Jesus is our Lord and Saviour!

I have been JW for 20 years and I believe Jesus was Archangel Michael. Recently I wake up and analyse again all the teachings. What you say make sense...if Jesus was an Archangel he will stop them and do not accept to be worship. Is logic then his nature should be divine. His diety is proven here.

1 Amen. 2 Amen 3 Amen Praise his name.

A final indication that the book of Revelation is teaching or hinting at Jesus' full deity in this last chapter is when we compare Rev. 22:16 with Rev. 1:1 and back to Rev. 22:6. Rev. 22:16 has Jesus saying, "I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify to you about these things for the churches." Rev. 1:1 states, "The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things that must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John," Rev. 22:6 states, "And he said to me, "These words are trustworthy and true. And the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, has sent his angel to show his servants what must soon take place." Examining these three verses there seem to be three possibilities. 1. The Father and Son sent two different angels. Each sending "His [own]" angel. 2. Both the Father and Son sent the same angel. The same angel being "his" to both the Father and Son. 3. The Son is the one who sent his angel. If the third option is true, then Jesus is "the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets" (per Rev. 22:6). That would seem to imply Jesus' full deity. The following are some reasons why this third option is plausible to me. We know that Rev. 22:16 has Jesus sending His angel. Regarding Rev. 1:1 I'm aware of at least one scholarly source that sides with Jesus being the one who sent His angel rather than the Father. The NET Bible states in a footnote on Rev. 1:1, "In 1:1 and 22:16 it is clear that Jesus has sent his angel to proclaim the message to John; thus the message is from Christ..." Options 1 & 2 seem implausible to me. Finally, it wouldn't be surprising to me that just as Rev. 22:20 was intended to indicate the identity of the speaker in Rev. 22:12-13 and so teach the full deity of Christ; so Rev. 22:16 was intended to indicate the identity of sender of an angel in Rev. 22:6 and so also teach the full deity of Christ. How can we make sense of all the foregoing data? The Trinitarian position can make sense of all this data. Data that suggests there are at least two persons who are Jehovah and possess the attributes of Jehovah. This is the case EVEN IF we reject the notion that Christ ever refers to Himself as the Almighty in the book of Revelation. Though, as I said, some would argue that Christ does refer to Himself as Almighty God in Rev. 1:8. Those who reject Christ's full deity have to argue that there are two firsts and lasts, God the Father and the Son who isn't truly or fully God. They may also argue that while Christ is called "first and last," he is not referred to as "the alpha and omega" or "the beginning and end." But is that really reasonable? Didn't I undermine that objection by my analysis of Rev. 22:12-13 in light of other similar verses in the same book? Isn't it more reasonable to conclude that all three phrases are three different ways to refer to the same thing? That is, the omnipotent and omniscient Sovereign source of the origin and meaning of all of creation. It's not inconsistent with the rest of the New Testament to see Christ as the co-source/co-creator/co-sustainer/co-purposer of the universe with the Father (John 1:1-3;1 Cor. 8:6; Col. 1:16-17; Heb. 1:2-3,10-13). Also, doesn't it make more sense that if Almighty God wanted to avoid giving the impression that Jesus is fully God, then He would not have inspired the book of Revelation to refer to Jesus as "the first and last"? Nor inspire it to seemingly imply Jesus is also "the Alpha and Omega" along with being "the beginning and the end"?

As far as we see in this channel, comments are so respecful and many are very deep in content. Very inteligent people are here using arguments that they know. I feel confortable reading all comments, thanks a lot for that, please keeping that line. Thanks for "Greek For All" for let people to interchange what on their minds.

1,2,3 Amen Amen Amen

Even a Christian cannot brush aside the worship of Jehovah as God. In Revelation 1:5 the Son of God called himself "Jesus Christ, 'The Faithful Witness.'" When on earth as a man he was a Jew, an Israelite, to whose nation the words of Isaiah 43:10 were written: "'You are my witnesses, 'is the utterance of Jehovah, 'even my servant whom I have chosen.'" Jesus demonstrated that he was a faithful and true witness of Jehovah God. His genuine disciples today must be the same kind of witnesses, Jehovah's.

