Who does expect that Chinese team will loose to Malaysia except a real mad ??!!!😠😠

@@sujitkumarbiswas2214 they know china will win.. but the MS is 50-50 with slight lcw advantage..

for me The Olympics is Lindans Greatest Master Piece

Yes also a really crazy stat, especially if you look at the record from other players when they played Lee Chong Wei

Ha ha ha ha 😆. I don't know why you people are forgetting the Chinese Rule over decades in badminton. And except Indonesia, not even Denmark was not in scenario. Try to think 1st, better you'll understand later. See, think in this manner that Chinese won 28 battles, lost 12 battles. Isn't it quite astonishing? Well, in next, loosings aren't against Denmark, Indonesia, or even England. That's against Malaysia, Japan. It's like USA faced a defeat in basketball against Bhutan!!!!! But if it'll be so then that's a new sunrise, a new hope for more sunlight. Wins of USA are excellence of basketball but Bhutan's win is the rich prosperity of basketball. A scorecard is a donkey bcoz it doesn't reflect everything in behind. 👃👃

IMO i felt that lin dan was exactly built to defeat lcw as a player. His playstyle really go against lcw playstyle. It's like Lindan was his kryptonite. LCW fan btw, but really lin dan is just insane

It's like Lee Chong Wei dominated over everyone. Then Lin Dan dominated over Lee Chong Wei. Too bad LCW retired early.

Hmm, terrible feelings. I can't oppose anyone's feelings. I may oppose any logic. 😁😁😁 Awesome idea that creator creating someone in Malaysia and at the same time someone in China just to oppose him 🤣🤣🤣. 199 weeks continuously and 368 weeks continually staying as number one proves his consistency above all others. One fine evening, you may win a final but, you can't be or continue World Ranking 1. 😁😁😁 Lin was born champ and legend beyond any doubt. 👃👃👃 But LCW proved his ruling over legends. Don't be fanatic as a fan bcoz statistics provided have alternative pages too.

Thank you! Glad you liked it!

Ur toxic

@@haoningzhang4640 Show me

Nice fact

Or maybe evolution of different playing styles throught history, for example how racket and shoe technology affected game, how faster footwork affected rallies etc.

Did the change to the rally point system affect anything? 🤔

And lost by unluck

Mr. Lendol never got Wimbledon. But we can find only few players better than him 😂😂😂😁. So, Evan was poor than other champs!! Federar won French Open only once in his career. So, surely Nadal is better!! George Best never played a World Cup. So, he's a substandard player!! Pogba must be better than LM 10 or CR 7 due to World Cup!!!! Sergei not got Olympic gold so he's not good enough!!!!! 😁😁 Nothing succeeds like success is not applicable in sports and games Sir. 😁😁😁

nah, he had injury and age problems and therefore inconsistent tournament play. His speed wasn't good anymore

@@Keepcalm-lovesports that son of a bitch won Malaysian open 2019. How many players in the world won men's singles super series in 2019?

So true. When I was going through all the stats and results LCW also amazed me so many times!

LCW stats would have been more amazing if he did not face LD so many times

LCW born in a wrong era.

In apart, one major thing you missed Sir. If you play robotic, you've to be caught in video analysis. Sorry, major Chinese players are robotic among players here mentioned. And everyone knows that robots are best performer. Sorry Sir. Regards 🙏.

As anyone becomes older they become slow. So they l loose Even in first or second round also. So is Lin Dan .

@@kalyankishore2042 yes but the first thing you lose is recovery not speed. LCW despite his age was one of the fastest players on tour. So your argument for 'anyone' is proven wrong there. All players, find it difficult to win later rounds in a tournament not 1st second rounds. Even lin dan, himself complained in his recent losses that he lost because he wasn't given enough recovery time. And I think lin dan knows more than us why he loses.

@@asadnoor6551 lin dan knows about him better than us i's the right ans 😜 Good one. 👍

lin dan never care about super series. every body know this. on his older age, he already won everything. his only target before retired was 3rd olympic gold medal. he was not really interested in other tournament. even though his dream for 3rd olympic gold was a failure. at least he try. super series for him was just to keep his ranking to be "enough" for the olympic.

All the best!

Does your parents know that you are on youtube?

Goodluck

I dont think so

Shubham kento

YEAH!!!!!!

So, you seem like man of jurisdiction 😇😇😇

@@TimmyVision not even close.. sorry. the closer player to lin dan prime is Lee chongwei

@@xmb6793 i Guess not. Lee Chong Wei aint clutch when the stakes are high

Lee Chong Wei coming tomorrow: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z8ldm8Zzqpu2hoE.html ;)

As far as i know it is not possible to get all 5 stars at the moment but I may be wrong

@@tobiaswadenka8435 true

Yes me too. Would be awesome if every player has something like that on his back or sleeve for certain tournaments

Cool idea, as it seem that there are a lot of people enjoying those kind of videos I will think about doing more of them!

Thanks Tobias. I look forward to it!

Thank you. More coming soon 😉

🤣🤪 let's keep that streak going

Excuse me Sirs. I didn't dislike but I opposed. 😁😁

Yes maybe but i think none of these two would have become so outstanding and great without the other one ;)

@@tobiaswadenka8435 great statement 👏

Erwischt XD

@@tobiaswadenka8435 Aber dann kann es ja nur gut werden. :D

Ich hoffe ich werde dem Vorbild halbwegs gerecht und konnte ein paar spannende Dinge zusammentragen

@@tobiaswadenka8435 Schönes Video. Dem Vorbild gerecht geworden. :D Sind die Statistiken von dir handgezählt? Sowas luxusriöses wie basketball-reference kenne ich für Badminton leider noch nicht.

