i was lucky to see this one first.

Well, Mischief Theatre with "The goes wrong..."shows have been doing this kind of act for years and they managed to pull the same stuff off over and over again. For this kind of act, your timing and comedic routine has to be on point and that is what they are lacking here. This is more of an idea put together in the garage overnight with as much going on as possible.

Agreed, couldn't said it better! I do think there is some good show element for this group though. But it's like you say: The element of surprise wasn't there anymore.

Imo the singing was better the first time too. This time it felt all over the place. The audition was an organized mess, but this performance was just a mess 😕. They should’ve kept it to the 3 of them. The men are too much and it became hard to follow. I was really looking forward to this performance and I’m disappointed too

@@DBLCreations I strongly disagree, if something that attempts to give you the element of surprise once and is only good because of the element of surprise, then it's simply not good. The slapstick is what made the first one funny, the chaos is what made this one funny, if you don't find chaos funny, you'll only find this a mess

Agree ! And yes, there was far too many things going on. They were all over the place !

💯 agree with you. Was funny the first audition but now it’s just getting worse

@@nancyisabellesicilia8217 I loved their audition but this was a mess!

There's a show called "the play that goes wrong" It's very successful and has been going on for years and years

If you’re familiar with mischief comedy they’ve made an empire of shows off of this concept & they’re extremely successful

Or at the very least have started it out perfect and have derailed it halfway through.

Oh man. Imagine doing a perfect job on one number with the “original” member. And then pull this for the third performance. If the judges see the vision, they would definitely give them enough yeses just to see what happens

I agree, I see a lot of comments that it was because there wasnt an element suprise, but I think it more had to do with it being pretty much the exact same story line. Team member changes unexpectedly, has no idea what there doing and does it all wrong, and did the same skirt changes again. It was kind of repetative untill twoards the end, and the extras just didnt feel intagrated into the story. The last scene also kind of missed the mark becuase he looked he was going for a jog rather then trying to get away from them so he didnt get knocked out too, and she didnt particularly look like she was trying to run after him and catch him. There were some good parts though, and I wouldn't say it necisarily a bad performance, just they way it was excecuted didn't land.

That is the problem with talent shows, they always expect something better. When they would perform the same routine throughout the country they could do so for years without changing it. Sometimes you have a perfect act as audition and Simon says the second performance I expected better even when it is not even possible to do better than their audition.

@@2012inca on the other hand this show is anything but new. An act has to prepare for success and have new material ready to go should they advance in the competition. More people and stuff on their set, just didn't chnage the fact that it was the same act. In comedy, you have to come through with Other gags. This actually isn't the vaudeville era, as you describe...or we wouldn't be commenting, having watched them from our present era devices.

Good Morning Siobhan You have got it completely right. The dancers were a distraction. There was too much material packed in to a short space of time. The ladies are at their best when pared back ie just on their own. All of that said they remain gifted, talented and a superb act, destined to go far. The audition and the VT just needs to be seen by a movie mogul or TV producer who recognises their skills and gives them the break they thoroughly deserve..

Couldn't agree more, the performance had a good concept (a trio act in which ones part is missing and two people are trying to play the same part) and the trolley prop was good for interaction and highlighting the 'mistakes' Everything on top of that just screamed of production wanting more more more though . The genius in this kind of act is in the subtlety and believability. Less is so much more.

I think if they extended it as a theater performance, kind of like that Peter Pan play where everything goes wrong lol

How is a "TV shoe" different from a common everyday shoe ???

They remind me of a singing dancing trio version of Lucy (I Love Lucy).

I agree with you, I think they could have done a better job with developing the storyline for their act, similar to the play that goes wrong.

The vibes were dead before the buzzer. They got everyone's attention the first time - they should have done a straight up performance and concentrated on the vocals instead. I thought retelling the same joke is cringy.

3:35 FIRE WE CANT PUT THE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES

He didn’t take his medication 😂

Actually there’s a show called “the show that goes wrong” and it’s pretty successful

@@apatheticace I’m referring to these judges who know what’s going to happen, when you go to see a show named this you obviously expect that. You be dumb not to. But give these poor girls such horrible feedback is imo horrible. I’ve seen on other got talent shows as well what these judges like makes me wonder what they smoke anyways 🤷‍♂️

I cried because it was too long

She was pretending not to be pretending