#38 For Sale 2004 Cessna T182T G1000 - ILS with KAP140 Autopilot

Рет қаралды 100,863

Күн бұрын

This 2004 Cessna T182T Skylane with G1000 avionics is one of two T182T's that we currently have for sale. We also have a 2008 Cessna T182T listed which has the more modern, integrated GFC700 autopilot. What a lot of people might not know, there is a huge price/cost difference between these two setups on the used market. The question is then, do you really need the GFC700 autopilot or is the KAP140 sufficient for your kind of flying. Avionics wise these two planes are almost identical with the exception of a Flight Director in the GFC700 version and being able to fly GPS precision approaches with WAAS. In my opinion, if you mostly fly VFR and not regularly approaches in IMC an earlier model T182T Skylane with the KAP140 Autopilot might be the better buy.
Please let me know if you know about upgradability for the KAP140 system. Is it possible to upgrade to a GFC500 and have it talk to the G1000?
If you're interested in either of these two Cessna T182Ts please feel free to reach out to me.
LINK TO THIS LISTING: www.controller.com/listing/fo...
LINK TO OTHER T182T LISTING: www.controller.com/listing/fo...
#Cessna #G1000 #GFC700 #Turbo182
0:00 Intro
1:15 Take-Off
2:43 This airplane
7:19 Requesting ILS Approach
11:20 Cleared to land
14:05 Landing
15:36 Question to you!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: All videos are for entertainment purposes only. Do not refer to them as instructional videos due to heavy editing and clips being edited out of context.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instagram: flying_with...
Website: ocraviation.com/
Contact:
Rich Manor
(562) 413-3251
Rich@ocraviation.com

Пікірлер: 148

@willbrewer1 2 жыл бұрын

Rich, I asked the GFC 500 question directly to Garmin about a month ago. Their exact response was “Sorry, the GFC 500 autopilot cannont be interfaced nor installed on the Cessna 182 G1000 NAV III Aircraft”. That was disappointing information. I would be happy to forward you the email exchange if you would like.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks - please do - rich@ocraviation.com.

@Steven9675 2 жыл бұрын

Anything can be accomplished, with enough money and the right person doing the work.

@stillrocknthissideofthedir141 2 жыл бұрын

As a pilot that hasn't flown in over 36 years and because of circumstances in my favor I can now resume my flying dreams. A freind has cooled my jets and told me to look for a T182 for my forever plane. I now have all of my ducks in a row and as soon as my condo sells my flight training will begin and then I will start looking to purchase a 182. Time will tell wish me luck.

@gillesbueno1153 2 жыл бұрын

Good Luck then. ‘Haven’t flown myself for over 30 years …writing from France….

@petermitchell7607 2 жыл бұрын

That is great news and happy flying. C182 is an excellent choice particularly with G1000 and CFG 700.

@colinsmith7741 2 жыл бұрын

I bought a 2004 182 with G1000 upgraded to WAAS a few years ago. I was told that the upgrade cost $40,000. The WAAS works great for precision RNAV approaches BUT the KAP 140 will NOT fly the RNAV glideslope. Nonetheless, I find the plane quite easy to control on the glideslope adjusting the autopilot's vertical speed and the KAP 140 holds the localizer well. As you said, the AP must be disengaged for the missed, but once established in the climb and headed for the missed approach waypoint the KAP 140 can be engaged and will fly the remainder of the missed approach including the hold quite nicely. I would not hesitate to fly this plane to minimums on an precision RNAV approach.

@alanex5225 Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the flight. I sit here eating dinner and go along for the ride. Nice.

@paratyshow 2 жыл бұрын

👍☑️ Nicely done Rich. Hope all the work your putting into these is paying off in sales, you deserve it. Great production quality and product knowledge.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you! I appreciate the nice feedback!

