This is disgusting. And I want to try it now 😂 What was your siding pattern like?

@@redoctober67honestly it depended on the matchup. Like against voiceless you wanna side out the cards that target like ring of destruction and bad luck blast. I always sided out the paleos and transaction rollback because I was so sick of drawing rollback lmfao.

Honestly hearing you going blind second but only having Lava golems and Mourners sounds very hard. Is the point to mostly let them play and fill thier own board so your traps do more damage?

How do you beat snake eyes if you don’t draw lava golem when they open borreload and formula synchro. That’s already to negates.

Hey Thoughts on any of the following: Michion/timelords Balance of judgment Duality Chain energy I suspect some are too slow, and continuous cards are more at risk to destruction?

I want to know how chicken game make simochi burn better

This is such a sick combo that unfortunately I wasn’t able to pull off! I wanted to do this so bad but unfortunately never got the opportunity! I should definitely have mentioned it! Thanks for the reminder!

👀

It doesn't actually work anymore because of ring's new errata. Since you take damage first it only reflects your damage and since you didn't take damage because of barrel, ring deals 0 damage to the opponent.

thanks dude! I considered cards like threatening roar in case they make me go first. And more draw power in the form of more pots could definitely be considered. Though I didn’t wanna play cards like accumulated fortune or reckless greed. The main reason being I didn’t wanna risk drawing too little burn cards, in almost all of my games I was winning turn 1-2 consistently since I just drew burn cards lol. If I was drawing draw/stall cards it gives the opponent more time to setup additional interruptions like shuffling Baronne back or setting up an s:p to make our cards do less damage!

@@user-ru4uo8gm5v still topping anything with this?

You don’t Need It because you have Booboo Game. It gives more consistency and you can set back two more burning traps

Nope, that’s way too slow lol. There were only 2 games where I was lower LP than my opponent and it never came up. Runick is also never doing that since you could kill them way faster than they could kill you since they’d need 8 turns.

Oh look, the cringe Yu-Gi-Oh Ohio sound effects guy

@@ilgattoyuumi ?

Yes. If you can get an attack off with it, it really speeds up the burn

Michion is really good if you can get it's effect off. It cuts the opponent's LP in half making it much easier for the traps to do their job.

I actually am seriously considering siding them for certain matchups! You could go blazing mirror force then chain ceasefire, and just desserts for insane damage.

Unfortunately rollback on the field only copies opponents traps in GY😔 which they literally never had all day. I guess you could get lucky if they discard an imperm for a diabellstar or something but it never came up once.

You can play cards like Jar of Greed, Reckless Greed, Legacy of Yata-Garasu, and Accumulated Fortune if you want more draw power, but the downside is you may not be able to burn your opponent as quickly.

@@amritlohia8240 thank you. I was trying out reckless greed but decided to take it out bc I preferred more burn cards

@@PandaQueen_ygo Yeah, I think that's probably the right choice in today's meta. Obviously cards like Reckless Greed and Accumulated Fortune have historically been a major part of burn decks, alongside other staples like Swift Scarecrow and Threatening Roar, but nowadays they seem to just be too slow and too prone to negates. In effect, in a format where your first 2 important cards are probably going to get negated, you need all your cards to do a lot more in order to compensate.

@amritlohia8240 I agree. In duels where is used greed it either never came up or just got negated. I found playing more burn is just better. Maybe In a slower meta it'll be better but rn burn is just more reliable.

He said in the video man. 2 lord heavenly

It’s so that they fill their board with cards so my traps do more damage! If they have a lot of monsters and spells/traps on their board then you could literally win with only 4 cards if they’re hitting for 2k damage each, which is very doable with your battle burn cards hitting for 3k pretty consistently against most decks.

@@user-ru4uo8gm5v thank you for replying! The opponent would still have to summon monsters even if you go first, but I think they would commit more cards to the field if you go 2nd. Makes sense. Again thanks!

@@davidgudd you got it! You obviously also get the extra card going second which can definitely make the difference, and you also automatically skip having to survive a battle phase! Also think about it, the only interruption in the deck is gravediggers and ring of destruction, what does going first allow us to do besides possibly stop 1 or 2 cards that we could just use going second? Most people will play into gravediggers even if you go second, they’ll activate a poplar or flamberge in GY or a saffira in hand. And obviously ring of destruction is almost always live. Also going second allows them to resolve multiple flamberges, which fills up their board even more for our burn cards!

@@user-ru4uo8gm5v not sure but was wondering if a small numeron engine could give another option as the ED isn't used, or at least good bait? Although I recognise you wanna be baiting negates in their turn and not yours ideally, when you activate your other cards.

@@flamingcbgamer4069 it’s definitely possible, I just really don’t like drawing multiples of a card that doesn’t further my gameplan. Drawing 2 dead cards is basically an instant loss so I try to keep the deck as streamlined as possible. I was even considering cutting Ring of destruction down to 2 to minimize the chances of drawing 2 since it’s once per turn. But since it says you can ACTIVATE one per turn and not USE one per turn if they Baronne negate you can use a second one.

Boo boo game

No I never chose to go first, however I could see a world where we side in curse of darkness and go first against purely or runick stun,

@@user-ru4uo8gm5v very nice list. Just opened my box of old cards and started building the deck

@@user-ru4uo8gm5v how would u go against pure stun lists? Like dino fossil jaugen deck and stuff

@@Seylanceit’s not a bad matchup since none of their stun cards really hurt us and it takes them forever to kill. You basically just keep flipping ceasefire, just desserts, ring of destruction and secret barrel/blast to slowly burn them down. I’m fairly confident we can burn them to 0 before they can beat us down.

Probably not for his deck since he blinded second every game.

If one is lucky just use 1 and side deck it

No idea tenpai wasn't out at the time of recording

@@TLETCG that is why i'm asking, does this stand a chance vs the current meta?

He uses chain strike. Therefore it's a chain burn deck

@@FalconsZone6 man yo did I goof that hard and not see Chain Strike?

@FalconsZone6 while correct, conventional CB decks relied solely on the chaining aspect. Chain Strike being limited doesn't necessarily connotate the "Chain" terminology, unless I missed draw traps+Accumulated Fortune in there too.