4 Subatomic Stories: The amazing neutrino

  Рет қаралды 121,133

Fermilab

Fermilab

4 жыл бұрын

Of all of the inhabitants of the subatomic realm, it is said that neutrinos have surprised researchers more than the rest. In episode 4 of Subatomic Stories, Fermilab’s Dr. Don Lincoln both introduces you to these perplexing fundamental particles, and answers some fascinating viewers’ questions.
Neutrinos: Nature’s Ghosts
• Neutrinos: Nature's G...
Neutrinos: Nature’s Identity Thieves
• Neutrinos: Nature's Id...
Sterile Neutrinos and Seesaws
• Sterile neutrinos and ...
Leptogenesis
• Can leptogenesis expla...
How do you make a neutrino beam?
• How do you make a neut...
How do you detect a neutrino?
• How do you detect a ne...
Why is the weak force weak?
• Why is the Weak Force ...
The weak nuclear force: The quantum chameleon
• The Weak Nuclear Force...
The weak nuclear force: Through the looking glass
• The Weak Nuclear Force...
DUNE Experiment
• What is the DUNE exper...
Fermilab physics 101:
www.fnal.gov/pub/science/part...
Fermilab home page:
fnal.gov

Пікірлер: 605
@maan7715
@maan7715 4 жыл бұрын
Over the years I find more and more quality youtube channels like this. Finally a positive side of the internet. Sitting at home in another continent , drinking my tea and I get lessons from a physicist from Fermilab. What a time to be alive.
@let4be
@let4be 4 жыл бұрын
If I had this 10y ago totally might end up in a totally different speciality... Nuclear physics and bio engineering do sound so appealing nowadays...
@maan7715
@maan7715 4 жыл бұрын
@@let4be Best part is , many kids watching these videos actually get inspired to be a scientist! Some future breakthroughs might be indirectly caused by one of these videos by kickstarting a future researcher's career.
@michaelblacktree
@michaelblacktree 4 жыл бұрын
"What a time to be alive." IKR?
@let4be
@let4be 4 жыл бұрын
@@maan7715 totally! I can only remember dreaming about inventions and asking myself various questions about the world when I was a child. I literally had nobody to really, really answer me... Things are so different nowdays - an endless ocean of information to bathe in and exceptional guys like dr. Don Lincoln to guide us in this area. I'm endlessly grateful for this and similar videos all across youtube - invaluable contribution to society and probably future of mankind ;)
@_c_e_
@_c_e_ 4 жыл бұрын
Honey, jasmine shroom tea and a touch of causality. I want to pick it to bits, but dang, he's a nerd! Love *their* work.
@renaudkener4082
@renaudkener4082 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Doctor, for all that science explained, and also for the joy you bring to us
@steinrich56
@steinrich56 4 жыл бұрын
I agree......I do not always understand the concepts, but I enjoy the big picture which is presented.
@NicleT
@NicleT 4 жыл бұрын
As always, ultra interesting. Thank you Dr. Lincoln.
@realdarthplagueis
@realdarthplagueis 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your amazing videos Dr. Lincoln! And thanks to Fermilab for their amazing work!
@Ambienfinity
@Ambienfinity 3 жыл бұрын
Love Don's enthusiasm, and love for his subject.
@matyasgembala
@matyasgembala 4 жыл бұрын
That was awesome. The Q&A section is a great addition that brings your videos to an even higher level. Please do keep on! :)
@wanyanxue7678
@wanyanxue7678 4 жыл бұрын
Keep these amazing videos coming up! Thank you so much for the knowledge!
@bastiaan7777777
@bastiaan7777777 4 жыл бұрын
Love these video's. No background music , very clearly. thanks.
@charulatapanigrahi4435
@charulatapanigrahi4435 4 жыл бұрын
But how are electron, muon and tau related to their respective neutrinos? How do we know that which one is whose?
@hinkles73
@hinkles73 4 жыл бұрын
Because each neutrino is only associated with their own charged lepton by a W boson, unlike the case with the quarks, where a top quark can decay into a strange quark, which is in another generation.
