+Futurama Llama I want to see this video

+charles jones whos john oliver

The host of Last Week Tonight. He used to be a "reporter" on The Daily Show.

+charles jones What dose bunnies were cute and friendly.

John Oliver has probably never read the Sluggy Freelance "kittens" arc. Doesn't take a swarm to be creepy.

Ever seen monty python ...holy grail....rabbits are dangerous...it's best to RUN AWAY...RUN AWAY.

***** Nah, it's a use of the classic gag of vastly underestimating a number of things.

+Mr. Creazil I counted eleven.

***** Twelve?

I wouldn't go quite that far

1,000

For some reason i really love this comment. So thank you

paha made my night

I don't understand this joke....

Young King Charles Certain members of Cracked express their tastes and styles regularly in their videos. Jack mentions Wolfman alot. Dan has Die hard and presidents. Swaim Aliens and being Swaim etc. etc.

Young King Charles Also, Jack is keen on the ATL rap scene, which is my favorite thing about him.

How would they do that, exactly? "There's a bomb" "Identify yourself!" "...no" *call disconnected* And you know 'swatting' is already illegal, right? What's it like having your brain?

True, but I think if your fast enough you can successfully perform a spin, all be it a very ineffective and unnecessary move. its just flashy, A good idea to keep your enemy in front of you at all times,I tried this spin move once when LARPing, I paid for it lol. still looks cool, though only in movies.

***** imo, it looks reminensent of a ballerina. I mean, in all seriousness, there are plenty of moves that work and can still keep the attention of an audience. Soon enough, they'll be throwing pommels in the movies

Flynt It gives you more torque if performed correctly, look at spinning elbows and spinning kicks in MMA

Haha, I wouldn't be surprised if they did.

I will definitely have to check that out.

Yeah I watched that full video a few days after it happened. Pretty fucked up, some people have absolutely no understanding or care for the consequences of their actions. I hope the people in question were found out and fined.

Haha

Apparently. And it's become so common that some gamers are bored by it.

SilverEye I hope the US gets back to a standard of reasonable suspicion for search and seizure and an even higher one for no knock warrants and SWAT raids.

Who was the one getting swatted in this video?

?

TomYawns No Country for Old Men? That device he uses is an air pressure cannon used for silently killing cattle so as to not startle the heard. It's not a gun or even a projectile firing device at all. It actually just sounds like that. "cannon" draws to mine a ship cannon I suppose, which might be confusing to some!

But the example you give is not plural, it’s possessive...

Don’t even pluralize it. Say “chimps named Spartacus.”

fair point

Crimson King Really? People possibly getting shot is just fun?

no ass hat, but getting shot isn't TERRERROORISM. its a crime, stop being melodramatic and be real. also calling the police without a purpose is also illegal and not TERRRRRISM!?!?!! this is the problem with america, half wits over exaggerate everything so once something really bad happens no one cares because yall keep crying wolf

rjh00 .... In a really fukin funny way. There i finished ur sentence

Crimson King, you fail to understand the definition of terrorism. There are many problems in america, but calling this terrorism isn't an exaggeration, it's pretty much the defintion.

NerdStoryteller this is one of the bad episode watch the old after hours but make sure it's the old cast

1) It's a shame that's not accurate. Check out Silencerco's channel featuring suppressors which mute the sound of firearms, including shotguns. Or check out their catalog of silencers which they just insist on calling suppressors, despite their company name. They are not the only company like that; just one example of the industry standard. Suppressor is a more technically accurate term, but it's also like how the paintball world uses the term "marker" instead of "gun", because in both cases there is a negative association with the other term. 2) Agreed. This video sucked.

