No Andy wasnt tired like Roger was. That match with Delpo was insane.

@@Dark_Voice Well then Fed should have finished the match against Delpo quicker. Murray beat Djokovic in the semis in straight sets.

@@djedd23 Yeah, that's life in the big city,.

Yeah Fed is usually best on grass, but this game was definitely not a great example of that.

Murray took it out of his hands. He played great!

@@c_m_b_3110 Delpo totally destroyed him the match before. Just like he got destroyed in 2016 against Rafa and Andy has 2 Gold medal's from playing exhausted opponents.

@@Dark_Voice agent smith shut up

Yes I agree .he played as if he is sleeping n that's the contest . It was once in a lifetime opportunity. Knowing he may not be able to play 2016 Olympics he should have poured his heart and soul in it. Though I am hugest fedrer fan sometimes it's difficult to understand his attitude during certain matches that too important matches

Well said! These sycophants do this all the time. It’s really annoying.

Perfect last sentence. Murray finished Djokovic in the semis of London 2012 beautifully. Murray’s serving numbers were off the charts in the semis and finals. Believe his first serve percentage was over 65. Did not get broken once against Djoker or Fed. His break conversion against Novak 2/4 while Novak was 0/4. Same number of opportunities but Murray converted. Novak was using custom grass shoes with extra side spikes while Murray used the more conventional grass shoes with spikes on the soles only. In theory Novak should have moved better, but Murray outran him also-especially at the mid and forecourt, leading to better volleys. The center ct is also less windy since they added the roof ( closed or open), also helping Novak. Still Murray overcame Novak’s superior ball striking from the baseline. I believe Murray’s London Olympic gold medal win is one of the most athletic and skillful performances in tennis history; evidenced by beating two GOAT contenders.

That is Why We have The Empire.

Anything to delegitimize Andy's wins eh? 🤔

@@judyclarkson5887 It's the truth. Every achievement he has comes with a big asterisk. US Open 2012 with the unplayable wind and Djokovic choking the first tiebreak. In Wimbledon 2013 Djokovic was tired after the semifinals. His run in 2016 was possible after Federer's and Nadal's loses and withdrawals, and with Djokovic going downhill after Roland Garros.

@@masters.1000 Can make the same case with everyone if we go into the little details really mate..

@@judyclarkson5887 Yes, but at least the Big 3 has some big wins by their own. When Murray had to prove himself in somewhat equal terms, like in the Australian Open finals, he failed and badly so.

@@masters.1000 Andy has some big wins of his own as well, so?

Stop your non sense, Murray helped himself winning two Olympic gold medals

@@ravirathee6801 Considering Murray's Bo5 record against Federer/Djokovic/Nadal he was very fortunate, especially in Rio.

@@MrBen51309 it doesn't matter you don't get to be a double Olympic champion by luck .

@@MrBen51309 novak's and federer's record vs Nadal at French is abysmal, I don't see people discrediting their French open titles in 2016 and 2009 respectively.

@@ravirathee6801 I've seen plenty of people say Federer was fortunate in 2009. As for Djokovic, he'd won 11 of his last 12 matches against Nadal, including a straight sets win at RG 2015. His chances were good regardless.