Where do I sign?

I said the same thing a few weeks back in one of her other vids😂 I said for her to make it with her hair

Let it be a fake, thick mustache close to Steve Harvey's since she's mainly the host of the bulk of the quizzes.

And a bikini aswell

I feel like we can petition until we’re blue in the face and she still won’t do that shit 😅

Yes!!

YEAH

Let her get paid to do the designs

Yesss

No Mercy 2007 with Orton was my personal favourite

Obviously it was in Hollywood, FL... /s

@@LiqdPTHollywood, Califlorida.

@@Stumme-40203 yes, that's why the /s for sarcasm. It was at Sofi stadium in Inglewood, but of course they were referencing Hollywood, CA. Hollywood, FL is a suburb of Ft Lauderdale.

​@@LiqdPTThey said "Califlorida" They aren't correcting you. They're riffing off you.

@@Lemons28KZ ah, good call. I missed that

My immediate thought lmao

Actually there's a City called Hollywood in Florida

@@claudiodigiuni2525Yeah it’s where Dolph Ziggler is billed from

Its nick nameth to you ​@@blakehelms7430

You telling me B 40 you must not watch it yet you must not went to any of these shows you just talk like you know everything just for fun. No funny business this is the S+ WrestleMania 40 the the champions is no longer 2 for 2 etch they separate them and the undertaker shows up also jhon cena and Cody beat roman even the rock in the WrestleMania 40 and didn't come since 6 years dood this is s+ f you babe am done I don't want to subscribe

I also wonder where IX would have landed if Sophie was told the location...

That's what I came here to explain lol

@@ReddCyranoVery surprised no one in the video remembered the location and the theme. As hated as this WM is, the WM9 theme sticks out more than any WM theme.

They did a poor job emphasizing the theme of Wrestlemania IX. Maybe show her a clip of the show or something, like Undertaker’s entrance. I’m sure She would’ve given it a higher rating.

These guys have a wrestling channel and they dont know this?

I like this idea alot

That will be great just on design alone. A lot of ranking are bias of course like ranking a title like the white strap IC title from the New Gen era high just because of those people who held it

Oh my goodness yes. If most of us aren't fans of this current gen of titles, imagine a graphic designer?!

You telling me B 40 you must not watch it yet you must not went to any of these shows you just talk like you know everything just for fun. No funny business this is the S+ WrestleMania 40 the the champions is no longer 2 for 2 etch they separate them and the undertaker shows up also jhon cena and Cody beat roman even the rock in the WrestleMania 40 and didn't come since 6 years dood this is s+ f you babe am done I don't want to subscribe

The new bloodline is coming soon

Idk , they already had an established event , so they could change it without losing the essence

@@lithium8083 but Wrestlemania isn’t just an event, it’s a brand that occurs outside the show itself. Merchandising is a big one, the Wrestlemania logo becomes a feature in and of itself, it needs to be immediately recognizable, and a consistent logo is part of that.

I 100% agree, nicely put.

@@lithium8083Super Bowl logos the same

@@lithium8083In the initial years, they were still establishing it

I agree with 80% of her choices but yea, they should have had someone older be the judge

graphic design principles are BS

​@1234_Flux lol what? It's just evolving standards dur to technology and skill evolution. Same thing that follows essentially any field.

I don't know if I agree with that. If you look at other logos from the same time period it still makes the Wrestlemania logos look dated.

Exactly that's why this video suckssss. Can't stand someone who doesn't understand how art and art decor changes over decades. Awful takes amd video

That’s exactly what I was looking at because that Wrestlemania 18 logo looked WAY better than that. Continuing with that metal look from 17 she liked.

I’ve also noticed that the REAL versions appear once she puts them on the list!

@@sphere3495 Good catch.

yeah a lot of this video was cringe. i bet they did it on purpose just to get people like us to comment.

I notice that...When you see the video logos they actually look really nice.

