Thank you for your kind words!

Thanks mate. Appreciate it!

Any time!

Thanks for watching! Thanks man!

Me too, I'm getting mine Monday

Thanks for watching! I always appreciate it!

They will fit you just fine!

Any time!!

thank you!!!!

Yep! Using them as my primary earbuds for everything and I totally agree. I think the bass is a tad weak (when making music, I notice that I usually feel comfortable with the bass when it's at +4 dB), and I definitely agree with you about the sibilance being harsh. I remember calling friends on discord (they didn't have pop filters) so it hurt my ears haha I'm a pretty noob when it comes to this stuff but I vibe with it, and I think $20 is super cheap

If I have the change I will!

@@SuperChonk thank you very much! I love the way you review!

I think avoiding kz earphones is a good choice. The zero 2 is a good choice if you value the booms. But if you want positioning precision then the Salsnote Zero would be good.

Great to see you again!

Zero:2 has between 1-3dB more bass up to 200Hz than the OG Zero. Lower treble has been reduced by 1dB as well.

@@KopiOkaya sounds like a good change i found the 1, a tad little bit to bright.

Because this is raw uncompensated data obtained through a custom software from Kippel unlike freeware such as REW. Most drivers struggle at both ends of the spectrum unless it’s a dedicated sub bass driver. Great that you spotted this!

Its a very different take on the Zero from the original. So if you are not a fan of the original do give this a try! It still has the resolution but in a different signature class.

@@SuperChonk I don’t own the og zero but I might get these soon!

Not yet! But should be available soon on Linsoul!

I disagree, they fit nicer like this

definitely zero 2 is better cuz it dont has a lot of peaks that makes some frequencies stand out more than others and also this has more bass but also the treble is there but less distracting so it will be very good for valorant and such games

Slightly better but the neutral signature of the original Zero makes details a little more obvious. The newer (Zero:2) natural-warm has an edge but isn't as obvious.

Okay, seems to be more of a tonality "upgrade" then, which is appreciated but i am looking for more details with a slightly warmer signature than the OG zeros. What you can get for $25 is truly amazing though, i got back into the iem game after a few years and it is amazing!

@@andr192 Really though if you want greater resolution, you still have to move up the ladder. Perhaps look at things like the Truthear Nova or Simgot EA1000! But for the price with a slight bump in resolution and newer tonal colour, I'd call this a win.

@@SuperChonk oh, this are 100% a win but i think i will just move up the ladder quite a bit, i don't want to be chasing my own tail for ages 😅

​@@SuperChonk That's a great insight, thank you!

More punchy and clearer than the Hola!

currently have this dilemma and want to upgrade from my KZ ZSN Pro X, and also interested getting Salnotes Zero 2 or Moondrop Chu II.. still cant decide but leaning towards this Zero 2, also have my fav color orange.

Perhaps have a look at RikugokdouGoku database (Google doc). In there are some great budget cable recommendasions.

Yeah mate! Haha we were there.

Stuck between the two as well

definitely zero 2 is better cuz it dont has a lot of peaks that makes some frequencies stand out more than others and also this has more bass but also the treble is there but less distracting so it will be very good for valorant and such games

Neutral and warm are 2 ends of a spectrum. I found that the Zero 2 sits kinda in the middle of that while the original zero leans to neutral a bit more. The Zero 2 has a friendlier signature that more people can accept.

​@@SuperChonkHello, thank you for responding. The truth is, I'm new to this world and it's a bit challenging for me. What I meant to say was that I'm looking for something flatter, but with a bit of bass-not excessive. Something not too cold, where the bass isn't the main focus, just present. Thanks again for responding.

@@xxdanielpiandaxx6069 no problem. Happy to help. Both are ok. I found the zero 2 to be more fun while the original zero to be a little more serious. You won’t go wrong either way !

​@@SuperChonk"Thank you, friend. Now you have one more subscriber. I think I'll go for the 02; I want to take it slowly until I get used to what they call 'neutral,' so I believe it will be a good purchase. Previously, I had the TRN MT4 with a V-shaped signature, if I'm not mistaken, so I feel it will be a good upgrade,

​@@xxdanielpiandaxx6069 Good choice, mate. If you somehow find that the bass (most likely sub bass) is too much for you still with Zero 2 it's MUCH easier and safer to fix with EQ than the OG Zero.

Simgot EA1000

And Truthear Nova

@@rickelijah4270 thanks

Would go with the Zero 2. Not a fan of moondrop qc these days.

Thanks for the spot! Too late now hahahahaha

I don't think the price is actually confirmed yet

​@@hello_2221 8:54 He literally mentioned in the video that it's $25... It's not yet available to the public but these reviewers with early access know.

@@roundabout9452 Even then that's not really a big difference, maybe if it was 10 dollars I would shy away from it but 5 dollars really isn't much. Also, on Amazon at least, at some point they raised the price of the original zeroes from $20 to $23 but then basically perpetually gave it a coupon for a discount that brought it right back down to $20. Would not be surprised if they ended up doing the same to the Zero:2s. Also, regarding EQ, I am definitely not against it, but (at least for me personally) I have situations where I cannot use it, since I switch between many different devices, and some of them don't support EQ. Neither do I want to go through the hassle of setting it up on a bunch of devices. Definitely can respect your decision not to get them since you can just EQ to them, but for me, since the tuning basically gives exactly what I felt was missing from the original zeroes, I think I will get them.

I also wish they'd made changes to the build, but otherwise it's a really nice upgrade. They changed a driver for an improved version, which is evident in lower measured distortion (stunningly low regardless of the price) and a significantly decreased the ~10 dB resonance peak in the treble around 12 kHz, which you can't properly get rid of with EQ (you can easily make the sound significantly worse instead) since it shifts depending on the insertion depth and seal. It's as good as it could get for this price.

Who cares, it's cheap. Usually people who buy at this price don't care about anything you say. And most of those who buy at this price are beginners or those who just want to listen to BGM during their activities.

@@thomasdanny7717 son please colabs. Simple

@thomasdanny7717 and who cares on what you say? Not me for sure.... Internet hero we have here

​@@paulosilva8200 No need to care what I say, the market has already answered everything. The cheap-fi that you laugh at is very marketable. There are no European or American brands visible there.

@thomasdanny7717 really. You are trying to teach me that cheap sells better. Uauuuu. Something new to me. Thanks Einstein

Is there any you'd like me to review?

@@SuperChonk now i feel bad, so sorry but i this iem is the same as zero, just little bit batter treble and more bass, nothing new about it and reviewers dont mention that at all, also at time the iem market has grown so much and 20$ price is much capable then this iem, the way u represent it like it is good option is not right in my opinion

Same diameter ≠ same driver

did you see the graph? @@sssVeee

@@basilalharbi3293 yes