😂

I’m sure there has to be a cheat code to get around that and have unlimited money lol

Not me im on holiday tomorrow 😅

I'm retired🤣🤣

@@bestkind123Im going to need a programming error, right now!

According to the One Simon theory, they're all the same Simon.

​@@Jay-ln1coWe are all Simon.

And in one of those multiverses, Simon believes in Ancient Aliens, and Decoding the Unknown has a very different premise.

Imagine the amount of sponsor money he has across all of those universes lol

Simon’s KZfaq channels are the only real constants in the multiverse.

Thank you, 💜 fellow ape-brained creature from this Universe! ❤❤

You are the one

"There is no proof you exist, only evidence." - Cecil Gershwin Palmer, Welcome to Night Vale

The fact that we're all bored by 3 says this is a simulation

If we are in a simulation, the creator is evil.

Why bother about computer simulations when we already know we live in human simulations. From your own world view and ego to whatever society you live in these are all just things of our own creation as a humans.

Exactly. Whatever our reality truly is doesn't effect our day in day out lives until the truth can be applied by us to assist our existence.

Same here. One cell off a big creature or the brain of a big creature.

I always thought we exist within an infinite fractal

What I find wild is that I had these same thoughts as you guys completely independently from each other. It makes me wonder if the theory of receiving information telepathically has some merit.

The problem with the analogy is that cells aren't anything like the large scale structure of the universe. There is, at best, slight visual similarity if you squint and let you imagination run wild. The moment you get into any of the details, the analogy just falls apart completely.

What if we're just a hemorrhoid inside a giant creature's anus cavity, living happily till the creature poops us out. Welcome to URANUS! Ha-Ha

In at least one universe Simon doesn’t even have one KZfaq channel. That’s a difficult concept to wrap your head around.

@@CAP198462 quit spreading such negativity. ☺️

Simon is the bloated spider at the center of the multiverse gorging himself on endless ad revenue created by his endless avatars, and thus holding all the skiens of reality together. From what I understand his studio is actually on a turtles back.

What if we are only seeing the projections of different "Simon" living a similar life, from different realities! 🤯

@@WhitePapi83 😱

Kinda sad tbh. A prisoner who is tortured daily who all of a sudden gets a week off from torture would also be thankful. Give them a great dinner and they’d be even more thankful. But don’t forget it’s relative, they r still a prisoner and will go thru more torture

thr facxt we are here is acosmic set of random events, that chance of the same random events happening elsewhere are i am sure true, but look at the rtandom events, there are thousands of them.. from the first really big one another cellestial body smashing int earth...i think we are alone in the universe

ok back to your 9 to 5 and worrying about bills please...

@@connectlogicman idk if it’s cause I’m on shrooms or what but this just broke my brain bro. We deadass just created all this nonsense

If you live in the West and are a pampered pooch then all is great. If you live in the East probably not so great. For the rest they probably think they are in hell.

“Infinite” is… impossible. Even space has edges out there somewhere. Einstein was only half correct.

​@@Havoc2305just because our brain can't comprehend it doesn't mean it doesn't exist

@@hansjuh5588 You may be correct. That’s another big question. If we are in a simulation, then our brains are limited I suppose to only see what we are meant to see. What we call Physics, is just the rules and parameters of the simulation? And yeah, “Infinite”. That word has always bothered me. Especially for our scientists using it. We only know most of what we do of space strictly through our telescopes. But, also, wouldn’t a mathematician or Physicist technically say our laws of math and physics don’t allow something to be infinite. I mean, it’s literally impossible to know imperially isn’t it? The truth is. We thought we were small and insignificant? Literally WAYY smaller of space goes on forever. Lol. I love these ideas just blow my mind.

