@Shawn Glass regarding the use of the NASB.. I also use the NASB but the opposite of how you use it... the KJV is my main study bible and I use the NASB alongside the KJV,, ..did you Not here when pastor Steve did a word count of Acts 9:5,6..?.. Pastor cited there were 29 words missing or Not in the updated NASB compared to the KJV.. I counted 24 words... when Pastor deducted 39 from 63 he came up with 29 I don't know how... but even if the important words are still in the text...... does this not bring the NASB into question just a little as to what is their motis operandi..?..

@Shawn Glass... and did you happen to catch his point of Matthew 9:13... where all versions of the NASB left the final two words of verse 13?... "to repentance" I think this is fairly important as there is a difference in just being called by Jesus and being called to repentance... as it is right now... many do not see their need to repent... and verses such as this in the NASB.. not stressing the outcome of being called..is Not helping the situation.. sinners need to understand the importance of repenting.. when they are called...or else do they full understand salvation?..

@@jeffcarlson3269 , Are you not aware that the KJV relies on different manuscripts than the NASB, ESV, LSB, etc. If you study the history of New Testament manuscripts you would understand why the KJV has more words. Many of those words aren’t found in any of the early manuscripts. Some words in the KJV aren’t found in manuscripts before the 14th century. Thankfully, God has preserved several older, closer to the original source, manuscripts so that we can see clearly what was in the original and what has been added. If you haven’t spent time researching New Testament Bible manuscripts and translation then listen to some of James Whites videos or watch him debate the King James Onlyist.

@@jeffcarlson3269 , I certainly don’t want to sound like I’m bashing or against the KJV. I lovingly encourage people to study the history of Bible translation and manuscripts. God has certainly allowed us to retain a wealth of them. Even some very early ones. We all want Gods true word as he gave it. Nothing taken and nothing added.

@@shawnglass108 I agree....

This kind of foolishness continue s to this day and getting worse by hour.Lets pray for deliverance from evil.

💯🎯

The devil has people so caught up in “understanding” Gods word. They don’t know it’s not all about understanding- which that’s what the Holy Ghost is for anyway, that they forget it’s about the power behind Gods word. The kjv clearly says angels hearken unto the voice of Gods word. So when we speak his word angels move on our behalf , and demons hate the true word. They are tripped up by it, because it thwarts their plans. Even when a demon is being cast out of someone, I notice they tend to use thee, and thus. Why is that? Why don’t they quote the niv or the others? Because even they know the true word. Niv, and all that other crap doesn’t even register with demons. If k say get THEE behind me Satan. They understand the kjv better than we ever will on this side of heaven. Therefore- I don’t need anything except the Bible that the devil is attacking. The one you can hardly find now. The one that’s hidden in my heart, even before I got saved. The one that worked when I quoted when I got saved. The one that ran demons out of the Alzheimer’s nursing home when I read it 23 years ago. The one people lost their lives over to get it printed. The one without the witchcraft symbol like nkjv. The one that gave me peace when I quoted it at night when I could hear what sounded like demons knocking on my window. The one that nobody had a problem with 100 years ago, or even 50 years ago- and worked for our grand and great grandparents, the one that I remember easily even with a bad memory- that’s the one I’ll stick with till I die!

dial the truth ministries or KJB Apostolics

I have answered this argument ad naseum.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa It's not an argument. I am stating an analysis of the content of the video. He is making an argument that is based on the standard of one of the items he is comparing. To make a comparison video, you have to actually explain why the superior of the two is actually superior.

@@kylepetruzziello3321 And I have ad infitum, and have also shown why these comparisons are valid, real world comparisons for English speakers.

Kyle Petruzziello, true. Then they condemn fellow Believers, and bring division into the Body of Christ, spreading doubt fear and their own traditions and myths. They are involved in cultist thinking. Preference is one thing, but this.. as stated above.. and their legalism is quite another.

If you want to keep on deceiving yourself, go ahead but abstain from deceiving others some of which might actually want to be truth-fully rooted. {Authorized Holy King James 1611}

Of course.

That's absurd of you to say you writing in the English language. The Tower of Babbel did happen, hence the Authorized Holy King James 1611 is the best and ideal translation IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, to this day onwards.

The apostles didn’t write any of the scriptures. Most were written by anonymous authors 50 to 100 years after Jesus, which is why it says “ gospels according to”

Asv off eBay Not sure of other

American satanic version - they sell those all over,

Try kjbapostolics

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Thank you however I was looking for an easy way to check if my KJV Bible is the best most accurate.

lol I doubt this biased man will dare to do that

How about you take the time to make a video of your own demonstrating that, if you care as much as you pretend, instead of spewing unsubstantiated statements against The Authorized Holy King James 1611 ? I guess you surpass all the scholars, commissioned by a godly King, who blessed The Church with that everlastingly and godly english language translation.

