Lol, you forgot to handle case explained in the video where player chooses wrong coordinate

Thanks

thank you

can you provide code for the same. It will be nice if you can make video explaining the code and approach. It's high time to start a you tube channel bro

Thank you

thanks

Thanks

thanks sounds good but need to vheck with complete flow but thanks for the input

🥲 same but its worth to spend 199

Noted

Try it out buddy, logic sounds good

Open closed principle, lets say in future you need to add more Piece, you can add it easily

:) thanks

Hi Aniket, to me Piece is an Object which can have both the things "Properties" and "Function". That's why i define it as an object. Rather than enum. But definitely you can also implement the same using enum

@@ConceptandCoding got it, btw thanks for this series Shreyansh. It’s an amazing resource to learn LLDs.

Thank you 🙏

Thank you

yes

@@ConceptandCoding We are totally totally screwed now!

Hi Madhav, you can refer "Head First Design Pattern" book, its good

yes in my view, ot should be sufficient

Got it, one more doubt, why are we not making variables private and using getters/setters Is that not required for games or did I miss something? Thanks.

@@justlc7 that would be good practice, i am focusing more on design, might be some gaps in coding implementation parts

@@ConceptandCoding Got it, thanks for the prompt replies.

Thanks 🙏

umm yea thats also correct

yes, we can, i just thought in future, if any more playing piece need to be introduced with some specific logic, we can add that here. but for this specific X and O you can you Enum too.

Make sense, we can do that

Thanks

@ConceptandCoding, I have joined the community as a member still I am unable to access the videos, is there a specific reason for it?

There is no one solution in LLD, but just think from future perceptive that can more fields will be added in playing piece in future (today it has only piece type), then you have to add them in player class.

@@ConceptandCoding this makes sense. thank you

yes, there might be some buisness logic missing, that can be taken care of easily, but i think with this also design will not get impacted.

Right queue is sufficient too.

Yes we can do. Implementation we can do with many ways, but overall design is imp for this video. But yes there might be efficient way to implement the logic

I think the board interface would be part of board concrete class. And you can make various types of board. In TicTacToeGame class you can use parent board interface for refrencing & apply run-time polymorphism to achieve various types of boards.

Thanks

Possible that some validations are missing we can add those

You're welcome!

Definitely there can be other ways to implement loggers. I used Chain of responsibility to implement it. Could you try to do it some other way, then we can discuss more.

yes winning logic can be taken out of it and put in some static util class.

@@ConceptandCoding okay, this code isn't following Single Responsibility Principle, right?

Depends, how you are grouping your classes. For example: for each method performing some task, we can not put into different class else we will face class explosion issue. So sometimes we have to group some logical related functionality into 1 class. That's why I said in LLD there is no 1 solution. If you think winning logic does not belong to this class and should be other, go ahead but question is will you create separate class for each method?

@@ConceptandCoding "So sometimes we have to group some logical related functionality into 1 class." this clears as I will not create separate class for each method.

There can be many approach, so do try it out

just type the link and you will get there

Hi Ayush, there are 2 types of round 1. LLD Round 2. Machine Coding Round In LLD round, usually it held for 45mins, in that full coding sometimes are not mandatory (depends upon company and interviewer), class diagram and sometimes partial coding works out too. In Machine coding round, it happens generally for more than 1:30hrs (depends upon different company), there they do expect full code with usecases which need to be satisfied.

interviewer can ask you to code Vishal, its a good question for 60mins interview

@@ConceptandCoding I have last round of interview at amazon most probably bar raiser round, my first two rounds were purely technical rounds which I have cleared so will they ask me to code in bar raiser or ask leadership principles related stuff.. I am so much confused right now..pls help

Hi Vishal, i think Bar Raiser round is also rown as Loop round, pls correct me, if this is the case yes in Loop rounds, there will be coding questions+ Leadership principles questions too. Generally Amazon has 5 rounds, of 2 you have cleared then i am thinking its loop round only where rest 3 round will happen including managerial round.

@@ConceptandCoding Things have changed now there are only 4 rounds now. 1 OA + 2 technical + 1 bar raiser.

Vishal, i would suggest, you can join this telegram group t.me/+KwJhmit5yDczNzY1 and ask the question

i am not a c++ guy buddy, sorry

We can add some validation in the code buddy to avoid these kind of situation

​@@ConceptandCoding My second thought was not to keep the playing pieces inside the player and to randomly assign playing pieces to players during the game, eliminating the need for players to change their playing pieces during the game. Would this be a beneficial enhancement, or might it potentially conflict with certain design principles?

@@dineshhardasani415 i has the same thought...did you get your ans?

Right, queue is sufficient here

but how would you add the player to the front in a queue when the cell u specify Is not valid? (filled up)

In some interviews like machine coding round, we have to do complete code too. And in normal LLD round complete code is not mandatory

Hi kindly check the description, I have shared the link there

@@ConceptandCoding plz share i checked in the discription

Both. In 45 mins round, if you can explain with UML, always go for it and try to come up with UML in first 20-25 mins and rest 20 mins keep for coding. Couple of points: - Don't try to create perfect design. - involve interviewer and keep asking for his input.

gitlab.com/shrayansh8/interviewcodingpractise/-/tree/main/src/LowLevelDesign

Hi Subhashish, usage of design patterns is not mandatory. Following SOLID principles is imp. As far as i can recollect, it's a very small question, no design pattern is needed for it. But all SOLID principles properly followed

@@ConceptandCoding Thanks a lot.

Lol i haven't noticed

Hi Ram, i am not comfortable in CPP, college mein padi thi but 7yr in company using Java only. really sorry buddy, but i will let other members if they can help to provide the same solution in Cpp

@@ConceptandCoding Thank You sir

Hi Ram, I can help you with this , if you still need this. Let me know if you do.

@@Prashantkumar-pn6qq sure bro, please provide the codes

@@RamKumar-kz8gg I'll try to push it to github by next week

Out of 33 videos only 6 videos (interview asked questions)are for members only buddy. Rest all open. Kindly have a look again pls

pls check member community post section buddy

Noted.