@@hansjuh5588 You may be correct. That’s another big question. If we are in a simulation, then our brains are limited I suppose to only see what we are meant to see. What we call Physics, is just the rules and parameters of the simulation? And yeah, “Infinite”. That word has always bothered me. Especially for our scientists using it. We only know most of what we do of space strictly through our telescopes. But, also, wouldn’t a mathematician or Physicist technically say our laws of math and physics don’t allow something to be infinite. I mean, it’s literally impossible to know imperially isn’t it? The truth is. We thought we were small and insignificant? Literally WAYY smaller if space goes on forever. Lol. I love these ideas just blow my mind.

​@@Havoc2305me too.u put it better than I could lol. When I dream there as real as I'm writing this."life weird man lol

Now please show timestamps not to be high and watch

There all Theorys nothing about space can be factually proven

Lol like there aren't already timestamps in the video

You didn’t get enough attention growing up huh?

Or me. [falls up steps]

Jumps down snaps ankle

Gay👍

Some of us got some weird programming

this just itches the right spot !!!

And we are basically beings of electricity

He was a real big brain.

*Bleidon Say no More !*

🍄🍄🍄

@@goosenotmaverick1156 Do MMs even grow in that part of the world?

Did they have the concept of the "universe" at that time, or was it just the flat disc Earth with the sun and mood orbiting it? He probably just thought that there were other disc Earths, either with our sun and moon including these other Earths in their orbit (that would explain day and night: the sun would be over some of the other Earths during the day), or the other Earths, each having their own sun and moon. Each disc Earth supported on an infinite tower of turtles, of course. 😀

Simon...get on it. I want to know history and how dish towels are made. Miniprojects: The towel

I… I had no idea I wanted this.

​@mikenapier3598 always bring a towel 42!

Could he not just work for How It's Made? I do like the robot sounding woman with the bad puns, but Simon would be a twist

Toilet paper starts as basically a 2400lb (roughly 1000Kg) massive single roll. It is transported by forklifts with giant clamps on the front, turned sideways, and placed into a large series of machines. First is the unwinder, which spools out the tp to the next machine, which is essentially a giant perforator to separate the single sheet into segments. This is the fed into a "rewinder" (as in to wind again, not reverse) which layers them onto the cardboard core "logs". These logs are then fed through a spinning saw which cuts them into the individual rolls, which are then fed into a conveyor belt. The rolls then either go through a machine which wraps them in paper individually, or continues without wrapping. They are then packaged. Source : I work for a company that produces toilet paper for a significant portion of Texas penitentiary facilities.

The hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy? The hyper intelligent pan-dimensional beings ( 🐁 🐁) in the book fit that description too.

Mixing Simulation with the idea of Intelligent Design misses some of the nuance imo One has no idea where or when the start point of the simulation is, or it's purpose. It's just as likely that the simulation starts at the big bang, and everything that happens afterwards is chaotic random nonsense in the confines of a set of universal laws. The rise of organic life on earth being a happy little accident for a lot of us, but not planned to be this way specifically. To assume that the simulation starts 6000 years ago with the "dawn of human civilization", and everything that came before was preprogrammed to appear to have existed for billions of years is incomprehensible. It's probably all automated if there is a sinulation, so it's not entirely impossible to imagine some unimaginable quantum machine running said simulation could do such a thing, but that seems like a stretch to me that it would want to. Humanity is not that special or important. The universe is vast. We and our miniscule experiences are not the center of it all.

It's quite a pointless theory, it doesn't explain how the universe of the simulators came into being, and there's no way to proof any of it.

We don't. The guy that came up with this idea is a philosopher, not physicist - in short to simulate an universe like ours "the higher civilization" would need MORE particles than could (even in theory) exists in theirs. Remember they would have to simulate everything, like you getting up in the morning or me typing it, but also big things like supernovas, like quantum laws etc - that would require a lot of computer power. Sabine Hossenfelder wrote about and some Chinese professor whose surname I can't recall now.

what if they are using some sort of hyper-quantum computer. by using superpositions they wouldnt need more particles. plus there is this sim theory that things only extist when you look at them or ineract with them. lolz@@RomaInvicta202

"Someone punch him out!"

