It should be automatic, that, if you refuse to work for Britain and refuse to even live in Britain, the most prestigious of British titles must be forfeit.

I will never should anyone forget the anxiety and unhappiness that Harry and Meghan caused queen Elizabeth and prince Philip in the last years of their lives. Is unforgivable actually.

who else thinks that Harry should be in Africa now,sorting out the tragedies there,instead of doing self-serving PR stunts everywhere else!

He's trying to win media sympathy and nothing else. Pathetic.

Harry could have kept his visit to his father, totally private but it looks like it was some cheap tacky PR stunt to boost a failing brand . Trash , cash and stash , better known as the harkles , make me sick to the core .

As a American 🇺🇸 and as someone who deeply respect and admired the queen , I have to say I’m very disappointed in Harry and what he has done to his grandmothers legacy , Harry allowed his wife to disrespect and mocked the queen in her last days was beyond disgusting and unforgettable, the queen did so much for Harry and his wife , only for them to turn around and trash her legacy , the queen gave 70+ years of her life to the monarchy and country, it’s absolutely shameful what Harry has done ✅ if I was the royal family, I would never allow him back in , not even for a funeral!!! This guy sold his entire life and family, and country for a few dollars on Netflix, a prince coming from the most wealthy family, sold himself out for a woman he just met , Harry should’ve known his wife only wanted one thing, and that was to go to Hollywood and live like a A list celebrity, which is why she invited all those celebrities she didn’t even know, yet she only had one family member at her wedding!! That told me everything I needed to know about Harry’s wife!!! You Always judge a woman by the way she treats her own family, she basically destroyed both families!!

Have we forgotten Harry fantasized about potentially doing away with his FATHER with a missile? Yes, a fantasy only, but suggests a very troublesome, possibly dangerous personality, in my opinion.

They were in Canada speaking to indigenous leaders and asking people to refer to them as Ma'am and Sir like they are the King and Queen of Canada on a Royal tour. Name another Royal family that had to deal with constant attacks from a former Royal who uses their titles to grift money from charities. There's no low for these two, they are in the basement still digging.

It appears that everyone has forgotten the African Parks situation, the media should be holding his feet to the fire for what he hasn't done for them. Please can you help keep the issue alive?

Leave the Royal Family Alone Harry and Meghan!! You are not wanted!!

Have you forgotten what he has written in a book and so much more?!

Question….WHY is Harry and Megan CONSTANTLY allowed to put out books, tv shows, overload us with puff pieces, that is full of “their truth”, which is basically all L I E S. But anyone else putting out their personal opinions and how they see the situation, is totally up for grabs on being sued and illegal. So AGAIN, it is ALWAYS a one way street with those 2. Absolutely Ridiculous!!!!!

They've worn out their welcome. Everyone is sick of their moaning and grifting.

He is a traitor to his country

I think they are BOTH dangerous!!

100%agree he should be sorting out africa and stop brushing it under carpet

I don't feel its harsh. It sums up how I feel about Harry.

She wanted a castle so I'm sure a room in the Tower will still be available!

Compared to the ridiculous puff pieces flooding print media, I am happy to see articles speak what is closer to truth vs “poor H” approach.

Don’t think the British public would tolerate him back, me included

We often say William , the conqueror , or Ivan , the terrible . Why not just say Harry ,the terrible , or Harry ,the destroyer .

I read this article this morning in the Daily Telegraph. It was written by Petronella Wyatt, who has an interesting background. I thought the whole article was rather odd. The language also a bit odd, but I do believe based on what Harry himself has publicly admitted, that he is a threat to the BRF, possibly even guilty of treason. In earlier times in the UK he'd be headless by now for the disrespet he's shown to the Crown. If you look back at images of Harry when he was with any of his former girlfriends, he was a totally different man. He seems to be in a coercive and very damaging relationship. If he was a woman, and Markle a man, I'm sure an intervention would have happened.

The answer to all the Royal Family's problems, is Princess Anne. Put her in charge please.

We have enough professional congratulators without Harry joining the party.

Removing their titles, Sussex, would destroy McLiar.

The carparkles have earned each and every “hit piece”.

Regardless of the titles they end up having, they would be meaningless in the USA.

Wait a minute! Harry needs to clean up Africa Reserve!

I doubt very much, that H has been given any royal duties. IMO, King Charles would have to be completely off his trolley to let H anywhere near royal duties, the prat & his wife are literally poison.