Cool idea. Maybe for the next video =)

One thing about what you said there. If you ask professional players what tournaments are most important to them it’s usually 1. Olympics 2. World champs 3. All England, there’s no cherry picking here

As a huge Momota fan, I had a lot of the same thoughts, especially regarding the number of matches played in 18' and 19' vs Lin Dan's shorter seasons, and being interested in knowing the stats for other high-level tournaments such as the Indonesia Open. Early in his career, Momota has already hit a few big accomplishments Lin Dan never will, such as the 1000 level grand slam in a year, 11 tournament titles in a year, and consecutive 90%+ win records on 70+ match seasons. Another thing that's difficult always comparing between eras, is the game evolves, and the level typically goes up, and the depth of the field increases. According to professional Danish player Vittinghus, who played Lin Dan through in his prime and has played Momota several times in the past couple years, the depth of men's singles is noticeably higher now than it was 10 years ago, and also he believes Momota is unquestionably better than Lin Dan or Lee Chong Wei ever were. The increase in depth makes Momota's win % even more impressive. In addition, coming back from a suspension where you couldn't train with the national squad or play tournaments in your prime for an entire year adds to the height of the accomplishment. All that being said, Lin Dan is the unquestionable GOAT of badminton and these stats are incredible. Really shows his level of dominance over a long period of time. It will take virtually another decade of similar dominance from Momota in the past couple years to match some of these stats, incredible.

Paul Chow what you said is fairly accurate. But the issue with momota being so great comes with caveat. LCW beat Kento fairly recently while kento was in his prime and LCW was not. The match was fairly even too. So since Kento and LCW were roughly the same level in 2018 I think. It just shows that LD was definitely better than any version of momota now. And this era does seems weaker than the previous. We had the 4 kings LD, LCW, TH, PG. currently it’s just momota with no real rival. Also Axelsen must be the luckiest player of all time. Momota couldn’t play for all the major competitions Axelsen won. I would say Axelsen would not a world champ or All England if momota could have played.

​@@kenkyuen This is conclusion is too simplistic. 1. What is Momota's "prime"? He was banned at 21 years of age, wasn't even allowed to train with National Team players for 1 1/2 years. Malaysia Open 2018 (where he lost the final to LCW) was his first 500 + tournament in 2 years - in badminton age, he's maybe 22 at that time, in real years, he was 23. Tell me, how "prime" was LCW at that age (that's the years 2003 and 2004)? 2. LCW won the Malaysia Open 12 times. As far as I know, no other player has won a single Open tournament even remotely as much. LD "only" won China Open 6 times, for example. He has a 76-6 record for MO, winning 93%. LD's best for a single tournament is Fouzhou China Open with 39-5 or 89% winning percentage. Malaysia Open is to LCW what French Open is to Nadal. The other two times LCW played KM in 2018, KM won in straight games. 3. LCW maintained his body and form for longer than LD. He had winning percentages of 75% and 85% for the last two years of his career. LD's numbers for the same age: 55% and 57%. Plus, he got really thrashed by Momota 3 times in those years, unlike LCW. 4. I agree that there is no group of absolute top players (yet) at the moment like the era you mentioned. However, the "4 kings" era is also a bit hyped, imo.+Taufik was really only good for the first few years of his career and became declined basically at the same time that LCW became good. They were barely top class at the same time. PG was several years older than the others and only won a single tournament after 2008. So there isn't as much overlap of greatness as the term might suggest. Furthermore, Badminton has changed a lot in the past few (!) years. While extremely buff guys where a rarety even a couple of years ago (LD, LCW, CL), they are now the norm. Compare the physiques of KM and VA from their SSF match in 2015 and then now. Look at LZJ, Antonsen, CTC, SYQ, VA - the sport is much faster than it was even 5, let alone 10 years ago. Watch matches from then and now, you'll notice quite the difference. 5. Making sweeping conclusions from one single match is quite silly. Novak Djokovic has a 1-1 h2h against Chung Hyeon. Federer's h2h against the same player is 2-0. Can we now conclude that "prime" Federer is better than "prime" Djokovic? Come on, man.

Cunning Linguist dude you’re wrong man. KM won world champs so that means he’s in his prime or at least approaching it. If lcw can even match it. It just shows Momotas era is weaker period.

Well, we saw 35 yrs old LCW defeated prime Momota. And here we already saw prime LD vs prime LCW.

Then i am sure you will like my next video 😉

Here you can find out about my story as player and coach: www.tobiaswadenka.com/2019/08/09/my-story/ Besides that I share a lot about my daily training, equipment, etc. on Instagram so you can follow me there @tobiwadenka ;)

@@tobiaswadenka8435 I to have a dream to have a racket like u

Hi Manuel, ja kann ich verstehen und habe auch lange überlegt, den Kanal auf deutsch zu machen aber für KZfaq wäre die Zielgruppe (zumindest im Moment noch) sehr klein geworden. Aber mit dem Podcast Shuttletalk gibt es zumindest für die Ohren jede Woche etwas für deutsche Badmintonfans ;)

Already thinking about future videos with stats ;)

Well that’s just delusional but okay, what criteria are you using to judge greatest? Just your eye test I guess cause it’s not even close. It’s 100% Lin Dan

Yes 😅 huge fan

@@tobiaswadenka8435 He's great! Love your technique video's, very high quality with great pointers! Fun to throw these things in here as well

@@teunvanderlaan6702 thank you 😊 great to hear that