I'm not an astrophysicist, though that was originally my major in college. However, it seems to me that "dark energy" could be solved by invoking some extra-unuversal force. It could even just be the gravitational pull of other nearby universes, stretching us in every direction.

​@@QBCPerditionjust a layperosn here. That's a great idea. That would fit nicely into the model of a multiverse I like. I think about those big bubble wands. Notice that when the bubble is made, the circle of the wand moves faster than the end of the bubble was that first created. Could it also be something like that? We know waves propagate outward. I'd say the edge of inflation has to be really turbulent and still quick moving. I don't view the MV as soap bubbles persay. I see space/time with pockets of different physics everywhere. Soft boundaries made simply by different physics. Like boundaries between fresh and salt water.

Half of biographics was like that at one point 😅

Agreed. Space observations and theories don't really belong on projects channel. Sometimes I think he rolls dice to decide which channel stuff goes on lol

Say whatcha want 'bout Simon dinkler... .. his big brain moment was snatchin' all the -o-graphics out there.

You are on the right track for sure, but I believe that Stephen King's Dark Tower Series more closely resembles the membrane theory than the multiverse.

Oh, I have those and I need to reread them 😊

Me too…

God isn't

Rougly the same we wpuld be able to see from them...

Uh... What we see, but from a slightly different angle?

That would depend on what color wavelengths they can see. Is their visible spectrum close to ours or a bees? Can they see beyone electromagnetic radiation?

Our sun is considerably brighter than proxima centauri but other than that they’d see our solar system as well as we see theirs if they had the same telescopes as we do🤨

@@timothygreer188 Well if they're using the same telescopes as us then they're receiving the same data to analyse, so same colours regardless of how they subjectively interpret them on their screens. I mean, we don't even tend to capture colours unless we're analysing emission spectra because it decreases resolution and brightness (basically, you need a red, green and blue pixel to together provide one pixel's worth of colour information), plus visible light doesn't penetrate dust well, isn't emitted from cold objects, etc

Feels like if we weren't allowed to figure it out we wouldn't even be able to ask rather we live in a simulation or not.

​@Djoarhet001 that's not exactly the case though. Think about a young child, they are able to ask any question they want, but we don't have to give an answer.

Be fair - a lot of what he says is false - not good for a "factboi".

they knew it was round, but not necessarily that it was a sphere. A flat disc is round too.

​@@Babarudra They mention it was a sphere. *Pythagoras* (c. 570-495 BCE) *Parmenides* (c. 515-450 BCE) mentions it in his writings " on nature" *Plato* (c. 427-347 BCE Plato discussed the concept of a spherical Earth in his philosophical works, including in his dialogue "Timaeus." *Aristotle* (384-322 BCE), another ancient Greek philosopher, also supported the idea of a spherical Earth. He observed that during lunar eclipses, the Earth casts a round shadow on the Moon, which suggests that the Earth is round. *Eratosthenes* (c. 276-194 BCE), a Greek mathematician and astronomer, provided one of the earliest practical demonstrations of the Earth's roundness. He calculated the Earth's circumference with remarkable accuracy using measurements of the angles of the Sun's rays at different locations.

The amount is infinite but the conditions that exists within them vary, in a universe where atoms or something similar can't form then life won't either

@@fakename1656 agree. But the amount that support life would still be infinite.

Same as me I watch and try to put things together and find an answer. When I tell friends there are baffled and they call me crazy 😂

I think the difference between crazy and curiosity comes from an acknowledgment that a theory is not of fact until proven. I personally think there's credibility in 'White holes' (horrible name) having Black holes essentially act as recyclers. But this is something I believe and if I were to research/test it to find evidence of it, I would only regard it as a belief until I can definitely say this is a fact of our reality. Stay curious and engage that imagination! We can all agree that no matter what the true answer is, it's crazy all the same :P

@@hiki_jr6333same here

To be fair there are far worse fates than being a Boltzmann Brain.