I stopped watching when she put XX below 2. XX is objectively genius. The diamond/emblem design, the texture, the minute arc skew on the word Wrestlemania; it's all cohesive, creative, and unique in comparison to the rest. Putting it below the copy/paste logo with a "timeless" neon pub 2 sign on the back is an absolute shit take.

@@risingtides8956 , couldn't agree more. WMXX is one of my most fav logos of WM.

Same. Had to dislike.

You can’t even tell it’s supposed to be a 2!! What is she smoking

For real. First 2 minutes into the video and Im like are you really a graphic designer. First 3 logos are same still she is putting in 3 different ranks because she's annoyed. Okay

That was so stupid of them to use that

I like this idea. I haven't looked at her work so I'm interested to see how she tackles the concept. Also, I think the WWE bare logo itself is trash. It's not timeless at all and showed up during the attitude era and it just screams 'remember the 90s, bruh? that was THE BOMB!' Not a fan.

Or she can do it not on video and just present it on video.

@shorbshib3218 just gonna take a wild stab in the dark and guess her opinions offended you

logos take a lot of time even just to think out the ideas and pitential outcomes. woulz just be better if she just presents them

oR mAY be sHE dOES it on a lIMITLESS tIME aND tHEY eDIT it so we sEE a lITTLE tIME of tHE wORK aND tHE rESULT of hER wORK so sHE gETS eNOUGH tIME aND we aRE aLL hAPY. aGREED?

Some of them made me question her being a "graphics designer", I would love to see her make a few of her own WM logos. Talk the talk. Lets see how good she is 😂

i mean, visit her website and you'll find out lol

@@geelusionalstudios what’s the name?

​@@geelusionalstudios link???

​@@atimetraveler4910she def threw tamper tantrums as a kid

also when the location for wrestlemania 41 is, you should have her maker he own design

I SECOND THIS!

She mentioned that she thought 24 would have a good set and she was right. It was the best ever for me. 25 was terrible. It just looked like Smackdown.

she's clearly not a graphic designer. the wrestlemania with 2 in the background you can't even tell its a 2. this is just a pathetic attempt at clicks and views

But maybe you're looking at it from the perspective of someone who watched that WrestleMania more than the graphic design side of things...

@@brv20 I am a graphic designer and a wrestling fan but people have their opinions, idk i love a lot of them from a design perspective

@@Keef101 fair enough, I think it comes down to taste as a designer, at the end of the day it is her opinion, it's subjective

Bro...

i thought AI replaced y’all

👍🏻

Yes they are fan art, idk which idiot was in charge of picking the images 😂😂😂

I've been saying this SINCE that year.

I absolutely bet that was a Vince thing, and no one had the nerve to correct his mistake. I did notice they've not used annniversary in their Wrestlemanias since.

Glad I'm not the only one who's been annoyed by this

I remember this fact being pointed out in a WhatCulture video many many years ago and it's bugged me ever since

That’s clearly not what they were going for but I get what u mean.

Imagine ranking the logos without caring about the context or theme

@@H1CoDoethat’s the whole point of the video. Otherwise it would just be ranking the quality of the WM, and X7 would top the lost for most people

@@ianbyrne465 ? You're telling me you'd rank a Pizza Shop logo without giving a damn about what they sell or who they cater to?

Same with the fake "WWE" versions of older logos they retconned in after the name change. Just find the OGs!

Simpy boy

Cringe

@@mihaimercenarul7467 proud simp, get over it

@@dethincarnate1149 She ain't gonna f you bro.

She ain't gonna let you hit

They don’t cover it but Dante watches it

I felt the same way when he said that. HHH/Rollins killed it. Hardyz returning. Neville vs Aries was amazing. Brock vs Goldberg was good for what it was. Not to mention Shane vs AJ and Owens vs Jericho....idk why he thinks that.

@@mattg5257 The show ends on a low note with Taker/Reigns underwhelming, the women's match being forgettable, and Wyatt/Orton being a complete mess. Thankfully Brock and Goldberg was a fantastic 4 minute match or else everything after Rollins/Trips would've been bad. It was a poorly laid out card in that respect.