@Lucius_Chiaraviglio
@Lucius_Chiaraviglio 4 жыл бұрын
Charged lepton to neutrino conversions occur on a time scale of single microseconds (2.2 microseconds for muon half life) or less. Neutrino oscillation seems to require tens of microseconds. So even though neutrinos corresponding to charged leptons _eventually_ get randomized, it takes long enough (and has low enough probability of violation immediately upon neutrino emission) so that this correspondence is observable. Also, charged leptons might have extremely rare but potentially observable flavor violations, a topic of active research: cerncourier.com/a/chasing-charged-lepton-flavour-violation/
@alexiordache4835
@alexiordache4835 3 жыл бұрын
What a nice series! Thank you.
@meranism673
@meranism673 4 жыл бұрын
Hi SIR! With my sincere appreciation for your effort and willingness to share such valuable knowledge, I'd like to ask a question: I have a problem with these little guys here: (charm, top, bottom, strange, muon, tau). I can not fully understand what do they do in the universe? We know for example Up and Down are building blocks of protons and neutrons, Higs bosons are responsible for mass and so on... but how about these particles? What do they build? Or what do they do? And most importantly would universe still exist without them ? Do we need them ?
@briandiehl9257
@briandiehl9257 4 жыл бұрын
i once read about this kind of stuff before, and the higher generations of quarks don't seem to actually do anything
@frankschneider6156
@frankschneider6156 4 жыл бұрын
The are in first approximation just higher energy variants of u, d resp. e. That's why they are also more or less instable and decay quite fast into energetically lower states.
@stephanemiallet6090
@stephanemiallet6090 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for all your videos !
@kagannasuhbeyoglu
@kagannasuhbeyoglu 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Fermilab and Dr.Don Lincoln.
@michaelglynn2638
@michaelglynn2638 4 жыл бұрын
Great video, really enjoyed the Q and A very much. Cool T-Shirt too! Thank you again.
@RandomNullpointer
@RandomNullpointer 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the links in the video description, they were helpful :)
@CTCTraining1
@CTCTraining1 4 жыл бұрын
Great videos as usual and I’m really pleased you give a good slice of time over to answering viewer questions ... one which I’ve pondered and never felt comfortable with is why particles decay when they do and what dictates their longevity? I appreciate (to some extent as I’m far from a good student of physics!) that travelling at the speed of light affects how long you are perceived as living ... but presumably this is adjusted-for when lifetimes are compared. Stay safe and keep up the great work!
@jdin3987
@jdin3987 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Doc. Thank you for doing this still.
@mheermance
@mheermance 4 жыл бұрын
Great video, and thank you for answering my question!
@Pintuuuxo
@Pintuuuxo 4 жыл бұрын
Humor is a fundamental particle in Physics. Thank you Dr. Don
@georgemattson5723
@georgemattson5723 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Dr. Lincoln.
@An0nim0u5
@An0nim0u5 4 жыл бұрын
The subject matter of the video is very scantly described but the Q&A segment answered many of my own queries. So yeah this was satisfying.
@philjamieson5572
@philjamieson5572 4 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy these films. Thanks.
@willyraphaell3306
@willyraphaell3306 4 жыл бұрын
Como tenho ampliado meus conhecimentos, so tenho a agradecer, thank you !! Very incredible!!
@Drbob369
@Drbob369 3 жыл бұрын
Good work, Dr.
@rkrajuraju8254
@rkrajuraju8254 4 жыл бұрын
Very accurate information about this mysterious particle...Thank very much you, sir
@tresajessygeorge210
@tresajessygeorge210 Жыл бұрын
THANK YOU... PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!!
@JEE322
@JEE322 4 жыл бұрын
1)Why the Pauli exclusion principle applies to fermions only? 2)How can there be charged waves? 3)does the neutrinos pass through our bodies via quantum tunneling? 4) how many types of particles are there in universe? (Spoiler: hundreds ) Thanks for recieving my questions.
@bruinflight1
@bruinflight1 4 жыл бұрын
The flagship Dr from the flagship research facility! THANK YOU!!!
@WhatAreDrums729
@WhatAreDrums729 4 жыл бұрын
I'm enjoying how much of these videos you dedicate to question response. Thanks for being so engaged! Question: you mention that neutrinos only interact via the weak force. But since they have mass, they must also interact gravitationally. Did you phrase it this way because there is no way to model gravity with QM?
@danuttall
@danuttall 4 жыл бұрын
Gravity is SO weak by comparison that even the Weak Nuclear Force is way more significant to neutrinos than gravity. Also because neutrinos are SO small, their mass is almost nothing anyway, so gravity has almost no effect on the (very, very) little guys.