@ca_pilot 2 жыл бұрын

One of the best GA channels on YT. Keep it up and eventually sub count will match the awesomeness as well 😀

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@caca121112 2 жыл бұрын

definitely one of the best youtube channels for general aviation. your videos are very well edited....

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks a lot!

@johnluhmann1581 2 жыл бұрын

Rich I really like your channel. Straight forward and if I was in the market or just had questions I think I would get a straight answer. I really like the turbo 182 from 2001 on . Great Video

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching!

@wewk584 2 жыл бұрын

Good stuff. always great content.. thanks Rich

@derickellisster 2 жыл бұрын

I really appreciate your honest and "no frills" approach to flying and reviewing airplanes. You give information I wonder about as I watch it and you're honest about your products.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you.

@spiro5327 2 жыл бұрын

Im guessing the G1000 would have been the biggest upgrade in the 182 for a while when introduced in 2004. Many agree, a fantastic cross country plane. Thanks Rich

@triskellian 2 жыл бұрын

Enjoyable demonstration of an older G1000 in action! The only aircraft I've personally flown the first generation G1000s was a DA 40. It was quite a departure from the steam gauges flown early in my career. The good things about it was the simplified instrument scan, large moving map, and of course the large altitude indicator. The only thing I didn't like was the amount of button pushing to do some of the simpler tasks. After some time, it got easier when one learned the shortcuts. Flying actual was great with this unit because of the centralized indicators on the primary display. Also, flying coupled approaches was fairly easy with the equipment available in the DA 40. Looking forward to future videos on IFR ops. Blue skies!

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching and your comments!

@bernardanderson3758 2 жыл бұрын

The GS 700 is nice because I’ve got a chance to see it work in a 182P model and what a very essential tools to have while flying Single Pilot IFR to make the work load easier

@airlogic 2 жыл бұрын

Love the sound of that engine...

@triskellian 2 жыл бұрын

It has a wonderful rumble to it!

@TheMilwaukieDan 2 жыл бұрын

Great channel. Just now subscribed. Been a PPL since 1974. Flew mostly the C 172 until 8 years ago. Typical medical issues grounded me. WatChing these channels, I wish I had completed my instrument rating. Ratings.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the message. Glad you like the channel!

@saschamenesi4865 2 жыл бұрын

Another great video Rich👍

@davidmadding2758 2 жыл бұрын

Hey RIch. I learned to fly (PPL/MEL/IR) out of ACF at KLGB, really enjoy your videos as they bring back memories of KLGB. I have had the issue with the KAP140 altitude difference that you had while flying DA40 G1000 planes with the KAP140 AP.. In one case it was simply I had a different BARO setting in the KAP140 vs G1000. In another case (different plane) I believe it was a calibration difference between the KAP140 and G1000 (I verified the BARO setting was identical on both and yet still a slightly different captured altitude). Keep the videos coming and the shiny side up!

@davidmadding2758 2 жыл бұрын

I should clarify for anyone new to flying a G1000 + KAP140 - The BARO setting in the G1000 is not read by the KAP140, you have to set the BARO in the KAP140 directly and that is what the autopilot uses for altitude capture/hold. In the GFC700 planes, the AP uses the BARO setting from the G1000 display so it is fully integrated in that configuratoin,

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the message!

@MattMorris481 5 ай бұрын

Great video and plane! My friend has a 2002 he just did a big upgrade on the engine and avionics. He went with the IO-550 310hp done by Texas Skyways and let me tell you it is fast and 4 Garmin GI275’s plus one for the engine and the GTN750/650 also G500 autopilot he did a nice job.

@Rwneil 2 жыл бұрын

I recently purchased a 206 with a similar configuration, with the exception that the previous owner added WAAS which is nice. David already covered the Baro setting, but another feature of the KP140 is that when you press the up or down when not in VS mode it will adjust the altitude about 20 feet for each press. So if you are 100 feet low and your Baro is right, press the up 5 times and it should adjust.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks - you are correct. I forgot about that feature!

