Rust has a crab, Lobster has a lobster.

Rust mentioned

​@@aumbhatt5339 RUST MENTIONED 💪💪💪

Compiling to JS being a good thing makes me sad.

PHP but this time it does truly suck

lobster lmao

Everything evolves to crab

@@vaishnav_mallya ooh i know about that. i guess its called carcenization or something similar lol

If you don't want to mess with memory and async issues gleam is an amazing gc alternative

?

golang?

@@godofpumpkins that would have been my answer before discovering this adorable pink star 🤩😍

@@UTJK. Wait, PINK star? Great, now I can't get "No, this is Patrick..." out of my head 🤣 - maybe not the best association for a programming language 😁...

@@CoPoint ✌️🤣

Ikr it makes me want to try it just because it’s so adorable😭

I thought I would never hear in my life that a programming language compiles to Javascript of all things

I mean it's pretty common. Typescript for example

@@aquau5777 I'm old. Back when they were teaching me, "compiled" applied specifically to compiling it to machine code (and later, other bytecode like Java) not simply translating from one scripting language to another - so it just feels weird.

​@@tzisoreyyeah, terminology is wrong in this video, the correct term would be "transpiles to JavaScript"

​@@aquau5777 Typescript transpiles to javascript i thought?

And like with C++, people THINK Mojo is a superset of Python but actually it doesn't support all Python features. It's more like "almost a superset" of Python.

They should've named it Viper instead of Mojo. To show similar it is to Python, while also being faster and "cooler" (in quotes because no programming language is really cooler than another)

​@@paulooliveiracastro is cython completely compatible with all python code, and is a superset?

Correction c++ is not a superset of c similarly mojo is also not a superset of python technically. Chris lattner founder of (mojo, swift ) told himself in a podcast. Mojo came into picture to replace python. Python is simple and great lang with tonnes of libraries so they gave compaitabilty with python to some extent not completely. So old python developers can switch to mojo easily also begginers start with mojo just like they do with python.

@@driveDoses what podcast?

A barely informative short tales barely anything at all i guess what he meant is that it transpiles to javascript like typescript

Gleam, on default, transpiles to Erlang which then is compiled to BEAM bytecode and runs on the Erlang VM (BEAM). But Gleam can also transpile to JS and the base of it will work the same way as if it ran on BEAM.

@@katekyy7 🤮

@@mirabilis And what seems to be your problem? If you don't wanna use JS just simply don't use it, I dislike JS too. I found Gleam a good tool to learn Erlang by reading the generated artifacts, they're made to be readable. And it's a pretty good and simple language so I don't understand what's your problem.

@@mirabilis it's actually a very good language and an alternative to js and ts, using javascript or typescript is stupid.

Hope we'll get a godot style game engine with built in DOTS in it soon

It's dynamically typed?

@@Norsilca Static vs. Dynamic Typing: Mojo is designed to be a superset of Python, preserving its dynamic features while introducing new primitives for systems programming. This means that type-checking occurs at runtime but also allows for static typing when necessary

​@@CHURCHISAWESUM turn off that chatgpt lil bro

Didn't 3.12 massively boosted performance compared to earlier versions? And they're not even done with it; more performance boost is on the roadmap for the next few updates.

You have abtraction you have the cost

My guy, use a different language if performance is critical. You wouldn't use a hammer if you had needed to chop a tree, use an axe

@@XxZeldaxXXxLinkxX Yeah basically programming language just tool

That's exactly what TypeScript does. It's just a way to write code that you like, that will later be converted into code that you wouldn't want to write yourself. (Kinda like you write C to avoid writing Assembly, even though in the end what you launch is Assembly, or how you write Java or Kotlin to avoid writing JavaByteCode, even though what you run is JavaByteCode) Also in the past CoffeeScript was popular, which also compiled into JavaScript. There are also some implementations of Scala that compile to JavaScript instead of JavaByteCode (JavaScript is way slower than JavaByteCode, but then, JavaScript IS the language of the Web, and is basically the only language used on the frontent apart from WebAssembly). This technique allows people who love Scala to write both Scala on the backend (that will be converted into JavaByteCode) and Scala on the frontend (that will be converted into JavaScript), so you can write your entire app in Scala (or Python, or Java, or Groovy, or Kotlin, or CoffeScript, or TypeScript, or Gleam or whatever, depending on the compiler you use to convert your code into JavaScript). The thing is, many people hate to write JavaScript, so they come up with ideas how not to write JavaScript while creating working code in JavaScript. It might seem overly complicated, but it simplifies life for many developers, so it's not as ridiculous as it might seem at first. P.S. And yes, JavaScript and JavaByteCode from the Java infrastructure are COMPLETELY different technologies, and yet, with a good compiler, you can make Java-oriented languages like Scala or Kotlin, compile into JavaScript, or JavaScript-oriented languages like TypeScript or Gleam to convert into JavaByteCode. It's not commonly done, but it CAN work.

