deep stuff

Agree, also $100 worth of groceries is heavy to bag and to drag home. I have no car. Having groceries delivered is well worth the membership. I also tip.

I prefer getting rewards money from my Visa card. Also, don't want to carry cash due to possibly of being robbed. It's crazy out there.

lol cats don’t cost much... until you learn about FORL.

Thank YOU, nexsolost! 😊

😁 Thanks for watching, Sacar!

😁

I think you've probably heard Kate Kaden talk about it, Scott! Xxx

I wouldn't call it the best. Maybe the best that works for you. Cash in my hands is quickly gone. This is why a video like this, that's considerate and takes different people and lifestyles into account, is always better than the "this is the one and only solution for all" approach.

@@bleh329 cash in the hand is a physical way of making a transaction. If trying to save you are conscious of the transaction in a more objective way. Transfering 200 pounds/dollars is no different to transfering 20 pounds/dollars when using the card (with exception of the physiological aspect). Handing 200 in cash is clearly differnt to handing over 20. Try to use cash and be tight with it as best you can... Trust me it's the best method to saving. With savings money, it depreciates over time... So saving money is pointless if inflation can't be met inline with by the banks. So then you need to think about how to invest in items or other assets that will generate a return. Good video. Always good to discuss the subject. When it comes to money though, the theory is always straight forward when the reality is different. This is because of the 'impulsive' nature of human beings. Last year I bought an original signed poster for 100pounds. Recently seen another from the same band signing up for sale for 10,000 pounds. Better I spent that 100 hundred than saved it in the bank.

@@terencebarnett9891 what? Cash is physical?? My goodness, Terry, why didn't you say so sooner? You mean to tell me that the dollar bills I can physically hold in my hand are physical?! 😲 Honey, what works for you doesn't work for everyone. Deal with it.

@@bleh329 look love, piss someone else off or go swig a gallon of diesel or something. Sadly the internet invites everyone... including morons!!

@@terencebarnett9891 😀 😃 😀

It's okay, but hoarding money sounds like you have a deepmseated fear of losing it. Maybe address that fear first and foremost 🤍🤍

It's okay to have things a be a minimalist, yes. Saving money to ensure you can live comfortably during a time you may no longer be able to make money is not hoarding.

You mean just don't spend money? Brilliant. Finance pros must hate this guy!

2. eat from the garbage cans of others

Hm. No. There are too many. They are too expensive. It's inconvenient. And many Americans are wasting hundreds of dollars on subscriptions every year that they don't even remember they have. Which is actually the purpose of these subscriptions. Pile on so many people are eventually paying for nothing. Like how companies hope you'll never use those last few bucks on that gift card. So, no. I'll leave ... intelligent peoples like yourself to bail out the poor, poor subscription corporations.

the streaming services are the middle men, so if you're really worried about artists urge people to support them directly, either via direct downloads (like Bandcamp for musicians) or by signing up to patreons of people they like. Or donations, or merch even. Or by going to shows, festivals, etc. Currently not an option a lot of places, but just saying that streaming doesn't equate to actual support. Look into how Spotify distributes the payouts and you'll realise it's not in the interest of the general artists, but rather in large labels and mainstream artists.