@benediktwalch1605
@benediktwalch1605 4 жыл бұрын
This channel is just awesome
@aadarshsaraf7959
@aadarshsaraf7959 4 жыл бұрын
at first I was about to skip the Q&A. But it turned out to be more interesting than the actual episode. I got hooked.
@patrickboudreau3846
@patrickboudreau3846 2 жыл бұрын
Love this man. Emotionally balanced with a highly functionning brain all the while just humble enough. Great role model.
@rc5989
@rc5989 4 жыл бұрын
I think we have much to learn about this fascinating tiny particle, and I am glad that the scientists at Fermilab are hard at work on the ‘matter’.
@rondolo711
@rondolo711 2 жыл бұрын
Especially as the "matter" gets a bit "wavy" when you look too hard into it.
@pressaltf4forfreevbucks179
@pressaltf4forfreevbucks179 4 жыл бұрын
1:04 project poltergeist. That sounds badass af
@mishvanzant
@mishvanzant 4 жыл бұрын
I love your quarky personality!
@siddharthnarang806
@siddharthnarang806 4 жыл бұрын
Nice
@conorproffitt
@conorproffitt 4 жыл бұрын
you are a wonderful man. thank you for doing what you do
@sofiatgarcia3970
@sofiatgarcia3970 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Dr Lincoln, for making neutrinos more or less understandable to a simple novelist/cabinetmaker.
@treyquattro
@treyquattro 4 жыл бұрын
Subatomic Stories: the best thing to come out of the coronavirus lockdown
@RealMajor66
@RealMajor66 4 жыл бұрын
I think this series is my new favorite thing on youtube.
@brothermine2292
@brothermine2292 4 жыл бұрын
Have you tried PBS Spacetime? It's a weekly series.
@RealMajor66
@RealMajor66 4 жыл бұрын
@@brothermine2292 Yes, I watch that also.
@thralldumehammer
@thralldumehammer 4 жыл бұрын
I don't comment often but thank you for sharing your knowledge. Knowledge is power and everyone should know!
@Tesseract9630
@Tesseract9630 4 жыл бұрын
Do more of this stuff. And also longer videos.
@ankeunruh7364
@ankeunruh7364 3 жыл бұрын
I do remember the news about the start of Kamioka Nucleon Decay Experiment. It brought the curiosity back to my mind, and it took me 20 years to understand, due to the new ways of asking questions...
@Revoluus
@Revoluus 4 жыл бұрын
Phenomenal. I'm a chemist and mostly look at electronic interactions, but this discussion about quarks, bosons, and neutrinos has peaked my interest. I might have to study some more physics!
@photinodecay
@photinodecay 4 жыл бұрын
Radioactive decay is probably the most relevant aspect of all of this to chemistry.
@halsnyder6199
@halsnyder6199 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review of neutrinos and the feast of prior videos about neutrinos and the Weak Nuclear Force. MAY THE 4TH BE WITH YOU.
@robertcox5948
@robertcox5948 4 жыл бұрын
I like your videos. I grew up in Batavia and remember seeing the admin building driving down Kirk road and Butterfield quite often, and then driving through when my sister lived in Warrenville. I also had a quantum and relativistic mechanics class at NIU taught by one of the researchers at Fermi. Glad to see you guys are still doing good work. it has been a while since I delved into this side of physics and I love the refreshers. I also had a fascination with particle physics through my schooling, reading my first book on it in middle school. My parents were kind enough to subscribe me to Science News (and I still am 40 years later) which kept me up to date on the overview latest findings. Now onto my question. How is the Buffalo herd doing there?
@eddu4361
@eddu4361 4 жыл бұрын
Always like the “lessons” 👍
@MaryAnnNytowl
@MaryAnnNytowl 2 жыл бұрын
Great sense of humor, IMO!
@michaelblacktree
@michaelblacktree 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video, Dr Lincoln! As a non-scientist, I find this stuff absolutely fascinating. I can even understand some of it! 😛
@Vazgen_Ghazaryan
@Vazgen_Ghazaryan 4 жыл бұрын
Dear Don. Thank you for your continuing effort. I have 3 interrelated questions, if I may... :) 1. What do you think of the 3 generations of quarks and leptons of being the different excitation states off a sort of more basic matter? 2. Didactically, what would you suggest as a way of imagining the 3 charges of strong force, except the "colors", and where else can one find their manifestations in the nature? 3. What do you think of Preon models, and particularly the Rishon model? Does it offer a better explanation than the Standard Model?
