaba? That's unity what prophet left behind this ummah on? In every century there were imams n scholars of repute who challenged the concept of blind following.... Educate yourself.

@@FazsterHQ Mashallah

You’re not a salafi and neither have you ever been a salafi. Fear Allah and stop lying just to score points.

Please show me where it says Shaykh Al-Fawzaan and Shaykh Uthaymeen differed with others on using tasbeeh? The classical scholars you name dropped we teach their books more fervently in our universities and madrasah, maybe when you go umrah or hajj sit in the duroos at masjid an nabawi and masjid Al haram and benefit from them. They are far more learned in the books of these scholars than a senior deobandi scholar like taqi usmani. The only scholars your people quote are the khandalvis, palanpuris and the odd classical scholar here and there, the names that are popular in your circles are ibn arabi and Al-ghazali 😂 I wonder why….

Brother... More you shoot blanks more it looks like you have an agenda🤣 Don't stop with imam bayhaqi... Go much into past.. Imam daarqutnee.. Imam Bukhari.. Imam daarmi... Imam ahmad.. Well... You will be surprised to learn that how badly these imams criticised blind following and especially ahnaf for rejecting ahaadees.... You are not sincere

@@FazsterHQ He is either lying or he is just mighty confused...

You have no idea... Looks like you are just dropping names... We salafis don't follow imam albani blindly.. And the idea you are trying to push through saying that imam albani came with something new than these imams is your ignorance. You mentioned IMAM ABDL BARR.. He was a salafi in aqeeda.. A maliki by learning but not a blind follower. Have u read his work? He has refuted blind following of madhabs very much...sheikh Albani just walked the way of these pious imams..thats all...as for difference in furoo issues see how badly deobandis differ among themselves..they can't even unite on a simple issue like EATING PRAWNS BEING ALLOWED OR PROHIBITED..According to some of them hanafis are not allowed to eat it but they can trade in it as it is halal for shafis🤣.thats the kind of blind following salafi manhaj opposes...as for few furoo issues, different opinions are no problem until there is proof both ways..Please don't push your ignorance and biased views on others... Fear Allah

😂 quite aggresive approach then.

Good for you brother... BaarakAllaahu feek!

Alhamdulilah

I know you're being dishonest in your comment. Stop playing fast and loose with Islam. You will have to answer for it one day.

Alhamdulillah ❤

Alhamdulillah.

Depends on the Sahabi, the fiqh of ibn Masood(ra) would be closer to the Hanafis than that of Ibn Umar(ra) as the fiqh of the Malikis would be closer to that of the Sahabahs in Madina. Abu Yusuf and Shaybani differed in issues, but they did not depart from the methodology of Imam Abu Hanifa.

​@@youngomniverse35Funny you should mention that. Coz the sahabi from whom Imam Abu Habifa has his chain is from Abdullah ibn Masud RA, and sahabi whose chain goes to Imam Malik was Ibn Umar RA. So rather than they following close to these Madhabs. They were actually the Progenitors of these madhabs.

This video is a lie and he's deliberately setting up hate. I've been Salafi for almost 30 years and we have never been taught that we can't follow a madhab. Rather, we are only taught (from imam Abu hanifa, imam Malik, imam Ahmed, and imam Shafi's words), that we must not be fanatical about the scholar / imam we learn from.

even if they choose not to raise their hands and do Rafayadhayn despite the saheeh ahadeeth, their Salah is still valid however I don't get those who say doing Rafayadhayn is 'Bid'ah' or that it is wrong etc... Even Imam Abu Hanifa (rahimahullah) said that if there is a more authentic narration and mine contradicts it, follow the authentic one

I might be wrong but I believe within the Hanafi and Maliki Madhabs, the reason they don't follow hadith is because they preferred to follow the actions of the sahabah from that area. Maliki - Madinah and Hanafi - Kufa. There are reasons why? If you study you'll see it's not that black and white as made out to be.

Common sense, if I don't know about maths I'll ask a maths teacher, if I don't know about engineering I'll ask an engineer, etc Quran reinforces this just incase anyone is confused But asking people who have memorised something isn't knowledge but the same as a data bank , they just process information from memory, dosent mean they're knowledgeable

That’s not true at all. You must stay consistent on a madhhab on one subject, like a business contract (unless you simply follow a scholar who goes with evidence and not a madhhab itself). But there are MANY situations in which it is perfectly fine to go outside of one’s madhhab. Like, if you follow the Shafi’i madhhab on financial matters why would you have to follow it when it comes to touching your wife and wudu, when the Shafi’i position is clearly weak and has nothing to do with finances?

No

Yeah, I don’t know where they got this idea from

Sheikh Fawzan (Salafi scholar) on Madhabs: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hrujqL2Sx6mWZZs.html

So Imam Abu Hanifa was from the Salaf and he wasn't a Salafi