And she fit 4 billion years into 8 minutes.

Except it was made-up storytelling. What evidence did she give for anything, yet you swallowed it? Listen to it again - she's just telling a story. It's opinion expressed as absolute fact. See my long rebuttal. Actually, I'll paste it here for you. "We know all this happened." No, you don't. You have told a fantasy story which is not based on science, but on wishful thinking. In attempting to explain the diversity of life - its existence, even - without intelligent input - means that you must be making it up, as I will seek to demonstrate. "Predictions for the future?" Yes, two of evolution theory's most famous 'predictions' were that human DNA is 98% "junk" and that the human body has dozens of "vestigial" organs - functionless body parts left over from our imaginary evolutionary past of going through all sorts of stages. These two predictions would have been logical and reasonable with belief in the Theory of Evolution. However, both predictions have been proven wrong. We did *not* go through all those stages at all. The creation prediction, on the other hand, that DNA mainly all had a purpose (and all mutations have occurred since the Fall) and that there were no vestigial organs in humans was undeniably the more correct prediction now we know so much more. How much damage to medicine over decades did the evolutionist predictions cause? Who can say? "There is no bigger data than the fossil record." The 'data' contained within the DNA of all living things would be much larger (who said the data had to be as patterns of ink on paper or as zeros and ones, etc.?) But the point is: what does the fossil record tell us? In Darwin's day, the record was much smaller, of course, but he acknowledged that the record did not show the "finely-graduated organic chain" that he predicted (another of those evolutionist 'predictions' gone wrong!), but rather, it showed a record of fully-formed organisms not changing into anything else and Darwin admitted that this was perhaps "the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory. The explanation lies, as I believe, in the extreme imperfection of the geological record." Well, over a century later, some scientists still reluctantly admitted that, yes, Darwin had been right all along (about the lack of evolution evident in the fossil record, that is). In 1972, Gould and Eldridge proposed the idea of "punctuated equilibrium," which proposes that there were very long periods of stasis punctuated by rapid bursts of change which happened so quickly that the transitionals aren't found in the fossil record. Again, this is just a convenient story, backed up by nothing but the desire to hold onto evolution theory - and therefore atheism - at any price. "Because we're still here." I know the context wasn't exactly the usual one, but this is the central 'proof' of neo-Darwinism, when all is said and done. We're here, therefore evolution must have happened. That's completely circular reasoning and embarrassing. The whole long ages/evolution story was concocted by the 'Enlightened' ones who simply wanted to try to explain the world by rejecting the Creator. So, even when the evidence points to there having been a purposeful act of design in an organism, 'science' cannot allow this most obvious conclusion from the evidence. "Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door," said one of the world’s leading evolutionary biologists, Richard Lewontin. It is *not* scientific to absolutely reject the findings of experimentation (and agreed in advance!) if you don't happen to like what you find. This is the opposite of good science. That's what the theory of evolution is: the opposite of good science. The evidence from the fossil record to scripture to molecular biology and DNA is that, "In the beginning, God created..." (Genesis 1:1) It was sensible not to mention dinosaurs, because the idea that we are descended from them, as are birds, is an insult to anyone who understands how the Theory of Evolution is meant to work. The story of reptiles flapping their forelimbs and thus eventually developing wings is ludicrous by evolution's own standards. A creature that had forelimbs which were neither one thing nor the other would be at a serious disadvantage against its normal fellows. In "the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life" (end of the full name of 'Origin of Species'), these mutants would end up dead and done for (they would not be "favoured" because their forelimbs would not yet be wings and they would be less effective as legs for running, climbing, fending off foes, etc.); they would not outlive their alleged ancestors by tens of millions of years. See how ludicrous it is?

@@stewartcowan9659 Chill

Stewart Cowan Thank-you for showing up with evidence and a clear argument. It was an interesting read- and I agree- we don’t know things necessarily, right now, we believe we do.

@@zain4019 - Thank you for saying so. The truth about origins and therefore about salvation is as serious as it gets, but almost nobody hears the other side. People laugh about 'creation science' out of sheer reflex, i.e. without thinking. Not only is it real, but it offers the best explanation. Remember: science is never completely objective - people always come to it with philosophical and religious (or anti-religious) views (or financial incentives) which affect how they interpret the evidence. The evidence is the same for everyone, but evolution theory is seen as a holy grail for atheism, otherwise it would have been discarded decades ago, probably with the invention of electron microscopes.* There is evolution, but it is always downhill - organisms lose genetic information, which is the opposite of what is required for the Theory to be remotely feasible. *"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find out no such case." (Darwin) He could now: molecular motors, blood-clotting, etc. The whole creation/evolution debate is enormous and takes in dozens of disciplines. It also helps to know when and by what means certain articles of evolutionary faith were adopted and what drove these people. It is imperative to understand scripture. Dawkins has been accused of having school-grade religious education, but I'm not sure it's that good. I have found that evolutionists don't really know what they are defending or what they are attacking. E.g. geomorphology clearly shows that the Earth was once flooded, but who has even heard of geomorphology? (Study of the shape of the Earth.) How else could you have flat-topped mountain ranges covered with very hard boulders covered in percussion marks from being banged around in turbulent water flow and which obviously planed flat the mountains while they were underwater. Anyway, keep studying it. I started studying it when I was 41 simply because I wanted to try to understand why evolutionists were enraged when a school in England decided to teach creationism alongside evolution. They were spitting venom and I couldn't understand why encouraging critical thinking could be a bad thing. Now I know that they are skating on very thin ice of a theory that can no longer support the weight of honest, healthy debate.

IbnBahtuta -Adam and Eve were Created about 6,000 Years go.