@nHans
@nHans 4 жыл бұрын
Whoa, so the W bosons can change particles’ identity? That's huge-it raises all kinds of metaphysical questions! As a computer programmer, it brought back nightmares of my early C/C++ programming years. Variables and objects were just bytes in memory. They had no inherent identity of their own. Any code that accessed those memory locations could assume their identity to be whatever it wanted. ‘Clever’ coders back then did unnatural things with unions and the omnipotent typecasting operator. I still have terror attacks when I recall debugging those monstrous hairballs. Subsequent languages like Java and Python assigned a permanent and immutable identity to every variable and object created, banned identity changes, and reduced the power of the typecasting operator to a mere shadow of its earlier self. I was happy; I believed that was the balanced and harmonious order of nature. And today I learn that the identity of the very fundamental particles of nature can be changed? Noooo...say it ain’t so, please...!
@thomasqsa
@thomasqsa 4 жыл бұрын
I would love it there was an infinite number of amazing videos like this in this channel, but I would also be infinitely sad because I wouldn’t be able to watch all of them
@psionicinversion
@psionicinversion 4 жыл бұрын
im a little drunk and i was listening to it and my face melted... sounds cool ill watch it again tomorrow when sober just so i can nod along again not understanding stuff :D love your vids keep going
@a51mj12
@a51mj12 4 жыл бұрын
fist. Also i would enjoy longer episodes.
@TrevorsRoom
@TrevorsRoom 2 жыл бұрын
I love all of the Fermi lab videos you do Don I'm going to make some low grade videos off my phone soon hope you'll get to see one one day
@alexandernichols413
@alexandernichols413 4 жыл бұрын
More time!!
@raghu45
@raghu45 4 жыл бұрын
Prof! U make it sound so easy to learn about S A particles! Like, for instance how an electron converts a proton into a neutron. But then, it is the contraptions to set-up these observations that take all the resources & best minds - CERN & other labs & scopes.
@dentoncrimescene
@dentoncrimescene 4 жыл бұрын
I'm loving his smile.
@brothermine2292
@brothermine2292 4 жыл бұрын
To me, his smile doesn't look genuine. It reminds me of Star Trek TNG's Lt. Commander Data attempting to smile.
@joeylawn36111
@joeylawn36111 4 жыл бұрын
2:14 I don’t think that guy is swimming in a pool of cleaning fluid.... 😂
@tonydarcy1606
@tonydarcy1606 4 жыл бұрын
Maybe he took Trump's suggestion seriously ?
@tracyh5751
@tracyh5751 4 жыл бұрын
I imagine that they filled it with water to ensure it is sealed before filling it with the cleaning fluid.
@l0_0l45
@l0_0l45 4 жыл бұрын
They filled it with water before it was filled with pure liquid chlorine. That is what happened. Just read about the solar neutrino experiment. Its not a mystery.
@joeylawn36111
@joeylawn36111 4 жыл бұрын
@@l0_0l45 OK, but not liquid Chlorine, but Perchloroethylene (C2Cl4).
@Lucius_Chiaraviglio
@Lucius_Chiaraviglio 4 жыл бұрын
@@l0_0l45 The final fluid was a chlorine compound like tetrachloroethylene, not chlorine (which would be physically possible but require too much pressure to keep liquid without refrigeration, and the first neutrino detector didn't have the budget for cryogenic refrigeration or a very high pressure tank).
@nouamanmoukassi81
@nouamanmoukassi81 4 жыл бұрын
Question: How and when was it decided/discovered that there are 4 fundamental forces and why should they unite
@grandpaobvious
@grandpaobvious 4 жыл бұрын
Do your own research.
@cabletelcontar5440
@cabletelcontar5440 4 жыл бұрын
We asked the Emperor when he came back
@frankschneider6156
@frankschneider6156 4 жыл бұрын
It's not known, that there are 4 fundamental forces, that's just what we currently assume. And you simply add a new one, if a new one is required, that's why you continuously hear every 3-4 years a new group speculating about a new 5th force. But that's of course wishful thinking. The unification is also less than certain, especially as the LHC didn't find any evidence for SUSY.