Can H and MM have their Duke/Duchess title discontinued like the Queen did in Denmark with her son’s children and be known as the Earl and Countess of Dumbarton? Edward and Sophie use to be the Earl and Countess of Wessex. Why can’t this name change be the one they are told they must use since they are no longer working Royals? I would rather see them removed from the Royal website since they do no work for the monarchy. It doesn’t matter if Harry likes it or not. They have their new cringing bios on their new website. 😊

The sheer amount of times where Harry and his wife put out direct attacks on the royal family is, in my opinion, the reason why now some articles are also more confronting and attacking the pair in return. I know it does not justify this article but it is not a surprise either. Harry and his wife should have been stopped much earlier by whatever means by the royal family, to show the British public that the monarchy cares about its people and not just one privileged son who has a questionable character. The continuous drama around these two will breed more and more haters especially since Harry and his wife are fuelling it themselves.

I have been thinking one of the same things the writer of the article posed. "Prince" and "Princess" sound, on the surface of it, to have more prestige than "Duke" and "Duchess". Seems to me this removal of titles dilemma is a no-win situation.

Harry on Oprah interview: i just want to be “just Harry”

Remember not only they've attacked everyone for years (even in the me you can't see, he complained about parenting, also by his grandparents), they've have also mocked them numeros times in between. I remember that disrespectful scene when he was joggling outside like a jester (she reduced him to that) while she was videocalling an actress who was wearing a very obvious cabbage hat (cabbage being one of the Queen's pet names, I believe by PP), all while sipping tea with the finger up and acting like silly teenagers. They've been relentless with under the radar disrespect, to put it mildly.

Article is what most of us are thinking! Liked it!

I have long wondered if this is why they have been so scathing about the royal family - maybe they have been trying to get their titles taken away. I think it more than likely that Meghan would probably love to have the titles removed so that she can then call herself 'Princess'.

Duke is a gifted peerage. Prince is a life title. I'm happy for them to remain the Duke & Duchess of Sausages. The thought of MM being free to call herself Princess is horrific. Everyone knows she would never settle for Princess Henry, she would be Princess Meghan and we definitely don't want that. She's unbearable as a fake Duchess, I can't imagine how she would be as a Princess.

Hary has been so publicly cruel that he put himself in the position to receive public criticism, even ridicule. He should be removed from the Line of Succession. Leave titles be, but get him far away from the throne. He's volatile and capable of harmful behavior.

Normally, I would agree with you in the use of the word “terrorist”, however, as a Canadian, and having just watched the spectacle of this duo as they brought their camera crews in to Whistler B.C. and managed to almost completely disregard the amazing veterans who should be the stars of this show, I think they are both “ holy terrors”. This used to be quite a common way to describe outlandish and destabilizing, chaotic behaviour. It didn’t stop there as Harry with camera crew on hand highlighted a gobsmacking visit with an Indigenous chief in the area to discuss reparations or some such thing. His father is King Charles and the relationship of the Crown with our Indigenous people is historic and complicated. Charles has made meaningful and bilateral connections over the years and had made plans to visit Canada again this May, obviously with an agenda that will need to be put on hold as he recovers from his treatments for cancer.. I cannot even begin to imagine what deliberate chaos Harry has created at no one’s behest in making these incredibly awkward and naive overtures. He is dangerous, like a terrorist as he has no boundaries whatsoever, and cares for no one other than himself! Sandra

"Born a prince of Great Britain and Ireland as a great-grandson of Queen Victoria, Hubertus lost this title during the First World War." --Wikipedia Many British royals with strong German ties were stripped of their British titles in this era. Including the title of prince.

I bet she would be beyond words if she were addressed, Princess Henry

I think that is fair opinion. Why shouldn't he be judged harshly? I object strongly to people like Harry trying to censor the press through litigation. I am always reminded of another great litigator Robert Maxwell. Some people doth protest too much. Harry's so called dragon slaying against the press involves practices that are no longer taking place. More intelligent people, like Prince William, settled their actions years ago and actually ended up with higher awards, freeing up valuable court time in the process. What went on in the past was unacceptable and unlawful but that horse is well and truly dead. So no, I think he is fair game. If he can dish it out, and he has on multiple occasions, then he deserves to get some back. His talk of loving his family and illness bringing families together was gaslighting 101. Go visit Mr Markle senior, he's your family too.