@jamestrigger7320 2 жыл бұрын

Love the 182. I used to take skydivers up in a 1956 182. What a workhorse.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

‘56 was very light. I love the way they look too - sit tall and straight tail. Would be a good candidate for a nice refresh!

@jamestrigger7320 2 жыл бұрын

I usually took up first time jumpers. This was in 1988. They jumped with a static line. One day in late July the club had a very large class of first time jumpers of over 70 students. The club had 2 Cessna 182s. I was up 34 times that one day.3 jumpers and a jump master. I saw first hand what a 182 can do. And the club still has that 182 to this day..@@FlyingwithRich

@hunterthepilot 2 жыл бұрын

A friendly suggestion, you guys should put the links to the controller listing in the description, would save some time for your potential buyers. Love the channel!

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Great suggestion. Thanks.

@donaldholman9070 2 жыл бұрын

Great video! Thank you.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@egreens8512 2 жыл бұрын

Rich you are on it , solid information. Any Diamonds come into OCR hanger ? DA 62 is on the list. I'm all ears. And eyes. You remind me a lot of my pilot and good friend that would use to fly Moonies from Bermuda Dunes for So Cal Business. Good game:)

@petermitchell7607 2 жыл бұрын

I enjoy flying Cessna with G1000 particularly with GFC 700.

@RelativeWind 2 жыл бұрын

4K VIDEO...sick

@LMays-cu2hp 2 жыл бұрын

Looking very nice...

@vintonland8001 2 жыл бұрын

Nicely done.

@donaldholman9070 2 жыл бұрын

Nice landing!

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

@DanRibar 2 жыл бұрын

nice flight. very smooth....

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@-AV8R- 2 жыл бұрын

Even when I load the baro in the KAP140, it likes to shoot through the altitude a bit. When I’m close to 200 ft of my capture altitude, I’ll shallow the V/S to 100-200 fpm to capture easier. The up and down buttons will adjust at 20 feet increments. Your standby AI looks inop by the way. Nice video.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Good tips. Standby AI is inop for sure!

@jasonalpha 2 жыл бұрын

Great video and very interesting

@bernardanderson3758 2 жыл бұрын

Hey Rich you have one inop indicator for your back up in case you loose your G1000 display screen in which I caught it fast

@hartvanmeter214 2 жыл бұрын

I own a virtually identical 2004 T182T and have had numerous conversations with Garmin and Cessna regarding the upgrade you asked about. I am also an avionics technician (mostly Garmin products). The short answer is (emphatically) “NO”. In order to accomplish it one would have to upgrade the entire system to G3X touch or the like which becomes prohibitively expensive. Sad to say both Garmin and Cessna are reluctant to certify an easy upgrade to an extraordinarily capable airframe. Seems the several hundreds of early T182T owners should collectively hold their feet to the proverbial fire to achieve that goal. I’d be on board! PS, I’m really glad the market value these ships is so good.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

That’s not what I was hoping to hear but thanks for the info!

@MVandemore 2 жыл бұрын

Just curious, about how much is 'prohibitively expensive'? Could you achieve the same functionality with an Avidyne setup?

@hartvanmeter214 2 жыл бұрын

@@MVandemore you’d have to talk to an avionics shop to determine that. I used the term “prohibitively” as related to my own situation.

@csact 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks RIch

@easttexan2933 2 ай бұрын

Beautiful. I use to fly many years ago. Got my PPL in 1965. Have about 700 hours. My last flight as PIC was in 1988. I have time in the 182 but I don't remember the power settings on climb out or the sequence of changing settings. Would you be so kind as to tell me how you do it on T/O and cruise? Thanks Rich. Enjoy your flights so much.