Just think of JS as human-friendly bytecode. Before WASM there was/is asm.js, a subset of JS that's easy to optimize. Besides, there's CPU instructions designed for JS (look up FJCVTZS in the ARM ISA), so JS is creeping its way into machine code as well 😆

@@awesomebearaudiobooks I appreciate the thought out response but I was just dogging on Javascript. I just like to make fun of it to be honest. I understand that it is currently a necessary evil.

Tranpiles.

@@ScriptlessWeek .Also, It only compiles to JS if you want it to. It natively compiles to Erlang.

Rust can replace all 3 of those and it's just better than all of them.

​@@agedvagabondtf are u yapping about

It's really fun, if that's your passion, but tbh that's something for everything, if that's ur passion then it's gonna be fun learning it. But gotta be honest too here, coding is not easy any way, especially at making your coding mind, that needs passion and determination. Hope you'll try it and maybe realize that you like it

@@SimonDevScr i am saying he could get the same utility by learning just one language that is pretty easy to learn, has good syntax and is as fast as c++. Rather than try to pick 3. Just pick a good low level language that can do anything. Once you know one you can understand them all.

@@agedvagabond the thing is, I think know each of them is the best thing you can do. Now, I would agree with you if we were talking about master programming languages, then yes, you should use the best one for you, but first u gotta get how a programming language works, how is different and many other things which u can't learn with just one

🤦🤦🤦 youre right

I tried Mojo! 🔥🔥

Tried Gleam for a functional programming course, was hard but when you get used to it's actually pretty fun to code with it

​@@artificialintelligencebirdis it really good and faster when dealing with problems in the data science field? Does it has many supported libraries like python? I assume not.

@@pet.me102 It's really good for creating neural networks, and of course It's wayyy faster than Python, for data science though, Python wins in my opinion, as Mojo doesn't have any libraries and not as many features for that.

I tried mojo, it's hella fast!🔥

I love the convenient syntax of C with inline assembly and the many quality of life features that result in a good development experience

@@mollthecoder what QOL features? Shooting yourself in the foot?

@@the_mastermagedo you suffer from a skill issue? I think so

​@@thebatchicle3429Quality of life usually means convenience... I can't see the convenience here.

@@fairphoneuser9009 C is very convenient, because it gives you full control to write actually performant software

wow funne loocc its familiar!1 hahaha111!11!!! or like go to ur bathroom and look theres toilet IT LOOKS LIKE SKIBIDI TOILET AHAHAH11!!!11!!!

good for ya

Zig is modern but not new.

@@whatsanimeshFair

people may know it by now

ZIG MENTIONNED

like what

@ilikegeorgiabutiveonlybeen6705 like gleam which has "support ukraine", "black lives matter", and "trans women are women" on the home page

@@VoxelPrismatic this is controversial but i kinda can agree

It called a superset😒. Like typescript

no it's smart, people won't buy into your language unless there is a benefit, but that's assuming we are rationale creature, in reality even if there is a benefit, the cost of habit is sometimes too expansive. By making mojo a superset of python, This allows every one to suddenly wield the power of C while keep using everything they know about python.

Mojo is python with support for hardware based code tuning to maximize performance.

Your free to learn bussin no one's controlling u

True, but Gleam supports a more "loose" retroactive type inference, so we can pretend we have generics without actually using them. Although I would prefer Rust and TS approach to generics, because it's safer

Gleam does have generics, like the built in option type is defined as "type Option(a) { Some(a) None }". The generics just can't have constraints on them or extend from other types, so you either use a concrete type or a generic that stands in for any type.

@@LittleLily_ That reminds me of `interface {}` in Go, which is equivalent to `unknown` in TS

Nice try but props cuz that was smooth