Let them have their titles in American, yhey can call themselves anything they want to their in the US, Parliament doesn't seem to care! But Charles needs to make a joint comment from the working family that THEY DO NOT REPRESENT THE ROYAL FAMILY IN ANYTHING THEY SAY OR DO! SHORT AND SWEET, 10 SECONDS. The UK, the country of Sussexs, the US and even poor Africa need to take out a front page, small article in CAPITAL LETTERS and say the same. We hear people say , "we hear reports from the palace" and quote what they want to say. NO, NO, NO, Charles has to go public this time because it's gone too far. This is hard to say . . . But say it NOW or let go of what you swore to protect, God and family.

Perhaps you should read up in some of the research by TRG. There are questions regarding his role in the US with questions as to being considered a foreign agent and also potentially harmful to the interest of the United States. Is he as it states in the Royal website working for the king and the monarchy? If you listened to his speech to the indigenous Chiefs in Canada recently, he spoke as though he was a representative of the crown. Perhaps Charles needs to pay attention to what his son is getting involved in and with whom, as well as making it clear that he is NOT representing the crown. Or is he?

Oh are we supposed to feel sorry for him now?? He started this mess, he and his wife. For years everyone including the RF treated them with kid clothes wrapped in cotton wool. If he could not deal with the fall out of running his mouth for 4 years, then he and his wife should have thought of the consequences. This is a world of free speech and not just for Harry and his wife. God bless the Queen, Prince Philip and now the King for all the suffering this useless man put them through. Please spare us the too far article analysis and sympathy. Harrogant is 40 years old. Time for him to start acting his age like the rest of us.

Harry, (sir) Meghan (Ma'm) and their children IMHO should call themselves whatever they like, since they will anyway. Harry, therefore his heirs should be REMOVED FROM THE LINE OF SUCCESSION - and stop all this nonsense, which will rattle on for the next 80 years through the reigns of William and George. Taken out of the LoS will render their titles meaningless.

Clearly, being from Texas I do not understand how far Harry can go if he were to insert himself into political situations involving England and Commonwealth countries. He has done a couple of things that seem to be (allegedly) entering the gray area of a pseudo official for Great Britain. Can Parliament or the Monarchy do anything to stop him since his title cannot be removed?

H&M are actively undermining the British constitution in my view. I don’t see how the article is problematic, although I’m not coming from a legal point of view, just speaking as a member of the public.

#AFRICAN PARKS.

Perhaps you do not comprehend the depth of distate that exists due to the behavior of H and MM? The duo has alienated members of their own families as well as the 66% of the UK's population that do not wish for the duo's return to royal duties. Yet, the duo insists on badgering the public with incessant torrents of PR drivel and paid appearances. Do you "get" the level of frustration ?

A better way of wording would have been "much like the fox guarding the hen house"--not likening to a terrorist.

If you choose to leave the royal family and not be a working royal, your titles should automatically stop being used.

Harry did a hit on his own family not to mention a whole nation (UK) so why would this article be offensive. Harry made lots of money by doing so. Did he feel remorse? Sorry but what goes around comes around Harry.

I think the opening is fully saved by the words ' a bit like'.

I also think that harry should be tending to the African Parks scandal. this is his job! He was president for 6 yrs, and then elevated to the board of that non profit. the letter was sent to him, almost a year ago. when are we going to see some accountability, harry?

Harry should be in Africa and put everything in stand down till he gets that terrible abuse of the Baka people solved.

No problem. In his own words in Spare, Harry says he once sent a fighter jet to blow up his dad.

Can’t wait for William to take the helm of the ship and clean house.

If the Queen of Denmark can take away her son's Prince title away... Why can't the king of England?

Automatic ‼️. How can the Royals continue with Harry and Megan constantly causing chaos in every situation , Bottom line is if you aren’t able to honor a title then you’re not Qualified ,period .

If Prince Harry were to have the Duke and Duchess titles removed and were then to go under the ‘elevated’ titles of Prince and Princess Harry, wouldn’t those titles be superfluous in the USA - it is a republic and had removed themselves from the Monarchy many moons ago!

Prince Harry title can be removed and it has been done and his prince title can be put in abeyance by his father the king

Harry messed up his own life by allowing that woman to come in between him and The Firm. Her treatment of her own family should have sent warning sirens to his brain. But evidently that wasn't what he was thinking with. 😏

Why would a couple who had everything throw it away for a celebrity lifestyle? was it jealousy because M thought she would be equal to our beautiful Princess of Wales? Or did she think because she had fooled H she could fool the entire Royal Family? Had she overestimated her ability to act the part of a lady then realised she was socially inept? Can their behaviour ever be forgiven the lies they have spun be forgotten, I personally would never forgive them. She would prefer to play the role of a grieving widow, hopefully more successful than her role as a pregnant woman 🤣😂🤣😂🤣

The play on “dynamite” reminds me of a wall of posters during the run up to the 1979 election. In Cardiff. A simple black and white graphic in the style of a woodcut. The “cartoon” featured a single figure holding what looked like an old fashioned bomb with its fuse alight. The slogan: “Guy Fawkes - the only man to enter Parliament with honest intentions”. I have never forgotten it’s impact.