@@RHColebeing a Boltzmann 💩

😂

"Rise from your grave"

If we were Pacman, space-time would just be a 3D stack of universe slides, one for each moment in time, and each brain-slide thinking that the moment it's in is the present moment because that's the information state of the brain at that given point in time. Not really a difficult idea once you're familiar with the general principles

Or, quantum mechanics needs to be "relativized," as Lee Smolin said, and time is very real as we can measure it. I mean, QM doesn't even know how to measure things. It just claims it is not possible, desplite measurement being one of the most basic elements of science.

I don't think he's planning to move into adult entertainment, that'd be a bold side-channel

That's the point. The simulation theory ONLY EXISTS BECAUSE the universe appears indistinguishable from reality. It has nothing to do with how you should live your life. It's only used to try and explain the universe, and it would probably help us answer other scientific questions as well.

Yes all great ideas to ponder! But unfortunately no proof of any of them has been discovered. I like to think that in the next life, all these secrets will be revealed. But no proof that will happen either. I recall when I was in college, studying electronics and computer science, when I learned exactly how a television worked I felt light headed! Like the secrets of the universe were being revealed to me. In a way, I guess they were. Everyone watches TV, but very few understand how it actually works.

Check out Everetian quantum mechanics/many world interpretation. Not to be confused with the multiveres theory. It's a very plausible interpretation and anything that can happen, does happen. But not to a you very far away...it is all YOU locally, riding different branches of a splitting quantum wave function. Mind blowing stuff. Credit Hughe Everett for the idea. Dr. Sean Carrol explains it well.

Dreams within dreams are always fun. Or realizing your still in a dream without having woken up yet.

Well there's got to be an original real universe, so the question just shifts to how that got created

​@manmoth4 Ah, the problem of infinite regress. A thorn in the side of the simulation hypothesis, pure big bang origins, basically any argument that claims the universe sprang into existence without a creator of some kind, or the "uncaused cause." I don't have any idea what this uncaused cause is from an empirical perspective, but it is a problem in every scientific theory about the origin of the universe. I have been trying to postulate, as an amateur, a way to get around it, but I haven't yet

@@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle A creator doesn't solve the problem, it just shifts the question. And not so much a problem as just a region of ignorance, something we have yet to understand

@@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle Here's a potential explanation of how something can seem to have an uncaused cause to us, though, based on what I know of M-theory. It's essentially a matter of limited perspective. In general relativity, time is just another spatial dimension. The difference is that causality points in that direction, which dictates the flow of entropy and information etc. Now imagine we're looking at Pacman universe, 2D. We could take every moment in time from this universe and stack a version of that universe in that moment in time up into a 3D structure, like a pile of animation slides. We'd see it as a fixed, static structure, able to see all moments in time, without the illusion of temporal flow or movement, unlike Pacman living inside it. As a static structure, it makes perfect sense to us that it has a start and end, it has finite dimensions after all, but Pacman sees his structure as everything, and so can't comprehend what could exist before the start of it, especially since he doesn't understand time as a spatial concept like we do. He might even start believing bronze-age Pacman goat-herder myths over Pacman scientists because he desires a sense of closure on some level more than they can provide. So imagine our 4D spacetime existed within a higher dimensional superstructure. There could multiple layers of time dimensions, entire timelines laid out from start to finish, this dimension itself playing through its own time dimension that to an even higher dimensional observer would itself seem static. If you see time in this context then it all starts to make sense a bit. M-theory found that all calculations done with the 4 conventional forces can be perfectly replicated by considering them as a purely gravitational phenomenon when considered in 5D, suggesting that we're just gravitational ripples in a brane encased in a universe of at least 5 dimensions, but probably more. Who knows how weird the universe really is if we're just ripples in a brane, like waves in a bathtub that could never escape to the broader world.

All scientists have to have their findings questioned. That's what peer review journals are for. The findings need to be replicated by others

@@NealBurkard-ut1oo indeed

Mental gymnastics of theoretical physicists.