If they are leaving out words its not word for word. It's lie. I'm sticking to KJV as much as possible but then if I get confused I will sometimes refer to other versions to get a paraphrase of meaning and then compare back to KJV. Eventually I'm going to try to move to a Greek to KJV study Bible to start to recognise some Greek words

Because the author did not write it and it was added therefore they put it in the footnotes because it was added!!

Because the original manuscript did not include it. They used the oldest manuscript older than KJV manuscript.

I've read where the KJV may have added text that was not in the original Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek text. I've also seen where the NASB is more word-for-word than the KJV. Either way, no translation is 100% and there's always words and phrases left up to interpretation. I do think there are a couple of translations to steer clear of, but I say just read whatever translation you feel brings you closer to God.

Use different texts I think.

Kjv

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa NASV is the best.

HANDS DOWN the NASB95 every day and x2 on Sunday. The KJV is beautiful for reading, and very accurate, "BUT" when it comes to the MOST ACCURATE WORD FOR WORD BIBLE, NASB95, no contest. Also the OLDEST manuscripts used for the KJV go back to MAYBE 12th-13th century. The Manuscripts for the NASB go ALL THE WAY back to the 3rd Century. Very much more accurate and credible.

@@Faith-Ministries oh go somewhere

The devil has people so caught up in “understanding” and Gods word, and accuracy garbage-They don’t know it’s not all about understanding- which that’s what the Holy Ghost is for anyway, that they forget it’s about the power behind Gods word. There are no errors in his word, The kjv clearly says angels hearken unto the voice of Gods word. So when we speak his word angels move on our behalf , and demons hate the true word. They are tripped up by it, because it thwarts their plans. Even when a demon is being cast out of someone, I notice they tend to use thee, and thus. Why is that? Why don’t they quote the niv or the others? Because even they know the true word. Niv, and all that other crap doesn’t even register with demons. If k say get THEE behind me Satan. They understand the kjv better than we ever will on this side of heaven. Therefore- I don’t need anything except the Bible that the devil is attacking. The one you can hardly find now. The one that’s hidden in my heart, even before I got saved. The one that worked when I quoted when I got saved. The one that ran demons out of the Alzheimer’s nursing home when I read it 23 years ago. The one people lost their lives over to get it printed. The one without the witchcraft symbol like nkjv. The one that gave me peace when I quoted it at night when I could hear what sounded like demons knocking on my window. The one that nobody had a problem with 100 years ago, or even 50 years ago- and worked for our grand and great grandparents, the one that I remember easily even with a bad memory-

Yes, there were several changes to the nasb before 95.

I think 95. But it was changed 7x before that according to Vance if I remember correctly.

NASB95, Also the KJV was revised up to x5 times, even more now. KJV was revised 3 times before they added 1st John 5:7 in the 15th Century as the Catholics "FORCED" Erasmus who was a Catholic Priest.

@@Faith-Ministries I’ve done videos on all of these topics.

This is false, the modern Church has been lied to! See my other posts in the comments.

Not a correction, Easter is absolutely correct! You're not understanding the context, or history? See my other post in the comments!

Yes, I’ve done a couple of reviews on it.

Yes, let us not go there.. doing what they did with the nasb 2020 was a no no.. its sad.

On #4, you don’t watch the channel very much.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa I will check it out in your other videos sir. I do like the kjv very much; however, I don't agree with some folks who hold a kjv only position. All these other versions are already out there and some of them are quite helpful. I do agree there seem to br an agenda behind certain verses in them. I have much respect for the NASV as well.