This question, like all the other current issues, are grossly overplayed by the media. We all know Harry will not be recalled for royal duties, but discussing it takes up many hours of broadcast time. The king's cancer is the common ailment of many, but treatable when caught early. Catherine's surgery is serious but is undergone by many women every year. The recovery period is normal for that operation.

We are talking about a Prince here who by his own admission is guilty of possession of class A drugs,is an ingoing addict,is possibly under investigation due to his financial involvement in "Foundations: He has made no statement regarding the Africa Parks allrgations. He now puts hinself forward as an Envoy a Viceroy or some high ranking representative of the UK!!! Words do not fail me but I will not express them here.

The article was spot on.

The prince title is not higher than the Dukedom of Sussex - which is why they’re clinging to those titles… certain dukedom’s rank higher than prince

Removal of their titles would be another endless ax to grind, racism, misogyny, evil institution, wouldn’t fund my hair transplant, and my brother will be King!, but what about me waaaagh! Can you imagine Princess Harold?

NOT Princess Harry BUT Princess HENRY (Harry's actual birth name). "Harry is a nickname.

Instead of just stripping the Duke/Dutchess titles, they should REDUCE the titles to Non-Hereditary titles: Knight of Sussex and Dame of Sussex, thus making the children Esquires. That way she is NOT Princess Henry and they have LOST the titles.

The press have been shackled unfairly, because that whelp still receives special treatment. But the day of reckoning approaches.

I don't like embellished language in a piece that is supposed to be serious. If the article has a comedic feel, then I think over-the-top language is fine. This article doesn't appear to be facetious, so I believe comparing H to terrorists in Parliment minimizes terrorists. Maybe there is a better choice of words to express the chaos that would ensue if Harry returned to the Royal Family. Other than that, I don't think this article is a hit piece.

Actually I think his prince title can be removed, in fact the title of prince was already removed in the past when they decided that only the children and the grandchildren of the reigning monarch would get to have or keep the title prince or princess. So the stipulation could be made that you must be a child or grandchild of the monarch and a working member of the royal family to hold the title. That, in my opinion, would go a long way to modernize the monarchy and it would put an end to this dreadful situation. When someone has been as publicly outspoken about not wanting to be a part of the monarchy as Harry has done- there should be a way to cut him loose- remove him from the succession and good riddance.

There is enough to criticize Harry over without the use of hyperbolic language like "terrorist" especially from people who make their living as journalists.

No Harry didn’t publish anything The press did Harry, you should wear Rachel’s wigs rather than hair implants

Some say they started the website because they knew the titles may be removed and it would look bad if the king did it now..They now call their children Sussex I doubt it legally especially for Lily.. If their titles are removed Harry will continue to use Prince and Meghan Princess different titles same problem...In my opinion let them keep their titles remove them from the royal website since they have there own because regardless of their titles their brand is crumbling anyway and would be worthless anyway...

American here so not familiar with UK laws/policies nor Royal protocols & rules: Can Harry be removed from the succession and is there a way that removes all titles including “Prince”? Long gone are the beheadings, imprisonment, quartering etc… of family members that were “enemies” of the realm so is there a new humane “act” that can place Harry into the plebeian position he originally coveted?

I believe the titles of Duke and Duchess were given out by our late Queen so that she could never be princess. They knew what she was like. People forget or have selective memory. Princess Margaret fell in love with a dashing war hero Group Captain Peter Townsend when she was 22, but she was prevented from marrying him due to his status as a divorcé. It was her own sister who had to tell her no. Not only would it not go down well with the palace but the public also due to the abdication of Edward. What happened next was Margaret went of the rails and was partying with the Hollywood jet set and gangsters and at first the public were sympathetic but that soon changed with her constant whining about how tough her life was. Meanwhile the rest of the country was still reeling after the war. The public made her IRRELEVANT. They turned their back on her. Now I wasn't alive when all this went down but my parents were and they said people were hungry no money and here was this rich princess moaning about her horrid life. What we are seeing now is the same a jealous man of a brother who had no say in when he was born and in what family. Harry went of the rails numerous times and now we believe he is always been this way and the palace covered it up. Those they couldn't ended up on the front page of every tabloid around the world. Meanwhile William has to knuckle down and learn how to me a king. So the public turned on the man they all loved his horrendous treatment of his grandparents was disgusting and at no time did he stop his wife with the slurs and insults and lies. So maybe it is extreme but he has only himself to blame. I do not think the titles can be removed not for their sake but those children. Let them keep the titles but it means nothing to us. People are obsessed with them especially the media. I do not trust them. If he wants to become a US citizen then let him because only then can the titles be taken. Reconciling with his father and brother is one thing the other is a totally different subject matter. It is for their safety and ours that this is done properly. I can not stand that woman but I hate Harry for what he has done. Coming after Catherine was the final straw and I think he knows this. he is in panic mode because if Charles is bad that means William steps up and I can't see him welcoming them back with open arms

