5 Most Economical Turbine Powered Airplanes

Рет қаралды 23,366

Күн бұрын

Start your Pilot Journey Today lookupflightacademy.com
Below are the specs for each plane.
JMB EVOLUTION
Engine: 750 HP
Speed: 333 mph
Range: up to 1081 miles
Fuel: 37 gph
Price: $1.8 million
PIPER M700
Engine: 700 HP
Speed: 346 mph
Range: up to 2129 miles
Fuel: 50 gph
Price: $4.2 million
TBM 960
Engine: 850 HP
Speed: 379 mph
Range: up to 1989 miles
Fuel: 60 gph
Price: $5 million
EPIC E1000
Engine: 1200 HP
Speed: 383 mph
Range: up to 1794 miles
Fuel: 50 gph
Price: $4.5 million
PILATUS PC-12 NGX
Engine: 160 HP
Speed: 303 mph
Range: up to 2073 miles
Fuel: 63 gph
Price: $5 - $7 million

Пікірлер: 25

@joebloggs8785 Ай бұрын

The Evolution looks like the ultimate personal aircraft. The others each come with their own advantages, but the affordability of the Lancair really makes it a dream plane.

@reed785M Ай бұрын

Yup, they are aiming square at cirrus owners. It seems way better than the vision jet at sr22T prices

@danielnofal Ай бұрын

We clearly need to make more money fellow pilots

@veveomidoc Ай бұрын

That was a great comparison video!!

@brent1041 Ай бұрын

Turbine legend would be a fun option.

@RR-kl6sl Ай бұрын

For years I've been enjoying your videos man, thank you for making them you truly enhanced my overall aviation knowledge and enjoyment. Thanx again from Europe !

@brucetwilliams7469 Ай бұрын

Great Video. Thanks for the content.

@AC-jk8wq Ай бұрын

Nice work Mike!

@RR-kl6sl Ай бұрын

Would be interesting if you had added which of the planes can do soft field landings / take offs and maybe an short overall comparison chart of them all . `Other than that great video !

@Dan_C604 Ай бұрын

Great brief review! I enjoyed it. Sadly, the single turboprops have killed the twin turbos for a long shot, unless specific applications where a king air is needed. I miss the C90s…!

@DanFrederiksen Ай бұрын

You can do a video comparing private operating costs of an Eclipse vs your pick of turboprop. There is a 2008 Eclipse for sale right now for 1mil. 1600 hours, TBO is 3500 but probably overhaul at 1800 or so. Last I checked with P&W the engines were 922k a piece. I think it's an illusion that turboprops are significantly cheaper to run.

@bogecoss Ай бұрын

Any kind of FIKI on it? I don’t see anything like that on it!

@Alfra1324 Ай бұрын

I’ll take the TBM! 😊

@scottstewart5784 26 күн бұрын

I'll take two!

@ytlongbeach Ай бұрын

Surely the PC-12 NGX stated HP is not correct, right? 160HP ?

@mts982 Ай бұрын

do you recommend single prop over dual prop? what dual prop planes do you recommend?

@nostradamus7648 Ай бұрын

I'd recommend the Diamond DA62 or DA42 for safety and reliability. If you're interested in jets, then the HondaJet Elite.

@mts982 Ай бұрын

@@nostradamus7648 for dual prop = PIPER CHEYENNE 400LS. for jet e550.

@aldohattonduran5227 Ай бұрын

Excelente excelente Bro 🫵🏼 I know you're busy with the flight ✈️ school 🏫 but please.. don't stop the full length videossssss ✈️🙏🏼✌🏼 all the best 🏆🥇

@stefanoferri1485 Ай бұрын

Owning an airplane is generally not economically at all its purely for the sport of it..

@alancarroll7764 Ай бұрын

Yeah, nice, but a turboprop engine costs almost as much to maintain as a jet engine!

@montyklaus7223 Ай бұрын

Economical? I’m not sure you know what that word means.

@paulocesarmello7875 Ай бұрын

@realnewsthatmatters9319 Ай бұрын

If you can afford to buy any of these planes, you can more than likely afford the upkeep on a Honda Jet. I’d take the Honda any day over any of these birds.