Jon Miller if its a suppressor which reduces the sound of gunshot its called a silent-suppressor. and isnt nearly as effective at one or the other. all an actual suppressor does is mask the muzzle-flash. and the reason why they refer to them as silencers or suppressors interchangeably is because people confuse the words, similar to how people now think the word 'decimate' means just to destroy, and not to destroy to a power of ten (ie: the actual definition)

I'm related to one of the guys at Silencerco. I am corrected every time I accidentally say "silencer" instead of "suppressor". I have discussed the physics of the devices at length. I am quite familiar. This is not my own assumptions. This is from one of the leaders in the industry. Why their name contradicts that is beyond me. Go check out their videos. What they are making is not your grandfather's silencer. Er, suppressor.

Jon Miller yeah, claiming that youre right because "i know a guy" isnt as effective an argument technique as you might think. also i'm talking about the actual technical terms for what the items are. if its a suppressor, it suppresses or obscures muzzle flashes, this technology has been around for like 200 years. if its a silencer, it baffles the noise of a gunshot escaping from the barrel (unless its built into the device, in which case it does so inside the chamber as well). this technology has been reported to be as young as 60 years and as old as 150 years. if it does both, its a silent-suppressor. those are the qualifications for the origination of those terms set by those who created the first of those devices. i've never seen a silent suppressor that actually works well except in the movies, so... People who make them might call them suppressors or silencers, but unless they form to those specific qualifications, they just aren't.

LoudAngryJerk I don't expect it to sway you by itself, just give you reason to think about it some more and find out for yourself. You seem incredibly sure of yourself for someone who is, in fact, not correct. I mean if you're right then everyone who has edited the Wikipedia page on the subject is wrong. Hundreds of edits from dozens of users going back half a decade. All wrong. But you're right. Try this: Search wikipedia for "silencer". There is no such article. There is, however, a link to the page on Suppressor, " a device attached to or part of the barrel of a firearm which reduces the amount of noise and flash". Now Wikipedia itself is not an especially reliable source, but it is an excellent starting point if you take the time to follow the links to the actual sources, such as the one where the ATF does call them silencers, but decidedly does not distinguish between silencers and suppressors for any reason. Historically the only significant difference between "silencer" and "suppressor" has been one of branding, as many, including the original, were called Silencers as part of their product name. But the technical term is, in fact, suppressor for the same device. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppressor

+Nova Sky Well all remarks aside it is common for police to put their feet, legs or otherwise stomp on suspects on the ground during dangerous calls while the suspect gets handcuffed.

+Nova Sky i feel bad for that guy cause he was compliant

+Nova Sky I'm not sure about "normal procedure" but from first hand knowledge I know that a not too small percentage of police were the kids that gave wedgies, randomly punched kids, stuffed kids in lockers, etc, in high school. Even in college, I had some fellows taking Police Foundations course over for prebar brews and they all bragged about wanting to cause bar fights and how they were looking forward to becoming officers so they could "legally" beat the shit out of people. Most police are great people though.

Emily Nelson go to Japan and catch the ferry to the island

care to elaborate?

On which part? The fact that that's not how gay sex works or the fact that someone breaking through the back window of your car to get in and them not getting caught or found is probably a very bad thing?

Raidengale on how you know for a fact she's dead.

*shrugs* Just saying that that is a crazy situation. As a pessimist, I say that's the most likely outcome is all.

Raidengale is that a confession? do you want to tell as something?

Actually its JorJor :D Kootra was abducted by lord Gaben after a false knife unboxing

Just Lam i though he was called hoarden

mshesh16 The point I was making is I've seen videos the exact same, or worse from the US. The US idea of Russia being backward and poverty stricken, is how most of the world views the US. That was the irony I was pointing out.

+cmomofilm The USA is run by and liberally peppered with morons people should laugh at us. Also every other State across the globe.

+cmomofilm russia is worse

+cmomofilm No but kill all minorities because america is the only relevant nation >tfw people unironically spout the meme that is /int/ + /pol/

+cmomofilm I don't see how anyone can think America is poverty stricken when they probably consume more than any other country. If anything the US needs to cut back on the luxuries.