Made me laugh:)

Yeah, but he had terrible timing.

😂❤

​​@@user-nr5tm8vp2r What?

What's funny is neither could get around basic science. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.

I feel the same. I'm capable of walking, talking seeing etc but hawking even if physically disabled he was definitely more advantaged than most of us because he had "the brains"

You can't say that, Hitchens was an amazing human being, Lawrence Krauss and Neil DeGrasse Tyson are also both geniuses.

***** I disagree with you, Hitchens was one of the greatest debaters to ever live and was unquestionably an intellectual to be reckoned with, on the humanities field, incomparable, doesn't mean he wasn't wrong on some issues, but on the ones he was right, he was right indeed, he predicted ISIS rising 10 years before it was even created. Krauss doesn't need to give time to his adversaries. Neil, on that we agree on, he's amazing on divulging science to the layman, just as his mentor Carl Sagan was.

***** To me Hitchens was the Socrates of our time, yes, only more cultured/informed because we live in a time where we have more access to information. You can refute his arguments? Which one? Cite one then refute it please.

***** Loving a mythological dictator and worshipping it is a moral action to you? Giving money to institutions that turn bright children into zealots is a moral action? Really? What are you even doing here, go read your bronze age myths. You do know Neil, Krauss, Dawkins and Hawking are atheists too right? So they are all horrible at what they do because they don't believe in your sky-daddy. I don't want you to elaborate on anything, ever, I understand where you're coming from exactly, you got brainwashed by the individuals who attain the high-ground of morality, who used to burn people at the stake for being "witches, faggots, unbelievers", who just don't still do that because they lost political power, thats your crowd and I don't to have anything with you or with it, goodbye sir.

hmm.. r u comparing stephen to richard dawkins aaah.. sigh .

How can he? if he believes there's no God? In terms of Stephen Hawkins don't you think you shouldn't have used R.I.P?

@@arizzammar3831 shut up

@profragz why truth hurts? & we don't care

@@arizzammar3831 mf by we you just mean yourself dumbass tryna be a keyboard warrior behind a screen making fun of a respectable accomplished person while no one knows your ass

@@arizzammar3831 He has contributed more to humanity than you most likely ever will in your lifetime. So yes, he definitely will rest in peace. Can't speak for you though

ohh yes

I didn't geek out, I nerded out.

locutus94 I geeked out

WOLF PACK DANTE DELGADILLO What does atheism have to do with this? They both have made huge contributions to the scientific community. Get out of here, bigoted cretin.

They spoke a bunch of none sence that went right over your heads and you got needed out ... LOL

The answer is simple: we all have something divine in us which also seeks after Him

@@sammyalmoalem lol. Not at all.

@@sammyalmoalem Critical thinking seems to be your enemy

@@sammyalmoalem The answer is simple: You're building a very strong relationship based on subjectivity with a fake omnipotent and omniscient deity, the more irrational you get, the less you are going to ponder other people's ideas and proposed solutions, and the more backwards in time we'll go, you can now see it in the Middle East, people are still living in 600 B.C. in the 21st century and still won't grow up from their infancy.

@@sammyalmoalem I believe that penises can get 20 inches erect, after all, let's avoid science and follow conspiracy theories because I have a fierce feeling inside of me that we have the ability to do it.

To Mr Carl Sagan, that's great. thank you to you! Though, I don't think 'thank you' matters for you. But, I had to say that.

🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

Well done 😊😊😊

I like John Lennox better! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fbOZm6-d2qnGiaM.html

Reading this after the death of Stephen Hawking hits hard. 😭

The way we are going, just watch the movie "Idiocracy" andyou will find the answer. Rdical religious movements and Feminism with Woke Culture.

@@digit313 that's the way those commoners are going, also, please keep democracy so that they destroy everything, anyway, science is always the same.

Richard would have said, "Just clone us".

@AmeliaRose Stephen said "nothing is perfect, nobody is perfect" He may be VERY smart BUT he's not perfect. As Stephen said: "Perfection does not exist"

Yes, I wish I can meet them as well as other scientists as well. Because I want to be a scientist too.

That's a good goal, we need more scientists for a better future :) I wish you much success!

***** Thanks! :-)

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a7uKi8Ke0azeYpc.html

REALnizz u believe in lies!

He works hard at ignoring science. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.

@@2fast2block sir chill i made that comment when i was 17

@@janemiles3006 and that was supposed to mean something as it did NOTHING to show I'm wrong. What's your next bluff?

@@2fast2block bro wtf are you on about

@@janemiles3006 it's expected you are able to read when making replies. Clearly you're not.

theyd get killed

I agree with Ultra Light. It's sad but true...