@alexiskaraf231
@alexiskaraf231 4 жыл бұрын
Through observation. I imagine that by the start of the 20th century physicists probably thought they could explain all phenomena with electromagnetism and gravity but soon found out about the nuclear forces. We right now might be in the same boat. We just dont know
@frankschneider6156
@frankschneider6156 4 жыл бұрын
​@Bertrand de Born This is one of the main ideas of current physics, that the 4 force are just different faces of a single force, resulting from a symmetry break, when the universe cooled down. That's why there was a Nobel prize for Salam, Glashow and Weinberg for the harmonization of the weak and the electromagnetic into to the electro weak force. That's a pretty big deal. Integrate now the strong force into this and you have GUT (Grand unified Theory). manage to put also gravity into it and you have ToE (Theory of Everything), the holy grail of modern physics.
@spyglass1005
@spyglass1005 3 жыл бұрын
You know, I do like your videos. 👍
@Alpha-gz6hk
@Alpha-gz6hk 4 жыл бұрын
He's the best teacher
@baldurk.1667
@baldurk.1667 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this series! Since Fermi Lab is pretty clever in generating those elusive particles, is there an idea or an attempt to influence their change in flavour in order to understand the underlying mechanism?
@robharwood3538
@robharwood3538 3 жыл бұрын
Dr. Lincoln, a couple of things you said in different videos that I watched recently have 'clicked' and given me a kinda-cool idea that may interest you. I'll try to form it as a question, but first, what led me to the idea: - In this video, you mention that neutrinos only interact via the weak nuclear force (aside: Wait, wouldn't they also interact via gravity??). - This reminded me of another recent video you did on Dark Matter, where you mentioned the possibility of 'complex' dark matter (I think that was what you called it), where the dark matter can perhaps have some structure if it interacts via some other as yet unknown force (oh, the temptation to call it the Dark Force is strong in this one! 😜), that only interacts with other dark matter. - Putting neutrinos' only-weak (and I'm guessing but-also-gravity) restriction and dark matter's only-gravity (plus that-we-know-of-yet) restriction together, it makes one wonder ...: How do we know (or can we even know) that there aren't one or more forces that don't interact (directly) *at all* (not even via gravity) with the standard particles and forces taught in physics? Perhaps there's a 'darker matter' that only interacts with 'dark matter' via unknown-force UF1, and not even gravity? And maybe a hidden 'even darker matter' that only interacts with 'darker matter' via unknown-force UF2? Such that UF2 doesn't even (directly) interact with normal, gravity-interacting dark matter. Presumably, in principle, this is potentially a testable hypothesis, if we could get a better grasp on making observations of normal dark matter, and infer the existence of 'darker' and 'even darker' matter through those observations. But then again, maybe there are some already-known limitations on what's possible to exist that I'm not aware of, and maybe there's a limit to how 'dark' any exotic matter or forces can possibly be. So, I guess my question is, "Is there such a limit, or is it basically 'anything's possible'?" P.S.: I'm a big fan of Occam's Razor, so I understand why one wouldn't want to 'multiply entities', but I'm also a big fan of science fiction, so I'm still curious as to what yet remains within the realm of physical possibility.
@zachyoung5598
@zachyoung5598 4 жыл бұрын
Fun fact about neutrinos: the first detection of neutrinos was awarded a Nobel prize 7 years AFTER the Nobel prize was awarded to the discoverers of the second type of neutrino.
@meandnoother
@meandnoother 4 жыл бұрын
Hi Dr. Lincoln, Loving your videos! However, I have one simple suggestion. Could you clip that microphone someplace where it doesn't rub against your clothes when you move your body around? Thanks and keep up the great work!
@sciencewithcats2274
@sciencewithcats2274 2 жыл бұрын
Love the T-Shirt :D
@hinkles73
@hinkles73 4 жыл бұрын
I can't wait to learn about the bosons!
@esperancaemisterio
@esperancaemisterio 4 жыл бұрын
Hi dr. Lincoln! It's hard to believe how lucky we are to have a top scientist, that work in one of the greatest labs in the world, explaining the most fundamental basis of the reality! =) Thanks! Please consider someday make a step by step video of what happens in a delayed choice quantum entanglement according to different interpretations of QM! =)
@ShamanElementalLord
@ShamanElementalLord 4 жыл бұрын
I already visited Cern last year, now i wanna visit Fermilab..
@kirkkohnen5050
@kirkkohnen5050 4 жыл бұрын
Dr. Don, Fred Reines landed at U. C. Irvine, and was there while I was an undergrad. For what it's worth, his name is not pronounced "Rains," but "RY-nes." And, yes, it was a special treat to have him as one of my professors! Regards, Dr. Kirk Kohnen.