What if she divorces him? Is she no longer a princess? And I understand her legal name would be Princess Henry.

That’s not harsh that’s truth….Hes a traitor

I don’t think it’s harsh. They have been despicable.

Prince Titles have been removed before, it was done in one of the WW for Traitor, I think it was 2 Princes, I’m not sure, but this is the BILL that Bob Sealy is trying to pass through government, with some tweaks here and there and M would be Princess Henry not Harry lol 😂 ❤xox

The language used in the article is extreme as it was intended to be sensationalist. That said, the points were accurate. They have proven themselves to be untrustworthy, self serving and manipulative. They are a liability and clearly not just for the Royal Family.

Harrys birthright as a prince is one thing, but the duke and duchess being removed takes meghan to : Princess Henry Mountbatten-Windsor She can only be known as Princess Henry, NOT princess meghan... whether she likes it or not.... They have nothing positive to say about the RF... they've mocked service, duty, the institution, the family, her family, the UK people and whinged about not getting paid (while living freely, being fed, transported, freebies designer clothes etc)... Everything they have touched/attempted was only successful because of the curiosity factor and no longevity of content or attraction... Once youve heard them once, all else is on repeat, sickeningly so.... Their PR firm sure are working hard to have them front page nearly every day... i dont click on their articles... heard it all once before, so nothing startling to grab my interest... I seriously perceive the late Princess Diana is spinning in her grave.... Harrys lifestyles of self indulgence has exposed his true character.... Basically a spoilt brat... who wont ever grow up until hes cut loose and truly made to fend for himself... Imho

I personally do not see anything wrong with the article(s).Why does Harry get to criticize everyone via Oprah, Spare, Netflix and countless interviews? Why doesnt he worry about being sued?

In one of Lady C's videos she said that the King can remove Harry's prince title with only "a stroke of a pen", and that the title is not a "birthright".

I don't think this article is harsh given what h and m have said in the past on tv and in writing. You reap what you sow.

No family in their right mind would let them back into their personal space, nor allow them to represent them in public. They have caused great harm.

For a couple who live in a country with the First Amendment, I find it astonishing that they spend so much time policing everyone else's language. The documentary (if you can call it that) and his book Spare, said awful things about the royal family and mocked our wonderful late Queen. I think the author has the right to say what they want. It doesn't break any laws, (or the lawyers would have stopped it) why should we police their language?

It would kill M to call her Princess Harry! I love it!

Charles CAN remove the titles, he does need to run it through parliament, but he could do it, just like Queen Margrethe of Denmark removed all titles except for the Heir to the throne. She removed all Prince and Princess titles from the line of succession apart from the one son who is the direct heir. Can easily be done here too, would leave Harry as the Earl of Dumbarton, the very title Meghan hates because she thinks it makes them sound Dumb 😂

🇺🇸 It sounds like the author is simply matching the harshness Harry and Meghan have to shown to others.

Actually i think that first paragraph is spot on.... 😊

Why doesn't the British government threaten H&M with a lawsuit if they continue to use their titles for financial gain versus stripping them of said titles? If they tried to fight such a lawsuit I imagine they'd go bankrupt trying (if they aren't already).

I understand that the amendment to the 1917 law could strip Harry of even his Prince title. Could this be confirmed?

As he is already referred to as Prince Harry & I can't imagine Meghan wanting to be called Princess Henry I say go for it. The people of Sussex have expressed their disgust at H & M's behaviour & they should be listened to.

The title of Prince can be removed by the king. If you look at the recent removal of titles in Europe, you'll see that some members of the royal family lost their prince titles by order of the Queen. In England the same applies.

I was lead to believe that the King CAN remove Harry's title of Prince and the titles of his children. Also that he can remove him from the line of succession and remove him as Counsellor of State ?