He is using a CX 200 tour 95 16x19 .

@@derekpappas1556 Thanks! I see you also use the cx200 tour 95, i wonder how different it would be to move from my old Dunlop Revelation Tour Pro MP 95 to the cx200 98. I love the size and feel of my 95, but would like a little more forgiving sweet spot with the same size.

@@michaelgelpi1727 All the Dunlop thin beam 200 series racquet models act similarly . My first racquet was the sister racquet to the 200g in 1985 , the Black Max/ MX 83 " . A 95 along these lines will have more isolated weight than a 98 . The difference may be the RA and thickness of beam for power along with solidity and stability being a bit better with the 98 in stock form . There seems to be a better balance between the head lightness and head size on the 98 . The issue with the 98 was the head size for me , having less ease to move around the body bs the tour and on the serve . I do have a 4 1/4 grip size and larger grip sizes and body forms may not have that issue . Have you tried a demo of the 98 as yet ? If you have not , by the commentary , then try it . 16x19 will give you the top spin tank slice just can not , because of the string spacing on an 18x20 even in a hybrid , unless going 18 gsuge . The CX is about connected control and feel , added weight can harm that , as well as overgrips , even if the current thinnest kimony. 0.33 . The newer CX will be out next year and if Dunlop through srixon acts Swart then the 16x19 's as a 98 and poss 95 should have the SX's speed grommets and FX's groove + . The rest is choosing the correct weight , balance and SW for you . The 98 currently plays as a family feel . There has been some concerns that it may create elbow pain , so really feel it out for that . Lastly if you want a larger sweetspot with the 95 , use the sergetti method of stringing . This will dramatically increase your sweetspot and according to sergetti , feel . Derek .