@narcisdragole5159
@narcisdragole5159 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for these videos Don and greetings from Romania! What do you think is next for particle physics? Do you anticipate the graviton being discovered and a solid quantum gravity coming up? Do you see dark matter particles as the next big step for quantum mechanics assuming WIMPs are the answer? So many questions.
@YutakaTaniyamasFeels
@YutakaTaniyamasFeels 4 жыл бұрын
The water tanks are always so beautiful.
@ainternet239
@ainternet239 4 жыл бұрын
I'm glad to see there's a book called "Collider" on Dr Don's bookshelf 😉
@drdon5205
@drdon5205 4 жыл бұрын
@Dr Deuteron The Fermilab Tevatron was the world's highest energy accelerator and brightest beams in the world for a quarter century.
@badwolfgooddog7979
@badwolfgooddog7979 10 ай бұрын
I was the proud recipient of the Clyde C. Cowen Scholarship offered from the Physics Department at the Catholic University in Washington D.C. back in 1989.
@elman2012
@elman2012 4 жыл бұрын
I love these videos I just think it's funny 4 minutes in Don is like "Welp, that's all the time we have to talk about neutrinos!"
@MitzvosGolem1
@MitzvosGolem1 4 жыл бұрын
Dr. Davis at B.N.L. Long island NY. Retired from there. Miss my work and that lab ....
@luislopes9825
@luislopes9825 4 жыл бұрын
Don, please share your ideas about neutrino mass doubts as well as about hypothetical sterile neutrino. Thanks
@Harbarder
@Harbarder 4 жыл бұрын
You should give us tour of the bookshelf behind you!
@superscienceshow
@superscienceshow 4 жыл бұрын
Question: how do the fundamental forces merge as energy increases in a collider and as we look back to the big bang? What does that even mean?
@l0_0l45
@l0_0l45 4 жыл бұрын
Gauge symmetry breaking gives mass to the particles via the higgs mechanism. When say at 10^17K, the SU(2) × U(1)y symmetry breaks down to U(1), the electro-weak force separates into electromagnetic and weak force fields. These fields are then populated by particles of W, Z bosons(SU(2) symmetry), and Photons(U(1) symmetry). Higgs mechanism is temperature dependent.
@l0_0l45
@l0_0l45 4 жыл бұрын
At higher energies(greater than 10^17K), the symmetries are resolved, so U(1) -> SU(2) × U(1)y happens. Reverse happens.
@l0_0l45
@l0_0l45 4 жыл бұрын
At even higher energies more symmetries fuse. The particles like W,Z bosons, and photons, and even gluons are force carriers. At temperatures higher than which their symmetries are allowed, they merge to a more combined symmetry.
@l0_0l45
@l0_0l45 4 жыл бұрын
So logically at the big bang, at temperatures in excess of 10^43K, all symmetries fuse to one common symmetry. That field would have pretty strange physics. But since this is not experimentally confirmable, its still a hypothesis, only for the very high energy part. Till about 10^19K, we have observations. We have seen field unification of Electromagnetism, and Weak force. But not for others.
@l0_0l45
@l0_0l45 4 жыл бұрын
I think I gave you some useful info. I am not a physicist myself, and my explanations may have some errors, but you can look it up. Gauge symmetry. That is the topic. Pretty cool. Most likely will answer that question of yours definitely. Hope that was sufficient.
@oisnowy5368
@oisnowy5368 4 жыл бұрын
What I've always found interesting regarding neutrino oscillations is that (I presume) the electron, muon and tau neutrino's have different masses. Do they? Do we have reliable measurements on that and if so, where does the mass differential come from/go to during oscillations?
@wolfman83778
@wolfman83778 4 жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly, we believe the differences in the masses of the neutrinos to be similar to the differences between the charged leptons. For example, the muon is about 200 times more massive than the electron, so we think the muon neutrino would be about 200 times more massive than the electron neutrino. The thing we don't know is how massive the neutrinos are on any sort of scale (we use electron volts or eV in particle physics to measure mass), but whatever it is, it must be incredibly small.
@Andrew-rl3uo
@Andrew-rl3uo 4 жыл бұрын
Neutrino oscillations tell us that neutrinos have a non-zero mass, but also that there are three massive neutrinos, each with a different mass! The thing is even more complicated as what we call electron, muon and tau neutrinos are not states with a defined mass, but rather a combination of them, and this is what allows the oscillation to happen. The states with defined mass are usually called nu_1, nu_2 and nu_3.