Stan, what program or app are you using at the 5:49 mark - the one that has the Greek alongside the English translation? I really like that simple format, and would like to use it myself as well.

This was fascinating!! 😲 Thank you! 😊

AMEN, AMEN, AMEN!!!

Hey what's the name of this program, is it free for PC?

"Jesus said"who saw me saw the father. (Jesus was) Jehovah's word who worshiped him worshiped his Father Jehovah (when he was on earth) Now we worship and pray to the Lord Jehovah in the name of his Son Jesus Christ, as he said to his desiples. and I (Jesus)will give it unto thee, that my father may be glorified.

1. AMEN! 2.AMEN! 3.AMEN!

Thank you so much for this. Wow. Needed this as I'm currently studying with JWs.

Hi sir/ma'am. Good day. can I ask how to say/write "The word has a beginning" in Koine Greek? I just want to know because my Unitarian friends insist that in John 1:1a John shows that the Word has a beginning. Thank you so much. God bless your work!

1, 2, 3 Amen!

Amen brother. Very helpful indeed.

I have a friend who is JW and I really did not know more of ways to show him because the common ways should be true enough but they are difficult to reach with their own Bible.. but with this, I can show him in his own JW bible...thank you!

Wow, I really want that Greek/English software but of all the things you listed, it’s not among them. What software is this?

You say, and I quote "The point of my video is to show that in the NT neither humans, nor angels but Got and Jesus receive proskuneo." Well, Jesus when telling of forgiveness uses proskuneo in connection to a HUMAN Matt 18:26 And at Rev. 3:9 Jesus shows the position of authority he will give to some of his human followers when he says he will make people "worship before thy feet." - KJV. The word used there is proskuneo! The ASV again adds this footnote: "The Greek word [proskuneo] denotes an act of reverence whether paid to a creature, or the Creator......... Looks like proskuneo is be given to humans in TWO seperate occasions here........The answer is there, you just got to do a bit of digging and look for it they way we do.............My advice is to try NOT to nullify Gods word, just accept what it says. Even the extremely trinitarian W. E. Vine writes in his An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, p. 1247: "PROSKUNEO ... to make obeisance, do reverence to (from pros, towards, and kuneo, to kiss), is the most frequent word rendered 'to worship'. It is used for an act of homage or reverence (a) to God ...; (b) to Christ ...; (c) to a man, Matt. 18:26." ("Obeisance," of course, shows "respect, submission, or reverence" - Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, 1961.) Noted Bible scholar J. H. Thayer defines proskuneo: "prop. to kiss the hand to (towards) one, in token of reverence ... hence in the N. T. by kneeling or prostration to do homage (to one) or make obeisance, whether in order to express respect or to make supplication. It is used a. of homage shown to men of superior rank [position] ... Rev. 3:9 .... b. of homage rendered to God and the ascended Christ, to heavenly beings [angels]" - p. 548, Thayer's Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, Baker Book House Publ., 1977. So as PROSKUNEO was given to people in the OT as well as the NT it goes without saying that it does not mean the exclusive worship we give to our creator !

In Exodus 20:4 God gave Israel this command; "You shall not make for yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above or that is on the earth beneath or that is in the water below. QUESTION If the Jesus is God, Has God contravene his own command when the bible which is inspired by God describes Jesus as a Lamb siting with God on his throne? Consider this question very carefully. Because God's command clearly says. That you should not make an image of God, in the likeness of anything that is in heaven (stars, planets, sun, moon or BIRDS) on earth (animals or plants) or in the water (the sea, meaning fish) In the Revelation Jesus is clearly seen in vision as a lamb. He is even called the lamb of God.

Excellent work, Stan.

1,2,&3 Amen..... Great job!

