Exploring the rendering of camera lenses (3D pop etc.) - part 5
Пікірлер: 16
@cameraconspiracies2 ай бұрын
This man knows his lenses :)
@sneye12 ай бұрын
Thanks. Enjoying your channel a lot.
@lawrencebroski584012 күн бұрын
Thanks for your perspective. What can you say about the FUJI GFX lenses, eg. The 23mm, the 20-35 mm, the 50 mm, the 45-100mm, the TTARTSAN 90 mm, and the Pentax 645 75 mm (used with GFX adapter?
@sneye112 күн бұрын
Not much. No experience with GFX.
@matteobregante565628 күн бұрын
Hey! Do you racomend any MFT lenses in this category? Thanks!!
@sneye128 күн бұрын
Hi. Yes. Olympus 12mm f/2 is exceptionally nice. Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 (the pancake one) is not bad either. There may be others too.
@ElRubio86427 күн бұрын
I see a relation between low count of lens groups and 3d pop in my experience, and I see it works for your examples aswell. What do you think? I thought I heard you say its the other way 😅
@sneye127 күн бұрын
According to my analyses it's the chemistry of the glass. Some of the best pip comes from zooms with loads of elements.
@ElRubio86427 күн бұрын
@@sneye1 What do you mean by chemistry?
@sneye127 күн бұрын
@@ElRubio864 The explanation is too long for a swift reply. You can watch the third video published on this channel.
@ElRubio86427 күн бұрын
@@sneye1 Thankyou
@KirmesRuf619 күн бұрын
Hey! Do you think the Voigtländer 21mm F1.8 is as "poppy" as the F1.4? Cheers :)
@sneye119 күн бұрын
Don't know. It should be...
@KirmesRuf618 күн бұрын
@@sneye1 Thanks ! Looks like it's pretty similar and it's predecessor :)