@bernardanderson3758 2 жыл бұрын

Rich I love to have been the camera man on this one

@bernardanderson3758 2 жыл бұрын

I love to be flying this Demo for you Rich

@Teebuck27 2 жыл бұрын

I am a student pilot and I am purchasing a 2005 T182T for my instrument and high performance ratings. Thank you for the review

@danblaize5742 2 жыл бұрын

Student pilot buying a turbo Cessna…I am not mad at you Sir. Fly safe.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

That’s awesome. Couldn’t have picked a better airplane in my opinion. Thanks for watching!

@joaoroberto2915 2 жыл бұрын

Espetacular 🎉

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@Parr4theCourse 2 жыл бұрын

Good job, looks like the KAP140 didn’t quite capture 1,600 feet, I have started watching my selected altitude closely as its hit-n-miss as to if it will capture or not. And I do believe you can upgrade to the GFC500 now.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah - I was a little surprised it didn’t get the 1600 because it did well earlier. Been a while since I have flown the KAP 140. Thanks for the info on the GFC 500 - that’s a game changer for the that vintage 182.

@planeaddiction2560 Жыл бұрын

I noticed your call sign went from 4 identifiers to 3, i just studied that in my PPL ground school

@chcr8150 2 жыл бұрын

Rich, with all the different aircraft you fly, is it fun to jump back into something “simple” like a 182? I remember back when I was spending a lot of time in a 310 and a Cherokee 6, it was like “coming home” to jump back in a 172. There’s just something about those high wings, almost like comfort food! Thanks for the video.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Agree. I spent a lot of time in 172/182/206 - feels like home for sure!

@FELiPES101 2 жыл бұрын

Hey Rich I'm relatively new to aviation, got my ppl last year. Why do Cessna owners reference numbers like 172/206 etc. yet Cessna themselves don't reference them at all and only say Skyhawk/Skylane? Did they flip flop marketing at some point and now everyone just references the code for the model?

@henrykhelsner6368 2 жыл бұрын

Dear Rich.. You best of the best CEO. in Long Beach. I ask you made more brand new film-video about You airplane.s please... Greetings... Henryk...!!!!!

@bernardanderson3758 2 жыл бұрын

It was your Altitude indicator

@brycecampbell4845 8 ай бұрын

Why don't they make the 182T RG any longer??

@jonachaval1912 2 жыл бұрын

The standby steam artificial horizon doesn’t appear to be working.

@willlewis9194 2 жыл бұрын

Something wrong with the capture bot on your website, it just reappears when you click the box :( hey just clicked from a different page then the capture worked but that's not good

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you! We will have to take a look at that. We've had some issues with the website lately.

@briansims4365 2 жыл бұрын

Hey Rich, is that a TURBO normalized model or a all the time turbo.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Turbo normalized.

@AirBlairNZ 2 жыл бұрын

Interesting - my 182T with a KAP140 always captures ALT 100ft low

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

That is interesting. Another friend said the same thing on his airplane.

@adamcorby804 2 жыл бұрын

Is it possible to upgrade the G1000 to WAAS or is it too cost prohibitive? Is it just a software upgrade?

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

As far as I am aware you can't upgrade the older G1000s to WAAS.

@saulcamacho5902 2 жыл бұрын

What was the price for this airplane, thanks

@FlightSimDude 2 жыл бұрын

👍👍👍👍👍

@goboulder 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the good video. What happened to the vacuum pump? Backup attitude indicator looks inoperable.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah we noticed that too. Probably needs a pump.

@triskellian 2 жыл бұрын

Caught that as well. If that vacuum pump has carbon vanes, several of them might have eroded badly.

@aviatorbja 2 жыл бұрын

How do I get Rich’s job?

@bo2030 2 жыл бұрын

Wondering why the one plane has a rebuilt engine with 1200 hrs Or is that not total time ?

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

We found metal in the oil at 1200 so hours it’s getting a 0/0 factory reman engine - that’s the 1200 TTAF and 0 TTE. Thanks for watching!

@rael5469 Жыл бұрын

N851Delta Sierra is similar to Stevokinevo's N851Tango Bravo.......except opposite coasts.