Ultra light greatest response in the history of KZfaq responses.

Babak Rainy Why, so they can be held as political prisoners and ransomed? Jesus, what a thought.

Your life is empty then. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.

His name was Hawking.

Correct lol

You give no thanks to God who created this all. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bb9krdGdprjQYGw.html . Id rather believe in Louis Pateur, Isaac Newton (thought to be the greatest scientist of all times), Michael Behe, Sy Garte, Philip E Johnson, Francis Collins, etc, etc. Remember my friend, life is short. Dont miss the chance that we still have to enjoy the truth. God loves you. It s a fact.

Maddie Jammo Dawkins or Hawking?

Maddie Jammo He is fake

Loving King Hahahahahahahah!!

+Philip IV of France Yes

Tiki that's what I thought I always thought that was fair but then I figured out that if you are an atheist or part of any other religion besides Christianity youwould go to hell doesnyt matter if your good or bad it matters what religion you are in and that's not fair btw im an atheist

Tiki This is consistent with the beliefs of the Church of Jesus Christ of LDS (Mormons).

The only way you can know God is through Jesus Christ!! He is the only way

you still have a chance buddy , you can pray to Jesus and ask him to save your soul , you have a place in heaven , pray to him whenever you get the chance and mean it with all your heart and mind.

Lol your a fool, because in Bible good work doesn't get you in heaven neither does loving god. You have to believe in christ sadly :((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

Brilliant stuff

Agree 👏🏻

And how did we get such a universe? 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.

what giants? Richard is the biggist lier on earth

@@mohammadbayazid5064 learn to spell idiot it's spelled liar not lier!

Tip: questions end with a question mark.

@@OriginalPuro Tip1: rhetorical question ends with exclamation mark (!) ,interrogative question ends with (?). Tip2: Rhetorical question means a question posed to express surprise and not to seek answer.

@@kennorton1478 I like how you after 6 years you still respond😂 but anyways 6 years down the drain you find stupid people

Mage Licious mine too, next to neil degrasse tyson

Can anyone tell me , does Steven hawkins types and the machine reads what is typed or on what basis the machine replies to Richard?

Ok, please tell us what he said. You have superhearing to cut through the noise and sparking explosions.

You have had several months to respond ==>>what did he say? You may have superhearing, but are you able to read?

I can type out what Dawkins said for you here. Not choosing to get into any debate here though. "Well, um, I noticed that you brought up the question of God and I didn't. When you ended 'A Brief History of Time' with 'for then we shall know the mind of God', I suspect that you were using God in a sort of Einsteinian sense; a euphemism for the mystery at the root of the universe, that which we don't understand. But most people use the word 'God' for a person. God as an answer to scientific questions. Then I think it is scientifically facetious because it distracts people away from the hard work of answering scientific questions. It's just too easy to say 'God did it, therefore we don't need to answer the question.'" So, uh, yeah. That was his response to it. Honestly, I'm surprised you didn't catch it; he was rambling a bit and there weren't really any special effects going on at the time.

Spirographic "OK, and can you now type out Hawkin's question??" Can't you read??? It was on his computer screen. Basically he asked how Dawkins could explain the conditions which made life possible that were so vastly improbable. Either (A) there was a god/creator, OR (B) there are a vast number of multiple universes. Select A or B, or give us another answer. Of course I am giving my own interpretation of his question, and the video gives the exact wording on Hawkin's computer screen so you can read it for yourself. Dawkins refused to answer the question, The explosions and sparkles hid his refusal to address this question. A very clever device that fooled his supporters, and even you refused to look at Hawking's question and compare it to the "answer".

cdowis No, Hawkins doesn't ask Dawkins any such thing in this video. Hawkin's is explaining that the fine balance in which our universe works in is so impressive that one might credit it to creation. He then goes on to argue that the multiverse theory, in which there are potentially a infinite number of universe, would eventually lead to the creation of a universe that can sustain intelligent life (us) and that this intelligent life could then come to the conclusion that "this can't be chance, it must be design." as one of this theories of existence.

Hello after 10 years

well actually its .00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002%

Zachary Zikeli I stand corrected.

You're pretty good at trolling. Please tell me you're trolling.

Austin Chinsky if he's such a genius, why can't he get up out of that chair? it's a serious question

Austin Chinsky so basicly he's gay?

UltimateNakia Dude, you can stop trolling now.

Austin Chinsky He is. He commented this on another video about Stephen Hawking.

He was so bad, even basic science crushed him. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.