36? Get the fuck outta here.

I genuinely think people are using and sayingmid without really knowing what it means, this just reinforced that

​@@ThePizza3dmid doesn't always mean the middle tho

@@ultraomenmurat9937 If is not the middle is not mid. What does mid mean then? There are words for when is not mid, top or bottom.

@@ultraomenmurat9937mid literally means “middle”, or average. Anyone that says otherwise is using it wrong.

English is dead, fellas, and there's no hope of revival.

Get a life simp !

Good thing we watch wrestling for.. wrestling and not the designs they have for events. I don't think I've ever actively thought about the Wrestlemania logos and whether or not I liked them, but now that I am, I don't think I like any of them, or at least 90% of them because it's all the same fucking font with the W and M having long tails and boardering the entire thing. This video unlocked a new pet peeve for me lmao

It's not brutal honesty, it's her bad taste

@@bullworthless Bro its called trademarking

This girl and her hairstyle sucks, looks like Arnold from nickelodeon with a wig

Bro almost every single wrestlemania logo sucks. You just feel nostalgic towards certain ones because you’re a fan

Dawg, almost everything that's design related in wrestling is shit, especially PPV logos and merch. If you think otherwise you might just have bad taste LMAO.

@@ryanmoore7283 Bro she gave Wrestlemania 2000 an A but 17 a C?

If you’re not a wrestling fan and have no attachment to these logos, and have to go through 40 of them, you’re gonna get sick of them after a while. If the Wrestlemania 2 design was used for a later Wrestlemania, I doubt she would have given it an S tier rating.

that's what's called "a joke"

​@@THENAMEISQUICKMANterrible one at that

Jericho vs Owens for US championship (should have been for the Universal championship) Lesnar vs Goldberg for the Universal Championship - even tho it was a fun little match but a world title shouldn't involve two part-timers Wyatt vs Orton for the WWE championship (Wyatt should have won, Randy had nothing to gain. Wyatt needed his big moment) The IC title was on the pre-show The tag titles match alongside Hardy's return was Fantastic! Undertaker vs Roman was a pretty slow paced match. Undertaker was way out of shape Dont remember much other than these moments

@@HamzaSajid123 I’d say it was better than 32 and 34, definitely 37

I'd agree as someone who is a general wrestling fan. Pretty much the only great moment of it was the tag team ladder match. Then again Mania has been really average for some time now. The second half of 33 was god-fucking-awful. A Seth/HHH match that dragged on to long, a 6-woman match for a world title that went, what, four minutes? Women's evolution at work there. Cena and Nikki against Miz and Maryse, oh god, talk about something that should've been on a B PPV undercard at best. Both men's world title matches were terrible, and then the night was capped off by possibly the most depressing main event in Wrestlemania history? I don't blame people for thinking it was legitimately crap. Worth noting at that time, the biggest WWE alternative was New Japan, and their annual Wrestle Kingdom show just happened to be one of the greatest wrestling shows ever.

@@THENAMEISQUICKMAN That’s fair, I just think pointing it out as a bad mania when I think it was overall better than the previous year and the year after is a strange one

Why not?

@@Reovio-xx7zj She has terrible taste in my opinion in design philosophy and seemingly has no sense of continuity or consistency. Familiarity is a huge importance in graphic design in my opinion. Simplicity is also very nice--if you can skirt the line of simplicity without going minimalist and keeping style, I'd say you're an excellent designer.

@@DanteLaBrieexactly. it’s an annual event so saying like the first 10 are bad because they’re similar is insane. they’re trying to build a brand and while you’re trying to build a brand you’ve got to keep some form of consistency, continuity and familiarity.

these jabronis probably weren't even alive back then...

Plus that was the time WWE had just launched their own Network/streaming service so they were heavily pushing that.

Everyone has one and they all stink

The best graphic designers are the ones that go off with valid criticism and if the logos give off a story throughout the years. But people of today can't do that these days.