The meaning has to be in the Art put by the Artist or does it need to have a meaning for me when i put it on the wall?

the Art put by the Artist@@aaronjoshua2857

The meaning is in prompt😂

Meaning is completely subjective and arbitrary. -Me

That was the person who changed the keys and did weird mashups? Damn

What did they do to There I Ruined It?

​@@thatsit5049FactS 👌🏾. ITs sCARY

@@thatsit5049Nah, it's just another source for beat digging.

​@@digidopethis 💯

Ye, but I think this was more for a test

​@@digidope sry but it's hard for me to believe that a person who thinks this way is a real Dilla fan..

wow fr? where u found that info?

can it be art if the computers doing it tho? is the computer an artist?? or is he the artist because he programed the ai. im confused tbh

Art?

The thought and intention that goes into this process is genius. It’s profoundly unique in my opinion, combining instruction on “what could be done” and the skill and technique to actually do something. I think it’s beautiful in the same way I think David Lynch’s films are beautiful 💕

Roger Linn!! God bless him too!!

🚮

What? Danny mentioned me in his podcast? I'm a huge fan; he's one of my favorite rappers. Can you tell me which episode it was?

@@nobodyandthecomputer He talked about somebody creating a donuts like album using AI on the latest episode, episode 101

I use it and most them are just distorted remixes of dilla beats, no original samples or drum breaks. Still a pretty cool idea tho, made some cool tribal stuff but they all just sound like remixes of the “People” beat

No he attached electrodes to Dilla

Do we want that?

Why not.@@amenetaka2419

Yes, sometimes it overfits in its generations, a bit like that case, but in other generations, it is super original

I guess it was only 2 hours, but still, there should at least be an extra 0 in that view count by now. Is it a protest/strike against the adblock slowdown?

It's because the Shaggs were just naturally dumb music, charming but dumb. AI is still pretty dumb. JD was genius. Coltrane was genius. AI will never be genius. It is still just 0s and 1s, with nothing between

some concepts are hard to describe in text though (good example from pic AI; the pose of a subject), as a musician myself i'm waiting much more for stuff like audio to audio, something that can run on a local machine, and ways to creatively constrain the output with my own drafts (like what controlnet does for image generation in stable diffusion)

@@sperzieb00n what about a music upscaler? Input a demo and output a polished track

Yes, sometimes it overfits a bit. I corrected it with more training on the model trained with all the beats, and now it generates much more original beats. Try it out!

I think this was more for fun

Can you create good art? If not then you have no soul. The A.I. doesn't need to have suffered loss to create something that can be appreciated. Some of this music sounded kinda weird but as A.I. advances it will get better

I think the people in the comments are more of "ai fans" than Dilla fans.

Can y'all realize this is just for fun?

@@malcolmkoharian It sucks bro. It would be fun if the music actually sounded good. The comments got me excited and I was let down.

Imagine a world where everything that's great and original must be carved in stone, frozen, derivatives strictly forbidden, inspiration policed and punished... I wonder if J Dilla's music could have come about in such a world in the first place. Everything gets watered down, copied, marketed to mediocre masses. I wonder how many humans are doing a terrible job of being truly inspired by J Dilla in this very instant.

@@AndersHansgaardI've watched the video in it's entirety now. But I'm still uneasy about it. Yeah lazy and untalented humans trying to capitalize off artist's legacy happens all the time (think Elvis impersonators). That happens, but passing that off to machines that can sound almost authentic. And that's where my contention begins because at what point and it's not hypothetical at all they will erase legacies that took lifetimes to build. Because it's too easy to replicate this on a widespread and eventually J Dilla or whatever artist will become a myth or legend. Wiped away because it will no longer be special it will be ordinary. For products such as soap and detergents alot people don't know their origins and history. But for those products they serve a greater purpose to society at whole. But this is someone's else art and emotion. To me it's like walking into someone's else house and photoshopping yourself in their family portraits. Funny yes, but after while if the context of the joke is lost. Then people will start making assumptions and narratives get created. And take away from the artist's intent and it starts to lose it's meaning. Like Waves on "Donuts' is like a personal message to his brother but now anybody named John can now make it about them. And have receipts of 'unreleased' Dilla beats it's gonna make me mad. I understand sampling but that's done by a human hand and mind but a computer trying to replicate a person's entire catalogue is insane to me. Maybe I'm in the minority but it's how I honestly feel about it right now. I may change under the right context but it makes me sick right now.

@@holdenhurdle8831 if we were living in the 90ies you probably would have similar issues with sampling, or synthesizers during their rise in popularity decades earlier, like seriously... you can STILL find people today who believe music isn't authentic (and thus can't be enjoyed) when it involves any programmed synthesizers. You say "I understand sampling but that's done by a human hand and mind", wich is just not true.... the sampling is done automatically by a device, the artist only picks the input material, adjusts some parameters and composes in post, wich all isn't far off from the way one can or could use AI in music.

@@sperzieb00n - "sampling is done automatically by a device"...... No it's not. A fret on a guitar has a designated, predetermined note value... Is that "automatic" too?

@@airfixx_8952 strings have a set wavelength when strummed. too easy. i only play music by spinning a bass string around my head at random speeds.