@Steven9675 2 жыл бұрын

What holds your camera on outside the plane? Could it fall off and kill someone?

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

No it can't fall off. It's a special mount designed for a GoPro.

@philsal17 2 жыл бұрын

How much would it cost to change the autopilot to the GFC 700? Thanks. I'm serious. Plus, how much to change to the NXi? How much is this plane?

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Garmin doesn’t have a plan for the GFC 500 upgrade yet. I’ll get you a price on the NXi.

@philsal17 2 жыл бұрын

I thought that I asked about the GFC-700? I also asked about the cost of changing to the G1000 Nxi. Thanks.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

They don’t retrofit the GFC700. Price on NXI upgrade is somewhere in the $45K-$60K range you have to upgrade to WAAS and there is some options for that which are less money depending on availability.

@derickellisster 2 жыл бұрын

Standby AH/HSI is out. Probably gotta look at that.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

You are correct. Thanks for watching!

@bernardanderson3758 2 жыл бұрын

The sunset is nice but not when it right facing on takeoff

@togen8032 2 жыл бұрын

Why are you leaving like 6 different comments?

@John.Halsted 2 жыл бұрын

Never double fist empty beer cans

@svsarabi9245 2 жыл бұрын

Your OCR website is broken. Cannot access your inventory?

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

What browser are you using?

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

And what device?

@svsarabi9245 2 жыл бұрын

Safari on iPad

@slowsteve3497 2 жыл бұрын

Is the backup AI working?

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

No - it was not working properly.

@MrRedwings84 2 жыл бұрын

if your pfd fails, you should use your backup artificial horizon, and it is not set correctly to be used !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 10:19

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

It's broke- known condition prior to the VFR flight. Thanks for watching.

@robwrenbassaz3505 2 жыл бұрын

Is the standby AI broke?

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Yes and fixed now!

@dieselyeti 2 жыл бұрын

Yikes, what's up with your standby AI @ 12:25?

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah - replacing with a Garmin GI 275. Thanks for watching!

@MerlinspopTBH 2 жыл бұрын

All those freighters….

@mikemc330 Жыл бұрын

Capable auto pilot but it seems like it’s in a very bad location on the panel.

@capitanarthur6669 2 жыл бұрын

How much for it?

@petsmith7772 2 жыл бұрын

$350k

@coasternut3091 Жыл бұрын

I just want any plane that has any autopilot

@alienxyt 2 жыл бұрын

Price?

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

$350K

@alienxyt 2 жыл бұрын

@@FlyingwithRich thanks

@algeriasolitaryman3662 2 жыл бұрын

Tell the price 👌🏻🇩🇿

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

$350K. Sold.

@mikeparise9133 2 жыл бұрын

Interested in your T182 DS. Please send contact info.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

Rich@ocraviation.com

@arielromero7483 2 жыл бұрын

Please, don't abbreviate the price, is confusing!!

@petsmith7772 2 жыл бұрын

Lol are you serious?

@rogerbee697 2 жыл бұрын

Only for dopes.

@Openwrt2023 2 жыл бұрын

It is way too expensive for a 17-year-old airplane with over 3500 hours. I wonder who is going to buy it. You can buy a brand new Tecnam P2010 for $410k.

@FlyingwithRich 2 жыл бұрын

What do you think of the Tecnam? I understood the 2010 with Lycomjng 390 was $503K. T182T sold - that market is very hot.

@Openwrt2023 2 жыл бұрын

@@FlyingwithRich Tecnam P2010 is a cheaper and better airplane than Cessna 182 in all aspects. Anyone who does enough research won't buy a 17-year-old 182 when they can get a less than 5-year-old P2010 at a lower price.

@togen8032 2 жыл бұрын

@@Openwrt2023 182 has a track record like no other. I am sure the buyer did plenty of research before pulling the trigger. Have you seen the switches in a Tecnam? Looks like a toy to me.