Wtf

Yeah. It’s that inside black holes are universes, which are white holes on the other side. information is never lost to a black hole, it’s simply expelled and reborn into a new universe. That’s why we can never see beyond the edge of space. Because we can’t see outside of the event horizon on the other side. The gravity is too great, because it’s the gravity of our universe/black hole we live in.

@@macynavarro9781 edge of space? It sounds like you assume a thing that we can't know..

The answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything has been well known since the late 70s.

@@mallninja9805 Where can we see that information?

@@mallninja9805I would like to know as well

Very true. Although, it must be said that not every 'seemingly outrageous' claim is true, or even worthy of consideration. In the case of the initially outrageous things claimed to exist or confirmed to exist in the Universe, all have one crucial ace up their sleeve - they have a place within existing, well-understood theories. In the case of gravitational lensing, which I agree is incredible; underlying our existing solid understanding of gravity, it's cause, it's method of action, it's effect on spacetime; etc. Likewise, positing the existence of Neutrinos - ghostly, almost mass-less, electric charge-less particles that pass in their billions through us and the entire Earth every second of every day - would be cheap talk if it were not for the fact that existing theories around Beta decay and conservation of angular momentum in particles physics had left space to predict their existence. I can only imagine the bizarre and frankly hard-to-get-your-mind-around discoveries that are yet to come. I'd never want to live forever, but hot damn I'd love to be able to 'return to life' periodically in the future to discover what humans or our descendants managed to learn about the Universe.

Time is just a spatial dimension with the distinction that causality points in that direction. What exactly "before the big bang" would mean depends on which theory you interpret it under, but under M-theory, branes could have a time dimension within their structure but exist within a larger space, within its own embedded time structure. Go from 4D to 5D and you can have entire timelines within a greater timeline, like a stack of movie discs on your shelf, assuming anyone still uses discs... Or it could be that the whole of reality just has one universal time component, who knows.

Depends on the theory. Sometimes time just compresses, but never reaches a singularity, leaving room for some continuity.

No it doesn't. The guy is a clown.

Your spot on. They’re here to suck in matter and spit it back out when everything “dies”. Idk how scientists skip past the fact that they consume matter. After the “big freeze” they should in theory spit it back out. I.e. the Big Bang.

Must be nice to be so ignorant to think this is a true statement

Hey I appreciate this comment and I have a question. Do you have people that you can talk to about cosmological theory? I’m a scientist and a Christian but I find that every conversation in my life with the bros is 1) sports 2) marvel movies 3) and with the ladies it’s theology (which I don’t mind so much as long as they listen to my 14B year old universe theory). Just wondering if KZfaq comments are possibly the only square for free thinkers these days. Because it isn’t happening in my life.

@@BEEFTEEF4 “Do you have people that you can talk to about cosmological theory?” - I really don’t, I find myself on the internet simply looking for conversation as the internet is the only place I can share my full thoughts. My best conversations always seem to come from online, as most people that i personally know (family, friends) have no interest and/or simply do not get this stuff. Finding people that actually care about space and everything around them is who I tend to have great conversations with. Unfortunately, I can’t just sit and talk to my family about the cosmos, they don’t bother to learn about it

The problem I have with the simulation hypothesis is that would seem to lie outside of science as we know it. By that I mean that I can't see any obvious way to interrogate the 'reality around us' and declare 'simulation!' or 'not simulation!'. Indeed, to me the simulation hypothesis adds to the complexity of our Universe by essentially adding a layer of abstraction to a Universe already full of holes in our understanding. In short, simulation theory seems to be similar to an infinite regress - rather than advance our understanding, it merely pushes our seeking an understanding back to a prior causative actor or event, where we once again ask ourselves if THEY are the ultimate source of causation and if not them, then our infinite regress continues. Ultimately, that regress would seem to be either infinite, or at some ultimate level end with a 'thats-that' explanation, which would likely NOT be the sort of explanation we'd find any solace or comfort in.