Χαιρετισμούς Σταν. I enjoyed this study so much that I just spent several hours transcribing much of it. However, I was dismayed when I looked up a verse I'd read earlier today in 1 Sam. 28:14/Septuagint 1 Kings re: King Saul going to see the medium woman at En Dor. When I checked the Greek, following the above studied, I found the Greek word under discussion and wondered why it is applied to a human worshiping the supposed ghost of the prophet Samuel. Can you shed some light on this?

Jesus is our king our salvation, amen

Amen to all,,, thank you so much

Great job! Lord bless you.

What application are you using for the interlinear?

Great content, I never seen it illustrated in this way. JW do see Jesus as only an Angel and angels can’t be worshipped, only Jesus!!🔥🙌🏽

Here is where logic come in. Do you worship or honor a king? This same word is used when doing obeisance. God installed Jesus as King. One honors Jesus in worship of Jehovah.

Amen, Amen, Amen!

That was truly righteous and amazing ty, I'm gonna save that video. Amen, Amen, and Amen.

Thank you brother 123 AMEN GLORY TO GOD IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF CHRIST JESUS

God bless you for the biblical explanation!

1 Amen, haven't finished the video yet, 2 and 3 pending for amens

Truth , truth , truth . Thanks 😊 for sharing your knowledge . Why do JWS in the new world translation you obeisance to show Jesus didn’t accept worship ?

They change the word to obeisance wherever it says worship. Do both words mean the same?

You’re adorable, thank you

Amen to all

This wasn't so mind blowing from the perspective that a JW will dismiss this fairly easily with this play on definitions, namely, "... " Hence, witnesses would see these verses as only showing [submission] just as a slave would to a master. Only God the father,namely, Jehovah, is to be [worshipped] in a religious sense. This is how they reason on this topic further: "The reading of Matthew 28:9 appears on the face of it to look like a flat contradiction of what Jehovah’s witnesses teach, but, of course, the King James Bible translators would naturally want to support their trinitarian view by rendering the Greek word here into English as “worshipped.” However, it is interesting to note howby Smith and Goodspeed renders Matthew 28:9. It reads: “And Jesus himself met them, and said, ‘Good morning!’ And they went up to him and clasped his feet, and bowed to the ground before him.” Thesays: “They approached and caught him by his feet and did obeisance to him.” This bowing to the ground or doing obeisance to the resurrected Jesus does not mean worshiping him. If it did, then men of God in ancient times could be found guilty of worshiping human creatures, because they bowed before them; whereas the angel that was used to transmit the Revelation to the apostle John stopped him when he wanted to worship the angel, and told him to worship only God.-Rev. 19:10; 22:8.

Didn't watch the video but I'm a JW. Ask me anything

Thank you for this! Recently I've been contemplating this, and my world would honestly crumble if Jesus was not Yahweh 😔

Amen, Amen and AMEN!

Correct me if I’m wrong but this video seems a bit disingenuous to the Koine Greek language and the audience. So my question: Is the only application of the Koine Greek word προσεκύνησαν only to mean “Worship” in a English? If not then how do you determine the difference of meaning applicable to where, how and who the word was used? Examplem Matthew 15:25 - NAS: But she came and [began] to bow down before Him, saying Matthew 8:2 - NAS: came to Him and bowed down before Him, and said Matthew 9:18 - NAS: came and bowed down before Him, and said, INT: certain having come knelt down to him saying Matthew 20:20 - NAS: to Jesus with her sons, bowing down and making a request INT: sons of her kneeling down and asking Yet KJV has worship in all scriptures with Matthew 20:20 refers to Jesus

Totally wrong brother Proskinao: to prostrate or offer respect. It can be offered to men as well God Latrevo: to offer sacred service: the word is used for the Father only and never Jesus

Amen to all those verses, I used to be in the cult. I could plainly see how they refused to give worship to Jesus, maybe that's why I left. I learned some Greek at the same time, thank you!

AMEN AMEN AMEN. I have a question. The JW Bible translates proskuneo as "do Obeisance" How do you respond to that?