Like most modern people who have been dumbed down over the last 50 plus years, you seem to have a lack of understanding when it comes to the English language? What you refer to as "archaisms or faulty bias translations", is really just someone who is lazy, and not wanting to be studious. The 1 John 5:7-8 passage is not a late addition! Besides being part of the TR/Majority Text/Byzantine type text, you have early Church leader quotes: ie Poly Carp(John's disciple), and Cyprian(200-248 AD martyred). Then let's not forgget ancient Bibles(which really are the oldest manuscripts, not the so called miniscual 3 Alexandrian modern bibles come from?), examples Greek Orthadox mid-2nd century, and the Old Latin 90-130 AD. Started by the Apostle John, with his disciples Polly Carp, and Papias, completed by Poly Carp, Papias, and their disciples Ireneaus, Tertullian, and Justin Martyr. All these match, along with the KJV! For the "Unicorn", Hebrew word is: re'em, Latin word is unacal, meaning single horned beast. The description of this animal dosen't match anything currently living, definately not an ox! It is large, powerful, unruly, not trainable. Jewish rabbis refer to this creature as an "aurochs", an exstinct animal. These are the Hebrew words used for various bovine: herd of cattle, or ox "baqar", ox "shor", Bull/bullock "tor", bullock/bulls/oxen/calf "par", kine/heifer/cow "parah". So "unicorn" is perfectly fine as is in it's context, and is a non issue! This creature has nothing to do with some modern view of a mythical creature? Now for the why of Easter over Passover? Pass over was already finished, and the feast of the unleavened had begun. Easter which comes from Canaanite Semitic Ishtar, Roman is Venus/Dianna, Greek Aphrodite(sex goddess), the Sunday Jesus arose from the grave was the Roman pagan holiday Ishtar(for Venus/Dianna/Aphrodite), hense Easter. So Jesus is Lord, even on a pagan holiday. The KJV translators were being technically correct, so again a non issue!

Run from those fake Bible's . This video is pure foolishnesses. Run - run from this junk and mess.

I love the KJV, but you think there is a perfect translation, you're confused. Read what the translators wrote in the beginning of the KJV 1620.

americanswan YES. You’ve got it. The KJV translators are doing the EXACT same thing the modern day translators are doing. English changes, and if the Greek/hebrew was translated literally word for word, it wouldn’t make sense. Words need to be re arranged and some added or removed for the context to make sense. If you were translating French to english, it’d be a similar process even though that’s a WHOLE lot easier than Greek to English, because Greek and English don’t translate all that well in some cases

In the Greek the word used was Pesach not ishtar. So it's Passover, not easter. Easter is a papist invention as is xmas. Even the protestants for 4-500 years didn't observe these papist days.

@@k-dogg9086 You misunderstand, Passover was finished, the feast of unleavened bread began. But Sunday when Jesus arose from the grave was the Roman pagan holiday "Ishtar", hence Easter! The translators were being historically, and technically correct! So Jesus is Lord, even on a pagan holiday! See my other post in the comments.

How can it possibly become an idol? You lost all credit with that statement. Making something a standard isn’t then by default an idol.

Texas guy I’m not saying that making something a standard is an idol, but when someone places the KJV as a standard and regards every other translation as wrong then that is making the KJV an idol. The standard is what was the inspired word of God, a translation made by fallible men is not the word of God. Soo I’m just saying let’s not make a translation like the KJV the standard bc that’s placing it above what it’s translating, the inspired word of God. There’s no such thing as a perfect translation so let’s do our best to discover what the apostles originally wrote. I’m not saying we don’t know what the apostles wrote, I’m just textual variants on Greek manuscript of the NT exist and a translation cannot take all of that into account. So making it the standard, as in King James Onlyism, ( I don’t know how to spell onlyism lol ), is making it an idol. I say all this with the love of Christ btw

The Authorized Holy King James 1611 is the reference and therefore the standard. If you want to keep deceiving yourself, go ahead, but abstain from deceiving others.

@@njiomonansichristianfreder6374 no one here is trying to deceive anyone. If you want to hear any interaction between brothers who disagree on these topics, I would recommend the debate between James White and Doug Wilson on the Textus Rectpus. That is the Greek the text the KJV is translated from.

@@isaiahardoin9574 You already did, and now you doubled down on the deception by stating that The Authorized Holy King James 1611 was translated from the Greek when it was not: it clearly state that from the very first pages as follows: "THE HOLY BIBLE CONTAINING THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS TRANSLATED OUT OF THE ORIGINAL TONGUES: AND WITH THE FORMER TRANSLATIONS DILIGENTLY COMPARED AND REVISED, BY HIS MAJESTY’S SPECIAL COMMAND Appointed to be read in Churches" The old testament was never in Greek but in Hebrew, and The complete Holy Scriptures in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek(notably the New Testament). You don't debate the unfruitful works of darkness: you reprove/condemn/destroy them. "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them."Jésus-Christ i.e. God i.e. Adonaï{Authorized Holy King James 1611}

I’ve taught Textual Criticism on a College level. I have several videos on the subject.

You are 100% correct, The KJV oldest manuscripts maybe go back to 12th-13th century, MOST of there mss are 15th century. The mss used for the NASB95 or NASB period go back to the 2nd and 3rd Century. Most mss for NASB are over a THOUSAND YEARS OLDER. YES older=Accurate, closer to original. The KJV is more of a mash up of Geneva Bible, Bishop Bible, Coverdale Bible. I mean the KJV is beautiful to read, but when it comes to accuracy, FACTS are FACTS, THE NASB95 is the most ACCURATE WORD FOR WORD TRANSLATION HANDS DOWN. KJV has been revised I think x5 times now, most use 1769 Blaney revision.