@scotthammond3230
@scotthammond3230 4 жыл бұрын
Would like to hear a lot more about this. Neutrinos move at the speed of light, which means they dont have any mass. Neutrinos can oscillate which means they should have mass. This is a paradox?
@Andrew-rl3uo
@Andrew-rl3uo 4 жыл бұрын
@@scotthammond3230 The fact that they have mass implies that they have a speed that slightly (a ridiculously tiny amount) less the one of light.
@AbhishekKrSingh-gp4hx
@AbhishekKrSingh-gp4hx 4 жыл бұрын
Question: We have learned about pair production. So doesn't electron converts into photons before striking nucleus?.
@RME76048
@RME76048 4 жыл бұрын
Dr. Don. A neutrino detection question that relates to neutrino oscillation. The distance that the variety of neutrino detectors are away from the center of the Sun varies depending on the rotation of the Earth (facing towards the Sun, facing away, in between at sunrise/sunset, etc.) and the Earth's seasonal distance from the Sun. The source of the neutrinos is not a single point at the center of the Sun, however; rather a (huge) sphere with a radius about 0.24 that of the Sun's radius. An enormous (!!!) amount of neutrinos are created (I recall reading about a percent that of surface-emitted photons but I could be wrong). Considering the times of flight (distance) required for a neutrino to oscillate, and the neutrinos can originate from anywhere in that 0.48 solar diameter sphere, would the effect of the comparatively tiny day-night, seasonal and Earth's slightly non-circular orbit variations in the detector-Sun distance be washed out, lost in the "noise" of the oscillating neutrinos? Or, can important oscillation information be teased out of the measurements based on the ever-changing detector-Sun distances? Thanks again for your interesting videos, taking the time of sharing them with the public. Physics IS everything, isn't it? Oh, and that quesadilla sure sounds good... :)
@loving-world
@loving-world Жыл бұрын
Thank you Dr Lincoln for your videos. Does Quantum Mechanics help to explain consciousness. Is consciousness another fundamental 'energy'? Is consciousness a 'physical' energy that comes from fundamental particles?
@octobersky9690
@octobersky9690 4 жыл бұрын
Hey Don, could you explain the MINOS experiment that happened at the Soudan Mine in northern Minnesota and how it relates to Fermilab? I went there as a kid and never understood what they were studying about neutrinos.
@VenomAloisius
@VenomAloisius 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for those videos, my question would be : what's the actual difference between chirality and spin of a particle
@maybepoet8148
@maybepoet8148 4 жыл бұрын
How many discoveries fermilab done and just how many of them are done you doc don
@Bless-the-Name
@Bless-the-Name 4 жыл бұрын
I'd like a video on the moment of transition between the states - especially at the Bose-Einstein and Plasma levels. Specifically ... the return to normality - as temperature rises from the condensate and lowers from the plasma state.
@navneet215
@navneet215 4 жыл бұрын
wow sir i really enjoyed
@blahpy
@blahpy 4 жыл бұрын
Hi Dr. Lincoln! I heard recently about the (empirical) Koide equation relating the masses of the charged leptons. I wondered whether there is a theoretical model explaining how it might arise, or whether it's considered to be pure coincidence, or something else entirely?
@louwclaassens4988
@louwclaassens4988 4 жыл бұрын
Question: How do they generate entangled pairs? How do they know where the other particle is? I heard a test once showed entanglement at 140 miles (or some large distance). How do they find the entangled particle so far away?
@brogant6793
@brogant6793 4 жыл бұрын
Why does gravity not work like other forces and how could we find out why it works this way?
@wolfman83778
@wolfman83778 4 жыл бұрын
Basically, relativity says it's simply a property of spacetime, but quantum physics says it should be carried by some sort of force carrying particle. We tried this in the 80s with the so-called "graviton" but we couldn't get it to work without the standard model falling apart. String theory is an attempt to explain it (it's far too big of a topic to explain in a comment). There's a couple other theories to unify relatively and quantum physics, but it's going to take someone as smart (if not smarter) than Einstein to crack it.