Please tell me what Bible app that you Use???

so we can only worship God and Jesus accepts worship so He is God? 3 amen amen amen

Thank you for the challenge you issued to JWs, to answer your question. I am not a JW, but I will accept the chalenge to answer your question in my own behalf and in the interests of biblical truth and integrity. Right from the start I am forced to take exception to the trinitarian logic in your line of argument, and in your conclusion. Father + Son + Spirit = God. If we express this mathematically, 1+1+1=1. Mathematically this doesn't work. 1+1+1 should =3 not 1. There is a similar trinitarian logic in your question. 1- You quote Acts 10:25,26 From this scripture you prove that HUMANS CAN'T BE WORSHIPED. 2- Next you now take us to Rev 19:9,10. To prove that ANGELS CAN'T BE WORSHIPED. 3- Next you quote Mat 4:9,10 To prove from Jesus reply to Satan's temptation, that ONLY GOD IS WORSHIPED. From these 3 scriptures you conclude that Jesus can't possibly be a created being. Since, as you have just shown from scripture, ONLY GOD CAN BE WORSHIPED. You now introduce a series of scriptures which according to your interpretation and logic prove that Jesus (the man) is God. WHY? Because he (Jesus) was worshiped. And there you have it! Its so simple! How can anyone miss it? Jesu must be God! Because Jesus was worshipped (he accepted it) and only God is to be worshipped. I don't have time here to examine all the scriptures you considered. Lets examine Acts 10:25,26 The first scripture you quoted. Because if your premise holds true for this scripture. It should theoretically hold true for all the others scriptures as well. But if it doesn't hold true. Your arguments would seem to be flawed right from the start. Let's examine Acts 10:25,26 and as it came, that Peter entered in, Cornelius having met him, having fallen at his feet, did bow before him; Notice how Young's Literal Translation renders the Greek word προσεκύνησεν (prosekynēsen) as bowed. Strong's Analytical Concordance assigns the Greek word prosekynēsen the following meaning. SEE Strong's Greek 4352;: From pros and a probable derivative of kuon; to fawn or crouch to, i.e. prostrate oneself in homage. Not in worship! Many bible translations, translate προσεκύνησεν as homage, adored, bowed. I like the way the NIV translates Acts 10:25; As Peter entered the house, Cornelius met him and fell at his feet in reverence. A lot of people are not going to like this. But I find that the JWs New World Translation is also accurate in its translation of this scripture. As Peter entered. Cornelius met him, fell down at his feet and did (prosekynēsen) obeisance to him. It could be argue that you have the majority of translators in your favour. Because most translations render prosekynēsen as worship. So who is right? Is this word (prosekynēsen) intended to be worship, like the worship one gives to God alone. Or is it a form of worship given as a form of obeisance as rendered by the NWT. You interpret worship to be the worship that is exclusively given to God. Your entire argument rests on this premise. And it's here that most commentators and Bible scholars don't support your conclusions and your interpretation of prosekynēsen. I suspect you knew this, but conveniently ignored this fact. Here is what Barnes has to say about the meaning of prosekynēsen in Acts 10:25 Fell down at his feet - This was an act of profound regard for him as an ambassador of God. In Oriental countries it was usual for persons to prostrate themselves at length on the ground before men of rank and honor. "Worshiped him" This does not mean religious homage, but civil respect - the homage, or profound regard which was due to one in honor. According to Barnes this is not worship in a religious sense. As you interpret it. But in a civil form of respect as homage, intended to honour a person. And the vast majority of scholars support this interpretation of προσεκύνησεν. Here is what Vincent's Word Studies has to say; Worshiped (προσεκύνησεν) An unfortunate translation, according to modern