Nick some manufacturers wont let me do walkthroughs because they want to shape the narrative. I dont let them I also steer customers away from those brands

The other reason the windscreens slope down is to shed water, when big seas smash into your windshield up on the NW coast. There can be chunks of sea ice (that don't exist in warmer waters) and the angle is more resistant to catastrophic failures in these events. Nobody wants a block of ice and a windshield in their laps in the middle of a storm.

It is mostly so the defrost will catch the windows where I'm at by the snake River I would as for twin jets motors the real advantage is this boat don't need all that draft cause sometimes we are in 2ft. Of water

@@ezm6153 thank you, I was just going to write a comment when I read yours. Yes people, that windshield design is for shedding water.

There are several other manufacturers that do this and some of them were Fisherman and wanted that same look. A good example is Lindell boats who make a glass 46 foot fisher/cruiser, or ocean sport.

Heck ya! That sounds rad! 🤩

Raul if I dont direct the clients to move on I'll have hour videos that only a small percentage will watch. I'm mindful of it. Keep in mind I'm watching everything behind the screen like camera battery life gimble battery life and most importantly Sd card space its harder than you think

clients? hahahaha theyre your clients?

@@littledeel yes because without them I wouldn't make money. They dont pay me but the fact that they allow me to interview them and do reviews on their product give me lots of value. You associate Client with old school logic that's why you responded the way you did. Videos are like workers that dont get tired always there waiting for someone to find them. The better you are at understanding KZfaq the more successful you'll be

@@AlfredMontaner nah

I had an aluminum "StarCraft" 30-footer boat, which was very similar to the "Allied Liberator" boat, and it got great MPG. Now I was running twin "70 Johnson Seahorses." It was cheaper for buying fuel than the actual the cost fishing for marlin/tuna at the time. Lost a lot of lures due to shark's bites, and due $20. bucks a lure set up and usually losing 3 lures, while only spending $20. bucks for gas and going twenty miles offshore and still having half a tank left. Of course, this was the early 80's when gas was $1. a gallon. If I still lived in San Diego, I would buy one of these "Allied boats."

Seattle

300k

Seattle

Hector St-Jacques I disagree . Seen everything , talked about anything .what were you missing ??

Great video I dunno what you were watching

Your comment has been removed because it exceeds my maximum word count of six words per comment. Your more than welcome to repost your comment with max 6 words. Similar comments like "Alfred you are amazing I'm impressed", is used often and dosen't break the rules I impose on my channel.