Edited? I want to know what typo or freudian slip a robot needs to go back and change.

Was the base model disclosed/ fine tuned llama build or something? Feels quite a bit behind SoTA ATM for sure, minus the cool form factor.

How does the bot pass the test and how do you control the the persons biased awareness from influencing in their conclusion during the test?

@@dysfunc121 It works by having a mix of bots and humans on one end. For example, 3 humans and 1 bot. Stephen would then get to do text chat with each of these 4 for, say, 30 minutes each. At the end, he guesses which one is the bot. If he can do this every time, the test is failed. If he is fooled a single time, the test is technically passed, and "artificial intelligence" has arrived. That is the original test. I am suggesting you want to have a tester that is good at probing and aware of AI, and you also don't want the other 3 humans to be children, or uneducated, etc.. They should be educated adults and are otherwise normal. I'd also suggest that a single time isn't enough, but if the bot can fool a good tester more than maybe 20% of the time, that would prove that the AI is reasonably indistinguishable from a human. I'd love to see some serious testing like this, because it seems to be getting close.

@@konberner170 Interesting idea, thanks for the elaboration.

A mood?

Once you see the kinekt as the robot's head, the thing on top looks like a novelty hat. Like a robot put this on its head and thinks its fooling us.

I was the OP. The context: to test the model for hallucinations and truthfulness by asking a leading question about something (going to the Grand Canyon) that likely didn't happen.

We don't need to do that. An AI could be trained in a virtual world (with sufficiently precise physics) with a virtual body and simulated sensors and actuators. That way it can train faster and safely, achieving a good grasp of understanding about the world (common sense) in the process.

@@CodexPermutatio That virtual world would never be realistic without human motion and sensory data. Even games and CGI use data recorded through sensors, because that is the simplest way for getting the real thing.

@@MegaUpstairs Games are about humans and are made to simulate the appearance of human motion (but not REAL motion and not REAL physics are needed to be simulated in a game). Virtual worlds to train robots are about robots and do not need to simulate a human body. They simulate the robot body and the physics, sensors, actuators, in a realistic way (not like in a game). For instance, they could simulate a car if the robot is a car that can drive itself (a robot body can have many forms). There is no need to simulate a human except if you want for some reason to create a robot body exactly like a human. Even so, it would be faster to get your data in a virtual world.

@@CodexPermutatio Nah, the main business in this will be sex robots :) But yeah, a cleaning robot will not need a human body and behavior. Although I'm skeptical about machines being able to produce training data for themselves, without humans providing it. There were many claims in that topic in the past, but no one was able to do it. Because it is not intelligent, but only mimics the reactions of intelligent beings. I even doubt that house cleaning can be self-learned by robots.

@@johnnuaxon3 thanks. This whole interview reminded me of scenes from the Westworld remake. This is then similar to Hanson Robotics Sophia.

hidoba says on their website that they used a custom mistral 7b-derived LLM for Captcha

Hidoba Research isn't saying, but seems to be a custom LLM. It has various personalities, including snarky teenager.

Whatever the AI is, I just hope they made that head soft so I dont bruise my hand when I smack it.

@@GGoAwayy Yeah. Then after the head is crushed it can sing "Daisy, Daisy" like HAL in 2001.

Already exists. East Asians are far ahead in this field

@@goldwhitedragon yeah japans got it on lock i think

Sounds like most humans

So your experience isn't hallucinated huh? Where exactly in your brain is that little TV screen at? Show me where the light that you see is actually getting to your brain? How about this show me one cell in your body that was there when you were born if you are over a certain age

Cringe? For who? The people who made the robot? Stephen's just testing the state-of-the-art and what it can do and how it responds to questions and conversation that tests its limits.

@@GGoAwayy .."state-of-the-art "....according to who ? Consider doing some homework before you make such a gratuitous assertion.