English usage, but justified by the usage of earlier English, according to which to worship meant simply to honor. Worship is worthship, or honor paid to dignity or worth. This usage survives in the expressions worshipful and your worship. In the marriage-service of the English Church occurs the phrase, "With my body I thee worship." So Wycliffe renders Matthew 19:19, "Worship thy father and thy mother;" and John 12:26, "If any man serve me, my Father shall worship him." Here the meaning is that Cornelius paid reverence by prostrating himself after the usual oriental manner. On the basis of this evidence Your premise is wrong right from the start. And your argument rests on scriptures that are not applicable to your conclusion. In the logic of Mathematics 1+1+1=3 But language doesn't work this way. Language has lots of meanings, which, we might say, alter the value of 1. This is what trinitarians so often do. They use philosophical explanation to explain an incomprehensible mistery. How 1+1+1=1 And it just doesn't work. What never ceases to amaze me is how trinitariians use the incarnation to explain away scripture. For example, If a scripture says that Jesus called God "his God". Trinitarians will argue that he did so because Jesus was a man (incarnate). But when it suits them they will argue from an opposite point of view. Just lIke you do in your argument. They (trinitarians) will argue that, since Jesus was a man and received worship, which you conclude is only given to God. Therefore he (Jesus) must be God. How convenient! when a scripture calls into question his divinity of Jesus, he was just a man. But when he receives obeisance (worship) as a man of God. This is misconstrued as worship that belongs to God and subsequently becomes undeniable proof that Jesus is God Another thing that never ceases to amaze me, is how trinitarians so often twist logic and scripture to prove their inexplicable and incomprehensible mystery. That 1+1+1=1 and often try to make it fit into the Bible. For example Trinitarians accept that Jesus Christ is the Jewish Messiah. And Messiah came to earth as a perfect man, without sin, to redeem us. But trinitarians never consider the question, to redeem us from what? To redeem us from Adamic sin. The ransom is required by God to erase Adamic sin from us, together with the consequences of that sin. But what they so often fail to consider is how in the Bible God showed that in order to forgive sin through sacrifice, the services of a third party to serve as a mediator is required. This third party must be a human, a person separate distinct. that stands apart from God as the representative of those who are ransomed. Humanity are the beneficiaries of the ransom exchange. This requires the services of a priest. In the case of the Old Covenant, a Levitical priests where appointed by God . In the case of the New Covenant a King Priest in the likeness of Melchizedek is required. Jesus therefore can't be God + the sacrifice + the Priest. Why? because if he is all these 3 things all rolled into one, It represents a clear conflict of interest and it defeats the purpose of a ransom. The whole thing becomes an exercise in judicial futility. And makes a mockery of God's perfect justice. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Or a perfect man for a perfect man. God might as well have forgiven us our inherited Adamic sin right from the start and spared us all the subsequent misery and human suffering that followed, If he (God) intended to ransom us himself, why require a ransom at all? God's ransoming us himself would serve no objective in justice at all. Since he is the one who both requires (exacts) the ransom and furnishes it what justice is served by such an action. A ransom is a price, set in exchange and it requires the services of an independent third party to pay the price and to mediate between God and man. SEE 1Tim 2:5. You are mistaken about who Christ Jesus is. If you think he (Jesus) is God and God ransomed us. READ John 3:16. He (Jesus) is the Son of God. READ Philippians 2:11