@xeno4162
@xeno4162 4 жыл бұрын
@@wolfman83778 Good answer
@KohuGaly
@KohuGaly 4 жыл бұрын
That's the million-dollar question nobody fully figured out yet. Quite literally - the person who finds the answer gets an instant nobel price in physics. Gravity simply doesn't work with quantum mechanics as we currently know it. It would have to be carried by particles with spin-2 (gravitons). The problem is, gravitons should attract each other. If they are point-like (like the other particles seem to be) than the energy of their attraction should grow to infinity as distance goes to zero. The equations blow up at that point, because they predict that quantum vacuum should be producing black hole singularities everywhere at infinite rate (which is obviously not happening). Quantum mechanics as we know it today seems to be an approximation of a larger more general theorem, called Theory of Everything. There are multiple candidates, most notable being string theory. The thing we are missing is observational/experimental data about how spacetime and quantum-mechanics works in extreme spacetime curvatures, such as event horizons of black holes or the big bang. That's where we expect our current theories to fully break down and reveal new physics.
@XEinstein
@XEinstein 4 жыл бұрын
@@wolfman83778 Yeah, I'm in my tenth reincarnation now and I still haven't figured it out!
@orbifold4387
@orbifold4387 4 жыл бұрын
The short answer is because quantum gravity is non renormalizable. Renormalization is a recipe to cancel divergences in quantum field theory. In quantum electrodynamics (QED), at every order in the perturbation theory expansion there is only a finite number of "infinites" , so you can hide the garbage under the carpet by renormalizing the fields. When you try the same approach in quantum gravity, you realize that you need to calculate an infinite number of amplitudes to cure divergences. And nobody knows how to do this.
@thisolesignguy2733
@thisolesignguy2733 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video! is Fermilab looking into using the neutrino beam & sensors to create an 'x-ray' of matter? much like having sensors to give us a picture of celestial bodies and gravitational forces? I'm curious if a black hole can be detected using neutrinos?
@PrzemyslawSliwinski
@PrzemyslawSliwinski 4 жыл бұрын
How to reconcile the quantum mechanics and the redshift/blueshift phenomena? How is the energy released from/added to a photon, respectively?
@dremonX
@dremonX 4 жыл бұрын
Question: what would it take to study internal structure of quarks? Is it possible to come up with an experiment to break them?
@shu21554
@shu21554 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you doctor! I have a question, what does it mean that the superposition of electrons with different wave function would make them non-existent? What does the anitisymmetric wave function of fermions mean?
@edwardlittle9362
@edwardlittle9362 4 жыл бұрын
Is that a stack of vinyl records on the shelf at the viewer’s upper right? And here I thought this channel couldn’t get any cooler!
@drdon5205
@drdon5205 4 жыл бұрын
Sadly, those are magazines written by Lincoln. His vinyl collection is in his underground dance club.
@thedeathsidius
@thedeathsidius 4 жыл бұрын
Hi Fermilab! I know I should have asked that question for the last video, but I'm going to ask you this way. The question is: how do pentaqvarks work, their lives are short (something tells me they are very unstable) or long? What do they interact with, and do they have anitpentaquarks? Thank you in advance for your reply. :)
@_John_Sean_Walker
@_John_Sean_Walker 4 жыл бұрын
Bon appetit.
@antoniomanuel1855
@antoniomanuel1855 4 жыл бұрын
Good veryviuthifor
5 Subatomic Stories: Forces the Feynman way
9:55
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 97 М.
25 Subatomic Stories: What's smaller than quarks?
13:37
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 159 М.
2000000❤️⚽️#shorts #thankyou
00:20
あしざるFC
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Они убрались очень быстро!
00:40
Аришнев
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН
Китайка и Пчелка 4 серия😂😆
00:19
KITAYKA
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН
20 Subatomic Stories: Is the Planck length really the smallest?
13:55
Space oddities - with Harry Cliff
54:22
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 455 М.
32 Subatomic Stories: Is supersymmetry real?
14:13
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 78 М.
The Solar Neutrino Problem
37:53
Jason Kendall
Рет қаралды 32 М.
What does the Muon g-2 experiment tell us?
14:42
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 188 М.
The physics anomaly no one talks about: What's up with those neutrinos?
11:54
Sabine Hossenfelder
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
33 Subatomic Stories: Does the multiverse exist?
14:41
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 74 М.
18 Subatomic Stories: When black holes evaporate
11:01
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 85 М.
How the Higgs Mechanism Give Things Mass
18:04
PBS Space Time
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
What happened before the Big Bang?
14:35
Fermilab
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
сюрприз
1:00
Capex0
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
wireless switch without wires part 6
0:49
DailyTech
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН
Iphone or nokia
0:15
rishton vines😇
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН