that's hilarious

🤣

No one else is responsible other than the pilot in command…irrespective.

😂😅

Definitely a holly shit moment 😮

That's very Christmassy 😁@@RodSwansmad

@@RodSwansmad RodSwansmad

Bet the passengers got a cheap thrill

Made me shout "blyat" in my head

Why do you concider thevideo an excitement??,

Makes it a lot easier wind the winds are not gusting. That said, he did do an awesome job!

Well not all of the weight is being put on the landing gear at once... Some lift might still be being produced by the wings and that offsets some of the weight of the aircraft. Still impress though you are right. Lol.

Air oleo strut. Can’t compress a liquid.

When you're up in the air, it seems all light and fine, then when you smack into the ground like that, you remember just how heavy that plane you're sitting in is.

Great recovery but dangerous to not go around

@@brianafc Agreed.

@@XLRSAvwhat recovery?

Recovery? I guess one might say the surface of the runway recovered the airplane from the worsening situation created by the pilot's handling of the controls.

@@gort8203 right. You always see it for what it is as well. 👍. This was classic over controlling by the pilot. And the level pavement straightened the plane out. 😂

No, that was bad, nearly really bad.

@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549 R u an aviation expert? Just looking at a video that was filmed thousands feet away n you making a judgment about it? Lol 😀 😆 🤣

@@LKA8884 it’s not the first landing I’ve seen. I’ve watched the same video you watched, I’m my opinion it was a dangerous amount of roll very close to the ground.

@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549 Don't judge a book by its cover.

@@LKA8884 I’m not judging a book, I’m judging a landing by a video of that landing. The same video that you have used to judge the landing.

Bet that landing opened all the overhead lockers!

China Southern.

China Airlines is Taiwanese

Buttered that landing

​@@dieselfan7406in fact it did! After it parked at the terminal.

That's about 400t of positive going on 😂

Man I hate to see a negative landing😂

Just like American football

The A380 was like "what tough weather conditions?"

@@slidefirst694 🤣😂

Yeah, 'some' wind...

@@chesk8inHey, I blew one off the runway once when I sneezed once as I was walking on the tarmac.

You realize wind has the ability to power entire cities, right? “Some wind” 😂

Any landing you can limp away from............

At Air Canada, we're not satisfied until you're not satisfied (those who've flown AC will know)

None, no damage at all. Had a hard landing inspection and back up in the air.

@@johnandrews3568 Knowing Air Canada, they’ll tack a hard landing surcharge onto the ticket. You have to pay extra for that.

@@squangan so you know. ;)

Yeah sure , good luck

Good for you. Planes are the safest mode of transport. And the worst that can happen is instant death.

​@@kingshanamanBro Wtf?🤣

If you skid on black ice or water on the road do you consider that not "losing control"? Being blown off trajectory by a gust or wind shear _is_ losing control.

I hope you'll appreciate this small grammatical correction. Writing "I'll never miss none of your videos" makes you sound like a Victorian street-urchin out of a Dickens novel such as Oliver Twist or Hard Times. All that's missing is the word "mister" at the end. It's also a double-negative, so to non-Victorian-street-urchins you're actually saying, "I'll always miss all of your videos". What you want to write is "I'll never miss any of your videos, mister" or "I will miss none of your videos, mister". Even, "I shall watch every one of your videos, mister". They are a very good creator though - you're spot on there! They must rack up some amount of Air Miles flying all over the place just to make these clips. Kudos to 3MOA.

Ok, I’ll try to improve my grammar with those tips u gave me 🤓

@@fluchterschoen They don't 'create' anything. All they do is search plane spotting channels for what they think are interesting videos and copy the videos and re-post them as their own. They don't shoot a single foot of any of this footage.

@@EdFhvn Nevertheless, it takes a lot of time and effort! I'm glad that this work is being taken off my shoulders.

Same

Very astute. I read something about a severe crosswind. I think it was in the captions in this video. The footage also supports your crosswind theory. Five thumbs up 👍👍👍👍👍

That China Southern crosswind landing video should be used by EVERY airline in their crosswind landing training modules. Never seen one any smoother or more finely controlled than that.

@@gordonbryan8381easy enough when there is a steady crosswind, but if the wind gusts or drops suddenly, then all the parameters change and the anticipated actions go out the window….

Nope, it was a PIO, even in a very gusty xwind, the 77W has very effective ailerons and a massive rudder surface. The PF over controlled after the gust hit. Speaking from over 11000 hrs of operating the 777 (All variants)

If it should have been a go around then they should have gone around. That much roll that close to the ground is very dangerous.

Yup.. I counted seven.. good eyes amigo

Hahaha .. me too !!!

Windsocks top wind indication is at 15kts.

@@ekbusdriver I had to go back and read up cause I thought I recalled that windsocks had different speed ratings, but I was incorrect and you were correct.

Wow, you fellas really know your windsocks! Once I realised it wasn't a giant carrot on a stick, all I took from it was "ooh, windy!" @ekbusdriver @@northmaineguy5896

Wow I didn't know that!@@ekbusdriver

I know man. Oh man.

Landed a 1000 feet short. They should have been higher on the approach.

Absolutely! The biggest development which i find crazy is how the Avro Lancaster's first flight was a mere 15 years before the Avro Vulcan.

PIO

Or the long version - Pilot Induced Oscillation

Who can blame them!?

Not much flare before the touchdown, resulting in a firm landing. Rather try to squeak out a sweet, smooth landing, this pilot does the right thing in those conditions.

@@ekbusdriver Now I see it. Nose wheel was barely after the main gear. Thanks.

What would be the worst case outcome?

@@rusinoe8364wingstrike, would have caused a crash probably

​@@rusinoe8364 one of the wing would've torn off which would've caused a huge fire. The plane would've skid off the runway. You can only guess

a go around doesn't happen in like half a second. And once they had hit the runway anyways the need for a go around was over.

@@rusinoe8364could have been a wing or an engine making contact with the ground which could have caused a crash

I probably shouldn’t watch this right before my flight today though.

You seem excited. What happened? You switched to Geico and saved a ton of money?

I like to watch air accident documentaries while I’m flying.

They should never roll like that close to the ground.

As a passenger, the view I would have would be the loss of control of my sphincter and everyone else's on the plane !

There's that "Aah!" moment of Toncontin landing.

Usually it involves the phone going flying and you see random inside shots.

@@MeppyMan And that's exactlly the reason they prohibit using phones / cameras while landing: a flying device could hurt a fellow pax.

It was the most boring.