Praise the Lord..

Wow Bro Praise our Mighty King And Risen Saviour Jesus Christ our Beautiful Lord and God 🙌🙌🙌❤️💯😃

to the JW'S Jesus is A GOD. 1 Timothy 2:5 King James Version (KJV) 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the MAN Christ Jesus; ( the word became flesh in other words GOD became Jesus the man, since all man kind are sons of GOD, so is the MAN Jesus

Greetings Stan, I agree with you that proskuneo means prostate oneself in the ground to show a deep level of respect and adoration. However it does not mean “religious type worship”. No were does Jesus ever receive “religious type worship”. There are specific Greek words for “religious type worship” and they are never used of Jesus. The act of proskuneo was never reserved for a god. It was word that was used for people in a higher station of life. In today's world it would be equivalent to saluting a superior officer, standing for a Judge when he entrees or leaves his cor room, bowing to royalty. In the days the Bible was written it was used among the Orientals, esp. the Persians, to fall upon the knees and touch the ground with the forehead as an expression of profound reverence. In the NT by kneeling or prostration to do homage (to one) or make obeisance, whether in order to express respect or to make supplication in the various ways used of homage shown to men and beings of superior rank to the Jewish high priests to God to Christ to heavenly beings In Acts 10:3, Cornelius had been visited by an angel. As the account continues Peter also is visited by an angel. We are not told but the sense we get is that Cornelius felt that Peter was holy , and, thus of a higher station to himself. In keeping with the use of the word proskuneo, Cornelius wants to who Peter honour and respect because Peter was sent by the angel. Why does Peter refuse the honour? Because he is not superior to Cornelius It is the same in Revelation 19. The angel did not deserve to receive extra honour as a superior because the angle was a συνδουλος “fellow servant” of God. H was not John’s superior and not deserving of being shown honour. The angel tells John to show honour and respect. to God. The text DOES NOT SAY that prokuneo IS ONLY for God. To say that is reading into the text what is not there the correct literal rendering of Matthew 4:9-10 into English is… and he-is-saying to-him these all to-you I-shall-be-giving if-ever falling you-should-be-honouring to-me then is-saying to-him the Jesus be-you-going-away Satan it-has-been-written for lord the god of-you you-shall-be-honouring and to-him only you-shall-be-giving-divine-service Satan did not want Jesus to give him religious type worship. He just want some honour and respect from Jesus as a superior

TWO WORDS translated as By in Col 1:16 - 1. En - a primary preposition denoting (fixed) position (in place, time or state), and (by implication) instrumentality (medially or constructively),.. Notice it says INSTRUMENTALITY 2. Dia - a primary preposition denoting the channel of an act Notice it says CHANNEL OF AN ACT So Colossians 1:16 simply mentions that Jesus is USED BY GOD AS A CHANNEL OF AN ACT, AN INSTRUMENT in the Creation. Compare that to GOD in 1 Cor 8:6 , notice for God the Father he uses the word EK - or ex ex a primary preposition denoting ORIGIN (the point whence action or motion proceeds), from, out (of place, time, or cause; literal or figurative; direct or remote):- Notice GOD the Father is the ORIGIN/FROM ,THE SOURCE FROM WHOM ALL THINGS are created. BIG DIFFERENCE. So the FATHER IS the ORIGIN of all things. For JEsus, it didn;t use the word Origin but "THrough" which in the Original Greek word also means "a primary preposition denoting the channel of an act". So God the Father is like the WRITER, he used his Son as a channel of a act to write (like a pen). So the only writer is the Father, the Son was used as a channel and NOT THE ORIGIN of creation. This is confirmed by Jesus in John 5:19 - " Jesus said to them: “Most truly I say to you, the Son cannot do a single thing of his own initiative, but only what he sees the Father doing.+" JESUS CANNOT DO A SINGLE THING , his FATHER always guide him.

1 amen, 2 amen, 3 amen, worship Jesus amen.

the original greek word - proskunew - also means the following :3) in the NT by kneeling or prostration to do homage (to one) or make obeisance, whether in order to express respect or to make supplication 3a) used of homage shown to men and beings of superior rank So those apply to Jesus as Jesus is King of kings and has become (future tense-will) a Mighty God (Not ALmighty God and Creator) Isa 9:6

To all those saying things like "Why did Jesus pray to God or worship God if he was God?" there is a simply explanation. The governing body of Jehovah's witnesses consist of 8 people who speak to each other. Yet it is one body. Your body is made up of trillions of cells which communicate with each other in order to sustain life. (Your brain alone has billions of neurons which communicate with each other. ) Why is it so hard for some to accept that God has the power to be in more than one place or form at the same time?

I wa t to k ow about the 1919 that Jesus cane to earth to choose the j w s fir his slaves? I can’t find in the bible Jesus cones here three times??? Do you know ?

Amen Amen Amen!

Amen to all!!

excellent video brother, praise Jesus

Hello, what computer program is this?