@@Faith-Ministries This is false, the modern Church has been lied to! See my other posts in the comments.

@@claytonsmith6148 I'm sorry but it's not. I've seen and held most of those manuscripts. Everything I said in my Statement above is 100% FACT. You don't have to believe it, you can tell yourself it's not true, but I CAN ASSURE IT IS 100% TRUE, every word. Please tell me specifically what you think is false. I will HAPPILY provide you with evidence. Please don't think me as being mean, I truly apologize if that's how I come across. I just reached my 50's now. Like I've stated, for the last 30+ years my whole world has been dedicated to GOD, to the study of his word, Apologetics and the study of manuscripts, textual criticism. I do love the KJV, it is BEAUTIFULLY written, yes I DO BELIEVE the KJV is the word of GOD. ***BUT*** it IS ))NOT(( the end all one and only word of GOD, not even close. As we had MANY COMPLETE BIBLES over a THOUSAND YEARS before the KJV. Like I've said if you can tell me specifically what you object to, or what you think is incorrect I'll happily present the evidence to you. May GOD Bless you and keep you safe.

@@Faith-Ministries Well I am also in my 50’s, while growing up the KJV was dominant. When I was 12 I was introduced to the NIV, then the NASB. Having used them for more than 30 years, along with the KJV. The missing verses, phrases, passages, brackets, notes etc always bothered me, and never set well in my spirit? So the Berean in me kicked in, seeking out the matter! After much research, and study I have come to a Tr/Majority Text/Byzantine type text, Masoretic text only, and a KJV preferred/best position! I do utilize other Bibles old, and new from these text families. You are wondering how, and why I came to this position? Let’s look at what is known as the Alexandrian type text/critical text/or eclectic text: Alexandrius was condemned by Jerome when compared with the Antioch manuscripts. He said that the book of Revelation from Alexandria 50 years from when John penned it was totally corrupt! The rest of the NT from Alexandria was corrupt by the end of the 2nd to the beginning of the 3rd centuries. He, and the other leaders invoked Jewish scribble protocols that they be destroyed(burned)! So all known copies were destroyed, and the Alexandrian’s managed to bury one copy, and that is what we have today. The Vaticanus supposedly discovered in 1475, with no prior history? It was given to Erasmus by the Catholic Church, he examined it, and found it to be a fraudulent/fake made in his time period. In his lesser known writings, he also states that he had multiple dozens of manuscripts that came from Antioch( early mid-2nd century)or was known to have come there. His life was endanger, and knew was being watched by the Catholic Church. Especially knowing what they did to John Wycliffe(and what they would eventually do to William Tyndale). Erasmus knew that the early Church leaders(except those who were from Alexandria) only authorized Biblical manuscripts from Antioch! The Sinaiticus supposedly discovered by Constantine Tischendorf in the mid-1800’s, when it was actually created by Constantine Simonides in the early mid-1800’s. This information was not hard to find! David Daniels of Chick Publications has a complete video series where he systematically shows that it was absolutely created by Simonides! Then on top of that, he has evidence through independent chemical testing that the ink is 19th century, both the written, art! So we have the Alexandrius, Vaticanus, and the Sinaiticus that are blatant false/fake manuscripts. That for the last 150 years or so being used to make “so called linguistic updates”, only to be lying to people! Let’s not forget that the Bible has already told us not to go to Egypt(represents sin, idolatry, and bondage), and Revelation compares it with Sodom! So when we look at TR/Majority Text, comparing it with the early Church leaders quotes, along with ancient Bibles: Greek Orthodox Bible(mid-2nd century, for English use KJV). The Old Latin 90-130 AD started by the Apostle John, with his disciples Poly Carp, and Papias. Completed by Poly Carp, Papias, with their disciples Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Justin Martyr. All of these match, along with the KJV. No missing verses, words, phrases, passages etc! By the way there are no errors or contradictions in the KJV, only misunderstandings!

I agree that is not the sole criteria.

Some comparisons use the word him instead of the name Jesus That's a pretty big jump

My dad told Bible says repentance or to repentance which Bible is it this one doesn't have a name

Yes

Me personally I'll stick to the NKJV and the older NASB and ESV.. I've got an NIV from the 80's before it's update and I like that over their update. I do not like this gender neutral stuff they're trying to pull off. 😤