Yh

The previous 5, or 6? were mere speedbumps, so . . .

yea dude what do you think we are special or something? we just a monkey that got too smart too quick... it been around 15 thousand years since we got out of the jungle and we already know way WAYY more than we can fathom.

Yes 6th mass extinction that too due to anthropogenic reasons

Yh

It's the _Caaaaambrian_ 🎶 explosion.

1:47 _Taste the Sun!_

Real talk

Regarding your lunch: Well, were you paleontologist, you could use those dna-isotope-scanner-robots to find out what it was, how you got it, and how often it died.

What were you doing 1956? Sliding out of your mothers womb perhaps?

@@btonemajor2703 Thanks for your time today here on the tube-of-you. BTW you sound like a narcissistic brat with an exaggerated sense of self-worth. I was just pointing out that our preconceived notions of culture stem from mediums (Hollywood and the like) rather than actual cultural data points such as FOSSILS.

@@btonemajor2703 so TV isn't reality? You're in need of an education. Google globalisation as a start.

helps* people*

The artist is Ray Troll. www.trollart.com/product/fossil-map-of-british-columbia-alberta/

I think , still speed could had been more better

Right? It’d be so much better being up-to-date on these talks

It's all guesswork

MENTES LIVRES - Close. -The Long Awaited Millennium: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h71ghZxz0tC7iqM.html

No its way older than that

Did you bring back some Polaroids?

@@gazinta Better than that, I have a rock!

You are still there. Eternity does not count seconds, days, years etc. It is just a still stand. Everything around it may change. We use what we call time to measure that. Thats all.

Right?!

By mistake. But Google and Wikipedia helped, then Amazon sold it.

which is?

Praise Helix.

Ha!

That’s false information.

In Quran it is said the world is 7 days old. 1 day is our 1000 years. That is for humans. Humans have lived for this much time. World evoluted for a whole lot of time.

Form your hypothesis in a testable explanation or prediction. 'Experiment and tell others of your results Collect Nobel prize if applicable.

What part of the video was it in?

Niki P 3:43 thanks for relying❤️

@@graysonsun5699 Wow, that was SOOO unclear. I'm a native English speaker and had to listen to that bit 6 times to understand what she was saying. Pretty certain she's saying, "somewhere around China, a fish developed jaws and its descendants drove jawless fishes, sea scorpions and branching plancton to extinction......" Hope that helps. 🙂

Niki P ❤️Your kindness is greatly appreciated and if one day this video is subtitled, I will be clarified...

@@graysonsun5699 You're most welcome. It was my pleasure.

The word life comes from old Germanic for body.

@@Richard_Nickerson nine

@@gzpo I'm assuming you meant "nein"... I'm not wrong though, so don't try to spread misinformation.

@@Richard_Nickerson The information I shared is not wrong. Don't spread misinformation.

@@gzpo Haha you literally are wrong though. In both comments. You also overuse commas by a lot.

@David Hughes like America then

David Hughes No 👎 we aren’t we just make you think we are.

@Ambreen Fatima There's a lot of history I would like to visit, but no, not to live through. My favourite fiction series is Jodi Taylor's fantastic _The Chronicles of St Mary's_ and the characters travel back in time to study historical events. Check it out. 😎

so true mate. the lady mentioned mass extinctions several times. us humans need to get over the fact that climate change is real, because its happened before without us , its been happening for millions of years, and will continue for a million more without us. species on earth average a life span of about 1 million years. we have overstayed our welcome. harsh but true.

The Long Awaited Millennium: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h71ghZxz0tC7iqM.html

Not soon enough. 😀😀

Great comment. Really interesting topic. www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/aug/29/declare-anthropocene-epoch-experts-urge-geological-congress-human-impact-earth

@Glenn J Panting ....yes, the evidence is the age of the ocean floor.

Thought the same thing. Then I thought It might have been intentional. The age of the weird fish might be confusing to some.

"Fishes" usually refers to multiple species of fish, especially in scientific contexts.

@@katerina.nesterova oh thank you i thought it was her lol

Nguyễn Văn Quyết

@Rebecca Leeman Actually, the main modern science theory suggests that it rained on the rocks, and elements from that magically changed in the sea, which eventually became life and everything we have now. So yes, although I simplified it for effect, you and every other believer in evolutionism is from a rock according to your own main theory. And your comparison and supposed "irony" falls flat because being formed from "dirt and dust" only applies to the first generation.

Not possible even 1000 years ago to exactly known what happened we just guessing !

@@remyllebeau77 what generation?

She means 'life' was there 😇

Oh no, here comes another Hovind fangirl...

Your first claim is mostly correct. The second one is clearly not.

Viruses probably think we have no awareness and are basically inanimate matter, which they invade occupy at eat. Like you biting one apple after another only one time and leaving them to rot and decay.

@@eemelilounela1212 give a natural example

I don't know that... never tasted it.. It could well be made out of cheese send me up there if it's possible I'll bring a piece back.

She did tell you! That's what Paleontology is!?

Yeah a paleontologist is somebody who "studies" fossils. These people speak like they are talking 100% facts.. On about creatures that lived millions of years ago. Gtfoh

All science is basically a theory.

mike logan you’re swaddled in “scientific theory” Mr. .Modern Man.

Its been disproven

I d like to see a photograph with you and a live tyrannosaurus rex. Sadly this requires a working timemachine.

You don't know what a scientific theory is. Go research it - assuming you can read.

@@ThomasTrue I'm a national science olympiad winner, Einstein.

@@gerhardhermann1571 I know. It was a joke.

Ed Liu and you are?