I really appreciate your work, thank you so much for sharing your knowledge with us !

I can already tell that I'm going to absolutely love this series! I'm glad I came across it. Thank you for all your work on this.

I'm trying to make a shift from ELT with a keen interest in linguistics towards cognitive linguistics as my chosen field of study... and this video just gave me a clear big picture of what I'll be dealing with in that area. Thanks, Martin.

Just began these videos as I'm starting work on metaphor in ELT. Thanks for sharing this!

I'm from Brazil and I'm spending this quarantine period to decide if Im gonna apply for a masters in Anthropology or Cognitive linguistics. Your videos are helping me a lot, thanks

I study english philology and systemic functional grammar is blowing my mind right now - I'm here to find out how far metafunctions can go. thank you for spreading the knowledge!

Wonderful video! Very clear explanation! Congrats and thanks a lot for sharing your knowledge here!

I love your passion about linguistics. In fact, I love you. Thank you for all of your videos. KZfaq needs more people like you.

I like the way you simplify and introduce the concept.

Thank you for your work. It's really helpful for all who start to be interested in cognitive linguistic.

I'm really glad that I came across your channel. Thanks a lot!

Amazing! I was looking for something that could help my students in their first contact with the theory. This is really hepful!

Thank you for freely distributing this knowledge.

I am pursuing a Master's in Linguistics, I have Cognitive Linguistics as one of my mandatory courses. My midterm exams starts the day after tomorrow. Your series is gonna help me a lot. Thanks a lot.

Your explanation is great Sir . Well done , thanks

thanks a lot for this! I'm taking language and cognition for my MA. really need this! again, thank you!

Thank you! It's very clear and well organized!

thank you for making straight up good content

Hello Sir, thanks for sharing. They're all so informative and helpful. 🌸🌸

Thanks! so clear, informative and helpful!

Thank you so much for these videos!

Your videos truly help me! Thank you 🙏

Thank you for these lectures, they are extremely helpful!

Thank you very for sharing your knowledge with us. You're awesome! :)

Your videos have already helped me to get ready for 2 important exams; thank you very much Martin!😊

Very good tutorial. Thank you!

Thank, you Sir for your really beneficial videos

Dear Martin! Thank you so much for this course - very informative, very interesting!

This is gold...thanks for this

I really apreciate that! Tanx a lot! So well explained!!!

This is amazing, thank you!

Helpful for all my macro linguistic subjects at modern language studies of MA..4th semester stud.Thanks !

thank you so much for explaining!

Excellent ! , so clear

Very helpful and clear, thank you! (From a philosophy undergraduate).

Thank you very much for this video.

Very interesting. Thank you. The filing example. Before reading what? the rules for filing? or the report itself? Semantically ambiguous in its referential function to the world hence interactive communicative potential. Whatever way I could get in trouble with the boss. Lacking in cohesion if written. In both cases but in writing the functional does not strike as much as the formal.

Thank you for this upload. It is very well explained.

Thank you very much for these lectures! Are the slides available for download somewhere?

Thank you!

Great Job

Thank you.

I consider both "reading" sentences to be grammatically correct in English. As a native speaker, they both sound right to me, they just have a significant difference in meaning.

Sir, thanks for the video? I study metaphor. Do we run into the problem of reduction when using metaphor for something abstract?

Your knowledge on congnitive Linguistics is deep . I want to do dessertation on congnitive Linguistics..Can you please suggest me any topic

Thank you for this intro

thank you for this

Thanks from Egypt 🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬😊🌹

Could you talk about cognitive stylistics please

My question is, I guess, if I say there is a language, where the equivalence expression of 'I filed the report before reading' / 'This is the report that I filed before reading it' is grammatical; then, should a good generativist come up with a new rule and add it up to their universal grammar first, or should they actually do some sort of field study to find an instance of such a language first? I guess that's why I prefer cognitive linguistics over the generative one, because the latter has a basal logic flaw: you can not claim there is a homo-sapiens universal grammar for all languages, no matter how deep it is embedded pyschologically; while devriving all evidences you need from extant languages. Extant languages only form up a very small subset of all languages, which also includes extinct, died languages and future yet-to-realise, yet-to-branch languages. That is to say, the generatists can claim that, given enough time, not all kinds of word-soup (that we construct from all the extant datas) well finally be adopted in one or another language since there must be a set of constraints, ergo there must be a universal grammar; but if that's the case, on what ground it is to proof the universal grammar's being truely universal? Why one can not say what the generativists think is universal is actually both phenomenologically and logically 'selected'?

Can I study that kind of masters program with an undergrad in romance philology?

Impressive!

thanks king

Thank youuu

Hello sir. First of all, I really love your videos, I have been watching them and taking down notes and ideas... I would like to ask you a couple of questions. look, I am currently thinking about carring out a research on cognitive linguistics. What I want to analyse are the cognitive differences that exist between native Spanish speakers and English native speakers when using prepositions. The real thing is that cognitive linguistics is a very new topic to me, and I do not know whether my idea is viable. Could you recommend me some books or authors that could help me to start off with my investigation?, and from your point of view, does my investigation have a possible and measurable finding? Thanks in advance ¡¡¡ I hope you can shed some light on my doubts ¡¡¡

Can u help me to find a source about this topic, i need it for me search graduate,plz

Can someone explain for non-native why is the second sentence is ungrammatical?

Awesome

I think I know how to use a very short phrase to give people some idea of what the cognitive linguistics roughly is... It's a version of generative linguistics where all nouns are fundamentally considered as pronoun (and all verbs re-verbalized verbal nouns, maybe), the word 'book' means nothing more than a very limited and very specified version of 'it' that refers to something which is empirically and COGNITIVELY not a non-book (and if you do use it to refer a non-book, grammar is just a frame-work instrument, a formal premise, for those who know 'a book is a book' to know how to correct you)...And GENERATIVELY, I believe one can actually derive a somewhat rudimentary version of cognitive linguistics from the extant generative lingustics literature by adopting this variable...

The most amazing thing about the video is it has 0 dislikes.

Thanks

¿Cuándo se publica el segundo episodio?

Hello sir. Can I contact with you? It's urgent.

Like your Voice

I've got a question I'll appreciate if u could answer🙇 My question is that whether trajectory/landmark are equal as figure/ground? ?

Hi Mr. Hilpert, Is Intro to English Linguistics a prerequisite for this course? Or can I just start with this course on Cognitive Linguistics without knowing anything about Linguistics? Thanks.

cani communicate with u professor ؟

Pretty sure war is a super violent argument. Never heard of a war where the participants were in perfect agreement and killed each other anyway.

Thank you for the great talk! Do you have any recommended books/papers that overview cognitive linguistics? Thank you!

you are s sweet and simple you are skilled

The sentence 'I filed the report before reading' is not ungrammatical, if reading is understood in the sense that requires no direct object.

Stories are constructed by words. The universe is constructed by stories. Although he seems earnest in his political activism, I don't listen to Chomsky when it comes to linguistics. Postmodern age activism has a trend towards understanding the function of language to self-identity and world-concept. It seems strange to me that Chomsky the activist doesn't see or mention an aspect of social-construction in the 'white people' identity, which is a significant study of civil-rights activism.

Isn't "I filed the report before reading" a grammatical sentence of English? How so? It seems everything IS in its right place in that sentence.

hi professor i wonder what is your nationality