Stan, correct me if I'm wrong. I believe beyond any doubt the Scriptures confirming Jesus is God, including the direct claims references. For "proskuneo", I think it can refer to the kneeling at the feet of a higher authority, like a king or a master of slaves. The context can decide the implication of the "proskuneo". For Cornelius, Peter was aware he was not his master or Roman authority, hence he needed to stop Cornelius from giving him such honour otherwise meant for God in that situation. For the angel, he stated that he was a servant like John, and God is the Master of them both, hence this homage must be directed to Him. The Roman soldiers who mocked Jesus after putting on Him the thorny crown, was sarcastically playing with Him by kneeling to Him as the supposed to them King of the Jews. Matt 18:26 stated the servant "proskuneo" before his human master. But regarding the spiritual realm, angels cannot receive this act from human beings, in particular the servants of God.

3 Amen!

Yes spot on brother. Just a question, How did people WORSHIP the LORD in the Old Testament? How do we do it now? We have no Jesus to see with our eyes!

All worship belongs to God , amen to all that agree that god before nen

All comments I agree with. Amen to all you said. God bless you

amen amen amen! Thank you for posting this great video!

Amen, amen, amen.

Question, does the Greek word proskuneo always mean to worship in the Bible?

Rather simple. The translation of the Koine Greek word " προσεκύνησεν " does not mean "worship" but means "did obeisance" which in modern terms means "to bow down", "showing deep respect for one superior to himself". This is a very simple error in translation. Reference Strongs Concordance προσκύνημα -- pilgrimage, prostration, obeisance

Great work !

Amen

Sad thing is, we, indeed, can answer these questions, but when we post them here, they get deleted.

Amen 🙏🏾!! Amen 🙏🏾!! Amen 🙏🏾!! Amen 🙏🏾

1 Amen!

Amen Amen and Amen!!!

3 Amen

Wonderful !

1.Amen 2.Amen 3.Amen. Such an important verb "proskuneo", and must be directed to the right Person! God alone! Surprised that even John the apostle could get it wrong, to be corrected by the angel. With Jesus now in heaven, we cannot do this to anyone, human or angel.

I am trying to find out if Jehovah was purposely taken out of the Bible when translated into English as the JW has said. They say that many words were changed and taken out. I would like to know from a Greek speaking and reading person if the kjv is in fact exactly like the original Holy Bible.

The 8 members of the Governing Body of JW will go for ever in the Fire because they changed the word of God. God bless you Bro for your teaching

Difficult to get you on U tube. What is Abeissance in greek

1 Amen 2 Amen 3 Amen Thanks very much for this analysis.

3 AMEN

Amen thank you

As Gods representative, as Christ Jesus was, even as a baby, who could not say anything in response to the worshipful acknowledgement rendered, it would have been a source of encouragement to his parents who had gone through much to reach that point, if you really think about it. We have to remember too, that his visitors were not Jews, who had a different view of worship. Mary and Joseph, Being respectful towards their visitors in extending hospitality, it would have been considered rude perhaps to correct their visitors not accepting ,and squashing their appreciative and thankful attitude after the long journey they had made. They were humans too. Long before that, Abaraham too, had visitors heavenly messengers who he had the privilege of entertaining.

2 AMEN!!

#1. Amen. Agreed (however some have noted that the word "human" is not a biblical word but a "legal" word.) # 2. Amen. Agreed...... #3. Amen.

Amen Amen Amen

3 and Amen!!! The only thing is, or the BIG thing rather is that Satan is not the Morning Star, Satan is Lucifer son of the morning! The Morning Star or Bright and Morning Star is a title that goes to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

Amazing! Thanks!

Not a JW, but this Greek verb is the same verb that the Septuagint translates ישתחוו or prostrate/worship. In the OT, people are constantly doing this to people and no one has a problem with it until the book of Esther. For example: Genesis 23:7 ἀναστὰς δὲ Ἀβραὰμ προσεκύνησεν τῷ λαῷ τῆς γῆς, τοῖς υἱοῖς Χέτ. Abraham does this verb to the sons of Heth.

amen amen amen

1 AMEN 2 AMEN 3 AMEN 4 AMEN!

1,2,3 Amen, Amen, Amen.

Amen.

Amen, Amen and Amen.

1, 2, 3 AMEN!